Ciudad Juarez, which shares a border with El Paso, in Texas, is the most violent city on earth. But you will not see smoking buildings or blown-up cars. What you notice is the deathly indifference in people’s eyes.

Before you snort your Coke tonight, read this woman's book and ask yourself if you want 10,000 bodies up your nose

Since President Felipe Calderón launched his offensive against the drug cartels in late 2006, more than 50,000 people have been murdered in Mexico. Juarez, located in the northern state of Chihuahua, has hurt most in the drug wars, with 10,000 executions in the last four years.

Calderón’s crackdown has failed. In Juarez, where he ordered in the army and the federales to take over from corrupt police, all that has happened is they have brought one cartel, La Linea, to its knees, while permitting another, Sinaloa, to take its place.

A plaque of grotesque executions in recent weeks – bodies hanging from bridges, headless bodies dumped by roadsides, heads stacked in ice chests – has once again hit northern Mexico.

Amid this chaos lives and works Sandra Rodriguez, a journalist for El Diario de Juárez, a newspaper that lost two reporters to the cartels in 2008 and 2010.

Despite this threatening environment, Ms Rodriguez recently released a book, Fabrica del Crimen (Crime Factory), which shows how the failure of the justice system has contributed to the rise in violence.

“We have had 10,000 homicides in the last four years,” she says. “More than 95 per cent are still unsolved. Prosecutors say they cannot solve these crimes. For me, this shows how impunity works.”

Ms Rodriguez says prosecuting authorities take the view that the dead are most likely cartel members who have been killed by their own side for acts of disloyalty, or murdered by their opponents in the battle to control turf and smuggling routes.

Therefore, they’re not worth investigating.

“How can you say they worked for the cartels if you don’t investigate?” Ms Rodriguez says. “What are we saying? Even if they were part of the cartels, we as a society need to know who killed them and why. That is one of the most criminal attitudes our government has taken. They have abandoned their responsibility.”

This state-sanctioned negligence accounts for the downcast faces in the people of Juarez. That is what you see when you cross by caged footbridge from El Paso, across the concrete canal that is the Rio Grande, into the dusty city.

It is not a war zone as we know it; even though the death toll from this city of 1.3 million people over the past few years runs as high. 

No one is untouched by the violence in Juarez. It plays into every facet of life, from the protection money shop owners must pay to making sure you do not look the wrong person in the eye as you pass on the sidewalk.

The place just feels sad.

When someone is murdered, the most his or her loved ones can expect to learn is the cause of death. They will never learn who killed them.

In such an environment, lack of respect for life becomes total. As the narcos string up bodies from bridges, people just look away. They know no one will ever be brought to account for it. And they’d rather not risk their lives informing to police officers who could easily be cartel members.

“It’s creating an anarchic state,” Ms Rodriguez says. “When the state doesn’t punish homicide, it sends a message that it’s almost legal. The human life doesn’t have any value.

“Across the whole country, you may kill the person and hang his body from a bridge. It’s a result of all this lack of respect. If I am the state and I don’t care about killing, I’m saying human life doesn’t count.

“This creates a lack of confidence from the victims. They cannot trust the state institutions. When you lose someone in a violent way, nobody turns up and says, ‘We are going to solve this.’ People don’t trust justice. They don’t expect justice. It is like the death of the state.”

Ms Rodriguez says Mexico does not have the death penalty but it has a “de facto death penalty”, whereby the state permits mass executions of criminals by not intervening.

“The world should know the problem of corruption and the policies that haven’t worked,” she says. “The world needs to know what’s going on in Mexico. It is corruption – this is the problem in Mexico. Corruption is everything. I don’t know if it’s a failed state but it’s a broken political system.”

What is hardest to understand about Mexico is the cruelty. Ms Rodriguez says this is something she thinks about often. It defies comprehension. She can only explain it by understanding the level of degradation in her country’s institutions.

“It’s like a staircase,” she says. “If the top of the stair is guilty, how can you expect the bottom of the stair to be guilty? It just shows the lack of respect for everything.

“There is no respect for human life, since no one is punishing them. If I am the state and I don’t care about killing, I’m saying human life doesn’t count. It’s so horrible, it’s so cruel, it’s so nasty.”

Asked whether she feels safe, she says: “I feel confident because most of the people that I expose, we have been exposing them in newspaper before the book came out and in some ways I feel most of the people from the Juarez cartel (La Linea) are losing power.”

That is true, but it is to be hoped that Ms Rodriguez, who received Spain’s 2010 El Mundo International Journalism Prize, and her colleagues stay safe now that the Sinaloa cartel has taken La Linea’s place.

Most commented

37 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Bertrand says:

      07:17am | 20/05/12

      Mexico is the best advertisement in the world for people who want to highlight how badly failed the global war on drugs is.

      People who continue to support policies of prohibition instead of legalisation and regulation are supporting the ongoing violence in Mexico. Closer to home, they are supporters of the ongoing violence between bikie gangs in Australia who are currently engaged in their own scaled-down battle for control over drug supply in Australia.

    • Gregg says:

      11:25am | 20/05/12

      It may interest you Bertrand that Holland is tightening up on their more liberal attitude, enough being enough for enough.

      And just how do you reckon it’ll work with decriminalising drugs for there’ll still be people looking to control supply and sales.
      Then there could be the flow on effect of even more people on drugs, where they would get their money for them and how useful a member of society they would be or lets say how a less useful many could be and no doubt many more being reliant on social security and health systems, all paid for by the more responsible taxpayers.

    • Bertrand says:

      02:39pm | 20/05/12

      If you look back,every vice that was once illegal and is now legalised and regulated (alcohol, gambling, prostitution) causes less social harm than when it was illegal. Criminalisation is based on the false assumption that it can possibly work.

    • Gregg says:

      08:35am | 20/05/12

      Miss Rodriguez is one brave woman Paul and the killing sprees in mexico which have been ongoing for quite a few years now just continually seem to get more horrendous when you think they have got as horrendous as they can.

      Last weeks report of fifty decapitated bodies by the roadside also having hands and feet removed would seem to be a new pinacle of horrow, something most of us in free and peaceful societies will never experience, hopefully.

      You do have to wonder how there is a way back from that living or as it may be, death being imminent.
      Is it that the innocent need to form their own vigilante groups and protection/execution squads? and you can understand why there are many mexicans attempting to get across into the US.

    • stephen says:

      10:45am | 20/05/12

      Those 50 dead bodies, once, were as guilty of criminal activities as those who killed them, and the authorities should be glad that the druggies fight amongst themselves and deplete their own numbers.

      (Our authorities should make contact with their Mexican counterparts, and see how they do it.)

    • Nick says:

      03:57pm | 20/05/12

      You don’t know that Stephen and you also don’t know what choices they had in life.  The insanity of these killingsand the impunity with which they are conducted is something we should be hoping never to meet face to face.  Ciudad Juarez is one of the most disturbing places I have ever seen, reinforced by the fact that it is just a ditch away from the wealthiest country on the planet.  There are people like Sandra Rodriguez…and then there are people like yourself - aren’t you just a little bit embarrassed to appear on the same page as her?

    • D says:

      06:54pm | 20/05/12

      stephen; did you even read the article above? The whole thing? If so, and you still wrote that…. wow. Just… wow.

      Ignorance is indeed bliss, yeah?

    • Anne71 says:

      08:21am | 21/05/12

      @Stephen - you sicken me.

    • Porter says:

      10:57am | 20/05/12

      It’s a wonder the US hasn’t intervened yet, since what they really care about when invading a country is justest and not the natural resources that county has for them to pillage.

    • Porter says:

      11:41am | 20/05/12

      or Justice

    • Budz says:

      01:07pm | 20/05/12

      Well the demand for drugs which the Mexican cartels are feeding comes from the US. If the US legalised the drugs and sourced it from legal avenues these drug cartels wouldn’t have anyone to sell to, therefore making the unprofitable and useless.

    • stephen says:

      01:31pm | 20/05/12

      What natural resources has the US plundered in Iraq or Afghanistan ?

    • stephen says:

      01:54pm | 20/05/12

      And the US has intervened, which is why the clampdown by Mexican Authorities on drugs.

    • D says:

      07:04pm | 20/05/12

      stephen; (again) Do you really buy everything they’re selling to you? The USA is a prime example of mass propaganda on a global scale. They didn’t intervene (directly - which was Porter’s point), only put political pressure on Mexico rather than address the actual problem - which is within their own borders (they are the primary market for these drugs). As for natural resources… riddle me this, what’s the difference between regimes in Afghanistan, Iraq & Iran (ok, so no movement on this yet - but unless they go nuclear real fast it will happen), compared to (for example) Somalia, Syria & Cote d’Ivoire? The answer? Oil. Oh, and the presence of major US armed forces. Funny that.

      You’re looking at a proxy global resource war unfolding, but the PR campaign says otherwise. Don’t just listen, observe. It’s not a conspiracy theory - the information is right there, so long as you’re prepared to think critically.

    • CD says:

      11:03am | 20/05/12

      When there is corruption at the highest levels and the sickening violence has become so acceptable to everyday people let alone the cartels, keys hard to see how this whole drug trade can be stopped.

      Is criminalizing it working? Certainly not when even the justice system and govt don’t give a damn about bringing any of the culprits to justice.

      The destruction of the human spirit can be seen right there in Mexico.  No wonder so many try crossing the border if the will is still there.

      I hope we don’t have to read about another journalist’s death. Strange how the western world has no qualms about intervening in other pockets of civil brutality but when it comes to drug wars they let it all continue without even blinking an eye.

    • Peter says:

      11:06am | 20/05/12

      There’s no point calling for a property operating justice process in such an environment. The carnage and the state’s failure to counter it are symptoms of something deeper and this lady touched on it - corruption. It pervades Mexico’s political, civil and private existence to an extent unimaginable in many other parts of the world. It’s naive to expect a first world level of due process in such a scenario. They need to go back to square one, whatever that might be.

    • John says:

      12:51pm | 20/05/12

      Cocaine users are the real ones feeding this cancer. Introduce 5 year sentences for buying cocaine. This is all cause and effect, little rich spoiled brats driving around in their BMW’s snorting coke and the thousands of lower class’s (druggie class) receiving their hands out to further fuel this cancer.

      There people in this society who don’t follow the rules, who don’t follow the rules should have their citizenship revoked and expelled. Your only going to deal with the problem with a firm hand.

      Maybe financial collapse will also do wonders to this world, hopefully the teach the mass’s about social responsibility. What a sick society, no standards, nobody to keep the mass’s in line, it’s just growing herd of self destruction.

    • Al B says:

      03:17pm | 20/05/12

      The druggie class u speak of, can we include most aussie alcohol users too? Recreational users of many illicit drugs are little different to most alcohol consumers. The sooner people get their heads round that little tidbit, the sooner this foolish war can wind up.

    • stephen says:

      03:40pm | 20/05/12

      You wind it up mate.
      And stop being a burden on those who like a drink, but who are not habit-formers and expect the rest of us to make excuses for you, or pay your way.

    • stephen says:

      04:08pm | 20/05/12

      Following ‘rules’ is not a good idea.
      Following rules is why small-time criminals have felt the need for imitative behaviour and wants what every other wannabe bad guy wants.
      Otherwise, every poor kid who wants what everybody wants, like girls and respect, will do it by ‘the rules’.

      There are no rules.
      And this is why the Labor Party and Ged Kearney must do all they can to establish connections with the Education Unions, and get rid of this stupid anti-private school ethos which is killing, not only school uniforms and quirky anthems, but much more importantly, variety.

      This country does not need more uniformity.

    • Chris R says:

      09:42pm | 20/05/12

      I think it’s time we just allowed adults to take drugs! The ‘war on drugs’ has not just failed, it has harmed. It has harmed drug takers, and innocent bystanders. Just about all drug-related crime occurs because of prohibition. Crime directly due to the effects of drugs on individuals is minimal. Check it out! We must accept that people have a right to take drugs and risk their own lives. When drugs are illegal, many more lives than their own, are at risk.

    • Leningen says:

      11:38pm | 20/05/12

      What? How would that work, exactly? We just ask people to consume their methamphetamine responsibly, and they do and nobody has a psychotic episode and it’s all so much nicer and nobody is afraid to go out at night, because if you are a little bit afraid, a snort of PCP will sort you out?
      The only thing going for this idea is that I’m sure I could find something that would make me enjoy watching Eurovision.

    • J Howard says:

      06:38am | 21/05/12

      I agree let them take drugs but if found in control of a motor vehicle, children, even riding a push bike while under the influence an automatic 5 year sentence I don’t care if we run out of places to put them they can go into chain gangs and live in tents like in Texas. The murder rate in Mexico can be blamed solely on the users of this crap both in the states as well as here. Drug users are to blame if there was no demand there would be no need for its manufacture

    • Al B says:

      08:26am | 21/05/12

      Treat it the same as alcohol

    • Mike F says:

      09:19am | 21/05/12

      The so called “war” against drugs is a myth perpetuated by the media.  All governments are really content to just put enough effort into enforcement of drug laws to keep the problem at a level which won’t alarm the general population too much.  Mexico is one example of the failure of that policy.  Drugs are not the same as alcohol and should be treated differently.  Alcohol has been used socially through the ages without harm to to the great majority of the population.  There is no safe level of use for illicit drugs. If you want to wipe the trade out be prepared to pay a much higher price for enforcement.

    • Al B says:

      10:56am | 21/05/12

      Wrong, just wrong ... There are illicit drugs that can be used socially, oft times in a safer way than alcohol. The big issues are amphetamines and alcohol IMO too easy to get both these now, they dominate much of the problematic drug useage.

      Regulate things like cannabis and MDMA and it will have a dramatically improving real world effect. Especially on the club scene and associated petty crimes which tie our police up. Drugs are going to be used either way, better to bring them into a system rather than rewarding criminal elements with a tax free enterprise…

    • retard says:

      09:59am | 21/05/12

      “This is no ordinary War, to be judged and fought on the principles of the historic conflicts of the past. This war is Armageddon, or to use a common phrase, a totalitarian struggle waged not only by the force of Arms on earth, but carried on in full intensity within the spirits, minds and hearts of people everywhere, soldiers and civilians alike. It is a stupendous and almost universal wrestling match to the death between the forces of darkness and the Power of Light – between demons and God, both sides working through human channels. Our adversaries are possessed by the full potency of the spiritual powers of darkness and are using and being used by them. On our side we have not yet put on the full armour of God.”

    • retard says:

      10:10am | 21/05/12

      Drug Addiction is a Demon. Humans blindly reinforce it. Energize it. It’s an active agent and a law unto itself. It seeks to dominate and destroy humanity. Don’t fall for the “soft” approach - that your old friend Satan talking.

    • Luce says:

      11:42am | 21/05/12

      The greatest demon is the legal and social stigma surrounding drugs that prevents people with real addiction problems from seeking the help they desperately need.

      Drugs will always cause more harm when illegal.

    • PaxUs says:

      10:43am | 21/05/12

      “It is like the death of the state.”  I think that sums it up pretty well.  So the UN continue to pretend that they care about Syria and human rights, yet let Mexico rot in hell?  There’s more to this ‘drug war’ than meets the eye!

    • PaxUs says:

      10:48am | 21/05/12

      @Gregg says - The Dutch were ‘forced’ to oblige EU guidelines.  Their ‘toughening up’ as you call it, had nothing to do with a perceived drug problem.  In fact, quite the opposite.  They had one of the lowest drug usage and addiction ratio’s in the western world.  Now we can expect to see prosecutions as the War reignites.

    • Luce says:

      11:29am | 21/05/12

      I think there was also an influence from conservative christians who were gaining power in the government.

      Even after years of tolerance proving to be effective in Holland, people are still short sighted enough to think prohibition is better. Just take a look at Portugal! Within a year or two of decriminalisation the number of deaths from overdose halved!

    • PaxUs says:

      10:50am | 21/05/12

      Heroin was legal within Australia until 1953.  Funny, I can’t find anyone who remembers a junkie before the late 1960’s.  What makes a drug user a criminal?  The Law!

    • Luce says:

      11:15am | 21/05/12

      Great article.. and it only reaffirms my view that drugs cause way more harm when illegal.

    • BAO says:

      02:56pm | 21/05/12

      They’re shooting people at Robina and now they’re shooting people at Elanora.
      Prohibition is not working, ignore it at your peril. We don’t want to end up Like Mexico??
      For god sake look at Portugal, they seemed to have stemmed the tide,
      Major Walters from the Salvation Army don’t you realize a lot of people seeking help from your organisation usually have some dependence whether it’s alcohol or drugs, this is an out for there situation. The quicker we move it from Criminal to Health the better, ‘cause at the moment there’s a huge drain on valuable resources and lots of people are falling therough the cracks

    • Satan says:

      03:24pm | 21/05/12

      You should decriminalize and legalize the lot. That way, when your kids come home stoned from school every day and their careers are destroyed, when your wife gets run over by a smacked-out driver, when your parents are robbed and killed by a crack-head junkie for 5 dollars and your sister is raped and murdered by a stoner coming down off a high and your brother is knifed for 20 cents then and only then you can say “Hey, legalization was the right decision !”

    • BAO says:

      06:38pm | 21/05/12

      Satan showing real ignorance in this opinion

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

@jennijenni a few companies are known to do that - ask for story ideas from job applicants so they can steal them later

Malcolm Farr

: Bruce Springsteen: "I get roughed up crowdsurfing… people try to pull chunks out of me" http://t.co/jiHqt8agt9” it was him, @patricklion

Daniel Piotrowski

Ray Hadley fires back at Carlton. Great @candacesutton1 get: http://t.co/7fQzk4Xixh

Malcolm Farr

@Drag0nista Can't see it bring re l 'ship Cos lots of Ruddites don't back gay marriage (Joel, Bowen) and lot of Gillardians do.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter