Who in their right mind would want to be a Princess? In the last week, the royal bride lark has well and truly lost its fairytale sparkle.

Do I really have to?

Charlene Wittstock’s real-life Princess story came close to coming off the rails when, in the days leading up to her and Prince Albert of Monaco’s $75 million three-day wedding, she reportedly tried to do a runner.

At the eleventh hour, the bride was caught at the airport in Nice, trying to flee to her native South Africa, on a one-way ticket in order to escape her royal fate.

Before she could even stock up on duty-free gin, the story took a sinister turn when the 33-year-old, allegedly, had her passport confiscated by authorities and a palace intermediary was called in to bargain with her to stay.

Nothing says happily-ever-after like having to use a pliant police force to get your bride to remain in the country long enough to get hitched.

Royal watchers can breathe a sigh of relief because the wedding did go ahead - Placido Domingo performance, Alain Ducasse dinner, Eagles concert and all.

But the photos of the “happy couple” don’t do much to quell any lingering questions about Charlene’s joy at being formally inducted into the Grimaldi family. Most brides’ don’t accessorise their handmade Armani frock with a look of terror and tears.

Then, who can blame her? Her husband, Prince Albert might be the reigning monarch of a stupendously wealth principality that enjoys a balmy Mediterranean climate, but he’s hardly much of a catch.

Rather, he’s a former playboy 20 years her senior who resembles uncooked dough squeezed into a Saville Row suit, and whose tally of illegitimate children currently stands at two (media accounts suggest that talk of another secret bebe coming out of the woodwork sparked Charlene’s airport dash).

Comparisons between Charlene and another naïve, blonde royal bride who was fed to palace courtiers to keep an ancient house with a ready supply of heirs, are hard to ignore. She bears a startling physical resemblance to Princess Diana circa 1981: spooked, nervous, and way too bony for her low-cut Chanel.

Then there’s Kate, whoops, Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, who is currently enjoying her first official overseas jaunt in Canada and appears to be about to drown in bonhomie and maple leaf tat.

With memories of her wedding relegated to dusty Woman’s Days in dentists’ waiting rooms, Catherine’s real, depressing fate is emerging. For the first time, it’s becoming glaringly apparent how boring, tedious and repetitive Kate’s life is.

Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, currently only has one purpose in life – smiling.

There is something a little bit tragic about a university-educated woman who is now judged solely on her ability to pick out hats, titter politely at her balding husband’s quips and not fart in front of minor dignitaries.

Whether she’s shit-scared, tired, PMSing, hungry or desperately needing to go to the loo, Kate has to grin and live with the fate she’s chosen.

It’s a lesson that someone should have told poor old Lady Di before she took the royal plunge. Even in death, Diana isn’t afforded any peace, with her ghost still routinely being hauled out like a ghoulish stage-trick to sell magazines.

Last week, when she would have turned the big 5-0, a digitally-aged picture of the People’s Princess, wrinkles and all, was splashed across the cover of Newsweek. The magazine’s editor, and Diana’s old friend, Tina Brown, seemed to have no qualms about dragging her royal pal out of the grave in a stunt that smacked of a desperate ploy to shift copies of the struggling title.

It’s time to ditch the Cindarella fantasy, because dead or alive, the Princess gig isn’t looking quite so magical these days.

140 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      06:07am | 04/07/11

      One of the easiest and best-paid jobs in the world, and these women still can’t hack it. Maybe the quality of princesses is declining.

      Make them work as a cleaner or a fisherman for a month and they’d soon change their tune.

    • Mahhrat says:

      08:20am | 04/07/11

      Aye.

    • fairsfair says:

      08:32am | 04/07/11

      Quality of Princesses you say Erick…. “Princess Charlene”... I rest my case.

      I really held serious hopes that Australia would produce the first Princess Charlene - instead, our bogan queen-to-be had to have a nice acceptable name like Mary.

      There is hope out there for all the Faylenes and the the Nerinas.

    • Tubesteak says:

      09:31am | 04/07/11

      hahahaha it had to be said!

      If a billionaire prince with a palace in the Mediterranean “isn’t much of a catch” then I’ll happily stay single rather than subject myself to the whims of women with their obvious over-inflated sense of entitlement and self-worth.

    • Paul C says:

      09:44am | 04/07/11

      I suppose being a Monegasque princess would be a bit of a bludge job when compared with being a British princess. You only ever hear about the Grimaldis when they are either Born, Married or Die - other than these events, the paparazzi don’t really give a damn.  Even Princess Grace had to drive herself off a cliff to gain attention - no motorbike riding paparazzi assistance rendered.

    • bec says:

      11:03am | 04/07/11

      Well, considering that you’re far more likely to end up marrying a close relative as a princess than otherwise, I’d say it’s a reasonably shitty job. At least, that’s what my knowledge of Tudor England and the Habsburg dynasty tells me.

      No amount of money could convince me to marry my cousin - even if he was devastatingly wealthy and handsome. (Chances are, if I were of one of Europe’s royal families from the 14th-19th centuries, I’d likely get one without a chin or neck. WOE.)

    • St. Michael says:

      11:35am | 04/07/11

      @ bec: on that note, I take it you’ve heard the factoid that Prince Harry’s latest love interest is actually his seventh cousin?

      Reaching, I know, but also causes shudders nonetheless.

    • Erick says:

      12:50pm | 04/07/11

      Yeah, and the whole being-sacrificed-to dragons bit routine can be a bit offputting. Especially if the prince is delayed by traffic.

      Relevant: (NSFW website, but reasonably safe page. Click at your own risk.)

    • Markus says:

      01:01pm | 04/07/11

      How would one even keep track of a seventh cousin, without the aid of some professional genealogist or something?

      I haven’t even met some of my first cousins, let alone seventh. Seventh is getting into the “One in five people are a descendant of Genghis Kahn” territory.

    • Slothy says:

      01:20pm | 04/07/11

      Tubesteak: “If a billionaire prince with a palace in the Mediterranean “isn’t much of a catch” then I’ll happily stay single rather than subject myself to the whims of women with their obvious over-inflated sense of entitlement and self-worth.”

      Ah, I love it. If a woman marries a creep for money and power she’s shallow and superficial, but if she tries to turn down a billionare because he’s a creepy playboy with multiple illegitimate children, she’s expecting too much and has tickets on herself. Heads you lose, tails I win hey?

    • Tubesteak says:

      01:55pm | 04/07/11

      Slothy I like those odds!

      Seriously, be honest with yourself, though. He’s not “creepy”. He’s a man born into privilege and wealth so naturally he’s going to bang everything that moves. Any man would.

      If she had a problem marrying into wealth and privilege then she shouldn’t have gone out with him in the first place. She defnitely should not have accepted a marriage proposal and waited until 3 days before the ceremony to pull a caper like this. Shows a rather poor character.

      As always, you don’t get everything you want in life, so make your shoices and stick with them.

    • Matthew says:

      02:05pm | 04/07/11

      St Michael, I’m not sure why that’s so shuddering.  You’ve have to remember.  In Australia you’re allowed to marry your first cousin, your 7th cousin isn’t that bad and you only have like 1/128th of the same blood.

    • St. Michael says:

      02:24pm | 04/07/11

      @ Markus: “In Australia you’re allowed to marry your first cousin, your 7th cousin isn’t that bad and you only have like 1/128th of the same blood.”

      Suddenly the behaviour of a number of people I know is explainable. wink

    • Bev says:

      03:25pm | 04/07/11

      Markus says:01:01pm | 04/07/11

      How would one even keep track of a seventh cousin, without the aid of some professional genealogist or something?

      Easy if you have nobility somewhere in your background as they were very careful to faithfuly record the family history. The rest of us dam hard in many cases. In my own case after much hard work we found a sir Robert. Within half an our we were back at Eleanor of Aquitaine mother of Edward the first.  One problem we had taken a wrong turn (so easy to do) and that blew that line.

    • n_dude says:

      05:12pm | 04/07/11

      Does that mean Tasmanians are Royalty because they marry their cousins?

    • bec says:

      05:55pm | 04/07/11

      I read that with Charles II of Spain (the last of the Habsburgs, if you don’t consider their absorption into the house of Lorraine) was so inbred in his pedigree that he was more inbred than someone born to parents who were siblings.

      That’s pretty damn inbred!

    • James says:

      02:12pm | 05/07/11

      I would suggest Katherine has two purposes in life.  Smiling, yes and producing the royal heir.

    • TChong says:

      06:58am | 04/07/11

      “Kate has to grin , and live with the life shes chosen”
      Yep.Thats correct.
      She chose it, and would have had a lot more dicretion to say yes or no about her choice than most of us do when it comes to choosing a career.
      ( the “job” and marriage status seem to be the same thing)
      “Royalty” of any type, British, Danes,Swede Japanese,  Saudi, Thai, Monaco, Tongan etc are all freeloading , anti -democratic pasrasites.
      Non merit based privelege , decided by birth , or marriage, deserves sympathy because? because ?
      Oh, thats right, there are some peoples ( like those who like to believe they are a monarchs subjects) who believe royalty are their “betters”
      Sad.

    • malohi says:

      08:04am | 04/07/11

      Did Chongy just say all that is needed to be said?

      Yes [ x ]          No [  ]

    • fairsfair says:

      09:08am | 04/07/11

      I don’t believe that they are my betters.

      I just think there is a place for tradition and history in our society. In the case of the English - they aren’t hurting anyone in 2011 - so whats the beef?

    • Suzanne says:

      09:22am | 04/07/11

      Yes [x]  No[ ]

    • The Badger says:

      09:55am | 04/07/11

      Yes [ x ]      No [  ]

    • St. Michael says:

      11:32am | 04/07/11

      Did Chongy just say all that is needed to be said?

      Yes [  ]      No [ x ]

      But then I talk endlessly, so I’m biased on this one.

    • Slothy says:

      01:22pm | 04/07/11

      I dunno TChong, nobody tried to take my passport away when I decided to turn down my last job offer.

    • Matthew says:

      02:16pm | 04/07/11

      Slothy, but would your wife had taken your passport away if you tried not to marry her?  It’s quite possible that she just had cold feet and they had a chat with her to make sure it was what she wanted before she had a chance to jump on the plane.

      Of course she may have been trying to get out as her last hope and got held captive by the prince.

      Either way, TChong is right for once.  “Tradition” is just a lazy way of saying we couldn’t be stuffed doing things for ourselves.

      What I loved the most was the bs they spun about both Kate and William’s families paying for the wedding out of their own pocket.  Who has paid the salary of the royal family for the last few hundred years?  Oh that’s right, the English tax payer (and probably us too).  It may only be half of the total cost of the wedding…but it’s still a lot of taxpayer money.

    • Cameron says:

      04:18pm | 04/07/11

      Matthew - The estates of the Queen generate 200 million pounds annually for the British Taxpayer. Give it a break.

    • Matthew says:

      05:21pm | 05/07/11

      Cameron, from where?  Property value? Tourism? Investments?

      In the end, all of it is still tax payers money.

    • acotrel says:

      07:28am | 04/07/11

      ‘Before she could even stock up on duty-free gin, the story took a sinister turn when the 33-year-old, allegedly, had her passport confiscated by authorities and a palace intermediary was called in to bargain with her to stay’

      Anyone who’s ever been to Monaco is aware that it’s a police state!  All the glitz and glamour is only a front for a pack of sleazey crims.

    • fairsfair says:

      08:44am | 04/07/11

      I had a fantastic time at the Monaco Grand Prix. I can’t say I agree with you acotrel and security was heightened due to the race.

    • stephen says:

      03:47pm | 04/07/11

      Police state, heh ?
      I’d say Palace state, cause now I read our very own Aussie/Croatian tennis star wants to live there so’s he don’t have to pay taxes.
      (Actually I’ll re-write that : Aussie tennis star, cause I know another tennis brat who’s done the same thing and I only ever see him on tele flogging underpants.)
      If only I had as much nerve.

    • Aussie expat says:

      08:07am | 05/07/11

      Monaco is a police state, there is a policeman for every 6 people in Monaco and camera’s are hidden in every possible location. Not just for Grand Prix as suggested.  Trust me I know I live here. I too have never seen a more sad looking bride, I do wonder what was said or done to this poor girl to make her stay, she really looked like she was medicated.

    • Jade says:

      07:47am | 04/07/11

      Obviously Kate wanted it (she didn’t try and do a runner the day before the wedding) and she did look truly happy when she did marry William.  However Charlene looks both scared and gutted at her wedding, the footage of her face after she gave him a kiss is priceless, it screams WTF have I just done.

      Princess Mary has done well fitting into the role in Denmark, I think Kate will do just fine (the fact that she has a university degree really means nothing), and Charlene’s wedding (if she had her way) would never of happened.  If the Prince of Monaco is that desperate to keep her, he definitely won’t be allowing a divorce either.

    • acotrel says:

      08:53am | 04/07/11

      ‘I think Kate will do just fine (the fact that she has a university degree really means nothing),’

      At least they’ll be able to have a decent conversation afterwards?

    • Liz says:

      09:29am | 04/07/11

      So University degrees mean nothing? She got a prince out of hers, which is better then an honours degree, when he is so wealthy.

    • Jade says:

      09:43am | 04/07/11

      @ Liz, it is not as if she has actually used it, isn’t it in Art History? Just because she has gone to uni doesn’t mean that her job now is beneath her.

    • jane2 says:

      11:27am | 04/07/11

      Even in the real world a university degree doesnt really mean anything. As a collector of bits of paper (and yes I have a full time day job where I earn money AND have paid off my HESC) I can say that most people mistakenly interpreta degree as a sign of intelligence…its not just look at me wink

      It also doesnt guarantee you a job, I know many with degrees who work in retail and hospitalty. For many finding a partner at university is the best thing they get out of 3-4 years of “higher education”

    • Tubesteak says:

      12:13pm | 04/07/11

      acotrel
      “At least they’ll be able to have a decent conversation afterwards?”

      About art history?

      zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

      Do a real degree.

    • John S says:

      12:54pm | 04/07/11

      Jade said: “(the fact that she has a university degree really means nothing), “

      Q: What’s the first thing someone with an Arts degrees asks you?
      A: ‘Do you want fries with that?’

      :D

    • St. Michael says:

      02:25pm | 04/07/11

      @ jane2: “For many finding a partner at university is the best thing they get out of 3-4 years of “higher education””

      It certainly seems to have worked for Waity Katie.

    • Bev says:

      03:29pm | 04/07/11

      Liz says:09:29am | 04/07/11
      So University degrees mean nothing
      It is said that many women who attend Ivy League colleges are there looking over the prospects. Getting a degree just helps pass the time.

    • JD says:

      03:55pm | 04/07/11

      Jane2: ‘Even in the real world a university degree doesnt really mean anything’.

      Bit of a generalisation! You can’t be a professional engineer without a degree in engineering. I’m pretty happy with the $200k pa return I’m getting on my 4 years at uni studying engineering.

      But yes an Arts degree, for example, is basically of no value other than the enjoyment of learning (which is, however, of value in itself).

    • Jane2 says:

      04:12pm | 04/07/11

      JD yes you cant be an engineer without one but how many engineers have you come across who are as dumb as ____. I work in an enginerring PM organisation and some of the engineers…well I dont trust what they produce and I know im not alone.

      This is what I mean. Its not the bit of paper that makes a good engineer its the individual and how they think.

    • stephen says:

      07:51pm | 04/07/11

      I think you underestimate Kate.
      She’s her own girl. Opinionated, secure, but needs more sport.
      (Or outdoor activities. Not polo, either, maybe a skateboard.)
      She’s a handsome gal though, no doubt.

    • Blind Freddy says:

      07:53am | 04/07/11

      Suck it up princess!

    • bec says:

      08:06am | 04/07/11

      I’d run away too if my fiance told me that we would have to listen to the Eagles at our wedding. It’s only marginally less horrible than being told I would be personally serenaded by Huey Louis as I was giving birth to my first child.

    • Markus says:

      10:28am | 04/07/11

      I think I only started liking Huey Lewis after watching American Psycho, which gives me the impression that my like of them is subconsciously dripping in irony.

      “Do you like Huey Lewis and The News? Their early work was a little too new wave for my tastes, but when Sports came out in ‘83, I think they really came into their own, commercially and artistically.
      The whole album has a clear, crisp sound, and a new sheen of consummate professionalism that really gives the songs a big boost.

      He’s been compared to Elvis Costello, but I think Huey has a far much more bitter, cynical sense of humor.”

    • bec says:

      10:59am | 04/07/11

      It would have to be. Mind, that was how I started liking Whitney Houston… oh how the mighty have fallen…

    • Big D says:

      05:58pm | 04/07/11

      Markus…Classic.

      I got it - not many others will.

    • Tim says:

      08:24am | 04/07/11

      Yeah,
      millions of dollars to do absolutely nothing.
      Tough gig.

    • Rachel says:

      01:31pm | 04/07/11

      how much is your free will worth?

    • Tom says:

      08:44am | 04/07/11

      The author’s hissing condemnation says it all for her sisterhood. .... “20 years her senior who resembles uncooked dough”?  But he is stinking rich and a prince, so its OK girls dive in and hook a wallet.

      He is much older and bald and fat and would have been laughed out of the place if he had been an accountant in the outer suburbs of Melbourne.

      Yes, the princess has a disgusting value set. The first is money, the second is money and the third is money. .... This value set worked pretty well for Albert over the years. It worked well for Bob Hawke, Paul Hogan and quite a few others. Such a value set is eternal.

    • Fiona says:

      09:28am | 04/07/11

      Well, I got that she thought he was unattractive, rich or not. The message didn’t appear to be that money was all she was after. Remember she got found trying to leave the country after all. As for bob hawk et al, those arrangements work well both ways, don’t they. You know the old, trade the old model for a new (younger and prettier) one. Maybe that value set is eternal too, hmmm?

    • Tom says:

      11:46am | 04/07/11

      Fiona, without the money, she would not have given the bloke a second look and it would never have got to the engagement.

      For the sake of balance, if she had been his age and matronly with a couple of kids thereabouts (which he had), he would not have given her a second look.

      She was selling her sex appeal at a high (dollar) price and he was buying because he had plenty of dollars. Eternal.

    • Jen says:

      12:40pm | 04/07/11

      Did you miss the part where she tried to run away and they wouldn’t let her? Scary stuff. Obviously doesn’t give as much of a crap about money as you thought.

    • Erick says:

      12:54pm | 04/07/11

      More like, she made a deal and then refused to do her part.

    • Tim says:

      12:56pm | 04/07/11

      Jen,
      did you miss the part where they did a deal so she would stay?
      No one forced her to marry him.

    • Tom says:

      04:36pm | 04/07/11

      Fiona, I agree with your Bob Hawke comment. Hazel loved him before he was a superstar and Bob threw her out like an old pair of underpants. Yet some people (particularly Bob himself) still thought he was gorgeous.

    • Sweating the small stuff says:

      08:52am | 04/07/11

      BTW it was Armani gown, not Chanel.

    • Dani says:

      09:39am | 04/07/11

      Diana’s was Chanel though… that’s what Daniela was talking about

    • Sarah says:

      10:53am | 04/07/11

      @Dani, Dianas gown was NOT Channel it was by the Emmanuells

    • A guy says:

      11:57am | 04/07/11

      Who gives a shit.

    • Z says:

      01:43pm | 04/07/11

      For the sake of clarity, her powder-blue suit for the civil ceremony was Chanel, and her gown was Armani.

    • nossy says:

      08:54am | 04/07/11

      Yes Daniela Prince Albert isnt really much of a catch and I am sorry the Princess didnt make it to the airport and get away. Albert has a head like a boiled egg and from what we read has been nothing more than a sponge on society having the personality of a dropped pie . Escape when you can dear Princess !

    • fairsfair says:

      09:17am | 04/07/11

      I’ve never agreed with you so much before Nossy. However, you must keep in mind he has a pretty killer view from his house.

    • nossy says:

      09:30am | 04/07/11

      @fairsfair - that he does FF - lets hope though that the lovely Princess can see the airport from there though !  hahaahha

    • jane2 says:

      11:32am | 04/07/11

      I actually find him quite attractive, which is a good thing since he looks very similiar to most males in his age group and Im a single female only 10 years younger. Not handsome like WIll but what will Will look like in another 15 plus years?

    • Jane2 says:

      11:36am | 04/07/11

      Ops I should have said he is a much better catch than most his age. I wish all the 50yo single guys looked that good!

    • jay-ded says:

      11:58am | 04/07/11

      @nossy - having the personality of a dropped pie.  Hahahahaha Love It !  Can’t say I’ve ever heard that one before.

      smile

    • Erick says:

      12:56pm | 04/07/11

      jene2, drop him an email after the divorce. You never know your luck! wink

    • Liz says:

      09:07am | 04/07/11

      I think you are a bit harsh on Kate. She waited 9 year for William and just might love her man and her new job. Already in Canada they were able to fulfill a dying man’s wish who has 6 weeks left to live. So lets leave her to it, wish her all the best and pray it works well for her. I think Kate is doing a great job by reusing clothes, shoes and accessories, sending a signal to the world that she won’t be bought out designers looking for a free kick. Just perhaps Kate and William will use their spot to bring some joy to some of the world’s most suffering people. Now if was one of them I would be so grateful for the work they do and I am grateful for the human approach they are taking the role unlike other members of the royal family.

      As to Charlene that is another story and could go any which way with that family.

      I think every girl who has lost the chance to marry a wealthy royal feels a little bit like why wasn’t that me when they see a commoner saying yest to a wealthy royal. So them good luck and pray they do some good for the world instead of just running up a tax bill for the poor to pay.

    • Elphaba says:

      09:13am | 04/07/11

      Ick.  20 years her senior.  Gross.  I’d never date a man old enough to be my father. *shudder*.

    • The Badger says:

      10:38am | 04/07/11

      Beggars can’t be choosers

    • Elphaba says:

      11:22am | 04/07/11

      Stalking, much?

    • Jane2 says:

      11:38am | 04/07/11

      I was asked out the other day by a guy 18 years younger than me so literally young enough to be my son….I said no btw

    • Elphaba says:

      11:52am | 04/07/11

      10 years either side, fine.  Any more than that and… eww.  It could be because I’ve got younger parents though, I don’t know.  I don’t need a surrogate parental figure, I think that’s what a lot of them are going for…

    • Shifter says:

      03:25pm | 04/07/11

      Standard rule of creepiness: Half your age + 7.

      Hi Badger!

    • The Badger says:

      06:54pm | 04/07/11

      Yes ele-phat
      I’ve replied to two of your posts in the last 6 months and I’m stalking you.

      One day you’ll make a good catch for someone, but I suspect they’ll throw you back quick smart when they see the side of you that spews things such as:

      “Stupid bitch.  May she die a lonely, death and move onto a hate-filled eternity. “
      Noice

    • NicoleG says:

      08:00pm | 04/07/11

      Excuse me Elphaba, do not steal my stalker! Find your own please. And tis lovey to see you have now taken on the vocabulary of your Queen Badger. Well done.

    • Elphaba says:

      11:06am | 05/07/11

      Badger, it’s obvious you took offence at my post re: bitchy mother-in-laws.  I didn’t realise you were one!  My bad.  Still, this insistent goings-on of what a catch I’ll be is getting awkward. It’s never going to happen, ok?  Now, unbunch your panties and stop trying to imitate my coolness with the emoticons.  Seriously, I’m flattered, but you’ll never be as awesome as me. grin

    • JennyF says:

      09:27am | 04/07/11

      Albert, so I read, had just been delivered another paternity suit. At least we know he functions. Charlene is there to make babies, so I hope she gets some enjoyment out of it all.

    • iansand says:

      10:07am | 04/07/11

      All she has to do is pop out an heir and a spare.  Effectively a brood mare.  She only has to see him twice and then she can live her own, well funded, life.  I wouldn’t be at all surprised to hear that this is what her captors said when they got her back from the airport.

      Apparently the deal with Monaco is that, if the Prince does not produce an heir, the place reverts to France.  There will be a lot of tax exiles hoping that Charlene is fertile.

    • fairsfair says:

      10:32am | 04/07/11

      “All she has to do is pop out an heir and a spare. 
      Effectively a brood mare. 
      She only has to see him twice
      and then she can live her own, well funded, life.”

      Poetry corner submission complete Iansand - well done! wink

      Poetry by stealth - perhaps it is the way forward….

    • Shifter says:

      12:50pm | 04/07/11

      The seed is strong!

      Maybe he’ll get drunk and be killed by a boar like a certain fictitious monarch with a penchant for whoring.

    • Shama says:

      01:13pm | 04/07/11

      Actually the man already has children.

      Another reason to do away with an institution that discriminates between “illegitimate” children and “legitimate” ones.  Only in royal land.

    • fairsfair says:

      02:44pm | 04/07/11

      bahahaha - fathers ignore their illegitimate children only in “royal land”.

      bahahahahaha!

    • Shama says:

      04:13pm | 04/07/11

      fairsfair, I didn’t mean ignore or try to wiggle out of child payments etc.

      I meant that an illegitimate chid cannot “inherit” the throne-hence the need to marry and produce the heir.

      Though from wiki it looks like Monaco’s succession is a little more complicated that what I thought.

    • fairsfair says:

      04:43pm | 04/07/11

      sorry, I take back my snide laughing too. What is that about, what have I become!?!!?  red face

      I have more than one uncle who has the odd illigitimate child from before marriage (good catholics you see) and even though those kids were acknowledged in life, not one of them were left anything in the will. I guess you see less of it these days, but I think a lot of fathers out there (and wives) put preference on the children produced in wedlock - even when the illigitimate children are older.

    • Cherry Gripe says:

      09:36am | 04/07/11

      Being a princess has always sucked! In the old days, one was prone to being cursed by witches, shut in towers and forced to spin straw into fricken gold. Having to wear silly hats isn’t looking so bad now, is it?

    • Kika says:

      12:51pm | 04/07/11

      Best post of the lot. Very true. People should have some perspective!

      Don’t forget the evil step-sisters, having to wear shoes made from glass just to impress some prince with a shoe fetish, having your car turn into a pumpkin if you aren’t home in time, getting cursed and having to sleep for a hundred years and by the time you are rescued your charming prince is now a decrepid old man while you still have your youthful looks and being tuned by an ugly beast who lives in a castle.

    • St. Michael says:

      02:29pm | 04/07/11

      “Don’t forget the evil step-sisters”

      Don’t talk about the Duchess of Arse that way! wink

    • Lesley Laurel says:

      10:58am | 04/07/11

      unlike media bum favorite Pippa Middleton, this princess actually has good looks, a good figure, and a good much older husband

    • Lesley Laurel says:

      11:00am | 04/07/11

      Is her new kingdom bigger than the Sutherland Shire?

    • Bomb78 says:

      03:58pm | 04/07/11

      It’s not a kingdom - those have Kings - it’s a principality.

    • The Liberal Loafer says:

      06:41pm | 04/07/11

      Is the principality as big as pippa middleton’s bum ??And as beautiful?

    • Lesley Laurel says:

      11:04am | 04/07/11

      Is her kingdom as big as kensington ?

    • Mythica says:

      11:37am | 04/07/11

      Aah ha ha ha! :D
      Not to mention poisoned apples, and sleeping for a fricken thousand years.
      Although I wouldn’t be surprised if there aint a bit of locking in the tower, for poor frightened scrawny little Charlene. So maybe not to far from the truth after all.

    • Cameron says:

      11:45am | 04/07/11

      The author comes across as pathetically superficial. There are plenty of, what women would describe as, handsome men who are hardly catches. In fact, come to think of it, none of us are real catches. I suppose half the battle is recognising our inperfections. The other is changing the things which really do need changing (and I’m not talking about looks).

    • Joel B1 says:

      12:27pm | 04/07/11

      “other is changing the things which really do need changing”

      Like underwear? (I recommend at least weekly)

    • Sylvie says:

      05:23pm | 04/07/11

      @Cameron, I agree -  superficial.  No question.
      The prince looks okay to me.  Why the hair loss gets a mention, I can’t fathom. 
      Silly and shallow

    • Fiona says:

      09:58pm | 04/07/11

      Bahaha, underwear….

    • Golddigger says:

      12:41pm | 04/07/11

      “There is something a little bit tragic about a university-educated woman who is now judged solely on her ability to pick out hats, titter politely at her balding husband’s quips and not fart in front of minor dignitaries. “

      On what else can Kate Middleton be judged? She got a university degree in BS and has only had a couple of deadhead jobs by the time she reached 29 years of age. What qualifications and experience does she have that will be an asset when her husband is king?

    • Markus says:

      01:08pm | 04/07/11

      Agreed.
      For me, there is something much more tragic about a grown woman who genuinely believes that a university education is in any way an indication of one’s intelligence or depth of character.

    • ?? says:

      02:11pm | 04/07/11

      college degree?? big deal. who cares. she got herself a prince with a title and a trustfund. who cares about the rest.

    • RyaN says:

      04:34pm | 04/07/11

      @Golddigger: at our University they were obvious, doing their BA Mrs. without shame.

    • Hah. says:

      10:28am | 05/07/11

      You underestimate Kate too much.

      She’s a predator. In fact, her sister and her are predators, looking for easy prey and of course, the big game prized catch (absolute wealth and status). Not sure if the rest of the family is in on it too, but the two are a ‘team’.

      She had been studying in another university when she suddenly ‘switched’ unis to the one that William enrolled himself into. She went into that fashion show dressed in see through lingere - oh wait, William just *happened* to be there, and she just *happened* to be “modelling” a “dress” which just *happened* to be effective see-through bra and panties under sheer fabric.
      She spent her time waiting and waiting because…he’s a prince! Any woman that ‘waits’ 7 years for some guy to decide he wants to get married while he sows his oats either is 1. Very stupid 2. Very desperate. 3. Doing it calculatively 4. Combo of 1 and 2, or 2 and 3.

      During the wedding, a friend of mine who didn’t have any opinion on the whole thing saw her break into this smile when the priest said the words “richer” in the marriage vows.

      She deliberately preyed on William, who of course isn’t innocent himself, but she’s got the body, she’s got the ‘looks’ (by his standards, not mine, I think she looks much older than she is), she might be very wild in bed - why not?

      That university degree pales in comparison to the years of calculating, waiting for the right moment. Look at Pippa, she’s running around looking for rich men to bag now that her sister’s part of the royal family.

      She’s smart, she’s cunning - and yes she knows what she’s doing. And I don’t say this in admiration, either. There are predatory men, and there’s Kate.

    • Shama says:

      12:44pm | 04/07/11

      Curious - how do you actually *force* someone to marry these days? Is Monaco like some Sultanate where you do the king’s bidding?!

      One lives in the hope that post this wedding, the ladies mags will stop with the whole “my dream is to marry a prince” rubbish that permeates their pages.

    • Babs of Sydney says:

      12:57pm | 04/07/11

      I hope Charlene is not influenced by Albert’s sisters.  They both look as though they could benefit from a Dettol bath.

    • LittleBirdy says:

      08:01pm | 06/07/11

      LOL!!  Well, Stepahnie sure does anyway.

    • Ned says:

      01:09pm | 04/07/11

      William and Kate looked truly happy, they’ll be alright.

      Charles and Diana.. Diana looked terrified and Charles looked like he’d rather be somewhere else.

    • iansand says:

      02:06pm | 04/07/11

      Didn’t that “somewhere else” involve Camilla and a tampon?

    • St. Michael says:

      02:26pm | 04/07/11

      Come to think of it, Albert and Charlene look much like Charles and Diana, too.

      @iansand: only in Charles’ next life.

    • Michael says:

      01:13pm | 04/07/11

      Whatever happened to the fairytale wedding and castles?  They never existed.  Look at how King Henry VIII treated his wives and how he disposed of them when they didn’t prove useful.  Girls today would do better to grow up with stories of university education and building a family, rather than prince charming arriving to rescue the princess from boredom.

    • Steve says:

      01:51pm | 04/07/11

      You would have thought Prince Phillip could have easily had any woman in the world. If the stories of her attempting to flee are true, why would have bothered to get her back?  Why not just move on? Maybe he does love her? Of course if the reports are true, it also proves the old adage that money does not buy happiness.

    • St. Michael says:

      02:27pm | 04/07/11

      ...Prince Phillip?  :O

    • Ce'Nedra says:

      10:49pm | 04/07/11

      psssstt his name is Albert

    • Bowser says:

      02:01pm | 04/07/11

      C’mon Mario, where are you now?!  mad

    • Dave-o says:

      04:29pm | 04/07/11

      ^

      Thanks for the laugh.

    • Kelly James says:

      02:13pm | 04/07/11

      He’s got billions!  Any woman with half a brain cell would marry him!  She can have her lovers too, without he husband knowing and she can pursue her dreams in life!  Perhaps, via prince albert, meet the one!

    • Jade says:

      03:35pm | 04/07/11

      To bad if he is abusive to her, no amount of money would make a sane women stay in a bad relationship.  At the end of the day, ones happiness is more important.

    • Wilma J Craig says:

      02:17pm | 04/07/11

      Does anyone really give a Tinker’s Cuss about that chatty, tatty little so-called “principality” with it’s equally phony self-styled ‘royal family’ & their spendthrift weddings?
      Neither Bert nor Charley looked the least bit happy. Charley looked bad-tempered & extraordinarily arrogant - Gracie could get away with looking arrogant but Charley can’t. Bert simply looked bored stiff!!
      If Charlene & Bert don’t produce an heir than this grotty little area will revert to French control. It will simply become just another precinct within the French Republic.
      Bert is no longer a youmg man. His sperm count will be in an ever-increasingly downward spiral.
      Charlene is fast approaching the end of her nomal fertility period. IVF? you might well ask & yes that is a possibility however what if Bert’s sperm count is so low it is ineffective? Will they use a donor? Will it be the legitimate son/daughter of Mr & Mrs Grimoldi? To succeed & for Monaco to remain an independent state doesn’t any child have to have it’s father’s blood in it’s veins to succeed?
      It is time all this nonsense of kings,queens - of the female variety - princes, princesses (ditto) & all that garbage was eliminated

    • Squishibits says:

      11:02pm | 04/07/11

      Actually the law was changed a few years back, in that if Albert (the Fugly) doesn’t have an heir and he dies, it gets passed onto Princess Caroline and then down her linage. If they all bite the dust, then sadly it goes to Princess Stephanie and her odd brood of children.

      Needless to say, it’s all doomed. ALL DOOOOMED anyway. (look up Prince Albert (the fugly) on Wikipedia. It explains it

    • Outraged says:

      03:30pm | 04/07/11

      Meow, Daniela! Jealous much?

      The unspoken elephant in the room is we all know you and ALL women would ditch your “career” in a heartbeat if a rich Prince asked to marry you…end of story.

    • melle says:

      04:06pm | 04/07/11

      @Outraged,  Never a truer word. 
      It’s like knighthoods for men -  show me the men who’ve knocked back one.  That small number -  worth more than any prince.
      And the women who’d knock back a prince…..............
      Lol

    • Jane2 says:

      04:18pm | 04/07/11

      Btw isnt a Prince Albert a ________ and which Prince Albert was it named after?

    • bella starkey says:

      04:45pm | 04/07/11

      It is, and it was after Queen Victoria’s husband

    • mike j says:

      04:30pm | 04/07/11

      “Once upon a time, being a princess didn’t suck so much”

      Then you gave up chivalry for the vote.

      Move on.

    • Bob Timmins says:

      04:56pm | 04/07/11

      @Daniella, Despite the disparaging “mundaneness” of the royal duties you lecture women with, every hetero-woman has, at some point in their lives, aspired to be a princess.

      Better to be a princess with mundane duties, than a columnist slaving away to meet ridiculous deadlines, having a spray about topics she secretly aspires to…..

    • Audra Blue says:

      07:24pm | 04/07/11

      Charlene has known Albert a long time.  Why on earth did she agree to marry him in the first place?  How much money did they throw at her anyway?

      Albert’s reputation is well known, so you can’t flame him for being a shit.  But Charlene marrying a guy she obviously doesn’t love and tried to run away from says volumes about her and none of it is nice.

      Just goes to show you that no matter how much money you have, love is a cruel, heinous lie.  I give her six months and she’ll be banging the gardener.

    • Toni says:

      08:37pm | 04/07/11

      Turns out poor Charlene tried to get away from Albert - 3 times. Each time, they took her passport. Sounds like imprisonment to me. Wonder if he has threatened her or her family as well? It’s so obvious there is no affection from him towards her. He just needs a healthy and beautiful female to legally bear him an heir. What happens to her after that? We’ll have to wait and see…

    • H B Bear says:

      10:39pm | 04/07/11

      South Africans will do anything for a foreign passport.

    • Simone says:

      11:11pm | 04/07/11

      Hopefully these princess do not resemble something off a reality TV show and actually use thier brains to change some stereotypes. Maybe go so far as to become leading role models for intelligent women around the world. It’s not all about getting your hat to match your shoes but use some of that power and cash to help some others who do hold a Sir, Highness or Majesty in their name.

    • Edward James says:

      07:31am | 05/07/11

      I watched the wedding kiss on ten, not a very happy little princess by the look of it

    • Sabrina says:

      08:34am | 05/07/11

      Charlene has been his girlfriend for a long time now, let them have some beautiful children.  William is a wonderful result of Charles union with Diana.  Look forward not back.  Albert keep yourself only for Charlene now, it will be best for your children and your country.  Look how Prince Phillip has supported Queen Elizabeth, that is a love match.

    • Leah says:

      09:53am | 05/07/11

      You know, while I appreciate the commentary on Charlene - the photos say it all, really - I don’t think the commentary on Catherine is fair. I have seen nothing to suggest she is bored or at all unhappy. Yes, she’s university educated, but so what? She did, like, a history degree or something. It’s not as if her university education would have her doing anything significantly better. And even if she had done something like Law, Medicine or Engineering - something that would have lead to a specific, ‘prestigious’ job otherwise - people can choose something else for their life if that’s what they want. Maybe it’s not your cup of tea, but many people in the world choose love and a partner over a specific career.

    • TheRealCharlene says:

      04:05pm | 05/07/11

      Not sure why so many dudes are getting hostile over this issue. After all, if women weren’t fed the ludicrous “princess dream” from when they were tots, maybe they would be far more accepting of regular guys, warts ‘n’ all.  There’s no room in modern life for the princess fantasy. I, for one, am a free-spirited, farting, potty-mouthed, tracky-dak-wearing modern woman, and I love it. No airs and graces on me. The idea of being stifled for life with a stick up my arse like the royals… not for all the tea in China. Now, Chelsy Davey (Harry’s ex) - THERE was a smart girl.  Got in, then got the hell out just in time.

    • Iamnololita says:

      07:38pm | 05/07/11

      Elphaba - each to their own.  I am married to a wonderful man 18 years my senior and no, he is not my surrogate father.  Older men have alot to offer.  I can do without the ewww commentary too thanks.  And before people start demonstrating their gender bias - I am not referring to money but life experience, wisdom and emotional maturity.  He was and is not a wealthy man.  Just one that I treasure for his values, integrity and moral standards.

    • Here to help says:

      10:23pm | 05/07/11

      Don’t waste your time with this one Iamnololita
      Nasty, opinionated grenade she is.

    • Elphaba - opinionated: deal with it. says:

      04:25pm | 06/07/11

      @Iamnololita - what, I can’t have an opinion?

      You don’t have to agree.  But I will have one, whether you agree with it or not.  I will comment, whether you like it or not.

      @Here to help, AKA Badger - you continue to stalk!  You continue to waste your time on me!  Kisses!!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

#Thomson will never get brothel tapes, CCTV-in-brothels experts tell the ABC. http://t.co/7YFORBBJ

Daniel Piotrowski

@ToryShepherd there's always time for Din Tai Fung.

ToryShepherd

@drpiotrowski will be there just in time for Din Tai Fung

Daniel Piotrowski

@ToryShepherd I hope that's in your piece tomorrow. Also - are you coming over this week or laaaaaater?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Bill Kelty made a memorable speech last week. Addressing the ACTU Congress Dinner in Sydney, the legendary…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Speaking of yourself in the third person is usually a sign that you’re suffering from delusions…

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

If South Australia had just arrived in the world, red and wrinkled and mewling, what would we call it?…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

241 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter