The high political farce of the last few days is unprecedented. Julia Gillard and Kevin Rudd are tearing each other to shreds and nameless Labor MPs are also leaping into the fray. It’s rapidly turned into a can’t-look-away episode of Jerry Springer; “Knifed in the back a year ago and still mad as hell”.
The invective has become a bloody spectator sport, with one Labor source declaring the backbench would rather chew their right arm off than have Kevin lead the Party again.
But the most telling comments of the debacle belong to Julia, who believes that opposition to the carbon tax will fade with time and an expensive taxpayer-funded advertising campaign. She also declared that the tax is part of her “vision” to “remake our experience of what it is to be an Australian”.
Gillard clearly underestimates the level of distrust and anger in the community about the carbon tax. She really ought to get out there and visit a pub, RSL club, building site, or just strike up a conversation with a few people outside the Canberra bubble.
She’d rapidly get the picture that this runs deeper than a “bad sell job”, that people aren’t simply going to “forgive and forget” once the tax is in place. Public discontent and distrust in this Government is entrenched and growing deeper each day.
And Gillard’s high-handed vision of “remaking our experience of being Australian” is a huge part of the problem. This underscores the public’s suspicion that the carbon tax isn’t about the environment at all – it’s about wealth redistribution and reshaping Australia.
It’s about a far-left vision of needing to correct Australia. As if we were inherently wrong.
Gillard’s desperate desire to prove our national worth to the world by sacrificing Australian jobs and industry on the altar of a carbon tax speaks of a deep-seated insecurity that harks back to the old cultural cringe.
It’s baffling to most Australians. They don’t get the Greens’ abhorrence and shame of our wealth-creating industries. They don’t get the symbolic imperative to be the first to impose an economy-wide carbon tax.
But they do understand this is not about environmental results – that much has been admitted by chief salespeople Ross Garnaut and Tim Flannery. And that’s part of why the public is fuming. It all seems so pointless – plenty of pain for no gain.
And that’s pretty much the story of the Gillard experiment of the past year.
So the big question is, who will stand up? Who of the 72 Labor Members of the House of Representatives will make a stand for the future integrity of the Labor Party, and more importantly, the national interest?
If the Independents really believed their own rhetoric, they’d be the first to declare an election was needed. Instead they sound like they’re running an old-fashioned protection racket: “you mess with Julia, you mess with me”.
It just adds to the farce.
Labor has become a laughing stock, tied to the fringe interests of the far-left Greens, locked into policies that make no sense and achieve little, and with a totally dysfunctional leadership team addicted to spin and the media cycle.
What Labor needs is the courage to reclaim its soul. To commit to their heartland. To stand up for old Labor principles and end this sad, directionless sideshow.
All we need is one Labor MP to have the courage to put their nation and their Party’s reputation above Gillard’s survival - and cross the floor of Parliament.
So who will it be?
Facebook Recommendations
Read all about it
Punch live
Up to the minute Twitter chatter
@ToryShepherd I hope that's in your piece tomorrow. Also - are you coming over this week or laaaaaater?
Recent posts
The latest and greatest
Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters
Bill Kelty made a memorable speech last week. Addressing the ACTU Congress Dinner in Sydney, the legendary…
Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…
Speaking of yourself in the third person is usually a sign that you’re suffering from delusions…
South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.
If South Australia had just arrived in the world, red and wrinkled and mewling, what would we call it?…
Nosebleed Section
choice ringside rantings
From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
Michael S says:
"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone
Change Up! says:
I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]Gentle jabs to the ribs
They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more
Most commented