As of next month Air New Zealand passengers will be allowed to use mobiles while on board, enabling Kiwi jet-setters to advise their loved ones that their flight is on schedule and they’ll be home by sucks.

What really sucks about this move is that it will destroy the sole remaining bastion of public peace, the sanctuary of the aircraft, which in this hyper-connected modern world is the only escape from texts, tweets, emails, and the sheer horror of the loud and long-winded conversations of strangers.

I’ve never been to New Zealand but from what I can gather it consists of two islands, each of them about 500km long, with a large airport in the middle somewhere so that its citizens can emigrate to Australia to find work. Based on this rough estimate the longest domestic flight in NZ would take about 40 minutes and the extremely popular one-way flight to Bondi only marginally longer.

This begs the question as to why anyone would find themselves incapable of going without a phone for such a brief period of time.

I was talking to an old mate on the weekend where we trying to remember how it was that, just 20 years ago, we managed to maintain an even more energetic social life without having mobiles. Some people even managed to meet members of the opposite sex without sending saucy Warne-esque tweets and texts or befriending them on Facebook.

These days the idea of leaving the house without a phone, even to go to the corner store, fills most of us with dread. The concept of meeting up with anybody, ever, without using a mobile phone seems to possess as high a degree of difficulty as tracking down Osama.

And it’s flying which gives one of the best insights into how desperate people are to remain connected – just watch as people have their phones at the ready to turn them back on the moment the rubber hits the runway, like drug addicts getting a fix.

Thanks to Air New Zealand we can panic no more.

The carrier’s determination to be the first airline to allow in-flight phone calls, emails and messaging shows the extent to which we have become so absurdly reliant on mobile communications.

Just as we used to start and finish each day by brushing our teeth, the first and last thing which any Blackberry or iPhone owner now does, this one included, is to check their inbox.

Flying is now the only place where we are safe from the tyranny of permanent connectivity. It’s a tyranny which operates on several levels. For the owner of the phone it’s the sense of being constantly pestered by work-related emails and meeting requests, the dread of seeing the words “unknown number” flash up on the screen and swallowing hard before taking the call (or feeling guilty for ignoring it), the permanent sense of intellectual inadequacy at seeing so many tweets with links to interesting articles which you rarely get time to read.

For all of us, even that 0.001 per cent of the population which still eschews technology, there’s the downside of what could be called passive conversation. Far more annoying than those sweet wafts of sidestream cigarette smoke, this is the unwelcome and usually inane bleating of the fellow train traveller talking to Cheryl about how she pashed Darren after the party and had spent the whole weekend just hating herself, or the yup, yup, yupping of the frazzled executive doing business on the run.

The irony of all this is that technology was meant to give us more time and make us more sociable but so often it feels as if it has the absolute reverse effect.

As a result of Air New Zealand’s actions air travel will now become every bit as annoying as general life. As night follows day once Air NZ allows phone use other airlines will follow.

One curious aspect to Air New Zealand’s decision is that the airline itself was only recently mentioned in a formal report into the flight risks of on-board phone use. The New York Times last month cited a 2003 plane crash in Christchurch in which eight people perished as an example where a mobile was believed to have interfered with the plane’s navigational equipment. However, a final report into the incident by the New Zealand Transport Accident Investigation Commission found that “the pilot’s own mobile phone may have caused erroneous indications” on the navigational aid.

Setting aside the risk of death, the greater risk is that we will now all be driven completely mad as the last venue for silent reflection is destroyed by a barrage of beeps and a background of blather. It would be interesting to know whether the airline has actually polled its passengers as to whether they support this latest technological development. My guess is that many would not, and that any airline which says it won’t allow phone use anyway could make a pretty penny out of our desire for some elusive peace and quiet.

Most commented

51 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      04:59am | 15/02/11

      Perhaps the aircraft could be segregated into “Mobile” and “Non-Mobile” areas. Even better, the airline could charge extra to one lot of passengers for the privilege of phone access, and charge extra to another lot of passengers for the bliss of phone-free space.

    • Macca says:

      07:57am | 15/02/11

      Excellent suggestion, can we do the same with a children section. I had a kid kicking my seat when I flew to Cairns a few months ago. When I turned around to look at the child it burst into tears saying to its mother that “the angry man scares me”.

      One of my proudest moments.

      Now, whilst we are discussing segragating parts of the plane, is there something we can do about smelly foreigners….. Or loud ignorant Americans… or the Obese? You’d have to put them in the middle as the plane can’t be nose or tail heavy; it’d be too hard to fly. (i’m joking of course)

    • Tubesteak says:

      08:13am | 15/02/11

      I second Macca’s suggestion.

      Put children in the cargo hold. Same with drunken bogans and chatterers

      I don’t know which planes Penbo uses that are a “bastion of public peace” but I think Penbo drinks a few too many of those mini cans of beer and doesn’t notice all the ruckus above his own drunken ruckus.

    • Babs says:

      10:56am | 15/02/11

      Queensland Rail now runs two carriages for each of its services, and these carriages are for passengers who don’t care for loud phone conversations, loud music and loud chatter. Like other travelling introverts, always so badly outnumbered by our extraverted cousins, I love the quiet carriage, read, think, and generally enjoy the meditative aspects of commuting unavailable in the rest of the train. Any flight that allows mobile phones onboard will probably lose its introvert passengers, but that won’t matter much. There aren’t enough of us in the general population to affect the airline’s bottom line. As a PS one thing I notice in the ‘quiet’ carriage is that passengers are rarely overweight. Interesting no?

    • Erick says:

      12:40pm | 15/02/11

      Babs, that is an amazingly good service. I would enthusiastically pay extra to be in the quiet zone when I travel by public transport!

    • Babs says:

      05:10pm | 15/02/11

      Hi Erick - it’s free!  And comes courtesy of QR actually consulting its long-suffering customers.  You’ll have to move to Qld of course, and floods, cyclones etc come our turf.

    • TChong says:

      06:42am | 15/02/11

      Dave - thats a jaw dropper, a sophisticated man-of-(some of) the-world ?
      Youve never been to N Zed?
      Its a very nice place, almost as good as NSW.

    • KH says:

      06:46am | 15/02/11

      I can’t wait to hear ‘I’m on the plane’ a hundred times.  Note to self: Air New Zealand added to list of no-fly airlines.  Wow - I never thought they would end up on a list with Garuda, Aeroflot, Aerolineas Argentinas and China Air…................

    • Paul says:

      07:40am | 15/02/11

      Add Air Egypt to that list KH.

    • Macca says:

      07:53am | 15/02/11

      You forgot to list RyanAir…

    • Elphaba says:

      08:02am | 15/02/11

      I’ve flown Garuda.  The food was nice, but the inflight entertainment was rubbish.

    • The Badger says:

      08:45am | 15/02/11

      Garuda
      Acronym
      Good And Reliable Under Dutch Administration

    • KH says:

      09:13am | 15/02/11

      Don’t worry - this isn’t the whole list - just some of the highlights (or should that be lowlights?)......................I will accept others’ judgements and known safety records….......

    • Tony says:

      06:53pm | 15/02/11

      haha.. I wish I could add ‘Aeroflot’ to my list!  But alas… in my line of work I have little choice..

      and even then… out of the choice I do have.. Aeroflot is often the best and safest!  Scarey thought I know…

    • rufus says:

      06:50am | 15/02/11

      A bigger plague than the public use of mobile phones is the whinging about this harmless activity. I just don’t get how someone else using a phone near you is a problem. At worst, they might be shouting into it, but they might be talking loudly to the person next to you, instead. Get some noise cancelling headphones if noise of someone talking is that annoying.

      The sight of someone texting offends you? Avert your gaze.

    • Just Say No. says:

      08:10am | 15/02/11

      You obvioulsy haven’t sat on an hour train ride next to a bimbo on the phone explaining to her friend why she should be on Jersey Shore instead of Snooki - or a douche bag loudly bragging in detail to his friend (again on the phone) about the colour of his vomit after the last weekends bender at the local.

    • KH says:

      09:17am | 15/02/11

      Or that kid every morning on the train - talking to her friend ‘Talia’ (although I suspect there is an H or a Y in that name somewhere).  Oh yes, how I love to hear about some silly 15 year olds dream about shoes and like, Talia? Talia? how they look, and like, Talia? Talia? Are you there Talia?  like like…..............seriously, can you like, shut up?

    • rufus says:

      12:26pm | 15/02/11

      Just say no, KH: you were on trains?  So, you can change seats, stand, change carriages even, if it’s so unbearable. Or really, are you just   pathetic wimps who would rather whinge than work on strategies - such as telling yourself it’s no big deal, learning to shut it out and absorbing yourself in reading or thinking?

      Is this how you approach all of life’s difficulties, large and small? Grow up.

    • n_dude says:

      12:56pm | 15/02/11

      @rufus - yes you can do that on a train. But that would be impossible on a plane unless you get out of your seat (which is a struggle if you are in cattle class). Even then you still have to sit during times on the flight like turbulence, serving meals, take off, landing. Hence I agree with KH on this one.

    • KH says:

      01:52pm | 15/02/11

      Rufus - obviously you don’t come from Melbourne.  Ever caught a peak hour train?!  Sure, ‘just stand somewhere else’...........hahahaha

    • bobw says:

      01:59pm | 15/02/11

      @rufus:  Nonsense.  The fact that you can go out of your way to avoid antisocial behaviour doesn’t make the behaviour itself any less antisocial.

    • rufus says:

      02:12pm | 15/02/11

      n_dude: like I said - learn some coping skills. Politely ask them to keep their voice down. Invest in noise-cancelling headphones.  Above all: stop whingeing! Jeez.

    • Muttley says:

      02:21pm | 15/02/11

      Rufus, you talk about growing up, how about the self important twits who cannot possibly go without talking for the small amount of time they are on the train. For christ sake, when did everyone become so damn important that they cant be incommunicado for an hour? Are you deadset serious? Someone sitting next to you shouting into a phone and you dont see a problem? What about the health implications when ones phone is rammed down ones gullet? A little common courtesy goes a long way.

    • Shifter says:

      03:20pm | 15/02/11

      @KH - Tahliya?

      The phone callers on my train a few and far between. The thing that gets me are the people listening to music on bad headphones (generally the default Apple ones) so that the rest of the car can hear clearly. From a few tests I’ve done, I’ve found the music doesn’t need to be particularly loud either.

      Ah well, off to the ‘quiet’ carriage for me.

    • rufus says:

      03:24pm | 15/02/11

      Muttley, will you read what I wrote, or do I have to repeat it? On a train, you’re not chained to a person next to you speaking loudly. Move, or learn to live with it. Stop whingeing.

      No-one here has provided a good reason for the angst over use of phones in public. Pathetic whingers.

    • Sam says:

      11:32pm | 15/02/11

      Rufus, there hasn’t yet been a set of noise cancelling headphone which are able to block everything out.  Being a frequent long haul traveller, I own a pair of these myself and although they can block out a lot of ambient noise, you can still hear when some twit next to you is constantly yapping away.  It’s especially annoying when you’re on a very long flight & trying to sleep!

      If you don’t think it’s annoying, try sitting next to them on a 14 hour flight from LA to Auckland and see how quickly the novelty wears off for you.

    • Fiona says:

      07:26am | 15/02/11

      I grew up outside a town in north west NSW & one of the greatest things about going home (aside from seeing Dad & the dog) is there is no mobile reception. Only 25ks out of town and a national highway within earshot, one of our major carriers has decided it doesn’t need to service the area. Quite frankly, that is fine by me - phone turned on when I’m in town, off when I’m at home. Bliss.

    • Steve says:

      07:50am | 15/02/11

      After reading this article I’ve just purchased a pair of decent quality noise cancelling headphones online. I recommended everyone else to do the same. The horror…. The horror…..

    • Elphaba says:

      08:03am | 15/02/11

      Me too.  I haven’t had a chance to test them out on a plane yet, but in the middle of the city, they were very impressive.

    • KH says:

      09:22am | 15/02/11

      I have Bose ones - they are great, but they don’t block out intermittent noise like someone talking right next to you, so someone talking on a mobile phone would probably still get through if they were sitting right next to you (as there is no space in economy!) - they are designed to block out constant noise…..........I have to say, I could barely hear the engines of the plane - it was a great purchase and made the flight very pleasant, and I used them without music as well - the engine noise was almost nothing.  On a long haul, they are worth their weight in gold!

    • Bitten says:

      02:47pm | 15/02/11

      I worship at the altar of Bose. A must-have for international flights. Plug into iPad, turn on something soporific and adjust eye mask.

    • Elphaba says:

      03:22pm | 15/02/11

      I’m looking forward to trying them out on the plane, that’s for sure.  Mine are Sony - good price on eBay, so I jumped at them. grin

    • Gregg says:

      08:24am | 15/02/11

      Those loud mouths on mobiles in close quarters do seem to be a real PITA I agree Penbo and the only thing better than no mobile reception is having your landline on the blink and then no one can phone you!
      But Penbo, please
      ” I’ve never been to New Zealand but from what I can gather it consists of two islands, each of them about 500km long, with a large airport in the middle somewhere so that its citizens can emigrate to Australia to find work. Based on this rough estimate the longest domestic flight in NZ would take about 40 minutes and the extremely popular one-way flight to Bondi only marginally longer. “

      You’ll have some Kiwis a tad upset for it’s not far under 500 km. from Auckland to the very northernmost tip and though there are some real beaut ” you might be the only person alive ” drives on the west coast roads, the last bit up to Cape Reinga is a bit of a gravel bitch and they still have in Kiwiland plenty of one at a time narrow bridges and the Kiwis probably know who is a tourist that can be bluffed, even if there is a sign system in place.
      And they do have quite a few airports available for us Aussies to fly into direct, the length of both two major islands being more about 800 km.+, maybe even more for the SI.

      They have a few things that we do not have in Oz too, like though we have a ferry to Tasmania and they have between NI, SI, Stewart and a few others, if you want to try a differnt form of travelling from Wellington to the SI, they have or has a parachuting service - yep, fly out of Welly and jump out over the SI.
      No mobile phone problems with that one though if you want to do it naked, I’m sure they’ll be able to arrange a photographer!
      Now that ought to win your Lizzie over.

      And though there are quite a few other islands along the coast, Stewart Island in far south is commonly referred to as their fourth with their third being that much bigger one a bit further away to the west!

    • G says:

      12:05pm | 15/02/11

      I’m a kiwi and the description of the country doesn’t offend me as much as this pointless article.

      Like every single passenger is now going to take advantage of this and commence tweeting, facebooking and calling whilst on a plane.

      The writer has taken into account how early some of these flights are right? I’m heading over to NZ for a holiday in a week’s time and reception or no reception, I’m getting some shut-eye for my morning flight lol.

    • thatmosis says:

      08:28am | 15/02/11

      You forgot QANTAS. From what has occured over the last few months it like taking your life in your hands. As for mobile phone, phone rage will become a problem on these flights and another good reason not to visit New Zealand.

    • Macca says:

      09:15am | 15/02/11

      @thatmosis, exactly how many people have died on QANTAS flights?
      None, oh, ok then.

      What happened on the A380 could have happened on any of Airbus’ Rolls Royce Engines, and it was the skill of the QANTAS pilots that saved lives.

      To say that flying with QANTAS is like taking your life in your hands is just a complete lie.

    • Matt says:

      10:35am | 15/02/11

      Macca, I think you’ll find that record only relates to the jet engine era. They have managed to knock off a few people in the early days. But yes, it’s an amazing record, and when I have the choice, wouldn’t choose to fly with anyone else.

    • ptsd says:

      09:08am | 15/02/11

      I’ve read the 15 comments so far. I can feel the face flush, the beads of sweat. This isn’t real, is it. It’s just a hoax.  I need a drink. It’s 9am. I don’t care.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      09:12am | 15/02/11

      The informal migration agreement with New Zealand should be scrapped. Period.

    • Gregg says:

      11:35am | 15/02/11

      Just so you know Shane, their immigration was scrapped yonks ago.
      Sure, they can still come and live here and work just as we can head on over there but now to get permanent residency status with all that goes with it like citizenship etc., it’s a PR visa application just like any other countries.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      11:54am | 15/02/11

      New Zealand citizens do not need permanent residency (unless they intend to access certain social security benefits); they can remain in Australia indefinitely under a special category visa. They are also not included under the annual immigration intake. It is a defacto unrestricted immigration intake

      http://www.immi.gov.au/media/fact-sheets/17nz.htm

    • Joe says:

      10:07am | 15/02/11

      I advise going to a chuch service. Everyone switches of from the net there… Maybe that is the last refuge?

    • jrvk says:

      11:33am | 15/02/11

      I assume you’ve never flown in the US then where this has been going on for years?

    • Andrew says:

      11:48am | 15/02/11

      You people don’t travel much do you (David Penberthy included)? There has already been the ability to make air to ground calls from your seat from quite a few different airlines for many years now, and yet I have never seen anyone actually use it. Why?

      Well at multiple dollars a minute your not going to simply yabber away for no reason. Furthermore it costs big time to even RECEIVE a text or phone call whilst using international roaming (which is charged to YOUR mobile bill, which is what the system will be using).

      All that is happening in AirNZ are making your mobile phone the handset which can be used, rather than a in seat phone which they have supplied.

      I guess one good thing can come from all this, you bogans will refuse to travel (for this one reason alone) and I’ll be able to get some piece and quiet on my flights without your sort acting like drunken idiots.

    • Matt B says:

      12:05pm | 15/02/11

      Dear Jeebus, I can only begin to realise the horror in flight calling will bring upon us. One thing is for sure, business class (even if I could afford it) has lost it’s appeal by a factor of 2.

      magine a 3 hour flight next to Chuck Blue-Tooth. A pin striped, game show host voiced running commentary on which stocks are sure things and how “That chick totally wanted a piece of my action on the week end,”

      I’d rather travel in the luggage hold.

    • n_dude says:

      12:51pm | 15/02/11

      Most airlines already have in flight phones built into their entertainment systems. The only reason they’re not used is that htey are exteremly expensive. I suspect that will be the same for mobile phone calls and that most sensible people would not bother until they reach the ground.

    • Frequent Flyer says:

      01:52pm | 15/02/11

      @rufus Space on a plane is limited.  You cannot just “block out” someone having a phone conversation 20cm from your head.  This is obvious.

      @n_dude No domestic Australian airline offers any sort of in-flight phone service.  You might be thinking of America, but this is not something that exists here.  And for a reason!

      It’s true that the high cost of the calls may keep their fequency down.  But this service is not really needed to begin with - people can live without their phones while in transit.

      More importantly, there is absolutely no question whatsoever that this would be incredibly annoying for those who just want a nice, quiet flight.

    • Franko says:

      10:11am | 16/02/11

      Wasn’t the fatal bikies brawl at the Sydney domestic terminal organised by in-flight text messaging?

    • adamjacobbryant says:

      02:13pm | 15/02/11

      pfft…as if you would answer a call from an “unknown” or “blocked” number!

    • Kimbo says:

      04:45pm | 15/02/11

      Well, I’m not sure when it was when you last travelled on a plane but I have to say that in my experience, they have never been “the last venue for silent reflection”.

    • thatmosis says:

      06:15am | 16/02/11

      macca, not yet but coming to a disaster near you soon as they send their servicing overseas. have a good look at the number of incidents over the last 12 months.
        Why should I have to buy noise cancelling headphones to enjoy a bit of peace and quiet. I would very politely ask the person on the phone to either put it away or I would shove it where the sun dont shine,simple. Its bad enough flying a distance now without some brain dead moron going on about his or her life at a decible rate that bursts eardrums.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Found a TV meteorologist on Twitter with the last name Piotrowski. There's a whole newsroom of Piotrowskis out there

Paul Colgan

RT @businessinsider: Man Being Questioned For Boston Bombing Connection Shot And Killed By FBI by @paulszoldrahttp://t.co/OtypP2PRgI

Daniel Piotrowski

This is a must read @TheAtlantic. Whether you think you know everything or think you know nothing http://t.co/naoUutCoWF

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JoshuaWithers: Have you seen the Australian version of Breaking bad? He get's cancer and Medicare covers his costs and the series ends.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter