The COAG reform agenda, having stalled long ago under Labor’s chaotic governing style, is showing about the same signs of life as the US housing market, if the latest performance reports are anything to by.

Raise your hand if you think we're achieving something. Photo: Ray Strange.

The 2009-10 performance reports released in recent days did not make for pleasant reading. Almost two years after the deadline for Kevin Rudd’s promise to take over the hospital system if the states did not lift their game, we are still no closer to a solution.

Elective surgery waiting times rose nationally while “financial barriers” caused one million Australians to put off seeing a GP. No doubt these financial barriers will only worsen as the inflationary effects of Labor’s stimulus spending come home to roost through higher taxes and interest rate hikes.

At least there was enough data available to provide an accurate picture of the health and hospital system. The affordable housing agreement was more conspicuous for what it didn’t say.

In what Donald Rumsfeld would have termed “known unknowns”, the COAG Reform Council most concerningly could not provide a comprehensive progress report on the National Partnerships on Social Housing; Remote Indigenous Housing; Homelessness; and, the Nation Building and Jobs Plan, “primarily due to limitations in available and comparable performance information”. 

This was compounded by the fact that one of the Council’s priorities for improving the performance reporting framework of the agreement had still not been developed after 18 months: 

The agreement provides that governments will develop performance indicators for the outcome that people have access to housing through an efficient and responsive housing market. No such indicator has been developed in the eighteen months since the agreement was finalised. The council therefore reaffirms its previous recommendation that the indicator (or indicators) be developed. (Page xiv, Executive Summary, National Affordable Housing Agreement: Performance report for 2009-10).

At a time when we have a housing shortage of 202,400, skyrocketing utility bills and rents rising well above general inflation, the fact that we can’t even develop a performance indicator, let alone measure progress of housing reforms is a bad reflection on the Gillard Government, especially after the Prime Minister’s commitment earlier this year to refocus on the COAG reform agenda.

The National Disability Agreement provided much of the same under Gillard Labor, with the COAG Reform Council admitting that they don’t know if people with a disability are getting improved services. 

Data was available for only two of the six National Disability Agreement performance benchmarks. As my colleague, Shadow Minister for Disabilities Senator Mitch Fifield has pointed out it is shameful there is no evidence of improvement for disability services for children aged 0-4. 

Earlier this month, COAG Reform Council Chair Paul McClintock, who has the unenviable task of trying to manage a growing list of reform demands from governments with limited resources, said during a speech to company directors that the CRC’s structure had not evolved to match its heightened role. 

And even though he showed typical restraint expected of a public servant, Mr McClintock still considered it appropriate to say that the CRC has reports on things as serious as health, education and skills, which are still waiting after 12 months without a response from COAG. 

He also outlined a list of reports awaiting response including Indigenous Reform, Disability, Affordable Housing and Healthcare, along with Water Management, Education and Skills and Workforce Development and Education. 

Clearly, the Gillard Government is continuing the Rudd theme of outsourcing responsibility for an ambitious reform agenda to the COAG Reform Council, without first exerting any pressure on relevant agencies to provide up-to-date data to track the progress of reforms. 

Instead of taking responsibility for promised reforms that are way overdue, the Government spends all of its time defending the policies it didn’t promise, like its friendless carbon tax.

Aside from further eroding the Government’s already flagging credibility, this creates more uncertainty for emissions-intensive sectors like the transport industry that already has to navigate a maze of different state regulations due to Labor’s inaction on COAG transport and road reform, and now faces inevitably higher fuel costs under a carbon tax. 

It is high time for this Government to get back to basics and focus on the reforms that are expected of it by mainstream Australia, not the demands of the Greens, who look like increasingly like the ones in the driver’s seat in this minority government. 

47 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • William says:

      06:43am | 28/06/11

      You don’t hear about these issues in the MSM and yet Gillard and Labor supporters say this Government get a tough time in the media. With these issues kept out of the MSM by a compliant Canberra Press Gallery Gillard and her team are getting an easy ride by the media. Imagine the Gillards polls if these issues were on the front pages and in the nightly news.

    • NigelC says:

      07:27am | 28/06/11

      The consistent lack of action on non-mainstream issues is, sadly a hallmark of this government and one of the reasons they will be tossed out at the next election.  Instead of focusing on governing and then accepting that the press gallery will report on their activity, they first watch what is reported and then govern accordingly. We need more people in parliament like Marise who do what is right, rather than doing what the media tell them is popular.

    • Andy1 says:

      08:39am | 28/06/11

      All we hear from the canberra press gallery is Tony Abbott negative, no policies, isn’t popular, would be no good as PM, doesn’t have the goods, and everything about him is a stunt.
      Julia Gillard is doing a good job considering tough agenda and minority Government, is attacking the tough issues, is learning and improving, will be more popular further down the track, good negotiator.
      How wrong, misleading and out of touch with the electorate the canberra press gallery are.

    • RyaN says:

      11:51am | 28/06/11

      @William: that would be wishful thinking, like imagine Mal Farr actually covered this issue! Nope to unrealistic to even contemplate.

    • Against the Man says:

      06:57am | 28/06/11

      Labor chaotic? This government get back to basics? Ok maybe things will change. But with Gilltard in charge, doesn’t seem like it is going to happen. The fake PM doesn’t care about Australia or Australians, if she does I don’t see one iota of it in her daily incompetence…..........

    • Sony b Goode says:

      08:28am | 28/06/11

      What can you expect from the party of professional parasites? The only agenda these envyists have is preventing anyone from getting ahead and keeping themselves in power at any price. There is not a single bit of ideology that these union hacks and thugs can fall back on, that has stood the test of time.

      A party dedicated towards destroying prosperity in a prosperous society is like letting loose jack the ripper in a whorehouse.

      Socialists are a blight on the planet and humanity, hiding behind the banner of fake compassion, they should be relegated to the dustbin of history.

      Labor mortgaging the future to offer today’s free lunch.

    • Tom says:

      08:52am | 28/06/11

      I remember all the true believers in the media fawning over Kevin07 when he uttered, “The buck stops here”. The more gullible one in the electorate sucked it all up and the rest is ...  ... ... 

      It was vomit then and is cold vomit now.

      @ATM, well said. A “fake” PM running a “fake” government making “fake” promises to titillate a criminally stupid media and a gullible electorate.

    • Against the Man says:

      10:25am | 28/06/11

      Wasn’t the buck stops with me comment about the federal government’s 100% take over of hospitals as part of its health care reform?

      And isn’t health care reform dead, buried and rotting away in Roxon’s backyard?

      Interesting indeed.

    • Tom says:

      11:12am | 28/06/11

      Sure was ATM 100%. Anyone with half a brain would have understood it most likely could not have been delivered because the constitutional problems of States giving up powers to the Feds. Even wall to wall Labor governments would not agree on a model.

      However, you did not hear our esteemed media calling B/S at the time and you don’t hear the media trumpeting anything today. Strange? Not really, our left wing media is really pretty mediocre.

    • Tubesteak says:

      08:56am | 28/06/11

      The main reform COAG needs is to get rid of the states altogether and increase the size of Councils so that they encompass about 1 million people each and are only responsible for maintenance and rubbish disposal. All planning issues should be under the Federal Government so that we can silence the NIMBYs.

      This would require significant Constitutional reform, obviously.

    • Malleeringneck says:

      09:44am | 28/06/11

      The councils are more incompetent than the State Governments and raise rates at a level higher than the tax rates by the government.

    • Tubesteak says:

      10:04am | 28/06/11

      Councils won’t be responsible for rates. They’ll be given money for maintenance of roads/community areas and rubbish collection. They will be subject to elections though

    • C1 says:

      11:13am | 28/06/11

      I wouldn’t trust the councils.

      Sydney City Council has just voted on formally declaring the arrival of white settlers in 1788 as an ‘invasion’. You would have this PC rubbish multipled 10 fold.

    • Tubesteak says:

      12:16pm | 28/06/11

      C1
      No, they won’t. They won’t have any power. Even if they do rewrite their own documents all educational policies are determined at Federal level. Therefore, the only thing changing is a few crusty old documents at Council chambers that no-one reads and no-one cares about.

      Plus, with more people voting the less you see of the basket-weaving types like Clover Moore.

    • Alicia says:

      09:08am | 28/06/11

      Gillard thinks that it’s just the carbon tax that’s causing her grief and that everything else is going well for her and it’s going to be good once she gets it through, she has to be kidding. I think also adding to her diabolical polls this morning is the fact she laughed at the idea of a plebiscite to allow the voters a say on her carbon tax. We were lead to believe by the media that it was just Abbott pulling a stunt and attempted to make a joke of him. I would say her giggling and laughing at him over it has caused her to come off second best.
      She’s probably not even aware of the other issues that Marisse has reminded us of today. Why don’t the media start reporting the whole story about this inept Gillard Government instead of wasting their time with cheap pot shots at Abbott.

    • Pansy says:

      09:44am | 28/06/11

      Marise you are laughable.  Isnt this just a case of Labor having to clean up after all the lazy Howard years?  No Climate change, No Health reform, No substantial pension increases, No Housing, Very little in education, No infrastructure (roads especially), No Murray River solution (even though there were droughts), A Defence force in a shambles, No enterprising broadband Scheme for the good of the country, a shocking Foreign Debt legacy - there are so many more.  Howard did pay off the inherited debt and through a mining boom used all the money to pay middle class welfare and garner votes, and also help in the death of over 300,000 innocent victims in the Iraq war!  Labor is in a mess at the moment but gee they do have a lot of cleaning up to do and I just wish people would read and learn about Abbotts ‘Direct Action’ climate plan.  It will cost us three or four times more than a carbon tax and the media just leaves it alone.  It is so frightening.

    • Butch says:

      09:52am | 28/06/11

      And the Labor Government under 2 Prime Ministers and 4 years in power haven’t completed any of the issues you have raised. I know who’s laughable Pansy.

    • persephone says:

      10:02am | 28/06/11

      Butch

      Climate change - action delayed by Liberals reneging on deals made. In progress.

      Health reform - in progress.

      Pension increases - tick. Delivered. More to come.

      Housing - increased funding in this area.

      Education - new national curriculum (promised by Howard for years). Computers in schools almost completed (by due date). Biggest renewal of school infrastructure in Australia’s history. My School website (promised by Howard for years). Review of teaching standards.

      Murray River - in progress.

      Defence Force - several reviews in progress.

      NBN - rolled out across Tasmania and several mainland sites. Telstra structurally separated and historic deal signed off which will allow faster roll out.

      All things Howard never got around to doing in eleven years.

    • L. says:

      10:50am | 28/06/11

      “NBN - rolled out across Tasmania”

      Liar..

      It is not rolled out “across Tas”.. It has been rolled out in some very selective (read politically sensitive) Tas suburbs.

    • L. says:

      10:56am | 28/06/11

      “Defence Force - several reviews in progress.”

      Big whoop…

      Howard got us the F-111 replacements… Super Hornets and JSF business.

      Howard got us the C-17’s.

      Howard got us the C-130 upgrades.

      Howard got the AWD underway.

      Howard got us new Abrams MBT’s.

      Howard got us new lead in fast jet trainers.

      Howard got us new Armadale class patrol boats.

      Howard got us the Collins Class sub upgrades.

      Howard got us the F-18 HUG’s, which make RAAF F-18 “Classics” the most advanced F-18C’s in the world.

      Want me to keep going Pers..??

    • Bob says:

      11:11am | 28/06/11

      Computers in schools almost completed (by due date) - thats a lie. (remember Rudd being attacked on Q&A about that delay back when he was still PM).
      Health reform? When was that promised to be completed? 1 year ago or was it 2 years ago? We’ll just say a long time ago.

    • C1 says:

      11:19am | 28/06/11

      @pers,

      Of the 8 ‘achievements’ you referred to 6 are ‘in progress’. Something is only an achievement when it is done. It is like saying what a great achievement it is that my daughter has completed her schooling when she is just finishing Year 1.
      Come see me when these ‘works of progress’ have been ‘achieved’.

    • persephone says:

      11:26am | 28/06/11

      L

      stand corrected on the NBN and Tasmania! Thank you.

      As for all those Defence items - were they all in his first four years? I think not.

      And ‘buying things’ is not the same as ‘reform’.

      Which is why we need to have all of the reviews we have at present - because the ADF isn’t functioning properly, despite all that bright shiny new hardware.

      Take it that you have no other holes to pick in anything I’ve said?

    • persephone says:

      11:34am | 28/06/11

      Bob

      no, the computers in schools program was meant to be rolled out by the end of 2011, so it’s right on track.

      http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/DigitalEducationRevolution/Pages/default.aspx

      ‘The primary aim of the Fund is to achieve a computer to student ratio of 1:1 for students in Years 9 to 12 by the end of 2011.’

      Health reform was always going to be a slow process - as I said, that’s why Howard didn’t tackle it. He wasn’t in to long term.

      C1

      and some of them will be ‘in progress’ forever, because they’re ongoing.

      Doesn’t mean there’s nothing being delivered, just that not everything has been.

      What had Howard achieved after three and a half years in government?

      None of this stuff is easy - if it had been, the Liberals would have done some of it.

      I repeat: if that;s all the holes you guys can pick in my list, it’s a pretty good one.

    • Michael says:

      12:03pm | 28/06/11

      persephone, simply dismissing someones alternate point of view does not mean you have achieved anything other than being dismissive, to acknowledge you have misrepresented the truth in such a flippant way shows me you have no regard or respect for the truth and seek to spin everything into a “win” by baffling yourself with your own bullshit.

      Go back to yesterday and read through all of the posts about Tony Abbott spinning the truth and there you will see your own work, where you have admitted error you think that giving it a millisecond of acknowledgement excuses the fact that your arguement is built on lies.

      Everyone else has it so wrong don’t they persephone, if only you could just make us see the truth? i’ll give you a tip…stop telling lies and covering them up with more lies/half truths.

    • persephone says:

      12:21pm | 28/06/11

      Michael

      what nonsense.

      L pointed out I was wrong, I checked, confirmed that I was, and thanked L for pointing it out.

      What exactly was I supposed to do differently?

      I’d have to be about the only person on this blog who is prepared to admit when I’ve made a mistake, and I get canned for it!

      Go figure.

      Unlike the majority of posters here, I am neither arrogant enough to believe that I don’t make mistakes or to pretend that I know everything.

      What do you do when someone points out you’ve made an error? Ignore it?

    • L. says:

      12:58pm | 28/06/11

      “Take it that you have no other holes to pick in anything I’ve said? “

      Absolutely I do…

      You didn’t specify “first 4 yrs”... you said:

      “All things Howard never got around to doing (including defence) in eleven years.”

      Eleven yrs Pers..!!!, your words… Don’t try and back pedel claiming you meant “first term”.

      Reform..?? You think a review or 2 is “reform”..??

      No, Defence reform is bringing our military well and truley into the 21st century. That is reform, from the sorry state it was in after Labor.

      But I’ll keep going..

      Howard gave us new Attck Helo’s (Tigers)..(Reform, we did not have these prior).

      Howard gave us MHR90 Blackhawk upgrades.

      Howard gave us anti-armour missles (Hellfire 2) for our helo’s (reform, another capability we didn’t have).

      I’ll keep going on defence if you want..??

    • Michael says:

      01:06pm | 28/06/11

      I say i’m sorry persephone when i am proven wrong, even if i’m not proven wrong but someone takes me the wrong way i say sorry.

      What i don’t do is come in here daily and spread misinformation, that is your self appointed position, proselyte.

      You persephone, as a teacher, historian, political agitator and policy writer/developer have a professional obligation to chack your facts, surely?

      The great unwashed do not have the same burden as their opinion is far less qualified than yours, according to your self promotion and appraisal pers’ smile

      I’m just helping you be all you claim to be dear.

    • persephone says:

      01:30pm | 28/06/11

      L

      yes, by all means keep on going.

      As I said, you’re confusing buying things for reform, and your only real problem with anything I’ve outlined is with Defence.

      I can live with that - 6 1/2 out of 8 still makes Howard a dismal failure.

      Michael

      your obsession with me is very interesting.

      There are multiple posters on this site who are here every day and demonstrably spread misinformation. They never admit when they’re wrong.

      You don’t seem to have a problem with them.

      Hypocrite.

      Stop stalking me and spend your time doing something useful.

      As far as I can see, your only contribution to this site is whinging about me.

      At least L.‘s being factual and thus adding something real to the discussion.

    • Michael says:

      01:57pm | 28/06/11

      persephone, again with the misinformation. i have called others on the very same thing i call you on, pots calling kettles black.

      http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/jusy-tobbos-not-a-crisis-of-multiculturalism/

      I find you most interesting as you offer me the most opportunities to respond…you are articulate and have a great vocab’ you have many opinions and i enjoy reading them very much, however my constructive criticism remains. If this makes you uncomfortable, say so and i will leave you alone.

      More truth, less spin, logic over emotive responses.

      I think sometimes you create wriggle room by either finely focussing your arguement to the point where there is no periphery for other opinions to exist or you zoom out broadly to a point where it’s a bit too general or you can slide a little instead of being pinned down to a particular view.

    • L. says:

      02:04pm | 28/06/11

      “As I said, you’re confusing buying things for reform, and your only real problem with anything I’ve outlined is with Defence.”

      Because that is my area of interest and speciality.

      DO don’t seem to understand that the shiny new toys Howard approved ARE reform, reform in the sense that the way we now fight is light years from how we used to. Howard’s team had the foresight to see that, and more closely align ourselves with the worlds only remaining super power.

      Now, Labor’s military “reform”..?

      Just what exactly would that be..?? Seriously, what..?? All Labor has done is rubber stamp everything Howard agreed to, inclusive of staying in Afghanistan.

      A review into sexual harrsement in the military..?? Gee, do you really think that has never been done before..?

    • persephone says:

      02:14pm | 28/06/11

      L.

      depends on what you mean by ‘reform’.

      Anyone can buy shiny new things. That’s not at all hard.

      Buying the right shiny new things - from what I know (and I admit my Defence contacts are probably not as good as yours - family member quite high up in Navy, a few ‘lifers’ in the army) not all of those shiny new things were good buys.

      But the reforms Labor is undertaking - hence the reviews, which are a necessary step - are cultural.

      More difficult, but probably even more important.

      We need people operating those shiny new things, and we need to make sure that they’re the best people we can get, and that we retain them.

      Attracting and retaining good people has long been a problem for the ADF (and my circle of friends contain quite a few ex-ADF members).

      Tackling the cultural problems within the Defence Forces is a huge task, and one which several ministers have put in the too hard basket. In some cases, even looking like they might be thinking that perhaps something to do with the ADF culture might need to change has seen Ministers mysteriously depart.

      So Howard did the easy bit and didn’t always do that right either.

      In far less time that it took Howard to even think of having one of his Ministers look at true reform of the ADF (and he never really did) Labor has undertaken this.

    • persephone says:

      09:56am | 28/06/11

      So it would appear the problem here is that the government has asked for various performance indicators to be put in place, so that whether or not taxpayers are getting value for money for programs can be ascertained.

      Are you seriously telling us, Senator, that the Howard government did not have these measures in place already?

      A bit rich to criticise the Gillard government for attempting to do something your government obviously put in the too hard basket!

    • Neil says:

      10:22am | 28/06/11

      The difference is Labor sell themselves on these issues with time frames while slagging the Howard Government and it never comes to fruition. It’s called amateurism and trying to be popular.

    • Sony b goode says:

      11:14am | 28/06/11

      Labor never care about value for money, since they believe in a free lunch to be paid for by stealing and mortgaging tomorrow’s prosperity and filthy redistribution under the banner of fake compassion, fraudulent environmental concern and the politics of class warfare and envy.

    • persephone says:

      11:37am | 28/06/11

      Neil

      OMG - fancy giving yourself timeframes to do stuff in!!

      Better to at least try and achieve something than put it in the ‘too hard’ basket and not attempt it, as the Howard government did.

      And even Marise admits that some of the reforms have been achieved.

      Sony

      so isn’t it good, then, that they’re putting these measures in place, so that it’s clear whether they’re achieving value for money or not?

    • CapitalBoy says:

      02:47pm | 30/06/11

      Persephone - Would I be mistaken if you were an English teacher of mine a few years back?

    • Wilma J Craig says:

      10:29am | 28/06/11

      Small wonder COAG & it’s, alleged, Reform Programme have stalled.
      The very name Council of Australian Governments (COAG) says it all.
      Who are on this expensive inactive, moribund Council?
      Politicians, that’s who!
      In SA there is a Government which epitomises all our politicians: All talk & no action. Plans, plans & more plans are put forward but that is as far as they get. They can’t even get the legislation the do get passed right. Just look at their silly legislation which was to show how “Tough we are on Law & Order” covering the so-called Bikie Gangs. A total, utter & complete failure. Challenged in the High Court their stupid laws get tossed out because they are Un-Constitutional or simply downright illegal.
      COAG is no different. All their meetings are nothing more than very expensive talkfests.The politicians stay at Taxpayer’s expense at the very best hotels. They eat, again at Tazpayer’s expense at the finest restaurants. They fart-arse around, again all at Taxpayer’s expense in chauffeor-driven limos, & depending on their position, rather than walking or 4 or 5 piling into the same car to travel a couple of hundred metres to the same luxury hotel they have Sole Use.
      COAG is a joke. It achieves nothing & it’s particpants are doing the one thing they are really good at: Bludging off the Taxpayers

    • Steve says:

      11:46am | 28/06/11

      “Instead of taking responsibility for promised reforms that are way overdue, the Government spends all of its time defending the policies it didn’t promise, like its friendless carbon tax”

      What more needs to be said?

    • Blazes says:

      12:18pm | 28/06/11

      The best thing about this article is the title.

    • Daniel says:

      12:46pm | 28/06/11

      Marise, We are in a hung parliament and there are more interests to take into consideration. I think the Liberals have never recovered about losing the last election.

    • ausspud says:

      01:49pm | 28/06/11

      Good ol labor,the party of chaos and destruction.
      If labor ever does anything on-time,on-budget,without the usual stuff-ups ill eat my boxers.

    • luke says:

      02:00pm | 28/06/11

      Gillard is always saying she is making tough decisions and that is why she is now rating poorly as PM, the fact is she is making bad decisions. Gillard would be better off not using the word tough when she actually means bad.

      The bad decisions that are costing her are,
      Saying there will be no carbon tax under a government I lead, then doing exactly that.

      Destroying the livelihood of the cattle industry families without actually investigating the allegations of animal cruelty first.

      The relentless failures associated with border protection East Timor, PNG and now the infamous Malaysian solution all failing over well before even getting started.

      The BER bllions of dollars over budget.

      The Gillard government continually confuses the word reform with the word the word tough, oops, I mean bad.

    • persephone says:

      07:52pm | 28/06/11

      luke

      So going for a carbon price was thus a tough decision, because she knew it would be used against her.

      And are you denying that cattle were being mistreated? Because I don’t know of anyone else - not the cattle industry, not their peak body, not the Opposition - who is questioning that.

      The BER happened when she was Minister, not PM. And it wasn’t billions of dollars over budget.

      As for the Malaysian solution, a bit early to make any judgements about that.

      Interestingly, Senator Pyne seems to be supporting the reforms referred to above; she’s complaining that they’re not happening fast enough.

      So she’s not denying they’re reforms.

    • lesley laurel says:

      06:34pm | 28/06/11

      marise is a major payne

    • lesley laurel says:

      06:41pm | 28/06/11

      if Kevin Rudd, the Saviour of Australia, returns as PM, then the commonwealth will take over all the states’ health systems , wealth systems and stealth systems.
      Until then, Julia Gillard will be guided by all effluence, affluence and influence within Australia

    • Perseus Remus says:

      05:36pm | 29/06/11

      There’s only one thing wrong with your analysis Marise; it’s a fraud!

      Labor got COAG going again after years of threats and intimidation by the Howard government. Over 96 separate tied funding agreements were streamlined down to something like eight. Incentive-based payments saw elective surgery waiting lists come down in Victoria for two years in a row, for example.

      More frequent COAG meetings saw more effective goal-setting take place. And with respect to your example of health, the Commonwealth and the States have butted out a new health reform deal. The third wave economic reform agenda continues, for example, with respect to weights and measures and the Australian Consumer Law.

      Labor took a chaotic process of threats under the Howard govt and counter threats and positional bargaining and injected a healthy dose of cooperation and principled negotiations.

      How about you get your facts straight before you get on your soap box, Marise?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

#Thomson will never get brothel tapes, CCTV-in-brothels experts tell the ABC. http://t.co/7YFORBBJ

Daniel Piotrowski

@ToryShepherd there's always time for Din Tai Fung.

ToryShepherd

@drpiotrowski will be there just in time for Din Tai Fung

Daniel Piotrowski

@ToryShepherd I hope that's in your piece tomorrow. Also - are you coming over this week or laaaaaater?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Bill Kelty made a memorable speech last week. Addressing the ACTU Congress Dinner in Sydney, the legendary…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Speaking of yourself in the third person is usually a sign that you’re suffering from delusions…

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

If South Australia had just arrived in the world, red and wrinkled and mewling, what would we call it?…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

241 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter