Do consumers want cheaper prices and greater product choices? Of course they do and that’s why it is essential that more Costco supermarkets open up around Australia.

Costco in the Docklands. Kinda looks like the Sydney Opera House from that angle.

Costco is a US company that operates retail warehouses where people can become members for a yearly fee which then entitles them to shop at a massive warehouse offering products at substantial discounts to competitors.

By way of background, Costco has about 563 warehouses worldwide with around 410 operated in the US, and the remainder operated in Canada, Mexico, the UK, Taiwan, Korea, Japan and Australia. We currently only have one Costco in Melbourne’s Docklands which opened on 17 August 2009.

The Costco model is very simple. It builds a “big box” warehouse of around 14,000 square metres and stocks around 4,000 products presented in bulk for members to select. Individuals pay an annual fee of $60, while business members can buy an annual membership for $55. The product categories on offer are very broad and include groceries, confectionary, electronic appliances, automotive supplies, toys, hardware, sporting goods, jewellery, watches, cameras, books, apparel, health and beauty, furniture, and office supplies and equipment.

Costco stocks known brands as well as generic products and offers its products at prices estimated to be up to 15% cheaper than competitors. Members typically buy in bulk and may only visit once every 2-3 weeks. Clearly, Costco works on the premise that the substantial savings members can achieve from buying at lower prices and in bulk justifies the yearly membership.

The Costco model appeals to consumers through a one stop retail warehouse concept where they may buy items less often, but in bulk and at lower prices. It’s a novel approach which combines the typical supermarket with a traditional department store.

Clearly, it’s a different model to Coles, Woolworths and ALDI. A typical Coles and Woolworths supermarket is between 2,000 and 3,000 square metres and stocks up to 20,000 or more products. An ALDI supermarket is typically up 1,500 square metres and offers only hundreds of mostly “private label” (ie generic) products. Apart from the massive size of Costco warehouses, Costco also sets itself apart by requiring the payment of membership fees.

While not traditionally part of the supermarket landscape in Australia, membership fees not only generate an upfront cash flow for Costco, but they offer an important psychological and financial incentive for customers to revisit the Costco warehouse. Much like petrol shopper dockets from Coles and Woolworths are designed to get customers back, membership fees can be used as an obvious way to “tie” customers to the Costco. Frequent flyer and other loyalty programs try to do the same thing. With Costco, the membership fee also seeks to give “members” (ie customers) a sense of exclusivity.

How will Australians respond to the payment of membership fees for a grocery/retailing experience? Only time will tell, but with reportedly over 50,000 members already paid up, the Melbourne Docklands Costco warehouse is certainly off to a good start given that it only opened in August last year. Will members renew their yearly membership? Again only time will tell, but interestingly, Costco states that they have a renewal rate of 87% in the US and Canada.

Now, will we see more Costco warehouses around Australia? Well, hopefully yes. But it may not be that simple as the big boys, namely the established shopping centre landlords and their industry association – the Shopping Centre Council of Australia are taking issue with the proposed Costco in the Sydney suburb of Auburn.

In fact, the Shopping Centre Council and its members – the big shopping centre landlords such as Westfield are opposing the Auburn development. While there are legal arguments that the Costco proposal may not completely fit within existing State planning and zoning requirements, the real concern is that the shopping centre landlords are simply trying to prevent or slow down the entry of a new competitor into the market.

For those not familiar with Sydney, Westfield, for example, has two large shopping centres in nearby Burwood and Parramatta. It doesn’t take a genius or even an economics degree to think that Westfield may possibly want to protect its nearby shopping centres from competition.

Needless to say, there is a danger that the various planning and zoning objections being made against Costco’s Auburn proposal may be an anti-competitive way to deny Sydney consumers much needed access to a new supermarket competitor. Melbourne consumers have responded very favourably to Costco opening up in Docklands and Sydney consumers should be given the chance to shop at a Costco sooner rather than later.

Planning and zoning objections no matter how valid under State laws, need to be carefully considered within the context of our federal competition laws. Clearly, there are serious questions to be asked about whether planning and zoning objections can or should be a breach of our competition laws. After all, planning and zoning objections can used in a potentially anti-competitive manner and for that reason alone should, whenever lodged by competitors, be closely reviewed by the competition regulator for possible breaches of our competition laws.

So who is standing up for those consumers in Sydney who would like to shop at a Costco? Will Federal Competition Minister Craig Emerson approach Westfield and other shopping centre landlords to withdraw their objections? Will the ACCC ask those curly questions of the shopping centres landlords and the Shopping Centre Council about why they are opposing the Costco development, especially given that there is an obvious place for the new competition that Costco would bring to the Sydney?

So, please Minister Emerson, can you make sure consumers quickly get more Costco supermarkets and that the cosy club of big existing shopping landlords doesn’t call the shots as far as getting the Sydney Costco opened as soon as possible. 

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

Most commented

40 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Ziggy says:

      06:57am | 14/04/10

      Its the same thinking that will allow Woolworths and Coles not to pay the higher electricity prices but force all other smaller retailers to do so. Thus forcing small business into liquidation and leading to less competition and higher prices. Then some Minister will trumpet how the Govts support small business!

    • Rob says:

      06:46am | 14/04/10

      I am not sure whether we need more supermarket chains ,but what we do need is some bloody service from the existing ones .The level of service in retailing is pathetic .

    • CantWaitToFinishUni says:

      12:02pm | 14/04/10

      If you’re referring to the attitude of the people that work in these places, consider that they see over 800 different faces a week come through their register.

      Every single different face expecting a genuine smile and genuinely friendly greeting is surely deluded.

    • Rob says:

      12:57pm | 14/04/10

      CantWaitToFinishUni,
      Sorry,but i am referring to the quantity of staff that these retailers(head office budget requirements)provide to management to effectively operate the store.Having been in retail management for 40 years i have watched the emphasis change from serving customers to serving shareholders.

    • Gaz says:

      07:23am | 14/04/10

      Well said. I’ve been to the costco in Docklands and it is good. Apart from the cheaper prices I like the opportunity to buy in bulk, as I live in the bush and buying in bulk makes it more convenient. Coles and Woolies have had it too good for too long. Operating in practically a duopoly market they are a law unto themselves. We have always been told that competition is good, that was one of the reasons cited for privatising Telstra and the SEC in Victoria. I saw somewhere that Australia’s grocery prices are in the top 5 of OECD countries, so we need something to break openthe market. It would be interesting to see how much money Frank Lowy donates to the Labor party.

    • John A Neve says:

      08:26am | 14/04/10

      Gaz,

      Tell us has your electricity & communications bill gone down since privatisation?

      Has the service provided got better?

      Ask the shareholders in Coles and Woolies if they want a reduction in their dividends.

    • Iva Tarbell says:

      04:24pm | 14/04/10

      Gaz,

      Yes, Australia’s grocery price inflation is in the top 5 of the OECD countries, but remember; the OECD includes basket case economies like; Turkey, Iceland and Mexico.

      Take those countries out, and Australian consumers live with the fastest increasing grocery prices in the developed world.

      See : “Australia has the world’s highest food inflation”

      http://www.news.com.au/national/australia-has-worlds-highest-food-inflation/story-e6frfkvr-1111115821584

      But then again, Australia also suffers from having the most concentrated retail market in world – nowhere else in the world, (excluding the old Eastern bloc countries)  do just two entities control over 80% of a nation’s supermarket shelves as Woolworths/Coles do in Australia.

      Gee, I wonder if there is a relationship between Australia having the developed worlds’ most concentrated supermarket sector -  and also having the developed world’s highest food inflation ?

      One Costco is not going to change that.

      Woolworths and Coles need to broken up – as the US government did with Standard Oil a century ago.

    • Gaz says:

      07:08pm | 14/04/10

      Thanks Iva. That’s a very interesting website.

    • John J says:

      08:04am | 14/04/10

      I am all for anything that brings down prices,  I am in N.S.W said with a sigh. Our Electricity bill are going up by a massive amount. Yes we are all aware Labor has to go. The elderly will either freeze and or starve to death, its either stay warm or eat. So bring in more competition in the food sector here and we will all flock to it

    • Sherlock says:

      09:30am | 14/04/10

      Surprisingly I actually agree with most of this article. I’ve always said that if other competitors think they can do a better job than Coles and Woolies they’ll open in Australia. I also agree that Costco should be given every encouragement to open as many stores as possible.

      However we have planning laws for a reason and while they should be bent to accommodate Costco, bending rules, no matter how hard ,is different to actually breaking them. Planning laws are there for a reason. If you break them everytime you believe you have a special case then it’s a waste of time having them in the first place.

    • Iva Tarbell says:

      04:18pm | 14/04/10

      Well, knock me over with a feather.

      Sherlock the great free-market disciple, actually supports prescriptive government regulation that inferences with the workings of the free market (planning laws) whereby the government, and not the market, decides what products can be sold where.

      And yes, Sherlock planning laws are there “for a reason” –  to hand special government legislative privilege and protection from competition to the likes of Westfield & Woolworths.

      The hypocrisy of those that claim to be free-market devotees, those who rally to oppose any strengthening of competition laws to level the playing field between big and small business, (as they claim this interfers with market) but remain totally mute when it comes to planning laws that protect the big end of town from competition - is utterly breath-taking.

    • Scott Glennon says:

      09:35am | 14/04/10

      Bring it on!

    • Terry Horsfall says:

      10:04am | 14/04/10

      I will happily pay $60 a year to Costco even if I never shop there because it is imperative that the Coles / Woolworth duopoly is broken down, and we should be supporting any contender that can help to break the duopolists’ hegemony. 
      Just look at how Wal-Mart has destroyed entire communities in the US to see the dangers that we face here in Australia because the multiple levels of government bully small business while pandering to every whim and demand of the big big boys.

    • Sherlock says:

      10:37am | 14/04/10

      What?

      The opening of a large supermarket has destroyed communities? Really? Can’t have been much of a community to begin with. Must of been all those new jobs that did it.

      I find it difficult to reconcile your belief that one wal-mart destroys communities with your preparedness to join costco. You complain about pandering to the big boys yet you’re happy to see costco open although it has a turnover far in excess of both coles and woolies combined.

    • Iva Tarbell says:

      05:39pm | 14/04/10

      Sherlock

      Please explain how the opening of new supermarket “creates jobs”

      Do you really think that people going to eat more food because a new supermarket opens ?

      Would you eat an extra helping of humble pie each night just because a new supermarket has opened in your area ?

      The opening of supermarket doesn’t “create” extra jobs – it merely transfers jobs from one store to the other.

      You confuse the opening of a supermarket, with the opening of a productive facility such as factory, a farm or a mine – which actually does create new jobs.

      And since you “find it difficult to reconcile that one wal-mart destroys communities” I suggest that do a bit of reading to educate yourself.

      Try: http://www.walmartmovie.com/facts.php to start with.

    • Kris howard says:

      10:26am | 14/04/10

      “I will happily pay $60 a year to Costco even if I never shop there because it is imperative that the Coles / Woolworth duopoly is broken down, and we should be supporting any contender that can help to break the duopolists’ hegemony. “

      I totally and completely agree! I live in the Inner West without a car, and shopping at Coles Broadway has become a total nightmare. Queues were always long, and now they’ve replaced half the cashiers with “self-service checkouts” so they’re even longer. If Costco was a possibility, it would be worth the annual fee PLUS the cost of hiring a car for a couple trips just to avoid a few more visits to Coles.

    • Greypower says:

      11:34am | 14/04/10

      Read this Sherlock—The Wal-Mart You Don’t Know, and the Eventual U.S. Decline 12/3/03

      Wal-Mart’s prices are so low that many vendors are forced to use overseas suppliers just to do business with the massive company. Will these low prices eventually devastate our economy, as more and more jobs get sent overseas?
      http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/12/03/walmart-jobs.aspx

    • Fred Farmer says:

      01:11pm | 14/04/10

      Australians too are very price-sensitive, which is why quite a high proportion of the supermarket products are already imported. For those that aren’t (milk, meat etc), the terms demanded of suppliers are onerous to the point where producer/farmers don’t get a fair return for their labour.

      The biggest beneficiaries of the retail trade in this country are the property-owners, whose rent is tied to turnover.

      Allowing Costco to open here won’t change any of this, expect perhaps to relocate some of the turnover away from the shopping centres.

    • stephen says:

      11:42am | 14/04/10

      But buying in bulk would turn me off. Why buy 5 of anything , when i only want one ?
      And i like those self-service checkouts at Wollies. Don’t get asked ‘flybuys, money out, or hows yer day’.

    • Jack from Perth says:

      02:48pm | 14/04/10

      They still ask for your woolworths rewards card

    • Jade says:

      03:37pm | 14/04/10

      Yeah self serve at coles ask for fly byes aswell… just means you dont have to talk to people.

    • Horthy says:

      11:47am | 14/04/10

      I’m no great fan of any supermarket (please, but your fruit and veg at a local independent) but I like self-service checkouts and have noticed they help speed up the lines, at least where I shop. YMMV.

    • Michelle says:

      12:07pm | 14/04/10

      What a load of croc! Woolworths is 100% australian owned.  All funds go back to australian mum and dad share holders!  Where do Costco’s profits go?  I can tell you, not back into our pockets.  We are so quick to “sell out” then whinge when we have no aussie “stuff” left.

    • Razzle_Dazzle says:

      01:28pm | 14/04/10

      Here’s evidence the govt is doing a great job in brainwashing the average aussie taxpayer. Im glad you are supporting the “mum and dad” shareholders of Australia by paying inflated prices for inferior products and substandard service. Good work.

    • antman says:

      01:33pm | 14/04/10

      Michelle,

      What a load of croc!

      Woolworths is a public, listed company. It’s shareholders can, and do, come from all over the world, not just Australia. There is no jurisdictional restriction on who can own its shares. Why would you think that it was 100% Australian owned?

      I’m also sure that the majority of shareholders are institutional, so there is no way that “all funds” (do you mean dividends?) go back to Australian mum and dad shareholders.

    • Michelle says:

      02:10pm | 14/04/10

      Of course their shareholders come from all over the world, they are a public listed company.  Do you think Costsco/Adldi are going to be any less ruthless with their buying power over small operators /farmers?  I would imagine worse.  Competition is good!, but the more “giants” there are, in the end less competition for us.  Bye Bye IGA.

    • antman says:

      05:50pm | 14/04/10

      Michelle, I’m confused. Are you agreeing that Woolies is not 100% Australian owned now or are you (bizarrely) disputing that shareholding equates to ownership?

      I said nothing about whether Costco/Aldi would be any more or less ruthless. I just picked you up on your 2 incorrect statements: that Woolworths are 100% Australian owned and that all “funds” go back to Australian mum and dad shareholders.

    • Iva Tarbell says:

      06:06pm | 14/04/10

      Yes Michelle.

      Costco and Aldi in Australia can’t be as ruthless with their buying power over small operators /farmers as Woolworths/Coles are – because Costco and Aldi only have a small market share.

      A small operator/farmer has the ability to say NO to a demand from Costco, as losing one customer with one store (even a big store) is not going to send you broke – as you still have 99% of the market to sell to.

      But when the market degenerates where one retailer controls as much 40% of the market - as Woolworths & Coles each have in Australia – any business that looses 40% of their total potential customers overnight is out of business.

      Therefore most Australian suppliers are simply bonded vassals to the Woolworths/Coles empire, becuase of Woolworths/Coles combined 80% market share.

      If you don’t obey every demand from Woolworths/Coles you risk being de-listing, and losing 40% of the potential market overnight will send even the strongest of firms to ruin.

    • Ian says:

      01:50pm | 14/04/10

      The membership fee is a rip off because the “discounts” aren’t that fantastic for most lines other than groceries.  The membership fee for me is a significant barrier to wanting to shop there - why should I pay a fee to be allowed inside. It’s like visiting a terrible nightclub - you wonder why you paid to get in.

      More concerning still is the complete lack of Australia-owned/made products available. Costco breaking up the duopoly? Seriously doubt it!

    • Tails says:

      03:20pm | 14/04/10

      I can’t believe I just read a long copy ad for a Supermarket. What is this, 1986? Have I just been traveling in some sort of hot tub time machine?

    • papachango says:

      04:39pm | 14/04/10

      I agree that Coles and Woolies are badly in need of a serious competitor but Costco’s not it. Not everyone enjoys buying in bulk at a massive warehouse, with oversize trolleys.

      Aldi do a far better job at keeping them honest, but to really slaughter them we need Carrefour, Tesco or Sainburys to seriously enter this market. All three are so vastly superior to Coles/Woolies they’d make them seem like third world bazaars.

    • Iva Tarbell says:

      05:47pm | 14/04/10

      You are on the right track papachango

      But the solution to the Woolworths/Coles problem is simple.

      We don’t need foriegn competitors, like Costco - simply break up Woolworths and Coles into 10 or more small competing companies, just like they did in the home of free market capitalism with Standard Oil years ago.

      Then get rid of the zoning laws that protect the likes of the Westfield for competition.

      Tthen Australian consumers would once again enjoy some of the lowest food prices in the world like we used to before the onset of the Woolworths/Coles duopoly.

    • papachango says:

      03:41pm | 15/04/10

      Breaking them up will increase, not lower, food prices, as they won’t have the same level of buying power.

      It could be good for their suppliers as they’d get screwed less, though their cost of doing business would be higher, and in any case most supermarket suppliers are big boys themselves - Nestle, Unilever, Kraft etc

      But the consumer would definitely pay more - think local IGA prices which are a huge ripoff in towns without a Coles/Woolies.

    • Judy says:

      05:50pm | 14/04/10

      And I bet everyone who’s whinging about the need for more than Woolies, Coles and Aldi lives in a city, or at least a large town. I’d LOVE to have access to an Aldi. At least now I have a Coles and a Woolies (even if their prices seem to be quite a lot higher than the ones near my family in Sydney). Imagine how expensive groceries are for country shoppers when they don’t even have any of these big stores…
      Cheers,

    • David says:

      10:29pm | 14/04/10

      Regarding prices - I think people forget that suppliers have to make money as well, because with declining profit they reduce their ability to continue as a going concern. The lower the price of your groceries, it is more likely the lower the profit of the supplier, which means reduced profits for the farmer/raw material supplier,  ergo lower levels of domestic investment and ultimately increased imports…..which means reduced jobs in the Australian manufacturing and supply industries. You cannot have your cake and eat it too…....

    • simon says:

      12:41am | 15/04/10

      why break up companies from being sucessful? how is that really fair, we do live in a capitalist society they are just following shareholders wishes. why put them out? let alone part of the 100’s of thousands of people who work for them putting their jobs at risk…

    • Lou says:

      10:22am | 15/04/10

      I try and avoid the big two at all costs. I shop at a local store or IGA for groceries, and a fruit and veg shop/farmers market/market for fruit and veg. Sure the lower prices are sometimes tempting, but there are no Coles or Wollies near me, whereas I can walk to all the other shops. Win - win.

      Also the local shops and IGA have much better opeing hours in this sleepy little deathtoll town!

    • James Canon says:

      03:43pm | 15/04/10

      Do Coles and Woolies really have 80pc of the market? IGA says themselves that they have a 20pc share. That’s 100pc. So what market share do ALDI, Franklins, Foodworks and all the other independent bakers, greengrocers and bakers have? I’ve heard that more Australians bought thier meat from butchers than at any other store.

      All these 80pc figures are bandied about, i suspect, by some commentators who have an axe to grind. Push comes to shove - there’s actually more competition in Australian grocery retailing than there has been for some time. But if you don’t like a particular store , don’t shop there. Simples!

    • Mike says:

      06:42pm | 22/04/10

      They’re all as bad as each other.. I have a small butchershop in Victoria and the local IGA specials are at a price that 1. I can’t buy at 2. If I could I’d lose money in matching/selling.  The bull with coles etc and their same “low” price across the state/Aust, last time I checked it cost money to go from Melbourne to Mildura or Brisbane to Mt.Isa, so who wears the cost of freight?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

tory_maguire

@nswpolice very polite and helpful officers manning the Pyrmont road closures this morning

David Penberthy

@KevCorduroy @SallyHitchiner it's a great idea I doubt he'd go for it though far too laid back

ToryShepherd

. @mcguiremi is journo of the year! #samediaawards

ToryShepherd

.@mariamosco @msmarto Super Smarto. And Shirley Stott Despoja into the Hall of Fame #samediaawards

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter