For the vast majority of people, images of the World Trade Centre in New York, and in particular its destruction, are permanently etched into their psyche. 

Beautiful rectangles. Pic: AP

While we understand a great deal about why the towers collapsed structurally, and the political motivations behind the attack, curiously very little is known about their architect and architecture.

So who was the architect of New York’s World Trade Centre, and what did his building represent at the time it was built?

Minoru Yamasaki was a second generation Japanese American, born in 1912 in Seattle to Japanese parents.  The family moved to Washington DC where Minoru grew up and studied architecture at the University of Washington. He relocated to New York where he enrolled in a Master of Architecture at New York University, before beginning professional practice.

He worked in New York for the firm that designed the Empire State Building, and later relocated to Detroit, where he set up a partnership.

His first significant project was the Pruitt-Igoe Public Housing in St Louis, which consisted of a series of thirty three parallel concrete slabs blocks in the planning championed by the German Modernist Hillbershiemer

It was never fully occupied and a series of social problems led to its decay, with buildings being gradually boarded up. Pruitt-Igoe was dramatically demolished “on July 15, 1972 at 3.32pm (or thereabouts)” in what the architecture critic Charles Jencks has famously quoted as the date of the death of Modern Architecture. Indeed it came to symbolise for many all that was wrong with Modern architecture.

In 1961 Yamasaki left the partnership and set up in his own practice. In 1965 he received the commission to design the World Trade Centre in New York from the New York Port Authority. 

He was selected ahead of some of his better known contemporaries such as IM Pei, Phillip Johnson, and Walter Gropius. The design began in 1965, and evolved through numerous iterations. Construction commenced in 1972, with the first building completed in 1976.

The design was resolutely abstract, consisting of two perfect squares in plan, offset from each other across a plaza. At 110 storeys they were the worlds tallest buildings from 1972-1974, although they held the title of the buildings with the most storeys until 2001.

Their design was based on the structural principle of a ‘braced tube’, whereby the lateral stability (stiffness) of the buildings was achieved from the external structural tube, rather than the internal core as is most frequently the case in Australia, which may have prevented their collapse. This external structure was expressed by Yamasaki as a series of closely spaced vertical columns, never more that 18 inches apart. This has in part been attributed to Yamasaki’s ironic fear of heights, and his consequent wish to give occupants a feeling of security. 

The fine vertical structural fins and the curved transfer at the base give the building a modern gothic appearance that was associated with many of the Yamasaki’s designs, as well as those of his contemporaries including Edward Durrell Stone, architect of the original Museum of Modern Art in New York. 

The World Trade Centre was, like Pruitt-Igoe, a form of urban renewal involving the consolidation of several city blocks to create a ‘superblock’. The design consisted of twin 110 storey towers set in an open plaza, with several smaller surrounding buildings.

This form of modernist urban renewal was strongly rallied against at the time. New York based Jane Jacobs was a leading critic and in 1961 wrote the seminal text “The Death and Life of Great American Cities”, which was a critique of modernist planning policies and urban renewal, in which she expounded four principles for good urban development.

In summary they were mixed-use, short blocks, buildings of various age and repair, and density. She advocated that “frequent streets and short blocks are valuable because of the intricate fabric of cross use that they permit among the users of a city neighbourhood”, which could not be in stronger contrast to the as yet unbuilt World Trade Centre design which created a large open plaza raised above the surrounding city fabric, surrounded by similarly designed buildings. 

Yamasaki and his contemporaries are often identified with the architectural style known as Late Modernism. This label was applied to architects who operated post World War II after the heroic period of Modern Architecture and the International Style. They used the images, ideas and motifs of modernism without its philosophical and intellectual underpinnings. Charles Jencks described Late Modernism as “tak(ing) the ideas and forms of the Modern Movement to an extreme, exaggerating the structure and technological image of the building.” 

The design of the World Trade Centre was heavily criticised at the time by among others the well known historian and critic Lewis Mumford, author of “The City in History”, who called them “just glass and metal filing cabinets”, and denounced them as another “example of gigantism and technological exhibitionism that are now eviscerating the living tissue of every great city.”

On approaching the World Trade Centres, the soaring verticals and absence of scale made it impossible to tell if they were 30, 50, or 110 storeys. The design was completely devoid of any reference to human scale, as was typical of the Late Modernists. This inhumanity of typical of Late Modernism would lead to one of the most complete reassessments of architecture in the twentieth century, rekindling an interest in historic forms and decorative design, known as Post Modernism

Ironically for a building that lacks human scale and reference Yamasaki said “The World Trade Centre should because of its importance become a representation of man’s belief in humanity, his need for individual dignity, his belief in the cooperation of men, and through cooperation his ability to find greatness.”

Most ironic of all Yamasaki said “World Trade means world peace!”. Yamasaki died in 1986 of stomach cancer and thus was spared seeing his iconic buildings destroyed.

Philip Vivian is an architect and urban designer.  A Director of Bates Smart, his buildings have received numerous awards, most recently for the high-rise 420 George Street in Sydney. In Brisbane he has designed a building that pending approval will be Australia’s tallest.

Most commented

16 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      05:41am | 12/09/11

      “just glass and metal filing cabinets” 
       
      Seems we haven’t learnt anything, then. That’s all I see being built in Australia.

    • Erick says:

      05:42am | 12/09/11

      Thanks for a fascinating tour through an aspect of this event I’d never before considered.

    • acotrel says:

      06:24am | 12/09/11

      What really staggered me about 9/11 was that the buildings didn’t just fall over immediately when hit by the planes. I’m impressed by their inbuilt stability.  They’re a credit to their designers.

    • John says:

      07:36am | 12/09/11

      If you look at the towers closely, you will notice that each tower is not 1 tower but three towers stacked one and another. Now ask your self the question if the top tower collapsed, why did the 2nd and 3rd collapse so symmetrical? Not only did they have a strong core in the middle, they also had three strong base’s. Combine the entire inner core which is 8x8 all interconnected together. then have 3 base’s strong bass’s. Making the towers very strong. This idea that a one single plane made this collapse is laughable. Just give way to hardly anything? Go get a steel beam and face it up ways, and i bet you can put your entire house on top of it and i bet you it won’t bend.

    • New Yorker says:

      09:21am | 12/09/11

      The truth is out there!
      and
      So are you!

    • RJB says:

      10:11am | 12/09/11

      @ John are you familiar with the term “fruit loop”?

    • Max, of Rocky says:

      10:30am | 12/09/11

      There is a good documentary on the structure and why the buildings collapsed.

      If they run it again it really does show graphically what happened.

      Turns out the design of the internal supports was the reason.

    • TC says:

      01:21am | 13/09/11

      I think you have made your point John…20-30 times

    • Jas says:

      10:31am | 12/09/11

      “While we understand a great deal about why the towers collapsed structurally, ....”

      Oh really? Not the old pancake theory, which if true, would have been evidenced by some sort of resistance from the building at the bottom, not to mention a stack of pancakes.. As there was continual acceleration of the “collapse” it must hold true that the building was being pulverised as it was coming down, as evidenced by videos that show exactly that, and the enourmous clouds of pyroclastic like dust, as explained on the website http://www.ae911truth.org , the collapse showed ALL the charecteristics of a controlled demolition, and NONE, of a progressive collapse.

      “............, curiously very little is known about their architect and architecture.”

      actually, we know a great deal about the architecture. Steel framed buildings, even building 7, that until 9/11, have never collapsed due to fire, ( oh sure, a plane hit two of the three, but the twin towers were designed to withstand aircraft impact, which they indeed did, the archtect himself believed they could withstand multiple impact ) nor since. Steel frames which make it IMPOSSIBLE to fall at freefall speed through the path of most resistance.

      architect my eye.

    • Jim says:

      03:34pm | 12/09/11

      Maybe you should watch the History Channel instead of jumping onto obscure conspiracy theory websites.

      The towers were built differently to any other building - the structural strength was on the outer shell, not the inner core. That’s how they were ableto be built so quick.

      The fire retardant used to coat the steelwork between floors was not applied as well as it should have been…weaken one floor and the rest come down. Your pancake theory falls kind of flat - it’s more like a house of cards.

    • Knemon says:

      04:41pm | 12/09/11

      @ Jim - So why did building 7 collapse like it did?

      http://www.ae911truth.org/

      This link is not from a bunch of conspiracy theorists but a group of concerned architects and engineers who have a major concern with the collapse of WTC building no 7 and to a lesser extent the two towers.

    • Jas says:

      05:43pm | 12/09/11

      history channel?....... spare me..

      obscure websites?
      ae911truth.org

      there could not be a more concise or visible, vocal organisation in support for a proper, transparent, independant investigation into the FACTS surrounding the events of 9/11.

      obscure?  lol ...  thanks for the chuckle..

      fire-( it’s spelt )-retardent… or no fire retardent..  is insignificant, there is no way on gods earth that those buildings could fall through themselves with absolutely no resistance from the lower floors.

      maybe on your planet though..

    • Em says:

      02:33pm | 12/09/11

      Yes, Jas, because I am sure you’re a demolitions expert just like everyone else.  Physics generally shows what happens when a big structure such as the tower collapses.  Heavy shit on top, weakened structure due to rather big plane crashing into it (the size and power of which it was NOT designed for) and 2200 degree burning fires through supporting floors and walls, possibly hot enough to melt/buckle or otherwise weaken the steel frames and supports.  It’s not called the pancake effect, it’s called the snowball effect.  The thing collapsed under the weight of itself.

      But I’m sure the intarwebs know better.

    • MD says:

      02:56pm | 12/09/11

      I hate to be the one to point this out, but how exactly was one of the centers for world capitalism a symbol of diginity and humanity?

    • Chris says:

      03:05pm | 12/09/11

      Like all modern buildings, the architect designed the space and aesthetics but it was the engineers who make the ideas work. Falzur Khan was the man who headed the engineering team for the project.

      Theorist who think there is an alternate group or reason for the building collapsing are perhaps somewhat missguided, uneducated in specific areas or just want to be opositional.

      The facts are building codes in reference to fire say the structure should remanin standing to allow occupants to evacuate which I understand many people did flee. But the construction using bundled steel tubed trusses was never designed to withstand such a long exposure to fire. The structures did an amazing job to withstand two massive impacts.

      If you don’t want to believe basic engineering logic or that terrorist drove a plane into a building during peacetime then I wish you would just remain silent because you are not helping peace in the world.

    • Jas says:

      01:24pm | 14/09/11

      thats all fine and dandy chris, and lets say youre correct, even though, never before has a steel framed building collapsed due to fire, even much much hotter fires that have last much longer..  but heres the thing..

      the thing is…

      if in fact we agree on the scenario, that the steel was weakened, and the top section fell onto the floors below, crushing them ( though, on the videos, you can actually see the top floors being pulverised into dust as theyre coming down ) there would be, some sort of resistance from the floors below.

      and..  there would be equal destruction to the top floors as the bottom ones, and as such - after a period, there would be nothing left to crush the remaining floors.

      as there is no resistance, evidence by the fact that the collaps actually accelerates, im afraid, for you, that the official story, again, falls short.

      not only that..  you just have to bloody well look at the towers destruction on the countless videos to and watch as they bloody well blow up!

      gees..  if people can watch that and not think its an explosion, after all, it has all the charateristics of a controlled demolition, and none of a simple structural collapse..  then theres not muchh hope for you.

      http://911review.org/Wget/members.fortunecity.com/911/wtc/tower-explosions.htm

      youre welcome smile

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@DaveJory Rex's latest trip?

Lucy Kippist

What a day to just look at Twitter.... Proud to be part of @newscomauHQ today! http://t.co/NELofB3o0j

ToryShepherd

@bigwordsblog Best night I had there I won backstage passes to meet Warrant, of Cherry Pie fame. Didn't happen in the end, though!

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @sarahmichael24: Such a nice story - 'No hoper' to become little town's first doctor http://t.co/toN1UDSWeM by @itsKShort @newscomauHQ

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter