Robert Redford was born in Santa Monica, California. Burt Lancaster was born in East Harlem, New York. There the similarities end.

Raindrops keep falling on my headstone. Tricky pic: Paul Toohey

Redford claims to be a facilitator of alternative artistic dreams and talent. Lancaster genuinely was. Redford can’t act. Lancaster could.

Redford has never risked playing characters that make him look malevolent or wrongfooted or unpleasant. Lancaster often played characters without redemptive traits. In 1961, with the war still close to many damaged hearts, he played a Nazi war criminal jurist in “Judgment in Nuremburg”.

Redford uses his face to show his face. Lancaster used his face to show a man’s soul.

Why this? Why now? Burt Lancaster has been dead for 18 years.

It’s because the Sundance Film Festival is up and about in Utah, an event that each year, when Redford rolls himself out as the film industry’s morality guarantor, reminds me that vacuous celebrity for celebrity’s sake is not the recent phenomenon many claim it to be.

It is the time of year when Redford accepts his annual praise for being a great guy, a great actor, a great director and a great supporter of unknown film talent – even though he’s never himself made a great film.

It is as creepy and fawning as a Mark Nicholas interview with Richie Benaud.

Sundance also means the Academy Awards are in the air, which in turns means the lobbyists are circling, infiltrating, influencing and distorting outcomes.

Redford has never won an Oscar for his acting. Not even the Academy Award judges could be as brazenly dishonest as that.

But Redford did win Best Picture for directing “Ordinary People”, which is sobering when you consider that in that same year, 1980, he was going head to head with Martin Scorsese’s “Raging Bull”.

(Ten years on, Scorsese’s “Goodfellas” would lose to the Kevin Costner’s “Dancing With Wolves”, which confirms the Oscars are more about weak-kneed sentiment than disinterested appreciation.)

It’s also because I watched “Jeremiah Johnson” the other night. It’s yet another film in which Redford claims a special spiritual connection with indigenous people or creatures of the wild lands, who are invariably belittled as noble failures beside Redford’s stronger white man instincts.

And it’s also because I watched, again, two brilliant Burt Lancaster films, being “The Sweet Smell of Success”, where he plays a black-hearted, possibly incestuous, oppressive and powerful newspaper columnist; and “Elmer Gantry”, in which he’s a charismatic hobo who reinvents himself by joining a tent show revival that is heading into dangerous mystical terrain.

For his role in “Elmer Gantry”, one of Lancaster’s greatest, he (deservedly) won the Oscar for Best Actor.

For a superhumanly fit fellow, Lancaster certainly proved false the axiom that exercise clears the mind, entirely. Initially hired by Hollywood for his physique, he didn’t let it define him.

He could be a psychopath, vicious and cruel without needing a gun. He could be the old deluded man in “Atlantic City”, perving through the curtains as his young neighbour, played by Susan Sarandon, washed herself down with lemons in the sink.

He ventured into strange, uncomfortable places. “The Swimmer”, of 1968, is the story of a man who decides to swim home across the backyard swimming pools of wealthy Connecticut. He spends most of the movie in tight trunks as he laps his way to a sorry truth.

Ridiculed as a pretentious film, it was nevertheless a brave one. There is the dodgy “Valdez is Coming”, in which he plays a Mexican constable who seeks to avenge a Mexican widow with a none-too-subtle crucifix tied to his back.

And there’s “Castle Keep”, a war/art/acid film co-starring Peter Falk and Bruce Dern, in which a straggler crew of US misfit soldiers, some of them thugs, some of them intellectuals, are sent to guard a count’s castle against the Germans.

One of the soldiers develops a sexual attraction for a Volkswagen. It’s that kind of film. It was 1969.

Burt Lancaster conducted or participated in these remarkable experiments as a seeker rather than a big box office opportunist, which is why he needed to create his own production company to make films the big studios wouldn’t touch.

There were, of course, popular successes, such as “Bird Man of Alcatraz”, “The Killers”, “From Here To Eternity”, “Gunfight at the OK Corral”, “Separate Tables”, “Elmer Gantry”, “Judgment at Nuremburg”, “Atlantic City” and “Local Hero”.

He worked with the Europeans making foreign language films. There were many forgettable films but his achievements were extraordinary. He never won the Oscar for Lifetime Achievement. Robert Redford, whose musical equivalent is Bob Geldof, won in 2002.

Redford turned down the role of playing drunkard lawyer Frank Galvin in “The Verdict”, because he said he didn’t want to play “such a loser”. It doesn’t say much for the depth by which Redford approaches his craft, but it says much about how he wants himself to be seen.

His longtime accomplice, Paul Newman, took the Frank Galvin role and won an Oscar nomination.

And who, out of Paul Newman and Robert Redford, starring in “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid”, could have swapped to the other actor’s role and made it work?

The answer is not Robert Redford.

Redford launched the 34th Sundance Festival this week saying: “We show stories of what people in America are really dealing with, and really living with, against a consequence of having a government that’s let them down.

“People can come and say, ‘God, at least we’re seeing how people are really living in America, and what they’re up against.’ We square away on the 99 percent.”

Starbucks is the official coffee supplier of Sundance.

The LA Times reported that amid this year’s numerous films, which are generally shortlisted for their depictions of American hardship, Sundance corporate sponsors provided special guests with free snow boots and iPads, canapés, Grey Goose vodka, Sugar lip exfoliations (whatever that is), hair touch ups, fancy exclusive dinners and “gifting suites”, where celebrities line up to be showered with free clothes and gadgets.

Sundance is a time for sponsors, such as Natrol, which set up a lounge offering Vitamin B-12 5000mcg Fast Dissolve drinks, to issue media releases which tend never to see the light of day. Except here.

“It was exciting to see B-12 become the energizing hit of Sundance among actors, musicians, filmmakers and filmgoers alike,” states Lisa Sheppard, Sr, Director of Marketing at Natrol, Inc. “The streets of Sundance were buzzing with people not only familiar with our product’s ability to provide energy and focus, but also the convenience of taking an easily dissolvable, and tasty pill on the run.”

Such is Redford’s annual celebration of himself.

Male actors such as Leonardo DiCaprio, Matt Damon, George Clooney and Brad Pitt years ago overtook Redford and left him in their dust. He can teach them nothing. But those actors are still trailing Lancaster.

In 1986, Lancaster appeared in an advertisement advocating AIDS awareness, at a time when it was considered unwise to do so. He joined Martin Luther King Jr’s March on Washington in 1963. But he remained a private and enigmatic man who let his films do the talking. As a true star should.

Lancaster’s gravestone simply reads: “Burt Lancaster, 1913—1994”. As a true star’s should.

Most commented

45 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • nihonin says:

      07:29am | 29/01/12

      Paul Toohey, are you hinting that the much fawned over, self flagellating, hypercritical thespians amongst us, believe they’re superior and like to manufacture that image.  If you are, I’m shocked, shocked that they would think that way, just listening to Cate Blanchett or Geoffrey Rush I know they donate over 2/3 of their earnings to all the causes they speak for and support by example.

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      07:32am | 29/01/12

      Hi Paul,

      I am very surprised that you should compare Robert Redford & Burt Lancaster in this way.  I am sorry to correct you but they both happened to be brilliant actors just seemed to target very different target audiences as well as different age groups & generations!  Personally speaking Burt Lancaster was very much liked & appreciated by my father’s generation. Somehow I feel that Robert Redford was very unique for my own generation.

      I just wanted to know if you do have a problem with good looking actors or the Sundance Film Festival in general?  Of course every organization such as Sundance needs sponsors as well as that is just common knowledge for most of us. For me personally the film festival itself,  is all about giving a chance to unknown actors as well as very low budget films which happens to be a great cause, anyway. Even if you do not think so yourself.

      I also wanted to say that I personally do admire George Clooney, but Brad Pitt & Leonardo Di Caprio do also have a similar effect on my circle of friends.  To cut the long story in short “they both happen to be far too good looking in an annoying way.  As well as the fact that they do seem to have a very long road before we actually see any kind change & signs of maturity on their faces!!

      Lets also not get obsessed about the Oscars this year, apart from the fact Mr Billy Crystal is hosting the actual blessed event that we look forward to every year.  I must say that he happens to be the really entertaining part of the Oscars, unfortunately.  To me it seems to be all about the re surfacing act by the same old crowds over & over again.  Of course different type films have a capability of entertaining very different target audiences, naturally.

      Way back the musicals & Western Cowboy movies were the hot favorites for my parents’ generation.  But they all seem to be part of history now. I personally make an effort to watch a film for the actual message content as well as being entertained.  But I must say that with all due respect to you & your knowledge about Hollywood.  After all it was invented in the USA, I personally do not see how a couple of high budget films can dominate the entertainment business.

      At the end of the day we are all very different people who would like to be entertained in our own special way!  Entertainment is all about leisure time which is something that we choose to do in our spare time for the most obvious reasons.  And ultimately our tastes in films & music may vary a great deal from one person to another. Kind regards to your editors.

    • Bertrand says:

      08:36am | 29/01/12

      “I just wanted to know if you do have a problem with good looking actors or the Sundance Film Festival in general?”

      I would say that Mr Toohey has a problem with the Sundance Festival, but, just like his OWS article last week, he has decided to attack it by attacking one of the faces of it. This is poor journalism, and a Journalism 101 student would be lucky to scrape through with a pass if they continued to write opinion pieces in which their opinions were supported by nothing but ad hominem attacks on individuals.

      By all means, Mr Toohey, write an article in which you express an opinion against the Sundance Film festival.

      You could argue that the overall standard of the films is quite low and that as a result the festival itself is over-rated. This is an argument that you could support with an anlysis of some of the films on offer.

      Or you could choose to argue that the festival focus too much on films with particular themes, and that the thematic content of the festival does not accurately reflect the realities of our society.

      Both of these arguments could be validly made, and could be reasonably disputed by people who disagree with them. But at least they would be an opinion in which you can support your ideas with actual references to the films or ideas the festival promotes.

      This article is simply another case of sloppy journalism in which it is the man being played and not the ball.

    • erbert says:

      10:15am | 29/01/12

      I reckon Paul Toohey’s just sore because he was denied a pass to the VIP tent at the festival where he was hoping to hob-nob with the famous.

    • acotrel says:

      07:57am | 29/01/12

      Dook did great things for America.  He fought in every war and won it, even in Vietnam !  He probably even posed for the WW1 poster ‘Uncle Sam needs You’ !
      Actors are good for democracy, especially when they give theirs mate up to the likes of Senator Joe Mc Carthy !

      Jimmy Stewart - now THERE was an actor.  He even pretended to fly bombers over Germany !

    • marley says:

      10:08am | 29/01/12

      @acotrel - I think you just set a new record for inane comments. 

      What does John Wayne have to do with a column about Burt Lancaster and Robert Redford?  What does Jimmy Stewart, for that matter?  And what makes you think Jimmy Stewart didn’t fly missions over Germany?  As for your comment below about Heston, not funny at all.

    • Martin says:

      10:09am | 29/01/12

      @acotrel. More stupidity. Stewart did fly bombers over Germany I believe he flew about 20 missions. Why don’t you check your facts before you put your foot in your mouth. It’s like your Tony Abbott infatuation, don’t let the facts stand in the way of lies and misinformation such as your embarrassing rants yesterday.

    • nihonin says:

      03:40pm | 29/01/12

      acotrel, has never let a little thing like the truth, get in the way of good rant, eh acotrel.  I’m onto you as acotrel, I know you’re a Lib plant, very clever of Tony to use misdirection and have a few of you always point the finger at Tony for the problems that beset this government.  Very clever indeed, Mr Abbott.

    • acotrel says:

      08:13am | 29/01/12

      Charleston Heston should have got the bullet early in his career !

    • Chris L says:

      11:08am | 29/01/12

      Get your stinking paws off Charleton Heston you damn dirty ape!

    • stephen says:

      11:20am | 29/01/12

      He did, but the bullet went in one side and straight out t’other.
      Straw man, Alco. straw man.

    • Nilbog says:

      11:48am | 29/01/12

      Nice spelling, you crazy old fool…

    • AdamC says:

      08:18am | 29/01/12

      As an erstwhile film fan, I must admit thebwork of both Lancaster and Redford (with the exceptions of the Sting and Butch Cassidy)  have rather passed me by.

      I have always seen Sundance as an indulgent waste of time. In general, films favored by the backslapping industry set at Sundance fail to find favor, even among indie audiences.  As you suggest, the whole thing seems like more of an ego boost.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      08:19am | 29/01/12

      Mean Guns with Christopher Lambert and Ice-T was one of the great films of all time. Philosophy mixed in with action. Burt Lancaster and Robert Redford, pffft…

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FJZklsuboo

    • Dan says:

      08:26am | 29/01/12

      A thoroughly nasty and uncalled for piece.

    • jf says:

      10:26am | 29/01/12

      And weird. I don’t get it I have to confess. Maybe it’s me.

    • stephen says:

      11:05am | 29/01/12

      Yeah, real naddty.
      But I’ll say it myself : Redford ain’t no Lancaster.

    • Dean says:

      08:42am | 29/01/12

      I don’t get the article. Who ever said that Redford was in Lancaster’s class as an actor? Why make the comparison at all? Why not get all steamed up and say Will Smith is no Marlon Brando, while you’re at it?

    • ant says:

      08:55am | 29/01/12

      So Redford isn’t Lancaster. He isn’t most other actors either. But he did start a very successful film festival. This article is a bit silly.

      I used to live and work in Park City… this is where the Sundance festival is held, by the way. It used to be held at Redford’s own ski resort, Sundance, a back-to-basics resort around the corner, but the festival outgrew the resort. So it’s held in Park City.  And every year, Redford makes it very clear that he is irritated by how the Hollywood glitterati have taken over his festival. He tries to keep it aligned with what it set out to do, and seems to do this rather well, and he makes his disgust at the likes of Paris Hilton turning up known to all.

      As for the schwag bags for the famous, yes they are obscene, ditto the parties (the top tier ones, the secondary parties can be quite good, I enjoyed them).

      But to say Redford is Rubbish because he’s not Lancaster is a bit pointless.

    • MummaMia says:

      10:52am | 29/01/12

      I always thought films were about ENTERTAINMENT..not necessarily the BEST movie, or the BEST actor. This is what peeves me about actors/celebs with “missions” ie Bono. Just do what you’re paid for !
      BTW I love The Way We Were..so Robert gets the thumbs up from me !

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      02:28pm | 29/01/12

      Umm…Bono is a musician…...

    • MammaMia says:

      06:22pm | 29/01/12

      I did say CELEBS there Shane !!

    • stephen says:

      11:03am | 29/01/12

      Lancaster was in a picture called ‘Lawman’ I think, where he is sent to a town to bring back some baddies to face trial, but after he’s yet to get the last baddie, the town realized that the lawman’s law is too severe, and they want him out.
      It’s a good picture, and it is a good realization of what a society is and is not prepared to pay for justice, (speeding police car-chases come to mind).

      Redford’s a lightweight, and when I was a kid I remember reading a Mad Magazine sendup called ‘Botch Cassidy and the Somedunce KId’.
      Apt, but Jeremiah Johnson is one of his better ones.
      Every shot in that film - every one, apparently - is of a different location.
      (Will Geer’s characterization of an old trapper is one of the best in all cinema.)
      Redford is a businessman really and nothing more.

      Newman should have won the Oscar for The Verdict.
      A lot of good critics hated his acting, but I thought that it was his best work.
      Magnificent, really, and even better than the work he did in The Hustler, which is a mighty film too, though the female lead - Tippy Hendren, I think it was - stole the acting credits there.

      Butch Cassidy, which I saw when it first came out at a cinema in centre road Bentleigh, was the first of the buddy movies.
      Steve McQueen was offered the part of Sundance but he and Newman could not agree on first billing so the part went to Redford, a relative unknown.
      In it’s day it was a good picture. Nice colour, good soundtrack, and I even bought the script once which came out in book form.
      It’s even funnier to read.
      But Redford’s a very vain person.
      And it shows in his unremarkable movies.

    • Rita says:

      11:44am | 29/01/12

      I know one thing both actors made more of their lives than you or I will ever do.Who could not like Burt in Local Hero , in his younger years as a trapeze artist in the movie about the circus pure entertainment. Robert Redford a totally different kid of actor,made the Way We Were , then The Great Gatsby , but hey it takes all sorts, as it does in journalism.

    • rudy says:

      11:50am | 29/01/12

      I agree, Redford is a light talent. Lancaster was a bigger one, but not that outstanding in an era of great actors from mid 50s onwards - his contemporaries were James Stewart, John Gielgud, Robert Mitchum, Carey Grant, Gregory Peck, George C Scott, Michael Cain, Spencer Tracy, Laurence Olivier, Anthony Quinn, Richard Burton, Orson Welles, Peter O’Toole - these are only some of Redford’s contemporaries who talent completely overshadowed him, and for that matter most of the big name actors today.

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      02:03pm | 29/01/12

      Holy cow,l that’s quite a lineup when you throw em all in together isn’t it. Today’s A-listers are amateurs compared to that mob

    • Cynicised says:

      02:38pm | 29/01/12

      To be completely fair, you can hardly call Spencer Tracy, Carey Grant, Robert Mitchum, Jimmy Stewart, Orson Welles and Olivier “contemporaries”. These actors were at least middle-aged and widely experienced on stage and screen when Redford was but a pup in the 70s.

    • marley says:

      06:38pm | 29/01/12

      This is completely irrelevant, but I was on a long-haul plane flight somewhere, and they were screening old episodes of the Twilight Zone.  And I’m watching this elderly actress confronting “Death” - and thinking, gee, the actor playing Death looks familiar.  A very young Robert Redford.  Good looking, but not much depth to his acting then.  Don’t know that he’s gotten much better since.

    • Anushka says:

      12:59pm | 29/01/12

      Is one not allowed to draw attention to The Leopard and the reviewer not mentioning it on the Punch?!

      Far as I can see, there was nothing in my comment to be moderated.

    • Richard says:

      01:19pm | 29/01/12

      God, I loved reading this article. I love reading all of your articles, Paul. How did you get so damn good at writing articles?

    • stephen says:

      01:35pm | 29/01/12

      Dances with Wolves ?
      Yeah, I remember that.
      In ‘94 i was living in Hawthorn, Melb. and I broke up with me girlfriend ; she moved out, and for 3 weeks I played that movie over and over and over again with a bottle of Jack Daniels by me side the whole time.

      Kind of sobering, actually, and I’ve never been able to say b-b-b-b ... buffalo with a straight face.

      ps week-kneed sentimentality has its place.
          Tennesee sour mash straight in yer face.

    • Cynicised says:

      01:38pm | 29/01/12

      The tone of this article is downright vicious, I agree. What a spurious attack. Of course Redford is no Lancaster, any fool can see that. And Lancaster was no John Guilgud. So flipping what? Horses for courses, Mr Toohey. Bertrand nailed it. If you want to criticize the Sundance Festival , do so, but the snide personal crap turns this piece into trash. Poor form, sir.

    • Cynicised says:

      02:23pm | 29/01/12

      And besides, I always thought Lancaster was a shocking over-actor. He was really rather mannered, which detracted from some of his characters, Elmer Gantry being one. Redford’s understated style was very, very different, for a different time. Compare apples with apples, not oranges. It’s unfair.

    • stephen says:

      04:09pm | 29/01/12

      In Barefoot in the Park, Jane Fonda made Redford look as wooden as a park bench ... and this is supposed to be the movie that made him ?

      And this is why none of the really big male stars - Newman aside, and only with The Sting, which was an uptake on Butch Cassidy - was allowed in a Redford movie : they would have acted him under the table.

    • Cynicism says:

      05:30pm | 29/01/12

      @Stephen I’m not defending Redford as a great actor, he wasn’t. He was popular and attractive, that’s about it. However, he did make a great foil to really great actors, like Fonda (duh!) and Newman . I simply think Toohey’s comparison is ridiculous. Judge the Sundance on IT’S merits, not Redford’s.

    • Cynicised says:

      05:42pm | 29/01/12

      Bloody autocorrect! Grr!

    • Cynicised says:

      07:28am | 30/01/12

      Also, @ Stephen In Barefoot In The Park, Redford’s character is supposed to be wooden, that’s the story! Have you SEEN the movie? ha! He played his part beautifully!

    • stephen says:

      06:32pm | 30/01/12

      Nah mate ... actors don’t give us woodenness by acting wooden ; the audience gets the impression of it, however, with a performance that might create a character which suffers from a particular pathology of, say reticence, or procrastination, or some such complexity.
      This is what Art is.
      Not life, but an imaginative realization of it.
      Wooden is wooden.
      Even the word is bad.

    • Dot says:

      02:15pm | 29/01/12

      5 minutes of my life I wont get back

    • stephen says:

      02:51pm | 29/01/12

      Yeah, so what’s 5 minutes of your time worth heh ?

      Whale shit, I’d suggest.

    • Paul Toohey says:

      12:25pm | 30/01/12

      I withdraw all I’ve said. I’m in Florida covering the primaries. Robert Redford is a far better actor than Mitt Romney.

    • Tony says:

      02:18pm | 31/01/12

      And yet no one mentioned Ulzana’s Raid - for shame.

    • Tony says:

      02:20pm | 31/01/12

      The Natural: a flawed film, over-cooked the sepia, but at least Redford showed he was a better actor than Kim Basinger.

    • David says:

      05:38pm | 07/02/12

      March 4, 2011 at 8:00 amPhotographic proof that Brad Pitt is sainvg the planet!!Pitt doesn’t really deserve derision for this.  He wasn’t behind it, it was a look-a-like contest in Copenhagen during the Copenhagen climate clusterflop.  For the most part, Pitt has not shot off his mouth telling other what to do.  After making the movie “Seven Years in Tibet” he was being interviwed by Time magazine and was asked what China should do about Tibet.  His response:  “You shouldn’t speak until you know what you’re talking about. That’s why I get uncomfortable with interviews. Reporters ask me what I feel China should do about Tibet. Who cares what I think China should do? I’m a f—ing actor! They hand me a script. I act. I’m here for entertainment. Basically, when you whittle everything away, I’m a grown man who puts on makeup.”

    • Francois says:

      01:45am | 09/02/12

      Everyone in Hollywood is a posiersfonal: at stating with complete evident sincerity things which have nothing to do with what they really think.  It’s called either “acting” or “lying”, depending on context.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

That was pretty much the best thing I have ever seen #crowwwwwwwwws

Anthony Sharwood

MT @RaidersCanberra "Congrats to Blake Ferguson on his selection for NSW. LIKE to show your support!" Um guys, you can't "like" a Tweet

Paul Colgan

@stilgherrian said Australia

Paul Colgan

RT @TheEconomist: Google is coming under intense scrutiny from regulators http://t.co/4bfvNp5oyEhttp://t.co/NLV9yRSIKr

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter