That raging red top, Prime Minister Julia Gillard, has promoted and demoted with ruthlessness in the last two days. Cricket selectors, after Australia’s unacceptable defeat on the raging green top in Hobart, must do likewise.

Seeyas. Pic: AFP

Really, no one gives a stuff about the reshuffled deckchairs on the rapidly-sinking Titanic that is this Federal Government. But cricket selection matters. Unlike Federal Labor, there is actually some fresh talent out there.

So here goes. Here’s what should happen after Hobart. It’s ruthless, it’s uncomplicated, and unlike Gillard’s re-shuffle, it might actually make a difference.

David Warner: The Punch argued a couple of weeks back that the selection of T20 specialist Warner could work. Why does patience have to be learned before skill, we argued. We might’ve got something right for once. Warner stays.

Phil Hughes: Lovely bloke, and a talented batsman, but he has issues at the moment. He goes.

Usman Khawaja: In a knife-edge selection, Khawaja deserves one more chance. He was incredibly unlucky to be run out when a big score looked certain in Brisbane. That said, he has a habit of getting out when he looks set for a score. Must deliver soon. But keep for now, if only so we can enjoy those silky cover drives.

Ricky Ponting: He gave a telling interview in the lead-up to the Hobart Test when he said “The day [of my retirement] is going to come, I know the day is going to come… I know I’ve got some work to do because the last 12 months have been almost a shadow of the way I’ve played for the 12 years before that, and I want to get back to the way I know Ricky Ponting can play.”

Ain’t going to happen. Ponting ain’t ever getting his groove back. It’s officially gone. His dismissal in the first innings falling across his crease to be struck plumb LBW, was a mirror of a dismissal that just keeps happening. The spooned catch in the second innings was just lame. No batsman in Australian history has been given this much grace. He’s our best since Bradman, and he averages a whopping 79 against India in Australia. Fat chance he’ll do that this time. He goes.

Michael Clarke: He continues to do a good job in the field, but is only making runs every second Test or so. Her makes tons, then makes ducks. More consistency please, Pup. He stays.

Mike Hussey: If a young batsman had performed as Hussey did in the October series against Sri Lanka, he would’ve earned a year’s worth of chances. Hussey has barely made a run since and must go. Players in their late 30s are invaluable. Their experience in all aspects of the game is fantastic for young players. The counterpoint is that you don’t get better as you get older. Not after 35, you don’t. Hussey has served brilliantly. Now he well is drying up. He goes.

Brad Haddin: Ironically, his glove work was great in Hobart. But he’s another who just doesn’t make runs consistently enough and he’s also the wrong side of 35. He goes.

Peter Siddle: He seems to be getting better with age. In Hobart he was always dangerous and was easily the fastest man onfield. He is also gutsy with bat in hand. He stays.

James Pattinson: It’ll be interesting how he goes against sterner opposition, but he has done all that could’ve been asked in his debut series. He stays.

Mitchell Starc: Kerry O’Keefe made an interesting observation of Starc in Hobart, noting that while he is occasionally very hostile, and does plenty with the ball, he hasn’t yet found a “stock delivery”. A season or two of Shield cricket should fix that. He goes.

Nathan Lyon: Has a happy knack of taking wickets, which no Australian spinner since Warne has managed. But someone, please, give him batting lessons. Inept Number 11s are comical. Watching NZ’s Chris Martin bat is hilarious. But in Australia, we don’t accept that. If Glenn McGrath could make a Test 50, Nathan Lyon can be shown how to keep out a straight ball. While someone works on that, he stays.

The Punch’s team for Boxing Day (assuming all players fit):

David Warner, Ed Cowan, Usman Khawaja, Shaun Marsh, Michael Clarke, Shane Watson, Tim Paine, Peter Siddle, James Pattinson, Ryan Harris, Nathan Lyon

Yours?

92 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Steve Perry says:

      11:10am | 13/12/11

      Nice suggestions.

      I have to admit that I felt a little sad yesterday watching Ricky leave the field knowing that would likely be the last time we see him in international test cricket. I hope that Cricket Australia will at least let him announce his retirement before he is officially dropped.

    • Magnus Vaisnys says:

      11:18am | 13/12/11

      Trade Wade for Paine and you’re there.

    • Arnold Layne says:

      10:50pm | 13/12/11

      Agreed.  Paine has been injured for ages and Wade has stepped up in his absence.  Bad luck for Paine but that’s life.  Wade gets the spot.

    • Edward says:

      11:20am | 13/12/11

      Australia loves punter.  I think someone in selections secretly hates him. Why are they waiting for him to be remembered as a pathetic lingerer, like an old bloke who refuses to stop driving, no matter how many of his neighbors cats he’s run over.

    • Farken says:

      11:36am | 13/12/11

      which Australia are you talking about . the one that wants tony abbott as the pm! ha ha ha

    • Brad says:

      07:17pm | 13/12/11

      No, Australia does not love Punter. He is the man that lost us the Ashes way too many times. He is the man that stood in the way of Warnie becoming captain. Love him or hate him, if Warnie had of been made captain instead of Punter, we wouldn’t be in this mess.

    • Shane says:

      07:43am | 14/12/11

      How can Australia love punter?  The man lost the ashes through extremely poor captaincy and proved he was a crap captain over and over again.  He was given the captaincy because the ACB didn’t want to give it to Shane Warne, because Warne had a problem keeping things in his pants.  Apparently the ACB finds alcohol and gambling much more attractive vices for a captain.

    • Tim says:

      11:24am | 13/12/11

      Warner, Watson, Marsh, Ponting, Clarke, Hussey, Haddin, Siddle, Pattinson, Harris, Lyon.
      Assuming everyone is fit.

      Sharwood’s just trying to stir up some controversy by dropping all the old blokes in one go but the fact is there’s no ready replacements who are in form at the moment and we need some experience to get us through this series with India.
      I would say that both Haddin and Ponting are out at the end of this summer and Hussey gets one more year.
      Hughes and Khawaja need to go back and work on their games before they get another chance.

    • TChong says:

      11:38am | 13/12/11

      Good comment and line up.
      With Cummins , possibly Hughes amongst others in reserve, the future is looking brighter.
      We ws spoilt with the recent Goldenn era, the younguns will just need a season or two.

    • n_dude says:

      11:43am | 13/12/11

      Agreed, but I think the time is ripe for Watson to be dropped down the order. Australia are going to rely more on his bowling whilst the attack is still inexperienced and green. I think Ponting will be the one who should go to make this happen. We also need a specialist opener who is in form.

    • gobsmack says:

      11:49am | 13/12/11

      @Tim
      Experience wasn’t much help when Australia was 2/159 chasing 241.
      Also, I don’t think having two sloggers opening is a good idea.

    • Gherkin says:

      12:04pm | 13/12/11

      What’s the point of “getting through” a series if you’re back to square 1 when it’s over?

      No point having vets get low scores in tests. Better to give some freshies a chance. At best, they rise to the occasion. At worst, they get match practice on the big stage.

      I love Punter, Huss and Haddin, but if they can’t dominate NZ, they’re not going to dominate India.

      Would be different if we were winning comfortably despite the vets not getting runs (like when Tubby was failing, but the team was still winning).

    • Tim says:

      12:14pm | 13/12/11

      Gherkin,
      I don’t think we should simply make changes for change’s sake.
      Your kind of argument only works if the young blokes are actually in good form and pushing for selection.
      I don’t think any of them are at the moment and we should pick a team on who we think will perform best against India.
      I still think that includes Ponting, Hussey and Haddin.

    • wolf says:

      01:07pm | 13/12/11

      Holding together the middle order is a BIG job, and it needs a BIG man to do that job.
      Select Cossie.

    • Tubesteak says:

      02:02pm | 13/12/11

      Totally agree with n_dude. Watson should be further down the order to preserve huim. Standing in the sun and boaling all day and then walking out first with the bat is not sustainable.

      Lyon: we should never have to rely on #11 for batting skills. This means the batsmen have failed so it’s not a bowler’s fault if a batting innings falls over.

    • Gherkin says:

      03:11pm | 13/12/11

      @Tim it’s not just change for the sake of it. It’s change for the purpose of blooding young talent for the future. You don’t becom a test level batsman playing Shield cricket.

    • MK says:

      03:17pm | 13/12/11

      It’s not change for change sake,
      If the older experienced players dont provide stability in testing times,
      and are generally not performing
      what is the point of keeping them in the team
      At least if you promote a young player who can average 30, and still crumple like a wet tissue,
      and the end of a series that young palyer has test experience, and might have developed, you might have found somone who can cope with the pressure of test cricekt and could be around for years to come.
      Australia has long resisted change untill recently, the old arguments of no one ready to come in, which are bollocks, Warner would have never been given a change if he was around 8 eyars ago,
      Luckily losing nearly all the test bowlers to injury proved we do have quite a few capable young bowlers

    • Matthew says:

      08:16am | 14/12/11

      Tim, they’re just prolonging the pain.  Get new players in and they’ll take a few years to settle.  Keep the old guys getting the same/lower scores than the young ones then when they finally retire you’re stuck with that few years to settle anyway.

      Give them the chance now and they’ll be ready sooner and we won’t be losing forever (and the young players will be still young instead of being nearly 30!)

    • Bear says:

      09:11am | 14/12/11

      There are others who should get a shot though, one or more of, Cowan, Christian, Ferguson, Wade or Paine. Yea and why the hell is Watson contiually included as a ‘must’ opener. He’s bowling a lot and he doesn’t even have the temperament for an opener, should be 5 or 6. We seem determined to not pick the best team!

    • K says:

      11:28am | 13/12/11

      If fit - Warner, Cowan, Marsh, Clarke, Watson, Ferguson, Wade, Siddle, Pattinson/Cummins, Harris, Lyon (12th - Khawaja)

    • Macca says:

      12:09pm | 13/12/11

      Ferguson ahead of Dan Christian?

    • Rev says:

      04:51pm | 13/12/11

      It never ceases to amuse when people select Ferguson…for god’s sake the guy can’t even average 40 in FC cricket, and plays half his home matches at the road known as the Adelaide Oval!!!

    • Andrew says:

      07:19pm | 13/12/11

      That fact that you think cummins might be fit shows how much you really follow cricket, its been all ove rthe news that he wont start training again until the end of january and proberly wont play foe australia all summer. Feguson averages 35 in shield cricket, has one score out of a number of innings this year, how is he in better form then ponting etc

    • Ben C says:

      11:31am | 13/12/11

      I’d have Khawaja coming in at 4 or 5, with Marsh at 3. Cowan deserves a chance, has been showing some blistering form over the past couple of years. I doubt Harris will have enough match fitness, which is why I’d be looking at Copeland or Bollinger. Paine or Haddin - too close to call.

    • Farken says:

      11:32am | 13/12/11

      man of the match in Hobart should have been the pitch

    • gobsmack says:

      01:10pm | 13/12/11

      The pitch was a beauty.
      I think green tops should be compulsory in Shield games to separate the batsmen with genuine class from the flat track sloggers.

    • Macca says:

      02:35pm | 13/12/11

      Gobsmack. Agreed, although how could you separate the Peter Siddles from the Shaun Taits. Bowlers need to grind too.

    • gobsmack says:

      06:27pm | 13/12/11

      @Macca
      Not sure, generally any pitch will dry out after a day or two.  There doesn’t seem to be the variety of pitches around the country that there once was.

    • sir ronald bradnam says:

      11:45am | 13/12/11

      More to the point, how embarassing for Warner to end up as MOTM should never go to a player in a losing team.
      Also take the eagle eye technology away from channel 9 and have someone independant run it as that was all that let the game get that close and rob the kiwis two or three of those decisions were clearly showing more than 50% of the ball heading into the stumps yet miraculously the ball veered at the end to miss the stumps in a very favourable australian decision, unbiased not.
      Kerry Okeefes comment at about 2pm on day one there is only one team that can win it from here, priceless.

    • Adam Diver says:

      11:59am | 13/12/11

      I assume the camera is not directly behind the pitch, because the eagle eye, and my eyes were quite different particular where the ball bounced and where the ball hit the pads.

      On a positive the referal system only added to the drama at the end IMO.

    • I hate pies says:

      12:27pm | 13/12/11

      They have 2 cameras - one on the offside of the stumps and one on the legside. So you never get a completely front on view (other than stump cam)

    • Jono says:

      12:32pm | 14/12/11

      I agree.  With The first review that Lyon had from Southee.  The ball certainly didn’t appear to pitch outside leg, maybe going down. I understand the difference in camera angles, but the time it took for that eagle eye to come up was MUCH longer than the appeal Lyon had with Bracewell the next over.

      Don’t think channel 9 can be trusted.

    • gobsmack says:

      11:46am | 13/12/11

      Anyone seen that vodafone ad where Australian cricketers talk about what they need to improve.  It features Ponting, Hussey, Mitch Johnson, Bollinger and Clarke.
      These companies must regret filming their ads before the cricket season starts.

    • Sambobs says:

      07:13am | 14/12/11

      @ I hate pies, for eagle-eye there are way more cameras than that. What you are thinking of is hot-spot which does only have two cameras.

      I agree with a previous comment that Ponting and Haddin should be dropped and Hussey kept. Hussey will offer the right amount of age and experience and has shown in the last 2 years that when it is really needed he can still produce the big innings, which Ponting cannot. Haddin has always been a flat-track bully. His big scores only ever come whent he pitch/ball is doing nothing. He is also a liability with the gloves, even though his stumpting was a piece of brilliance, moments like those have been few and far between in his career. The longer you keep these oldies the longer you delay the inevitable, sooner or later you need to replace them, may as well do it now. This touring Indian team are going to struggle with the ball. Ishant is not the same man he once was only Zaheer offers and real danger and he may not be fit. This is the perfect opportunity for Aus’ young-ones to step up to the plate. Please don’t drop Kawajha, the big scores will come very soon, he is a class act and a man I can see as a world class No.3 for years to come

    • Andy says:

      08:41am | 14/12/11

      I don’t know why everyone is bagging haddin, he had the third best batting average for the series, following a great last dig in South Africa, and his keeping was outstanding. If anything he has bought himself more time in the baggy green.

    • Esteban says:

      11:48am | 13/12/11

      Why is everone so upset about Hobart? The team is on the improve. We only scored 42 in a second innings in South Africa a few weeks ago.

      This second innings dig at hobart was much bettter.

      If you recall Katich the top of the list looks so much more stable.

    • MarkS says:

      12:19pm | 13/12/11

      I am distressed; the dismal Australian team is in dire straits after a depressing result due to the dreadful batting of a deplorable team in what has been a disappointing series.

    • Esteban says:

      12:58pm | 13/12/11

      Don’t despair too much MarkS. The hard part is to assemble a bowling attack than can bowl out the opposition. Our present youthfull crop of bowlers are looking the goods going forward.

      In a country like Australia the easier part should be the top 6. Bad luck the whole middle order failed in one innings. usually someone steps up.

      Dropping to 4th in the world for a period of time is not as bad as the dark days after WSC decimated the team and we hit the bottom. (Some say 1985) After the team was just starting to get better there was a rebel tour of South Africa that resulted in bans that hurt us again.

      If we bottom out at 4th best in the world and get back to the top in say 2 to 3 years I will be delighted.

      I am very optomistic of that happening with these bowlers.

    • GB says:

      11:57am | 13/12/11

      100% agree with you Ant on your assessment of the 11 who played in Hobart in terms of who stays and who goes, but you’re a bit harsh on Lyon’s ability with the bat. He isn’t too bad. As to who to bring in, I disagree slightly. I’d have Wade in before Paine.

    • Gherkin says:

      11:57am | 13/12/11

      1. Agree about Warner. He just looks solid like an opener should be.
      2. Still reckon Katich should be there, but otherwise Cowan looks good.
      3. Marsh all the way. Reliable. Measured. Long haul player.
      4. Clarke. Would fare much better with the more reliable 1, 2 and 3.
      5. CONTROVERSIAL but I’d slot Hughes in here. He’s got something special. Smashes it. Could be the next Steve Waugh given time. But he’s definitely not a test opener.
      6. Watson. Imagine having this gun in at 6. In the mould of Neil Harvey, Sobers.
      7. Paine or Haddo. Much of a muchness.

      The rest would revolve around Pattinson, Cummins, Siddle, Harris and Lyon.

    • Christo says:

      05:09am | 14/12/11

      What part of failure do all the Hughes backers don’t understand. The man has been given that many chances at this level. He needs to go back to shield cricket to prove he still has it, if he ever had it. His style was always going to be found wanting at test level, in fact, it should have been found wanting at shield level.

    • I hate pies says:

      12:08pm | 13/12/11

      SK WARNE…tape up the burnt fingers and he’s ready to go

    • Bill says:

      12:08pm | 13/12/11

      Time to clear out all the deadwood from NSW. They’re bringing the team down. This constant overlooking of all the better-performing players from outside NSW has to stop or the Indians will slaughter us.

    • Strawb says:

      07:22pm | 13/12/11

      Let me guess you’re a Mexican?

    • Andrew says:

      07:22pm | 13/12/11

      Can you name these better performed players Bill?

    • Chris says:

      07:33pm | 13/12/11

      Who are these “best performing people” you refer…

      bet you can’t come up with 3 - typical NSW conspiracy crap.

    • Bear says:

      09:25am | 14/12/11

      3 better performers outside NSW. A bat leant up on a tree stump could potentially last just as long as Hughes. Cutting, (Ok don’t need a bowler) Wade or Paine.

    • Bear says:

      09:43am | 14/12/11

      Warnie would have been an awesome capt. Punter often looked lost since Warney wasn’t there to tell him what to do.

    • Macca says:

      12:12pm | 13/12/11

      Warner
      Watson / Cowan
      Khawaja
      Clarke
      Marsh
      Watson / Christian
      Wade / Paine
      Siddle
      Harris
      Pattinson
      Lyon

      Cummins instead of Hartis if fit.

    • I hate pies says:

      12:15pm | 13/12/11

      Haddin’s got to go. He’s the worst of the lot of them. Every bloody time they’re struggling he comes in an throws the bat at something he shouldn’t and get’s out. I’d leave Ponting in for the time being and get rid of Hussey. Put in the blokes who are most likely to be there for the long term and can play with patience; we’ll cop some losses but so what. Kawajha and Warner have to stay. Hughes has to go - can’t play a ball on off stump.

    • SM says:

      12:56pm | 13/12/11

      Correct except for Ponting.  He will come back to form against India.

    • Little Joe says:

      03:51pm | 13/12/11

      Ponting is mentally gone.

    • Little Joe says:

      06:44pm | 28/12/11

      I stand corrected

    • Kebabpete says:

      01:14pm | 13/12/11

      Who should go? Hughes (Marsh), Ponting (Watson at 6), Haddin (Paine).
      Who will go? Hughes only. He’ll be replaced by the returning Watson (who shouldn’t be opening!).

      Hussey deserves to stay til the end of this summer. You can’t get rid of all the old boys in one go.

      I have it on good authority that Punter is announcing his retirement after the Adelaide test so they are letting him play through til then.

    • RED says:

      01:32pm | 13/12/11

      Are you seriously having a go at Lyon because of his batting? He’s a number 11 for god sake, he hung around a lot longer than many of the players above him! As for comparing him with McGrath, how many innings did he have for that one 50?
      Stupid comment and it reeks of bitterness blaming the poor bloke who was made to try and save a situation he should never have been in in the first place.

    • SM says:

      02:02pm | 13/12/11

      Absolutely right RED.  Lyon kept out 43 balls - that’s a big effort for any number 11.  As if his (or any number eleven’s) batting will ever be a factor in deciding their selection Anthony

    • Andrew says:

      07:32pm | 13/12/11

      Yeah, he batted well, I really dont know what Ant is going on about, as number 11’s go he’s proberly one of the better ones around, hes already scored a few 20’s which isnt to bad., thats not to say he cant and wont improve quite a lot. Warner batted well but why hasnt someone asked why he took a single from the first ball to expose pattinson, you take a single that early and not only is there a chance of losing a wicket but 2 wickets, which the aussie did. Cant see the point in taking a single first ball then asking a tailender to block 5 balls, wouldnt it be better for you to block 3-4 balls then take the single so the tailender only has to block 2 or 3 balls. Either way your only looking at a single per over so why do you want tailenders to face 5 of them, saying that its the first time warner has being in that situation and its easy in hindsight and when your not out in the middle.

    • TheBigMicka says:

      01:51pm | 13/12/11

      Cowan
      Warner
      Marsh
      Ponting
      Clarke
      Watson
      Wade
      Siddle
      Pattinson
      Harris/Starc (Starc in if Harris isn’t fit)
      Lyon
      Khawaja (12th man)

      Hussey and Haddin - gone.  Punter - this is your last summer, make it count.  They won’t be playing for the next Ashes so they have to go now.
      Hughes - just not good enough yet.  Get back to work on that technique.
      Khawaja comes in at the end of the India series or if Marsh’s back goes again.

      And can everyone please stop bringing up Katich.  He’s gone along with Brad Hodge.  They will play no more Test cricket for Australia so get over it.  Find someone under 25 and push for them.  Y’know, youth and the future.

    • Gherkin says:

      04:42pm | 13/12/11

      Cowan’s 29.

    • Eskimo says:

      02:10pm | 13/12/11

      Gillard didn’t drop anyone to the back bench. She merely increased the cabinet by two. Hopefully the Aussie selectors will show her how its done.

    • Tom says:

      04:04pm | 13/12/11

      That’s it! Play two extra players!
      Nah, even with 13 players batting, fielding and bowling the Aussies will be no match for India.

    • Disgusted! says:

      03:02pm | 13/12/11

      Man of the Match should have gone to Bracewell…..... as someone earlier said, you never give a MOTM to a losing team….. I feel the NZ’ers especially Bracewell, have been hard done by again, by us….. shameful!  Plus, never in clarkes speech, did he say well played NZ….. and we wonder, why they give us a hard time!!

    • Tator says:

      04:10pm | 13/12/11

      I disagree, the MOM award should go to the best performance according to the conditions.  Now getting 9 wickets on a greentop as well as favourable atmospheric conditions so the ball swung like a cut snake compared to an opening batsman carrying his bat with an unbeaten 123 on the same minefield with the rest of the team collapsing around him and nearly carrying his team to victory on his own.  Bracewell had a good game but had the deck stacked in his favour and picked up tailenders to pad his figures in the end whilst Warner prospered against the odds in difficult batting conditions against the Kiwi front line pace attack.

    • Little Joe says:

      04:12pm | 13/12/11

      First thing is sack the selectors. Hughes / Ponting were never going to impress.

      Warner
      Katich
      Marsh / Cowan
      Khawaja
      Clarke
      Watson (Captain)
      Wade
      Siddle   (Vice Captain)
      Pattinson
      Cummins / Harris
      Lyon

      Clarke can bat but can’t Captain. The reason why Bracewell bowled so well in the second test is because of Taylor’s captaincy in the first test.

    • Macca says:

      05:37pm | 13/12/11

      Absolute Rubbish.

      Clarke has been an excellent captain. His young bowlers have flourished under him. He has made superb bowling changes that have resulted in M.Hussey breaking multiple crucial partnerships in the past 4 tests to more than double his career stats. He has consistently bowled Lyon at the correct time, placing fields that clean up the tail.

      He has been an excellent captain and the fact that Watson keeps failing to get a ton speaks volumes for his mental endurance.

      We have lost these test matches because experienced (read past their prime) middle order batsmen who average over 50 in test match cricket failed to deliver when they previously have.

      I’m not simply disagreeing with your opinion. I’m saying it’s wrong.

    • gobsmack says:

      06:24pm | 13/12/11

      Clarke’s a good on field captain but his waft to get out in the 2nd innings was like too many of his innings when the match is there to be won.
      Taylor’s 2nd innings knock was a real captain’s grind.

    • Reader says:

      09:37am | 14/12/11

      Mistake there is that Katich and Clarke CANNOT be in the same team, thus why Kat was sacked despite being our best batsman. Katich should have been in and capt and Clarke dropped. But as Clarke had been annointed since he was a ‘Pup’ it was never going to happen that way, regardless of form. Stupid isn’t it? Would never happen in any other sport!

    • Little Joe says:

      10:49am | 14/12/11

      @ Macca .....

      When I look at Australian Cricket Captains, Michael Clarke is up there with Kim Hughes.

      Firstly, I believe that the only reason that Hughes was in the side is because Clarke is Captain which speaks volumes for his leadership because he is putting friendship before the team.

      Using a change-up bowler to break a partnership is hoping that a batsman makes a mistake and bringing in a spinner to skittle the tail is just common sense. But I will think that you will find that the last three wickets in both innings of the second test cost over 30 runs and that Lyon didn’t take a wicket in the first innings.

      I concur with your statement “We have lost these test matches because experienced middle order batsmen who average over 50 in test match cricket failed to deliver when they previously have.” because that includes Clarke.

      As a batting Captain, let’s have a look at Clarks recent batting performance.

      In Sri Lanka he had an average of 25 before his last innings where he scored a century on a flattop.

      In South Africa he scored an excellent century in the first innings of the first test, but then averaged 5 for his next three innings. This included 2 runs in the second innings of the second test when Australia needed a captain’s knock. Luckily, Mitchell Johnson held up the tail allowing Australia to win the test match and draw the series.

      Against New Zealand he scored a lucky century in the first innings of the first test, but then scored only 22 runs in the second test. This included a duck (0 runs) in the second innings of the second test when we needed a captain’s knock. Unfortunately, Lyon couldn’t hold on and we lost the match and drew the series.

      Meanwhile I watched Taylor with great admiration during both tests. It took real leadership when he stepped out slips and moved to long off to settle Bracewell in the first test. He then nutted out a half century in the second innings when his team needed the runs. Compared to Clarke’s duck is the true comparison of captaincies.

    • Little Joe says:

      11:40am | 28/12/11

      @ Macca

      Spreading the field for the last wicket after bagging 6 in the morning session ...... the captain is a moron.

    • Little Joe says:

      06:53pm | 28/12/11

      Clarke fails again ...... contributing only one run.

      The puts Lyons up the order!!!

      Another pathetic display by a pathetic Captain.

      Lets face it ..... the only reason he is Captain is because he is from NSW

    • Arup Saikia says:

      04:30pm | 13/12/11

      Over-reaction to the Hobart defeat where conditions were loaded in favour of the bowlers - without taking anything away from the Kiwis. Australia still has a wide range of bowlers and batters to choose from.
      The India series? Watson, Marsh and Harris will make a difference. India’s bowling resources (in Australian conditions) are wafer-thin; would love to be proved wrong, but cant see them taking 20 wickets every time. The two over-35s in the Aussie batting line-up that the media wants out might get stacks of runs.

    • I hate pies...and Americanisms creeping into crick says:

      05:12pm | 13/12/11

      BatSMEN, they’re called batsmen in cricket.

    • sir ronald bradnam says:

      06:12pm | 13/12/11

      Without taking anything away fromn the kiwis…the aussies had the use of the best bowling conditions on day one and never should have lost from there they also had the advantedge of several very dodgy referal decisions that went in there favour when clearly they were out, even with these advantedges they couldnt win. Aussie cricket is in big trouble.

    • The Labor Landslide says:

      05:00pm | 13/12/11

      Unlike Xmas Day , Boxing Day is the suitable day to meet relatives,friends, acquaintances and bosses .Get out the boxing gloves
      My Boxing Day Team would be Jeff Fenech, Mohammad Ali, George Foreman, Joe Bugner, Danny Green, Tony Mundine, Anthony Mundine,

    • VVS says:

      07:39pm | 13/12/11

      Yes! Yes! Yes! Aussie Joe Bugner FTW!!

    • The Labor Landslide says:

      05:11pm | 13/12/11

      India will win the Boxing Day Test regardless of who Australia selects.

    • Macca says:

      05:39pm | 13/12/11

      Your screen name alone is enough to question the accuracy of your post

    • Arup Saikia says:

      07:35pm | 13/12/11

      On the contrary Australia has a very good chance. India have always been slow starters,  its difficult to see Zaheer Khan bowling 40 overs over 5 days on his return to the long-format (most of the other bowlers havent played in Australia before), and its unlikely that both Ponting and Hussey will fail. Australia has enough resources and will soon get its combination right (batters/batsmen & bowlers).

    • Matthew says:

      08:21am | 14/12/11

      “its unlikely that both Ponting and Hussey will fail”  You make me laugh.  They’ve done it successfully every match for the 2 years, I’d say the odds of either of them succeeding is “unlikely”.

    • Richard says:

      08:18pm | 13/12/11

      Ideally, I’d pick Watson and Warner to open, Marsh at first drop, Clarke and Ponting in the middle, whichever is the best keeper after that, then Pattinson, Cummins and Siddle as the quicks, with Lyon as the spinner.

      The reason I don’t drop Ponting is because I think the Indians fear him. But if he doesn’t perform in the first test (and the second), I’d replace him with Khawaja quick smart.

    • Adam says:

      08:58pm | 13/12/11

      Agree with Mr Arup, India’s bowling is wafer thin and Zaheer won’t get through 4 Tests. Their Ageing stars will struggle on bouncy green tops. Sick of hearing from whinging QLDS & VICS with a chip on their shoulder about NSW conspiracy. Fact is NSW has the most No. of cricketers so will have bigger pool to pick from.We have to rebuild folks so be patient. It won’t happen overnight but it WILL happen

    • Rob says:

      11:54am | 14/12/11

      Ah India, imagine being the team that loses to the team that lost to NZ…

    • John Inverarity says:

      03:21am | 14/12/11

      Agree, however Katich and wade must come in instead of Khaja and Paine.

    • Terence of Sydney says:

      06:51am | 14/12/11

      Anthony, sound logic.  I think you’ll find that Paine is out for the season, and maybe its over for him.  They can’t get his broken finger to heal.  You’re right though if he was fit he replaces Haddin.  In the absence of Paine, Haddin stays. The key one you missed is Clarke.  Four dramatic batting collapses is the sign of a bad captain.  Harsh but true.  They are not afraid of him.  He a chatterer and no one is lisening.  Do you keep him as a batsman, probably not becuase he would be too great a disruptive influence.  You do need some experience though with Ponting and Clarke and Hussey gone.  I’m afrain Bob Simpson was right.  Katich captains and opens with Warner.  So its Katich, Warner, Cowan, Marsh, Kahawaja. Watson, Haddin, Patterson,  Cummins (if fit) or Harris, Starc (you need a left hander) and Lyon.

    • gobsmack says:

      10:32am | 14/12/11

      “of Sydney” says it all.
      Siddle was the best of the bowlers in Hobart and kept Australia in the match with his top scoring effort in their1st innings.  You don’t need a mediocre left hander.
      And its “Pattinson”.

    • bazza says:

      07:14am | 14/12/11

      What should drive the selectors thinking is the need to get a balanced and settled team before the next Ashes series, and that doesn’t happen in 2 or 3 months. Inverarity is old enough to know what was done to get us back to the top in the eighties and lets hope Clarke has the intestinal fortitude and no nonsense approach of old capt Grumpy If they want to get player injuries down they should look at ditching the “sport scientists” from the bludgers brigade that are joined at the hip of the team. The players brains must be scrambled with all the different advice they will be getting from these expert advisers. The “life coach” needs to be second cab off the rank to get the heave ho because whatever dribble he is putting in their heads sure ain’t working.

    • Rusty says:

      08:30am | 14/12/11

      Best since Bradman, hyperbole perhaps in light of a champions retirement, best since Greg Chappell I would suggest, Ponting would have (or had) been retired long before now if he had to face the fearsome West Indies attack Greg Chappell (and later Border) endured as captains. If you got old and slow in those days wicket keepers were dodging flying stumps! When given the chance Pointing stamped his authority at first drop, like all the great batsmen Australia have, and like those before him he should have graciously slid down the order two years ago.

    • Realistic Squad! says:

      08:42am | 14/12/11

      Gosh people! Marsh is out, Paine is out, Harris is only 80% fit. Watson wont be bowling. Your all wrong!

      Team realistically should be based on performance and players who are actually fit. Also Mickey Arthur has already said Ponting and Hussey WILL play. So I think the major changes should be Haddin out for Wade (Haddin is having a shocker!), Starc out for Copeland (bowls long spells and wont need allrounder in side - playing in chairmans 11 before test against india also) Hughes out for Watson (obvious choice!)

      My Team

      1. D Warner
      2. S Watson
      3. U Khawaja
      4. R Ponting
      5. M Clarke
      6. M Hussey
      7. M Wade
      8. P Siddle
      9. T Copeland
      10. J Pattinson
      11. N Lyon

    • Catsman says:

      08:58am | 14/12/11

      Agree with all you said but we all know it’s not giong ot happen. Players don’t just get dropped from the Australian cricket team.  Ponting and Hussey will probably get the Indian series and then be tapped on the shoulder if they don’t go. Haddin stays for now, god knows why, but you know.. Starc is a sheild bowler. Hughes will be the only change, and only after relentless failures and the public roar becoming too loud for the selectors to ignore. The selection policy seems to be first and fore-most who’s the ‘in-crowd’. I think Clarke in all likelihood has a disproportionate say on the team. The new selectors may in time change the culture of the captain picking his mates but it hasn’t happened yet. Also, Clarkes form before being made Captain was worthy of being dropped. Ridiculous that he is then made captain solely because he was his ‘turn’.

    • Mike D says:

      09:26am | 14/12/11

      Ponting has been given too many chances, however, having said that, with his record against India I would say he gets a start in the first test. If he succeeds he stays and retires at the end of the series. He has been kept far too long, but a chance against a side he has dominated, why not?

      If Ponting stays then Hussey and Haddin must go. We have 12 months until the Ashes, and the team which will be playing then needs as much match time as possible. If Ponting goes Hussey should stay. Either or, not both. Hughes also needs to go until he sorts out his technical issues. You cannot get out the same way 21 of 31 dismissals and be allowed to continue.

      Watson needs to move down the order as has been said so we can get a proper all rounder performance from him.

      I have heard different stories this week about who is fit and who is not, so it is hard to say who should come into the side. My only question is around Hughes.

      Remembering this is a team sport and Clarke is the captain, Katich would be valuable for his playing skills but as he did not keep his mouth shut he will not and should not be back. You cannot have a player undermine the captain especially in a young and what looks like a fragile team. Shame, but a dumb play on or off the field should get you dropped.

      This is just another test, the Ashes are in twelve months, lets start picking sides which will be around (without needing a zimmer frame) and get some experience for the young blokes. Having experienced players was a luxury we had when they were performing, a broken down shell is not a good example and wastes a spot which could be filled by the next Ponting, McGrath or Warne. Clarke can teach them the ins and outs of Test level cricket.

    • cybacaT says:

      09:33am | 14/12/11

      Write Ponting off at your peril.  I remember long dry spells for Taylor and Waugh also - which they famously came out of.  He’s still got it.  Besides there might not be a NSW batsman ready to take his place in the Aussie side.

    • Richard says:

      02:35pm | 14/12/11

      Also Ant, the point about Watson that Chapelli was making the other day was that he doesn’t play spin too well, so it’d be stupid to have him coming in down the order at 6 or 7 when the bowling team would just throw the spinner on straight away, (if he wasn’t bowling already).

      Honestly Watson must play either opener or first drop, the guy is a genius at the top of the order, why fix what ain’t broke?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

#Thomson will never get brothel tapes, CCTV-in-brothels experts tell the ABC. http://t.co/7YFORBBJ

Daniel Piotrowski

@ToryShepherd there's always time for Din Tai Fung.

ToryShepherd

@drpiotrowski will be there just in time for Din Tai Fung

Daniel Piotrowski

@ToryShepherd I hope that's in your piece tomorrow. Also - are you coming over this week or laaaaaater?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Bill Kelty made a memorable speech last week. Addressing the ACTU Congress Dinner in Sydney, the legendary…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Speaking of yourself in the third person is usually a sign that you’re suffering from delusions…

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

If South Australia had just arrived in the world, red and wrinkled and mewling, what would we call it?…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

241 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter