This week The Punch features two Angry Cripples, both anonymous. It’s fair to say they have somewhat opposing points of view to say the least. We recommend reading this one first.

If only it were this easy. Pic: Jeff Herbert

I am an angry cripple. No, I do not have a disability, but as the mother of a young woman with severe and multiple disabilities, I am as crippled by the cruel Australian disability support system as much as – and sometimes more than - many people with a disability themselves.

I have been the sole primary carer of my daughter since my divorce more than 20 years ago, with the result that - like hundreds of thousands of other sole primary carers - I subsist on the poverty line.

During the global financial crisis, when the government was throwing cash at families earning up to $110,000 a year and the widescreen TVs and handbags were rolling out shop doors, I looked at my life, my old and decrepit furniture, my second hand clothes and all the things about my health and life that desperately need work but which I have not been able to attend to because of lack of support services and/or my inability to pay.

After 20 years of devastating poverty, everything in my life is broken and falling apart.

I cuddled my beautiful, innocent daughter, who needs so much support, and I decided to kill myself. Simple really. A solution to a life totally limited, isolated and desperate with no hope in sight.

Then I realised I would have to take my daughter with me, because I could not leave her in the hands of uncaring governments and private service providers who prefer to hide the neglect and abuse of many in care rather than take on staff and their union bullies.

And I realised that no matter how hopeless my life, I was and am not yet ready to make that decision for my daughter. She has her difficulties, but she does not feel the same about her life as I do about mine.

I have spent my life trying to ensure that her life, although limited, is a good and happy one. But if nothing changes over the next five years, there will come a point where there will be no return for me. There is a point when the life I can offer my beautiful girl will become even more limited by my age and decades of poverty.

As the years pass, my choices will become more limited and my fear of the future can only grow greater, because unrelenting poverty, loss of hope and loss of my own humanity is becoming more and more overpowering.

Sitting here crying as I write this piece, I acknowledge and despair that I have changed so dramatically over the past three decades. I am consumed by desperation. I have turned from a vibrant, hopeful and joyful young woman into an embittered, frightened and desperate older woman fast approaching the latter stage of the ‘middle’ years. I am bereft. I am scared.

A few years ago, with my daughter funded to attend a post-school day program three days a week, I accepted the offer of a terrific part-time job, believing it could eventually lead to full-time work and a better life financially for both of us.

But I now know better - because more days working simply mean greater care costs for me. If I accepted the full-time job I was recently offered, I’d have to pay for an additional 34 hours of care for my daughter each fortnight, out of taxed income and on top of my current care costs.

In fact, if I didn’t work and just stayed at home on full Carers’ Payment, my net income would be nearly the same.

In addition, the travelling time to and from even my part-time job already takes me over Centrelink’s draconian 25-hour rule, meaning I am entitled to no Carers’ Payment to help cover extra care costs. (This rule holds that carers may spend no more than 25 hours a week in education, employment or volunteer work while receiving the miserly Carers’ Payment – including travel time. It’s irrelevant if the carer earns $300 per week or nothing at all; if they don’t provide the minimum 143 hours per week of care, they are not eligible for the poverty-line carer payment.)

We ‘carers’ - who it is worth stressing are in fact simply families - are the only people in this country who are expected to pay for and be responsible for adults for decades: financially, socially and personally. Every other relationship sees adults as separate identities whose costs are autonomous, except ours if the adult has a dependant disability.

I know some people with disability are enraged when family carers are allowed a voice in this space, insisting it should belong solely to them. But this is nonsense. Until people with severe disability are provided with the services they need, the debate must also be about the family members expected to provide what governments will not.

Lack of support for one means someone else has to give up their life, career and income to provide what government does not. How can families who provide this care not share this space?

95 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • S.L says:

      06:04am | 06/07/11

      Unfortunately both major political parties make decisions for one common reason…......to win votes. If you were in the majority instead of the Wide Screen TV brigade you would have the help you need.

    • atthepub says:

      06:29am | 06/07/11

      I read the other column first and from that figured that this one was one long whine about some one wanting to end her life. I hear you and your despair. Have been there myself a number of times. We are all in this together. The carers, the people needing caring and all those who like to think that it has nothing to do with them.

      I often think that if only ‘able’ people could spend a week as a carer or ‘not-so-able’ how would that change their perspective? And some of them will too and change their tune.

      Society is cold and judgmental. We’d all do better following some ancient advice

      “For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me”

    • Michael says:

      08:30am | 06/07/11

      We need to raise the compassion index on a global scale.

    • tony of poorakistan says:

      08:50am | 06/07/11

      No we don’t Michael. We Aussies need to raise it for our fellow born and bred Aussies. Let the others look after themselves.

    • Michael says:

      09:27am | 06/07/11

      Tony, you have agreed with me without realising it. If Australians increase our compassion for Australians and other nations do likewise for their nationals, the global result will still be a raised level of compassion. I don’t mind who has compassion for whom so long as people are attempting to be compassionate towards each other

    • Elizabeth says:

      03:38pm | 06/07/11

      To ‘tony of poorakistan’: I hope you mean ‘compassion begins at home’!

      Sadly I don’t believe that you do.  Please tell me why I, a born and bred Aussie (I had an ancestor at the ‘Proclamation of South Australia’) deserves compassion more than a woman my age who has dealt with similar issues: a) who is an indigenous Australian or b) who spent many years raising her family in a refugee camp in the Sudan, or c) who gave up everything she had worked or saved for to bring her family by boat for a better life?

    • Miles says:

      04:41pm | 06/07/11

      Elizabeth, are you suggesting that an indigineous woman is somehow different from a ‘born and bred’ aussie???

    • acotrel says:

      07:21am | 06/07/11

      My wife spends over 50% of her life in Melbourne looking after her mother who has dementia, as well as her elderly father.  The carers duties are shared between 5 people at different times, so there is no monetary support from the government.  I pick up the tab for my wife’s expenses.  I believe that care of the aged should be reviewed with the objective of making acceptable reforms.  I love my mother-in-law, and I don’t wish her dead, however the situation is very difficult to live with.

    • Roy says:

      08:11am | 06/07/11

      I was read this with interest until you said
      “private service providers who prefer to hide the neglect and abuse of many in care rather than take on staff and their union bullies”
      It is the miserable owners that don’t supply enough staff that cause the problems, I am sure your back is just a buggered as most of the nursing staff’s is, from doing the job of 2 people!

    • acotrel says:

      09:00am | 06/07/11

      Many oldies who are coerced into nursing homes, protest by stopping eating. It’s an easy solution to the problem of getting rid of them after they’ve served their purpose in society.

    • F73 says:

      09:12am | 06/07/11

      The issue is far more complex than that Roy. As many people who work within the NSW state disability service know, incidents of heinous neglect and abuse are very often covered up and the union always fights for the abuser to keep their job.

      Often good, decent staff who report abuse become disillusioned by a system so unwilling to stand up to union domination. Most families are acutely aware of this and terrified of what will happen to their loved one when they die or can’t continue in their caring role.

      Don’t believe me then read the transcript from last years parliamentary inquiry. I suppose it’s not really the unions fault, they are merely fulfilling their role. It is the fault of gutless leadership and a department so unwilling to stand up to the unions, put client welfare first and fight for the right of pwd to be free from abuse and neglect.

    • Tess says:

      08:36am | 08/07/11

      Who said anything about nursing staff Roy?

      Besides, a family carer does the job of 4 or 5 shifts of workers. How fair is that. Often if a person goes into care they are provided with 24/7 paid carers because of the difficulty of the job. But on this page some of the people reckon that that is a fair thing - to expect an ageing parent carer to do what the government considers needs 5 workers a day to do - and do it alone, with few supports.

      Gee our fellow citizens have one standard of ‘fair’ for themselves and yet another for families who through no fault of their own have a child/adult with complex needs.

      Perhaps some of you should take a long hard look at the kind of people you have become and consider what it would be like to walk in our shoes for a day - obviously I am a parent carer…

    • Jess Thompson says:

      08:12am | 06/07/11

      Interesting how we perceive things in different ways.

      I just watched a documentary about a woman who killed her daughter and I read the above not with horror, but with sympathy for a woman who has flatly been let down by the system.  Then it dawned on me that I had read a clear threat to end the life of a vulnerable person and that I had been moved by the mother plight rather than that of her child.

      Why did I do that?  Is it because her life is ‘limited’ and not worth living?  Is the assumption that she’ll be abused in care so great that death is preferable?

      You can guarantee the monster who threw his child over the bridge recently would have had a far different outcome if the child had, say, Down Syndrome.  There is an inherent but unstated (except amongst the truly crass) that people with disability do not truly have a place amongst ‘us’.  That really it would have been kinder to ‘knock them on the head at birth’.  That their quality of life is less than ours and that it would be okay if I ‘took her with me’, that beautiful euphemism for murder.

      I’m not minimizing what this is - not a cry, but a scream for help.  But in the argument that ‘this space also belongs to carers’ - who is speaking up for a girl who has just been condemned to die by an at the end of their rope parent?  Her voice is the quietest of all.  The reason there is a space for people with disability to speak is that they are not the voices that are the loudest.

    • Lisa H. says:

      12:57pm | 06/07/11

      Erm, if you read the full story, you would have seen you were not reading am article written by a killer.
      In any other context, the situation of this carer would be seen for what it is: slavery. No wonder she is mentally compromised.

      The government is drastically exploiting a mother’s love (or daughters, or other family member’s love, depending on the individual family situation) .
      The government expects 143 hours of care per week from this woman, in order to get her measly pension? That is pathetic, where is her union?

    • ells says:

      11:10pm | 06/07/11

      Hi Jess, where was the clear threat to end the life of another person? It seems to me that the writer changed her mind because she did not trust our governments to provide decent care. The only other alternative in her mind was that she would have to do the unthinkable and she knew she could not do that.

    • F73 says:

      08:42am | 06/07/11

      If a society should be judged by how it treats its most vulnerable then god help Australia! I can think of no more powerful symbol of a government neglecting its responsibilities than the mess that is Australian disability system. It is our hidden shame and it’s about time our government, with all it’s appalling priorities, decided to actually show some leadership on the issue.

    • fairsfair says:

      08:43am | 06/07/11

      Anonymous, you do a fantastic job and deserve to be commended for it. However, you lost a bit of me when you say “In fact, if I didn’t work and just stayed at home on full Carers’ Payment, my net income would be nearly the same.”

      My mother is 54 years old and faced with the same situation. She is probably at a point in life where she should be slowing down but she works, because you have to work in life - it is part of it and even if working doesn’t get you much further ahead you are at least releasing some funds for other people. I am sure your life is hard and I don’t think you or our daughter deserve it for a second and I agree that a lot of things within the system should change. But it is an access thing. The answer is not more more more. The answer is a system that can be relied upon for all OR complete private funding through insurance. Australia needs to decide. Half arsed bits of both worlds just does not work.

      You then go on to say “Until people with severe disability are provided with the services they need, the debate must also be about the family members expected to provide what governments will not.”

      That is what family is for and you should count your daughter lucky that she at least has you - there are many people out there much worse off. Perhaps that is what you mean when you said that some people are “enraged” that you have a voice? You are entitled to air your opinion as much as you bloody want, but you should also know that you receive a lot of assistance in the current system even if it could perhaps be better managed.

    • F73 says:

      09:34am | 06/07/11

      ‘You should also know that receive a lot of assistance in the current system.’ Maybe you wouldn’t mind pointing out to the many parents of children with a disability who read this column precisely what assistance is on offer to them. Most I know have lost their homes as they have been unable to pay the mortgage due to no places for children with disabilities in day care, preschool, before and after school care and post school programs.

      Like most mothers these days I planned on returning to work following the birth of my child but when he was diagnosed with a disability that all changed. There were no places in daycare for him, in fact I was offered half a day a week when he turned 3! I had to give up my job and live in poverty. When I hear parents complain about having to pay 50% of childcare costs, I’m stunned. I suppose most people don’t realise, or just don’t care, that if your child is born with a disability, more often than not, there won’t be any childcare for them. None.

      So maybe you’d like to enlighten all of the parents who read this as to exactly what support is available, I think we’d all be very interested to know.

    • Fiona says:

      09:39am | 06/07/11

      A lot of people work up to their 60s, it’s not just your mum. 54 is not considered that old these days. It used to be expected that you’d work to the 60s and die within a few years after retirement. These days people live longer and will need to work longer or save up a lot more money for retirement.
      Prsonally, I feel for anonymous. Disability (and aged care too) are sadly neglected by governments. None of us no what it’s like unless we live it. I don’t know what I’d do if I was in anonymous’ shoes. To work or not?

    • DaisyDuke says:

      10:04am | 06/07/11

      Get real mate, you wouldn’t work if the government said we will provide you with the same net income, plus you get to spend all that extra time with your daughter.

      Poverty line subsistance is not “a lot of help”, and your remarks stink of ‘the rats should be thankful for the crumbs they recieve from my table’ attitude.

    • fairsfair says:

      10:14am | 06/07/11

      Fiona, I think if you re-read my original comment you will find the answers. 1) I said slow down - I didn’t say retire and take up scrapbooking. Most people in later life alter their lifestyle and (many) after busting their arse to pay off their house in their younger years drop to part time/reduced hours. 2) I also feel for anonymous, I said that more than once. 3) my family does live it, I know it all too well. But you make hay while the sun shines and you make the best of the situation. 3) To work or not you ask - WORK. Like I said it is part of life and not many people get to go home and put their feet up after work. We all have responsibilities after hours, rarely get days off, a good night sleep etc etc. Yes, the situation is shit, but you can’t sit around feeling sorry for yourself contemplating suicide and expecing the government to step in so you get a weekend every week.

      F75 - you have to find someone privately to look after your child if you do not live in an area that offers the services you are after. If you want to go back to work you will find one as they are there. In my are there is a school who accepts young kids and school age children on a campus within a campus. I am not speaking for everyone in my comments and you will note that anonymous’ child is not of young age. She is now an adult. This is an opinion website, not lets carve social policy into stone website. Its all about the blessed parents though isn’t it? Not single people who don’t have parents to look after them? Not older people who don’t have children to look after them? It is not the role of the government to ensure that you can go back to work as if there is nothing wrong with your child.

    • fairsfair says:

      10:19am | 06/07/11

      “Get real mate, you wouldn’t work if the government said we will provide you with the same net income, plus you get to spend all that extra time with your daughter.”

      BTW it is “almost”.

      In my world - that is not the role of the government. In my world - that is the life of my mother who has instilled the same values in me. So no you are wrong - I would still work for a similar benefit. And yes, we should be thankful (and I am thankful that my family gets what it does) because it is a hell of a lot more than a lot of people get and our Government does a hell of a lot more than a lot of other Governments in the developed world.

    • DaisyDuke says:

      11:44am | 06/07/11

      If your child was in a car crash and required full time car because of disability thereafter would you go and work while sending your child to private care for no net gain?

      Despite claiming to be some societal paragon of virtue, if you were put in that situation in reality you wouldn’t.

    • fairsfair says:

      12:20pm | 06/07/11

      If that was the case then DaisyDuke, I’d be thankful that I was afforded the ability to look after my own child with some financial assistance. But then I’d have to buy all the equpment wouldn’t I? Why oh why won’t the government pay to fit out my house to the standards of an intensive care ward? Its my right isn’t it?

      Feel free to disregard my opinion all you want. I am not forcing you to read my posts and then call me names.

    • Tim says:

      12:44pm | 06/07/11

      DaisyDuke,
      are you kidding?
      Welfare is not there to provide you with a better life, it is there as a safety net for people who fall through the cracks.
      Sure it may suck but that’s life.
      My sister is disabled and my mother barely worked when I was younger because she spent so much time at home caring for her. We survived partly on support given from the government to assist us even though it was hard on the rest of us.
      When my sister was more able to look after herself, my mother went back to work and lost the government benefits she had been receiving. In reality we were only slightly better off but my mother wanted to work.
      People should stop being so reliant on the government to look after every aspect of their life.

    • DaisyDuke says:

      01:21pm | 06/07/11

      @ Tim & Fairsfair.

      Point of the article was that the carers payment is barely above the poverty line. Author far from buying a big flat screen or ICU

    • Abbie says:

      01:25pm | 06/07/11

      What a truly shameful response fairsfair. Totally lacking in any insight and compassion. Try being the care giver for a person with severe diabilities, not just for a day or a month or even a year, but for deacdes and see how you would be feeling. I doubt however if you would last a week.

    • fairsfair says:

      01:46pm | 06/07/11

      Abbie, you know nothing about me or my family’s situation - but judge away.

      As I have said before on these threads - this is about debate and differing opinion that could potentially lead to better outcomes. Just because I don’t simper at the individual story of the author does not mean I am callous.

      Throwing cash at problems does not work. How many times do people have to see that fail before they realise it is not a solution?

    • Abbie says:

      02:05pm | 06/07/11

      @fairsfair

      “Abbie, you know nothing about me or my family’s situation - but judge away”. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!

    • fairsfair says:

      02:39pm | 06/07/11

      please advise who I am judging in my attempted discussion on the current Australian system? Discussion can’t even happen because people are too busy trying to catch other people our for saying “nasty” things.

      How do you expect to get anything resolved when we all sit around agreeing and sympathising with people’s sob story? My family has its own sob story so please excuse me if I am sick to death of hearing the “poor you’s” and “you don’t deserve this” and “lets blame other people for your misfortune” because it does sweet diddly toward the resolution of my problem or that of other people.

      What an utter waste of time.

    • AdamC says:

      03:32pm | 06/07/11

      Fairs, I get the impression that you are arguing with particularly surly brick walls here.

      I tend to avoid these ‘Angry Cripple’ threads as, being one of the lucky people, I feel I have nothing to add. I also find they tend to be exceedingly negative and pessimistic, with a fixation on grasping at more and more government money and support. This tendency seems to have been dialled up especially high today. 

      Personally, I don’t understand why the Punch keeps publishing these screeds. They are usually underweight in the comments, presumably because many Punch readers agree with me and largely steer clear. I know I’ll be doing that again from now on!

    • fairsfair says:

      04:02pm | 06/07/11

      Thanks Adam. How true and case and point is that when it is about disabled car spaces it rakes in trip figure comments.

      I think I am out too. I have said it before on AC threads because it is not the first time I have been met with this crap and I have watched it happen to other people, but I have eventually come back because it is a serious issue. It is completely pointless though and truth be told doing a disservice to the plight of the disabled Australian.

    • Fair'sFairFromTheGreenSide says:

      08:40pm | 06/07/11

      @ Fairsfair

      I think one of the main issues with disability care is that day care is not possible. Staff require special training (I’d imagine a specialised version of mandatory notification training, training for specialised disabilities, training to lift and move children in a way that won’t injure the worker or the child, even special training and protocols for something as basic as food at lunch) and the costs involved are astronomical.
      Everything is harder and more expensive when disability comes into things. How can the government finance an oval no one bloody wants yet leave people committing suicide and getting so desperate they snap and kill someone?
      I can understand where carers get so frightened, angry and depressed.
      Look around you at what you have. I’m a young person who has just started work and is saving for a house. I don’t have enough money to do everything I want, but I know I get more money than many other people in the world, so I donate- I sponsor a child, I donate blood, I donate to Veterans for their service and I donate to (currently) an association helping people with Spina Biffida.
      I donate because I know that if I were in their shoes, I would want every measley cent I could get, and if I can donate, I know other, wealthier people could too.

      Also, just as food for thought, many religiously minded people argue disabled children should not be aborted in the womb (and that others should not be allowed to). I wonder how many of them are carers, volunteer their time to help or donate to carers?

    • ells says:

      10:29am | 07/07/11

      I think that fairsfair and a number of others are missing two very important points here.

      First of all, in a country that has spent a great number of years raising awareness of the crippling nature of depression you are being very obtuse. Depression creates a selfishness of mind that will never be roused in any other situation. It is important to have a little understanding of the disease before you bash this woman for speaking out honestly about her feelings - a smaller person would have sheltered herself from these sorts of attacks by curling into a ball and taking her life, and in desperation, taking her daughters. If you read into various enquiries of care in the public sector you will find that the care often afforded to disabled people is often so atrocious that death would be kinder. I am not advocating murder, in fact I am strongly against these kinds of ‘mercy’ killings, but I am advocating sympathy. We live in a country that is becoming increasingly aware and compassionate about depression, but this hand is not extended to those in situations that cannot be fixed, such as those in crippling carers roles. When depression attacks in two forms: hormonal imbalance, and circumstantiality, what can be done when one can not fix their own circumstances, no matter how hard they try?

      Yes family is there to care - and care she obviously does. Read the tenderness in the words “my beautiful, innocent daughter”, and the resolution to push through the pain of life because her daughter was too precious. However, surely there has to be a limit to this expectation of care. Yes, we love and protect our children always, but how can we be expected to be providing physical laborious care to our adult children when we reach an age when society would normally be extending care to us?

      Secondly, I did not get the vibe that this woman was demanding intensive care fittings in her home, or even more money. What this woman seemed to be asking for was availability of services that would enable her to take on full-time employment so, wait for it, she COULD pay taxes! I heard her point loud and clear. As a student I received all of the equity allowances and I can tell you now, I needed it far less than people in these caring roles do. Yes, I could afford to buy my text books that year, and even pay my car registration without suffering. I am also eligible, along with every other independent student, to receive a couple of thousand bucks each year in student equity scholarships, isn’t life grand? Meanwhile these sole carers are afforded not a lot more than students, will never be able to afford a home, will never be able to buy a new car of pay for registration without struggling and we students have the audacity to whinge and complain about the ‘life of a student’. From another angle - people always have so much compassion for the newly single mother raising three healthy children under the age of five. Yes, that is no easy feat, and I have a lot of admiration for them - but when their children are all in school and are well cared for those mothers can build a career for themselves. It’s all about perspective.

      I say instead of attacking this author about her mental illness, or her desperation to lead a more fulfilling life, we applaud her for having the strength to carry out her role as the single mother of a severely disabled daughter for over 20 years. I’d like to see half the people I know do it for a week, myself included.

    • Felicity says:

      04:40pm | 08/07/11

      Fairsfair
      Family implies that there is more than one person you can turn to for help, often there is only aged parents who are unable to help because they are too frail, often needing help themselves. Most carers parents are divorced and alone, most of them are women with out of date work skills and no means of updating them because of the 25 hr rule mentioned in the story.
      Please tell me where is all of this assistance you speak of , because as a carer of my 25 year old son i am yet to find very much in the way of help out there.
      You say that your Mother is in the same situation at 54 and she works who cares for your sibling when she is working? my son cannot be left alone for 1 minute and there is no one to take my place whilst i work.
      You make it sound so easy but it is not if you don’t have any support add to that the depression that is crippling and the road blocks placed in your path by government bodies that really want you to stay exactly where you are so that you can continued to save them that 31 billion every year

    • Cathy says:

      10:12pm | 08/07/11

      Hi Fairstar, what assistance do I get? Or you think I get?
      Why do you assume any assistance is much at all? What are you actually trying to say?

    • Jane2 says:

      08:44am | 06/07/11

      You are severely underpaid and under appreciated by most. It doesnt seem fair that a carer must put in so many hours to get $300 of government money while an unemployed person only needs to make a notion attempt to find employment to qualify for theirs.

      There should be free “day care” (respite) for families so they can have a life beyond their disabled family member. So that other siblings, regardless how much they love their sibling, can get some undivided attention from their parent. So parents can have time away from the isolation of the house without being punished for doing so.

      By my estimate a career saves the government over a thousand a week by providing the services that the government would other wise have to pay. The government should show its appreciation for these savings by providing more support for the carer.

      And what most people dont realise is that being a carer is a growing “job” sector. When you wife/husband has a stroke or a car accident, what are you going to do? You probably cant afford to pay for a full time carer and there isnt the places available in assisted care for all those that need it (besides which do you want to seperate your loved one who is mentally aware from your family and put them in one of those facilities?).

      We also have a growing aging population and not enough care facilities for them. There will most likely be a period when your olds are frail but not ill enough for “care”, are you going to provide the care they need?

      We need some major reform now before the Tsunami hits.

    • TChong says:

      08:47am | 06/07/11

      Full and sincere sympathy, but why the “union bullies"claim?
      What is it that the union(s) do that you find unacceptable. ?
      Previosly , in the “Angry Cripple” spot, claims were made that “unions”
      ( which one is never specified) are all on the nod about abuse.
      Claims that are never backed.
      If the “unions” in this field are doing wrong, , then you are morally obliged, in (order to protect others), to put forward your concerns to police, or your states Health Complaints Unit ( varios titles in different states)
      Have you done so?

    • fairsfair says:

      09:03am | 06/07/11

      TChong, what is your take on the QLD Nurse’s union’s recent behaviour over the past few years?

      Genuine question BTW, I am not trying to stir you up I am just wondering what you feeling is toward the worker’s representatives spending a significant proportion of their budget on political advertising which helped to elect a government who has not been able to pay them correctly. The issue is still raging up here with hundreds of people in receipt of demands for the repayment of wages.

      This particular example tells me that a lot of union deligates are more interested in furthering their political careers than actually doing what it is that they claim they seek to do - ie - protect their members. It is also sad, because the nurses and professional carers within the public system have devoted all their energies to getting themselves paid that they push for services has kind of fallen onto the backburner.

    • Fiona says:

      09:30am | 06/07/11

      FF, do you work for free, or very little? If not, is there a problem with nurses negotiating a pay rise to keep up with the cost of living? Actually, the last EB the QNU negotiated with the govt. went through very quickly and with very little publicity or fuss. Interestingly, the elderly care nurses have needed morre support to get a raise. Have you thought that some of the reason that we lose nurses at a rate of knots is that the pay isn’t great (better than the poor ambos though), employers are tight wads with their budgets, so you’re often overworked and understaffed and rosters are not family friendly, despite what they tell you at the job interview.

    • TChong says:

      09:33am | 06/07/11

      FF
      Have to say I am unawre of the issues.
      ( I am not aligned , or even vote ALP, and cant recall seeing the issue refered to in the NSW Nurses publication, [dont read it too closely,so it may have rated a mention, dont know] )
      My personal POV would be similar to a share holder who might object to their company donating to the LNP, ( or ALP).
      Mispayments do happen , as they do in all bureacracies ( not that I’m defending the errors)
      I dont believe this is the issue here though.

    • fairsfair says:

      09:56am | 06/07/11

      Fiona, you have completely misunderstood my intention there. My point was that the Union has let the nurses down in not protecting their interests in terms of their wages/raises/payments. They have had to step up and do it themselves because the union appears to preoccupied in not getting on the wrong side of the Labor state govt they helped elect. The nurses should be left to do their jobs (ie help people and push for better services) while the union handles the rest for them.

      Thanks TC - it is a pretty big issue up here, but public support is now turning because the admin staff in payroll are now striking because they have had to do too much paid overtime to correct the errors. Paid overtime. Coming from people who probably get paid more than the nurses themselves. Agh, it is an absolute farce. I have to say I don’t agree with the donations comparison though. The union is supposed to protect the worker - there is a direct failure here. You don’t expect that kind of assistance in your daily life from your paid membership. Ultimately boards approve investments for the overall financial benefit of the business - the exact oppostie is going on here. The union seems to have left the QLD Health staff to languish here and you can kind of understand why they are getting angry at the recipt of a request for payment on wages from a couple of years ago.

    • Fiona says:

      06:19pm | 06/07/11

      FF,I belong to that union and don’t remember having to negotiate myself with the govt. for the last pay rise. The union did that for us. do I think they’re the greatest thing since sliced bread? No, but I haven’t had the feeling they’re more interested in supporting the labour govt either. They have actually been quite willing to assist their members (colleagues of mine & myself) over the last 16 years that I’ve worked for Qld health.

    • fairsfair says:

      06:51pm | 06/07/11

      Fi, I’m talking about the pay bungle. The software issue, not regular industrial relations practices.

      My mum works at a private hospital and all of her friends over at the base are ropable. Only a couple of weeks ago we had industrial action from the payroll staff and on the back of that they still didn’t seem happy with any resolution offered. It is an ongoing nightmare.

    • ells says:

      10:41am | 07/07/11

      I read the complaint about the unions in this article to be about their oversupport of the workers in these programs, rather than their lack of support. It has been evidenced of late by various cases both in the media and also in government enquiries, that the support workers in disability groups homes and respite services are being protected far better than the rights of the individual being cared for. In a number of cases where a person with a physical or mental disability has been subjected to neglect and abuse and instead of ceasing the employment of the neglectful or abusive care worker the innocent client has been removed from their home or program, and had their entire life disrupted. I believed the author to be sharing a fear that a large number of carers have, that to place their child in care could lead to this sort of neglect or abuse, where their child would have fewer rights than the care workers.

    • Fiona says:

      02:17pm | 07/07/11

      FF, the pay bungle is one thing. That’s a wider Qld health issue. Public sector staff have been affected, not private hospital staff, as your mum would know.  I don’t know anyone (including myself) who has not been affected and I’d love to know how the union is responsible for that one. Even if you were talking about the payroll staff and their union, it still wouldn’t be the QNU, more like the QPSU, if you’re talking about support for those workers. For the nurses, the union will always have limited power with this mess. I’d be more inclined to be angry with Paul Lucas, the man in charge of this mess.

    • thirdworldsystem says:

      09:21am | 06/07/11

      Makes me wonder if there are ‘angry carers’ in India and other third world countries where there is no government support or benefits.

    • Hammond says:

      10:36am | 06/07/11

      couldn’t have put it better myself.

      some people are dealt a crap hand. Just deal with it. OP, there are BILLIONS upon billions of people in the world who lead a far more bleak life than you.

    • Lisa H. says:

      01:09pm | 06/07/11

      Cannot believe the wilful blindness of this remark. Firstly, we are living in Australia. There are a myriad of expenses to be met every day, to retain a house, hot water etc…
      Secondly, there are very many exploited and abused people in India and other third world countries. In accepting this as fact, do we then just accept the expoitation of the families of disabled here?

      In a country where ordinary women demand and receive a 50 per cent subsidy on childcare, I honestly cannot believe your comments.

    • firstworldsystem says:

      02:17pm | 06/07/11

      Actually, there are probably relatively few Angry Carers in places like India. Their severely disabled kids tend to die. A much more economically efficient system. So yeah.. let’s turn Australia into a place that kills people with disabilities, then we would have nothing to complain about, right?

    • ells says:

      10:56am | 07/07/11

      I certainly hope that narrow-minded people using this mindset are never heard grumbling about paying taxes, the cost of dental services, the length of time one can wait in the emergency department before being seen by a physician, the state of the roads, the cost of childcare, or any number of other regular political issues in Australia.

      Yes, Australia is a lucky country, so should we not be helping our weakest? The fact of the matter is that Australians love to feel good about themselves by throwing money at poverty stricken countries without even looking at the meagre percentage of those donations that actually make it to the needy. As a nation we seem to be lacking integrity ourselves - we talk about the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer in countries like India, but we’re ignoring the realities right in our own backyard. Carers in Australia on the carers payment are entitled to just over $300 a week to cover all care costs, rent, bills, car costs, food, not to mention the costs of raising any other children they may have.  In a country with the cost of living soaring high is it any wonder they are desperate?

    • F73 says:

      09:51am | 06/07/11

      Some, not all, unions have lost sight of humanity. They put the demands of their members above basic human decency. I’ve always been a union member however I think the unions need to examine exactly why they have been haemorrhaging members for decades. I remember a time when the unions proudly fought for the human rights of all, would have stood up for the vulnerable. Not anymore.

      Now all I see is greed and, in the case of the disability sector in NSW, unions have quite simply fought to keep people who have been guilty of abuse and neglect in jobs. Good staff, of which there are many, report abuse to their superiors and the abuser always, always keeps their job.

      I don’t solely blame the union for this, governments need to accept their fair share of the blame for allowing it to happen. I get the feeling, TChong, that nothing I say will stop you from accusing anyone, who has a critical word to say about union behaviour, of “union bashing”.

      We need to look at why staunch union supporters are deserting the unions in droves, I think I’ve just outlined some of the reasons.

    • ells says:

      10:58am | 07/07/11

      Well said F73!

    • Hammond says:

      10:31am | 06/07/11

      whine > whine > whine > whine

      i’m sorry, but i completely disagree with you. Here’s why.

      in any other society but this modern day one, cripples would either be killed at birth, or wouldn’t last very long at all. Harsh, but it’s true. Be thankful that they can live, and get a free ride off the government.

    • Leggy says:

      12:08pm | 06/07/11

      troll > troll > troll > troll

      Just because it was common in the past, doesn’t make it right.

    • Jane2 says:

      03:20pm | 06/07/11

      Actually those with severe mental conditions where put into care which was ll paid for by teh government or by charity groups. they were called “poor houses” and “hospitals”.

      It is only 30 years ago that we shut down the “hospitals” for the mentally handicapped to give them a better way of life. For the high functioning this was a brilliant move but for the extremely mentally handicapped all that happened was families become full time carers struggling on poverty line incomes and without the specialist skills to give their family members the best future possible and the government saved money.

    • ells says:

      11:01am | 07/07/11

      I sure do hope you never have a child with a disability - I hate to think of the outcome. Darwin would be proud of you.

    • Felicity says:

      05:19pm | 08/07/11

      I hope you are never in a position to eat your words but there is something you need to remember and that is tommorrow you could be hit by a car and become a cripple how hard would you fight to live?
      No don’t tell me because you won’t know untill it happens, i have seen people fight for life against incredible odds

    • atthepub says:

      10:41am | 06/07/11

      Mum you’re pitching caring against disability as if it is some kind of competition. You’re in this together. All of us are in this together.

      So mum is suffering, that’s sad. But parents are supposed to be taking care of their kids, that’s how society works. To tell everyone that this ‘burden’ makes you want to kill yourself how does that help the debate?

      People complaining about needing to take care of their aging parents .. if you’re lucky enough, your kids will do the same for you.

      That’s how society works .. family taking care of each other. Expecting others to do so is passing the buck.

      I hear you mum, I know it’s tough, you’re not alone either but to see your child as a burden is not the right perspective. To be upset that you can’t afford for someone else to take care of your child isn’t either. Blaming society is not the right perspective either.
      We should all pitch in wherever we can, accept our lives without judging and comparing. Enjoy your daughter whilst you can, I’m sure that’s she’s teaching all of us much about compassion and love and caring.

    • atthepub says:

      11:37am | 06/07/11

      If there were a finger to point in any direction at all .. how about we all start pointing at the partner who walked away .. because it was all too hard. And this so called partner left the other with all the caring, financially, physically, emotionally .. all on their own.

      How much better would society be if people were made to live up to their responsibilities?

    • Lisa H. says:

      01:01pm | 06/07/11

      The real question though is how much can an individual, or a family, bear?
      The irony is that women pregnant with a disabled child are actually encouraged by the system to abort that baby… because medical staff are fully aware of the dangers to her and her family’s health and well being.
      Many families split over the stress of managing the disabled child.
      atthepub feels comfortable reminding this carer that her daughter is teaching ‘all of us’ (especially Mum’ about compassion and love… yet, where is she on a Sun morning at 3am? She’s not doing the work.

      atthepub seems to me

    • Lisa H. says:

      01:54pm | 06/07/11

      Oops! sorry, had to rush out!
      to finish my comment I wanted to say that atthepub, would you say that 143 hours of caring per week to qualify for a tiny pension as a full time carer is about right?
      When we have a government that is fine with parenting leave for wealthy workers, 50 per cent child care subsidies for people working or studying…hey, we even have pink batts money to burn… why are families left so destitute by disability?

      Or would you agree that really, every person, t

    • Jane2 says:

      03:25pm | 06/07/11

      You forget that parents with “kids” normally have a decreasing level of responsibilty as they child ages. Imagine having 100% care of someone who is full adult size but is less mentally aware than most toddlers, someone who needs their bottom wiped at age 30.

      This Mum’s kid is a full grown adult and she is becoming concerned about what happens when she is gone - who will look after her child then.

      This is something a lot of carer parents of adult children are wondering, she is not alone.

    • Cathy says:

      09:05pm | 06/07/11

      1. My daughter is NOT a child
      2. My daughter is NOT a burden
      3. No-one who earns an above average wage should hgave it reduced to poverty levels while we support women who have perfectly healthy children - believing that a mother in Australia should not have to care for their infant at home until school age without being ‘paid’ to do so?
      4. I would love to see the reactions of some of these bloggers if anything befell them to make their easy lives the tiniest bit difficult, I suspect they would be bellowing loud and often.
      5. It would appear that some of you who dare to criticise me spend an awful lot of time perusing these blogs - are you collecting welfare? Not supporting yourselves? I do not know many people gainfully employed who can indolently spend so much time criticising others!
      6. The reality is families who care for sons and daughters who have disabilities that require 24/7 support are expected to provide that care until they, the caregiver drop dead or become disabled themselves because their body packs it in.
      7. Lately we have wept, campaigned over bloody cattle yet Australians turn a blind eye to issues that so greatly effect PEOPLE! It makes me want to vomit!

    • atthepub says:

      01:22pm | 07/07/11

      I’m one of you Cathy, just a different outlook.
      If I were waiting for society to do ‘the right thing’ I’d be pretty peeved too.

      The Punch selectively posts some and not other submissions. I submitted another with more detail about my situation which was not posted. I am sorry you are hurting. I am too. As far as I am concerned, when I’m 90 and my child 60, that is still my child. An adult one, but still my child.

    • Cathy says:

      07:34pm | 09/07/11

      Atthepub - Maybe the partner died…

    • Elizabeth says:

      01:01pm | 06/07/11

      Compassion is not an either/or thing (Jess Thompson) - it is possible to have compassion (as I do) for both the child and the mother. 

      We should also recognise that some people with disability (such as the author of the second article) are quite capable of advocating for themselves, but does that make them the best person to advocate for the needs of all people with disabilities?  The article says that the daughter has multiple disabilities which may mean that it is the mother/carer who is in the best position to advocate for her needs.  It seems to me that her greatest need at the moment is a mother who is not ‘at the end of her tether’ from trying to deal with ‘the system’ as well as care. 

      I have been there, I wasn’t a full time carer, I worked, studied and had a family of my own yet it was trying to navigate ‘the system(s)’ to advocate the needs of my aging mother who had bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, parkinson’s disease and failing kidneys (from long term use of the medication to treat the former problems) as well as dealing with a myriad of ‘spotfires’ that caused my psychogenic movement disorder.  As seems the mother in the article, I was at the ‘end of my tether’, many times and then somehow I’d start over, as I am sure she will.

      It seems to me that this article wasn’t about blaming society, her child or anyone else, she was simply trying to get across to those who run ‘the systems’, this is how she feels and ask for support, understanding and most importantly compassion.

      To the author of the second article, I have learnt that while one can always do more it is important to ask ‘at what cost’, when caring for those we love damages our health don’t we have the right to call ourselves ‘angry cripples’ too?

    • Felicity says:

      05:50pm | 08/07/11

      I think that she was trying to say is that the people who care for people with a disability and people with a disability want the same thing in the end . We all want timely services and accommodation provision appropriate to need for people with a disability giving flexibility and choice and we don’t want family carers to die before it is provided

    • Craig says:

      01:07pm | 06/07/11

      I share your anger.  As someone said above, the Government does quite well financially out of having committed family members such as yourself who look after those with disabilities who cannot look after themselves. 

      From where I see it, there are two options really; either we (a) pay family carers to look after the disabled in the community, or (b) institutionalise the disabled and look after them there.  Even assuming the unlikely scenario that there would be no abuse under option (b), it would clearly be much much more expensive to house the disabled in institutions than it would be to pay carers a decent wage.  And I’m not talking about the paltry breadcrumbs they get now.  Double the carers allowance, and the government would probably still be ahead in dollar terms.

      Of course, there is option (c) of not providing any support to the disabled at all, but I don’t see anyone except extreme economic rationalists and libertarians (and maybe Phillip Ruddock) supporting that idea, thankfully.

    • fairsfair says:

      01:26pm | 06/07/11

      “the Government does quite well financially out of having committed family members such as yourself who look after those with disabilities who cannot look after themselves.”

      They also do very well from people who pay their own rent and don’t rely on public housing. And parents who don’t abuse their children allowing them to not require a foster home.

      I think you asert a valid position in your later post - but that is just bizzarre logic.

    • Craig says:

      02:15pm | 06/07/11

      @fairsfair - The point I was trying to make is that if you accept that it’s a social necessity to make sure that disabled people are looked after, the best result for the government in dollar terms is the current arrangement where they give out a carers allowance rather than building and staffing institutions.  In fact, that option is so much cheaper for the government and the taxpayer that they could afford to be quite a bit more generous when it comes to that allowance.

      And from a political standpoint, who is going to dare go on TV and claim that giving more money to disabled carers is a waste of taxpayer funds?

    • Eye4anEye says:

      01:11pm | 06/07/11

      Tragic story and I hope things get better but “I am as crippled by the cruel Australian disability support system”  isn’t really that accurate in my opinion. It’s not cruel at least here in Australia you get support and it’s enough to survive on (though I grant it’s not enough to thrive on). If it’s to much for you instead of killing yourself and your daughter I suggest you go to counselling now and if the situation doesn’t improve put your daughter into care and visit her frequently to ensure she’s not being abused and see if your quality of life improves without having to care for her.

      Does your family not help you out at all? I’m assuming not from your writing about being isolated. Thats the cruel thing in society today families do not seem to care for and support each other as they once did instead passing the responsibilty onto the system/government. Kudos for sticking by your daughter.

    • Sam Paior says:

      02:30pm | 06/07/11

      Eye4anEye - you say “put your daughter into care” as if that’s an option. More than 1200 south australians with a disability are waiting for supported accomodation (more than 600 are in the category one “immediately danger of harm to self and others crisis” list). Many have waited for more than 20 years. The “system” is funded to really only house those in absolute crisis eg: when the parents are dead, and rarely before.
      Just this morning I met with a 72 yo woman whose autistic son beats her black and blue (“But it’s only every few months”). Her husband died three years ago and she is desperate to find a home for her son so that she can help him settle in and help educate his support workers (he’s barely verbal) etc. She has no financial resources after 40 years of not working to care for her son.
      She has between Buckley’s and no chance of finding him a place to live with any support until that one day, when he beats her, and she falls over and breaks a hip or has a stroke, and then the government will have to house and support two people with disabilities. Insane. It’s our government that is disabled, and our people are disabled by our government…

    • Les Cope says:

      06:51pm | 13/07/11

      Eye4anEye. It’s a very uninformed comment suggesting she should have therapy, and if that does not work then put her daughter into care. Neither of these two options will solve her issues or her daughters specific needs. As Sam Paior mentioned its just not possible for many parents to even get care when its actually needed. If the therapy worked then she still has the role of being her carer for the rest of her life. Won’t be long before its back to the therapist again. It is the responsibly of Government to provide assistance and that’s where an NDIS is crucial.

      If you yourself were hit with a major disability that required full time support you may be initially fortunate to have the support of your family. If the support was not forthcoming or if it ceased for what ever purpose, here is the scenario that currently exists. There are no ‘care facilities’ as such just waiting for tenants. The ‘system’ is just as likely to place you into an aged care facility until a more appropriate place was found. This happens regularly right now. Often its younger people that are placed in this situation. Disgraceful.

    • Soames says:

      01:53pm | 06/07/11

      It’s difficult to make a rational comment on a faux-analogy by an anonymous individual, particularly with a photo of a joey obviously being ‘nursed’ by an uninformed bleeding heart animal welfare nut, who thinks kangaroos aren’t a pest in this country.

    • Angry Cripple Editor says:

      02:32pm | 06/07/11

      I know the writer of the column personally. I know that her situation is a real one. I would not have allowed its publication otherwise.

    • Peter G. says:

      10:42pm | 06/07/11

      No fake Syrian lesbians here, then? wink
      (Just kidding ... it’s reassuring though in this current climate where fakes keep sucking media outlets in that this author is indeed genuine. It makes me feel less sooky for having got tears in my eyes as I tried to imagine myself in her shoes)

    • Harquebus says:

      03:06pm | 06/07/11

      I have read this. Thought about it. Read it again. All I can say TAC is, in the poverty department, you’re about to get company. Lots of it.

    • Lesley Laurel says:

      06:33pm | 06/07/11

      nobody cares any more. Just suffer in peace, in Liberal NSW

    • Bren says:

      07:07pm | 06/07/11

      @Lesley Laurel It is Labor and the greens that dont care and make the whole country suffer . It is fantastic that Liberals are in goverment in NSW maybe finally we can become the state we deserve to be under a caring Barry O Farrell and if you feel this way maybe you need to find a new home where some can care for you.

    • Nerryl says:

      10:13pm | 07/07/11

      Well Lesley all I can say is NSW has finally got some hope. I believe the new Minister for Disability Services actually cares about people unlike the past years of Labor except of course for John Della Bosca the only Minister in that fetid cesspool of a Labor government who had any value at all.

      Thank you voters of NSW for giving us some hope!

    • Greenhouse says:

      07:02pm | 06/07/11

      If you don’t vote, you don’t count!  Adults with a disability who do not have the capacity to vote in elections will never be counted by politicians. As adults, their needs should be considered and won’t unless they have a proxie vote given to their carers. As soon as they are seen as a voting demographic, there needs and those of their families will be taken into consideration. I have an adult daughter with a severe disability. Life is a constant battle for her and those in similar situations. Families and carers are ripped apart, left in poverty and generally dismissed by many of our political representatives.

    • bloke says:

      09:57pm | 06/07/11

      i’m in the highest tax bracket, partnered and childless (by choice). i would rather my taxes go to carers and the disabled ONLY. i am dead against them going to lazy bogans and breeders.

    • Rosina Benson says:

      02:18pm | 09/07/11

      Bloke, thank you.

    • Peter G. says:

      10:56pm | 06/07/11

      I’m not interested in getting involved in any of the “politics” surrounding this. I skimmed the comments and saw some pretty harsh ones, ones which I wonder whether, if you were talking to this woman in a coffee shop or at a barbecue, you would say to her face?  (I hope not).

      I just wanted to say that although I can’t even begin to imagine what your day-in day-out life for the past 20 years has been like, I’m just so enormously impressed by the heroic levels of hard work you (and all the other full time carers out there) put in to taking care of your loved ones.  I won’t be complaining next time I have to work a few hours overtime, that’s for sure.

      I wish you strength and peace, and best of luck in having your voice heard by the people who make the decisions, as you advocate so fiercely and so lovingly for your daughter.  I think it was brave of you to write this piece, and I thank you for the perspective I’ve gained through reading it.

      God bless.

    • everyaustraliancounts says:

      09:35am | 07/07/11

      I just read every comment on this thread.  There’s twenty minutes of my life I’ll never get back.

      For those of you who read the Punch religiously and don’t think they have anything to contribute to something because disability doesn’t affect them, you’re only a car accident or a newborn child away from being personally, intrinsically connected with the nasty little world that many of us live in.

      That’s a world where people are sniping about ‘their government dollars’ going to support people with disability, where people are advocating for eugenics (that’s having views like advocating for killing kids with disability at birth, I’m sure some of those posters won’t know big words) and the ‘don’t care’ attitude. 

      Man.  Hope your car doesn’t crash into a tree.  Hope your latent diabetes doesn’t cause you to lose a leg.  Hope you don’t have a baby with a congenital disability, or autism (thats 1 in 160 kids in Australia, btw).  Hope you don’t get too close to that outdoor motor on your boat.  Hope you don’t get cancer.  Hell, hope you don’t get OLD.

      Disability affects us all.  And if you want to do something about it - to make sure that ALL Australians are supported to work and contribute to our economy - go to http://www.everyaustraliancounts.com.au and read, then sign up.

    • Ells says:

      11:16am | 07/07/11

      Very well said. We will ALL be affected at some point in our lives. I just hope that I am affected when I am older and have had the ability to set myself up to survive it all on my own, because based on the responses on this thread people will be far more likely to care for mistreated cattle than they will be for my human plight.

      I would never in my life expect or demand handouts, but I would expect adequate support and human compassion to get me through the hardest yards. I won’t be holding my breath, but I will be fighting for a better future for all those affected by these very real issues.

    • Julie says:

      04:09pm | 07/07/11

      Can I ask the writer what she thinks of the proposed National Disability Insurance Scheme. Thankyou for sharing your experience - glad you decided to write instead of kill yourself. Send it to your Federal and State MP’s.
      I believe the situation will improve.

    • Cathy says:

      10:34pm | 08/07/11

      Hi Julie, I believe the NDIS is part of the answer. The Productivity Commissioners have done a brilliant job of disemminating the submissions,  the personal accounts and the actuarial studies that have been provided to them and they have come up with a pretty good answer to this national dillema.

      What we need is politicians with courage and with heart who are willing to be advocates for change.

      I do not believe our current government has the ticker to embrace such transformational change under its current leader and that stills my heart.

      Therefore I have to hope that there are enough politicians who are willing to put the proposal forward for debate in the legislative assembly, and enough to cross the floor because Labor does not allow conscience votes very often (crossing the floor is more acceptable to the Liberal party - have no idea why).

      The final report is due at the end of the month.

      We need the families who provide care, people who need support and their friends and colleagues to all come together to ensure that this is not just another ‘idea’ but becomes a reality.

      We need to sell an NDIS for what it is; the liberalising of peoples lives, as well as cost saving because all people who can work will be provided with the services to enable them to work, which will then offset the cost burden through the tax system. It is, with the ageing of the population, more an imperative than simply being about social justice. An NDIS is really also about sound economics.

    • Cathy says:

      12:30am | 09/07/11

      ooops I meant cross the floor if an NDIS is put forward in the House of Representatives (Federal Parliament) , the Legislative Assembly is state based government. *!****

      If it is any comfort the states spport the NDIS except I have been told Westen Australia - they must have something in their drinking water in their parliament as this attitude makes no absolutely no sense.

    • Disgusted. says:

      10:25pm | 07/07/11

      This writer is incredibly courageous to expose her life and that of her disabled adult daughter to the utterly cruel and selfish gaze of the PIGS who dare to criticize her for 20 years of slavery - which she endures for LOVE’s sake. Some of you on this thread are far more disabled than her daughter - your soul’s are crippled and filthy.

    • CM says:

      02:32pm | 09/07/11

      I send you and your daughter a hug - I know where you are at, as I have lived your life. As much as the general public care unfortunately they can never fully understand the overwhelming grief and dispair that consumes a long term carer.

    • Calpurnia's Cat says:

      02:49pm | 09/07/11

      This week’s TAC has been very frank in telling it like it is,  holding up her life and feelings for us to comnment on. There have been some very low rent comments here and some posters who should perhaps present themselves to the zoo as some new form of higher order species. Being homo sapiens does not make you human, that takes empathy and compassion

      The Editor has told us this week’s TAC is real, I know she is real because that person is me although I am not the writer. There many who are worn down and worn out and like TAC might think to check-out but we are not blinded to the light in the eyes of the person we love and for whom we care for that light is hope and we all know about hope, sometimes it’s all we have other times it’s all we need.

    • Felicity says:

      04:42pm | 09/07/11

      Well said Calpurnia’s Cat it’s me too, but don’t forget the love, the love keeps us going as well

    • Cathy says:

      07:40pm | 09/07/11

      Yes the love is the overwhelming feature of being a parent, particularly a parent to someone who needs so much more than others…

      All of you families who provide care and all of you people who need supports be a strong voice for transformational change. We can win but we will have to work diligently to make it happen, there is no use in licking our wounds - there is far more sense in being loud and being united.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

#Thomson will never get brothel tapes, CCTV-in-brothels experts tell the ABC. http://t.co/7YFORBBJ

Daniel Piotrowski

@ToryShepherd there's always time for Din Tai Fung.

ToryShepherd

@drpiotrowski will be there just in time for Din Tai Fung

Daniel Piotrowski

@ToryShepherd I hope that's in your piece tomorrow. Also - are you coming over this week or laaaaaater?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Bill Kelty made a memorable speech last week. Addressing the ACTU Congress Dinner in Sydney, the legendary…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Speaking of yourself in the third person is usually a sign that you’re suffering from delusions…

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

If South Australia had just arrived in the world, red and wrinkled and mewling, what would we call it?…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

241 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter