Now that the Cup’s behind us and Shocking has won it, let’s get serious about addressing the massive gap in our national dialogue on gambling. It’s that gap that’s referred to in the title of this piece.

2009 Melbourne Cup winner Shocking

Punch deputy editor Tory Maguire wrote a great piece recently on the scourge of the pokies. In it, she summarised some of the measures proposed to combat that electronic plague. But where is the same debate about racing?

The Melbourne Cup is a great national event. I’ve written about it in glowing, enthusiastic terms twice on this website this week, and countless times elsewhere. I once even argued that Cup Day should be our National Day. Everybody, sing with me: Horse Trainers all let us rejoice…

But the Melbourne Cup is totally unrepresentative of what the racing industry is all about in the year 2009. For 364 days of the year, racing is essentially no more glamorous – nor any less monotonous – than the pokies themselves.

Consider this. Today, there are almost 130 gallops races you can bet on with Aussie TABs, from the first at Trentham (NZ) at 10 am to the last at Kempton (UK) at 1.50 am. If you fancy the dogs and the trots, throw another 100 or so races into the mix.

No punter in their right mind could do the form on all of those races, so naturally, they don’t bother. The majority just throw their money away as blindly as a blue-haired pensioner on the pokies.

In the old days, when tens of thousands people went to every race meeting, you bet on race eight and then put the wallet away until the following Saturday.

Back then, a day at the races was a social outing. Yes, there were desperates and addicts and crims, but the general atmosphere was not dissimilar to an afternoon at the footy.

Nowadays, in all but carnival times, gambling on horses is primarily a solo pursuit. Gambling counsellors will tell you that if you keep it social, you keep it safe, but the wall-to-wall barrage of races, 24/7/364, is a trap perfectly designed to lure the solo punter.

Got a spare hour at lunchtime? Hit the TAB and help line the pockets of Tabcorp shareholders. Got nothing to do on a lazy Saturday arvo? Put Sky Racing on the Foxtel and help your online bookie buy a new Mercedes.

The explosion of internet gambling – whether it be racing, sports, poker or two pixellated flies crawling up a wall – is the really big story here. Largely unchecked and virtually un-debated at any level of government or wider society, internet gambling is dangerous in ways we haven’t even begun to imagine yet.

In the Productivity Commission’s latest report, online gambling constituted an unspecified portion of the so-called “wagering” sector (sports and racing). Whatever the figure is (and it’s probably about 5 per cent of the total gambling spend), you can be sure it’s growing.

Like the pokies, the internet is there all day and all night. It’s the new frontier of chain-you-to-the-chair gambling, designed to lull you into a sense of ongoing expectation and anticipation, one mind-numbing hit at a time.

Congratulations to you if you won on the Cup today. But if you lost, and this whole gambling caper suddenly seems like an instant turnoff, you’re the really lucky one.

13 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Daniel says:

      04:03pm | 03/11/09

      Completely agree. You can have fun at a Casino just as you can have fun at the races, but to me both pursuits are so tainted by the dirty business of gambling that neither have an ounce of integrity left in them. I don’t gamble, never have and never will. It’s not that I don’t trust myself to gamble responsibly, but I feel I have a moral obligation not to gamble in support of those who have fallen foul of the insidious addiction. That leaves only the appeal of the sport to entice me to watch horse racing and frankly I find it incredibly boring, so even if I do watch the Melbourne Cup I might well change channels halfway through. Similary with Casinos you will only find me there for the benefit of friends or the food, both of which are rare occurances. My views on alcohol are similar, thus I don’t drink and avoid socialising in bars.

    • Matt says:

      04:10pm | 03/11/09

      Ok I pose a question. You talk about people throwing their money away with gambling on line. I work in an office environment and I see throughout the day talks about shares,stocks etc…People in my office alone throwing big dollars into the stockmarket. Sometimes they win, sometimes I see them screaming at their computers. They review stocks online of course…I personally don’t mind a tinker occasionally on the horses (refuse to play pokies). How is this different to countless people throwing money into the stockmarket? The end of the day it is all still gambing whether it’s horses, dogs, pokies or stockmarket it is not?? I would be betting that you play the stockmarket Anthony??

    • foraggio says:

      04:31pm | 03/11/09

      Excellent post. Don’t need to say any more than that.

    • David says:

      04:45pm | 03/11/09

      Matt:

      While some people might gamble in the stock market, most people invest there. Investors who buy quality stocks and invest long term usually get good returns. There are risks in buying stocks, but it is not the same as gambling at the casino or the races.

    • Adrian says:

      06:01pm | 03/11/09

      Gambling is one of Australia’s worst problems. If the money spent on gambling would be spent on say durable value products or family holidays, or even reducing debt or your mortgage it would be of enormous benefits to our economy, create more jobs etc. Money spend on gambling mostly benefits the filthy rich who don’t need it anyway.

    • Schartos says:

      06:31pm | 03/11/09

      I didn’t gamble - I’m the lucky one.

    • Bateman says:

      07:02pm | 03/11/09

      Who cares what stupid people do with their money. They pump money back in to the economy and only hurt themselves and those stupid enough to attach themselves to them.

      And Matt @ 4:10pm read David @4:45pm. Shares are an investment recognised by the tax system. Shares have outperformed property over the last 30 years and you can offset your losses against your gains. Not the same as gambling

    • a different matt says:

      07:29pm | 03/11/09

      Adrian- people make their own choices and can do what they wish with their money, provided it’s legal. Gambling is indeed a problem but only to a very small minortiy of people who can’t control themselves, although i admit the number swells a bit if you include the people close to the addict. regardless you can’t ban something that the vast majority of people do, and enjoy, very rarely and in small amounts, just to appease the small minority who lack self-control.

      Schartos- I, like lots of people around the country, had a bet on the cup today. it’s the only day i bet on the horses all year. In fact in most years the only sporting event i bet on period. most years i lose $10 or so. this year i won so i today i’m the lucky one (well at least one of them!)

    • Steve Smith says:

      07:51pm | 03/11/09

      @Bateman “you can offset your losses against your gains. Not the same as gambling ” ...that’s the same concept gamblers use.

    • Bateman says:

      09:55pm | 03/11/09

      Steve Smith - whatever copncept gamblers use their logic is defunct and they only have themselves to blame. There is nothing inherently wrong with having a flutter for some fun. Blaming gambling is like blaming cars for crashing. For responsible people it is safe. Penalising responsible people for the actions of a moronic few is the increasing horror of the nanny state.

    • Steve Smith says:

      10:56pm | 03/11/09

      Bateman: whether their logic is incorrect or not does not change the fact gamblers use the same concept.

    • Nick says:

      10:52am | 04/11/09

      Likening betting on racing to gambling on poker machines is a false analogy. On the poker machine the player has no choice about anything the machine does other than decide how much to put in and how many reels to play. On the other hand, the racing investor can decide which race to bet on, which horse or horses to support. He is supported by a mountain of information, from past form to predicted prices. He can take into account the horse’s previous form, its most recent attempts, its preference for distance, track, its record with this or that jockey. Approached properly, racing allows for an intelligent investment regime. I have punted since the late 60’s. I limit the amount I will invest each year (a set bank to start every racing year), I have a limit on the size of my bets and I only bet in Melbourne on a Saturday.(personal preference and trying to fit punting into my working life). When I have a loss I consider it the cost of my hobby. When I win, I put the money to something tangible. Over the years I have paid off a house, car, various items of furniture and taken holidays. No I am not a millionaire from the punt, I am not prepared to take that level of risk.
      And my hobby supports an industry that feeds thousands of workers from the producers of grains and hays, to saddlers and equipment makers to trainers and jockeys and stablehands, horse transport companies, stud farms, horse handlers etc etc.

      If I am a gambler then so is every stock market player. BTW when the GFC was eroding my superannuation, and my ever so clever financial advisors did not see it coming, I was winning on the punt! The horses did not fall for shonky credit products like those offered by Lehman etc

      Again though, the do- gooders want to destroy legitimate pastimes, enjoyments and recreational pursuits for the many because of a few who misuse the opportunities available.

    • Jack says:

      03:10pm | 04/11/09

      Dear Anthony,

      As someone who holds degrees in commerce and finance, a masters of applied finance and works with money and applied statistics all day, I am clearly unqualified to decide whether or not to buy a scratch ticket or play some poker at home.

      Thankyou for protecting me from GAMBLOR, and the evilness that is games of chance. Because, you know, I might somehow lose my house or something.

      And, God knows, just because *some* people lack impulse control, the majority should be banned from what many find to be enjoyable pursuits.

      Also: please shut down bars, because some people are alcoholics. And ban cars, because some people speed. And ban paint, because some people sniff it. See where I am going with this?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Lucy Kippist

RT @JenBrockie: A take on social media from India http://t.co/5XCerDTB @tehelkadotcom

Lucy Kippist

RT @alaindebotton: So many of our problems would be alleviated if we had 3 or 4 exceptional friends living within a 2 minute radius.

Paul Colgan

RT @latikambourke: Yes, @PeterSlipperMP is genuine.

Anthony Sharwood

It's terribly unfashionable to admit but my Cityrail train just left on time again

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Interest rate barney barely even rates as interesting

Interest rate barney barely even rates as interesting

Stop all the cheering, cut off the champagne. Prevent the pollies from barking and silence the drums.…

Life slips away while you’re filming it on your phone

Life slips away while you’re filming it on your phone

Some friends of mine had lunch on Saturday with a mate who spent so much time artfully composing photos…

Other stuff to be angry about today (with chorizo pic)

Other stuff to be angry about today (with chorizo pic)

That dopey Spaniard. Three-time Tour de France winner Alberto Contador has been banned for two years,…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: City vs country: What would you change your life for?

Dieter Moeckel says:

We made the tree change from Darwin to Wonbah more than 15 years ago. After fencing, a road, and couple of dams our money was gone. Super is enough to live comfortably. We have geese growing old and stringy the only one that made it to the pot committed Kamakazi by flying into a tree; the chooks are… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

150 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter