This is a guest blog by journalist and former senior Howard Government press secretary Niki Savva, whose book So Greek, confessions of a conservative leftie, has just been published by Scribe. We thank her for this post and wish her well for the book, it’s a terrific read.

Abbott: circling Rudd's cage like a speedo-clad shark. Photo: Kym Smith


If anyone out there stumbles across the real Kevin Rudd, could they please call his wife and kids. They are very worried because they haven’t seen him for a while and have apparently lodged a missing persons report with the police.

There have been images of Rudd on television and in the newspapers, usually smiling and joking, often with toddlers, but there is no proof it is really him. Or anybody, really. He just looks and sounds like a clone of someone he wishes he was.

Like some alien body snatcher he slithered into John Howard’s skin one night towards the end of 2006 and wore it comfortably all the way through the 2007 election to convince people they were electing a fresher, more modern version of Howard.

The cops should have dropped Haneef, and arrested Rudd instead for identity theft.

Rudd shed Howard’s skin as soon as the election was over, and ever since he has been sliding around desperately looking for someone else’s skin to crawl into.

As Opposition Leader, Rudd dragged out the brand new conservative suit Therese had bought for him, and vowed to halt reckless government spending. He said climate change was the greatest moral challenge of our time and pledged to tackle it, promised to take over hospitals in a year and bring in an education revolution, threatened to take the Japanese to court over whaling, warned he would turn back refugee boats, and promised to live at the Lodge.

He has done none of those things, and I doubt he ever will.

I don’t know why he is there, who he thinks or is, or what he thinks a Prime Minister’s job involves. It actually means he can and must do things, big things, which can shape the country he leads and not just spin from one pic fac to another.

In his first term, Howard took on his own base and reformed gun laws, an action which has had a hugely positive impact on Australian society; challenged the stranglehold of unions on the waterfront, and began the difficult task of introducing a goods and services tax. At the same time his Treasurer, Peter Costello, wiped out billions of dollars of deficit and put the Budget back in the black.

Consider just two examples of Rudd’s gross dereliction. First his approach on climate change. It was lazy and gutless. He relied on the media to make the opposition the story - and the Liberals stupidly obliged - and to pressure Malcolm Turnbull to support the Government’s policy. He failed to take his arguments to the people, to explain what his scheme entailed, and how they would be affected by it.

Second. When he was casting around for something else to do, he commissioned Ken Henry to undertake a comprehensive review on tax reform. He is now treating it as if someone has sent him a stink bomb. They probably have.

It’s an independent report, he tried to tell Laurie Oakes the other day, it’s got nothing to do with the Government, and we might or might not pick up its recommendations. Oakes pointed out the head of Treasury was not exactly independent from the Government.

The man’s got a teleprompter where his ticker should be.

Granted he succeeded in staving off the recession threatened by the economic crisis which saved him from disappearing into vapor, but any fool could do that by spraying around billions of dollars. The trick is to spend money wisely on long term productive enterprises, and there is little evidence that is happening.

By the time people realise how much has been wasted, and how hard it will be to repay, he will be long gone, and Julia Gillard will probably be out there trying to explain it all.

That can’t come soon enough for me. I watched all the Oakes interview with Rudd on Sunday. It went about 20 minutes and it felt as if half my life had slipped away. His voice acts like a verbal sedative. He throws in lots of facts and figures and uses his favorite expressions – you know something? Guess what?- as if he is about to offer some profound insight, then whacks us with another cliche.

He is both anal and banal.

Away from the cameras, the secret Kevin is given to hissy fits, foul language and bursts of revenge. In public he is the eminently reasonable, totally predictable, and infuriatingly, nauseatingly hammy actor who got elected Prime Minister.

Like I say, if anybody finds the real Kevin Rudd, please call his family.

Tony Abbott on the other hand can’t help but be interesting. It is both a blessing and a curse. He has opinions and he expresses them in ways people can immediately understand and the reactions are not always positive.

The trick for politicians is to be interesting enough to attract attention, but not too interesting so that they come across as scatter brained or weird or ill-disciplined(see Barnaby Joyce) and invite the kind of media exposure than can end up killing them.

So far Abbott is having some success. He is rattling Rudd’s cage like a great white shark in red speedos. Rudd is so tightly wound, it wouldn’t take much to unhinge him and if Abbott keeps his team united he might just manage it. Bring it on.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

201 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • thomas vesely says:

      07:51pm | 13/02/10

      latelyi keep coming back to a persistant idea that our politicians are irrelevant because of who they are,and the priviledge that usually forms them.their debating mind set is not about problem solving but smart arse comeback.whilst in real life i know smart,practical people who usually fix the problem,economically as well.perhaps tradies/engineers would make for better governance.

    • D'elles says:

      04:00pm | 13/02/10

      When I was young we worked for and on behalf of our employers, we did a good hard days work for a fair wage. 
      The only bat(t)s we had were in the belfry and AC/DC was the type of electricity we used.
      As youngsters we walked, caught a bus or rode a bicycle.  When we managed to get mobile it was a Sandman panel van and the movies were held at drive-ins.
      Most of all we enjoyed ourselves and were happy with our lot.

      There was no internet, only “Letters to the Editor” in which we communicated in a literary manner and paid attention to our spelling and handwriting.  Only letters that had meaningful literary and worthwhile content were published.  Not a load of worthless ill informed diatribes heretofore published, the contents of which have very little bearing on the article presented for comment. 

      KR is doomed to lose the next election, because he has, of his own admittance, said it is too hard.  Of late, this is all he can say, “It is going to be very hard” and other negatives which fail to inspire any confidence in this person and his underlings to get us out of the debt he put us in.

    • Michael Ryan says:

      02:18pm | 11/02/10

      OWED TO RUDD
      ________________________________________


      Our inspired leader has many ideas
      Which lead to ground our many fears
      Of his wretched “vision” for the coming years,
      So let’s see a few over a couple of beers.
      He spoke to Bush in private meeting,
      Then told the world, with boastful bleating.
      The employee tax share scheme,
      Was aimed at the rich, but hit the lean.
      Petrol Watch was to do the trick,
      Yet, toothless, was soon given the flick.
      Grocery Watch was another wonder
      That left the chains quite free to plunder.
      Public Hospitals - the buck would stop
      at Rudd, and yet that’s been a flop.
      He told the Pope, McKillop to cannonise,
      With painful hubris in other’s eyes.
      A new forum for Asian leaders was mooted,
      And yet they told him to get rooted.
      The mighty monetary stimulus pack
      We see us all on debtor’s rack.
      Forty three billion on internet speeds
      To help with the nation’s porno needs.
      A Security Council seat was this man’s aim,
      Sec. Gen., UN, being the real main game.

      The alcopops tax would stop binge drinking,
      The assertion itself shows arrested thinking.
      A lap-top yet for every student
      Was always laughed at by the prudent.

      The “Education Revolution” delivered a spare
      Library or gym next to the one that’s there.

      The Exclusive Brethern, were a “fearful nemesis”,
      Yet were found 68 mill to improve their premises.
      A Bank Guarantee was announced by this jerk
      Without any thought as to how it would work.
      He did say “Sorry”, but then no more
      Was done by him to even the score.

      Instead of wisdom, calm and thoughtful,
      He spent half his time abusing Turnbull.
      The I. R. rules are all in place
      With jobs bound for Asia at a cracking pace.

      He took a freebie from Kerry Stokes
      Showing just the poor judgment that dashes our hopes.

      The homeless rate was a “national obscenity” –
      Yet under his care, it’s increased in intensity.

      His response to asylum seekers arriving pell-mell -
      Is to say that the traffickers should burn in hell.

      Our survival of the G F C
      He now says was “all down to me.”
      We all know that the credit’s due
      To Howard, and Costello too,
      The likes of whom, as we’ll eventually see
      From Labor’s debt, will set us free.

      When it came to asylum, he took the high moral ground –
      Would eschew Howard’s stance -  new ways would be found -
      With steaming hypocrisy, it’s now “tough and fair”,
      He’s vying with Ruddock to be one of a pair.

      S. B. Y. was Australia’s friend,
      Who Rudd, with no judgement, went on to offend
      In his frantic effort to be seen by us
      Simultaneously, as ‘tough’ and ‘un-tough.’

      (Alternative endings)………….
      What need more of proof-
      The man is a goof.

      What need of more evidence –
      Good judgment’s an irrelevance.

      Dad and Dave Rudd
      Down “On Their Selection”
      Would have none of this dud
      When it comes to elections.

      To be added to the OWED.

      He promised:-

      •  To end the GST’s” fundamental injustice.”
      •  To achieve 25-40% reduction in carbon emissions.
      •  To initiate legal action against Ahmadinejad
      •  To take Japan’s whaling to the I. C. J.

      He has done none of these things.

      When it was politically advantageous to do so:-

      •  He spoke of seeking more responsibility from indigenous Australians
      •  He said he was an economic conservative.

      Whereas in fact:-

      •  Nothing has been done to further the intervention
      •  He then became a social democrat saying that economic conservatives were responsible for the G F C.

      He has never taken a responsible but unpopular decision.

      He is an opportunist value-vacuum.

    • pieman says:

      11:41pm | 03/02/10

      Instead of waiting for a double dissolution, why not force “THE GREAT PRETENDERS” hand and stop giving him OUR MONEY, I hate the term government stimulus, government subsidies, government loans, government grants THEY are all paid for by TAX PAYERS its our money that he spends , and when he spends it all he borrows some more and WE have to pay that back as well, how much money do these greedy bastards think we earn.

      Blocking Supply

      The constitutional text denies the Senate the power to originate or amend appropriation bills, in deference to the conventions of the classical Westminster system. Under a traditional Westminster system, the executive government is responsible for its use of public funds to the lower house, which has the power to bring down a government by blocking its access to Supply – i.e. revenue appropriated through taxation. The arrangement as expressed in the Australian Constitution, however, still leaves the Senate with the power to reject supply bills or defer their passage – undoubtedly one of the Senate’s most contentious and powerful abilities.
      The ability to block Supply was the origin of the 1975 Australian constitutional crisis. The Opposition used its numbers in the Senate to defer supply bills, refusing to deal with them until an election was called for both Houses of Parliament, an election which it hoped to win. The Prime Minister of the day, Gough Whitlam, contested the legitimacy of the blocking and refused to resign. The crisis brought to a head two Westminster conventions that, under the Australian constitutional system, were in conflict – firstly, that a government may continue to govern for as long as it has the support of the lower house, and secondly, that a government that no longer has access to Supply must either resign or be dismissed. The crisis was resolved in November 1975 when Governor-General Sir John Kerr dismissed Whitlam’s government and appointed a caretaker government on condition that elections for both houses of parliament be held. This action in itself was a source of controversy and debate continues on the proper usage of the Senate’s ability to block Supply and on whether such a power should even exist.

    • Phil says:

      02:38pm | 04/02/10

      John agreed it is our debt. Just that unlike my home mortgage I had/have no say in how Kevy spends it or hands it to others. Not a bad call on Pieman.

      Mind you Labor were/are in power when most of the debt is racked up, hence why many say Labor’s debt.

      I think they should bring in laws that state that Polititions become personally liable for bad decision/broken promises. It is probably the only way to get accountability in government and rid the books of wastage and the government of fools.

      In private business if I make a statement which is deceptive and misleading I am in breach of the Trade Practices Act. These clowns should face the same scutiny.

    • John A Neve says:

      08:24am | 04/02/10

      Pieman @ 1137hrs on 3/2/10.

      I agree with you 100% Pieman, it’s “our money” that is why there is no such thing as Labor’s debt, it’s OUR DEBT.  I just wish you would explain this to your mates.

    • Lonk says:

      10:37pm | 03/02/10

      Just wonder how many of you feel like suckers for voting Rudd into power?

    • Matt says:

      03:10pm | 04/02/10

      When I turned up to vote at te last elecion, someone said something about Kevin Rudd and handed me a Labor How to Vote card.  I said “You think I should vote for Kevin, do you?” to which he replied “For sure, mate”.  So I asked him “How am I going to vote for Kevin when I don’t even live in his electorate?”  Then I told him to piss off and stop misleading voters.  Up until that point I had not decided how to vote, but I wasn’t going to vote for the party that is dishonest with voters on polling day and voted for the Liberal candidate instead.

    • Average Joe says:

      08:44am | 04/02/10

      I voted for Kevin Rudd and my wife and 2 kids followed suit - we are one of the ‘working families’ appealed to at the last election campaign.
      I don’t feel like a sucker - but I’m really disappointed that he hasn’t lived up to my expectations and he does now seem just a little too smooth for my liking.
      If he leads the ALP to the coming election, as of course he will, my family will not vote for the ALP candidate.
      Don’t know if Abbott will turn out better but he does appear more genuine and more ‘Aussie’, and that’s a good start. It’s just a pity that a Don Chipp is no longer around.

    • anzac says:

      07:44pm | 03/02/10

      When im reading the ridiculous comments from the liberal cheer squad on this site all I can think about is the huge mistake the ALP made in continually trying to denigrate John Howard even though the majority of voters thought he was doing a good job. Perhaps you guys should lighten up, lose the vitriol and give the majority of voters who prefer Rudd and the ALP at the moment a reason to change their preference?
      Also, good to see that Ms Savva knows where to crawl after her years advising one of Australian politics biggers loser, straight to chairman Rupert and the news ltd fold.

    • Matt says:

      07:42pm | 03/02/10

      “It was left up to the states to improve infrastructure in this country”

      So we had a PM who actually read the Australian constitution once or twice… ooh how terrible!  Lets not forget the fact that he also gave them the money they needed for that infrastrucure though the GST.

    • Robbo says:

      06:53pm | 03/02/10

      How come I don’t see you complaining about all the one-sided Labor pieces that get posted on this site?

    • Mikko says:

      06:53pm | 03/02/10

      Good one Niki, you’ve described the Toxic Bore to a capital ‘T’,

    • Dave Ross says:

      06:02pm | 03/02/10

      OK Niki,
      I give up.
      You’ve just sold another book.

    • David of Emerald says:

      05:50pm | 03/02/10

      Top article Niki - so wonderfully put about Priscilla the Pretend PM

    • mountcross says:

      05:36pm | 03/02/10

      What about thehelp Mr Rudd has given us pensioners Niki ? you left that out and there are about 4 million of us. we will repay Mr rudd come election time. mr Abott will most likely take money off us as he seems pretty heartless and uncaring to battlers. We dont trust Mr Abott and no pensioner should.

    • RR says:

      09:35pm | 03/02/10

      Sure mountcross,  and how’s the rising cost of living treating you these days?

    • Brad Coward says:

      05:28pm | 03/02/10

      Kevin Rudd….the Marie Celeste of Australian Prime Ministers !  Kevin Rudd…the man so dull that his birthstone is jacket lint !  Kevin Rudd….the man who won’t watch the musical “Chicago” because he thinks that the song “Mr Celophane” is about him.  Kevin Rudd….the man so vain that he autographs pictures of himself and keeps them !

      They seek him in heaven, they seek him in hell…that darned, elusive Pimpernel !

    • paul says:

      05:28pm | 03/02/10

      what a joke:
      Howard and Costello brought us back into surplus by cutting back on infrastructure, health and other vital services that had been put in place.

      so - stopped spending money we didn’t have in the first place? Thats a bad thing?

      Also, very keen to know what infrastructure rudd has invested in?
      You mean flat bats for homes? Hows that going to help us support 15m more people over the next 20 years, while cutting back emissions by almost 31% per capita?

    • eye4aneye says:

      06:58pm | 11/02/10

      @ persephone - I don’t agree with your stance but I can’t argue with your substance.

      Thank you for debating the issue as it should be done with data and rationality.

      My personal view is this - politicians are unpleasant people all round on both sides however we have a choice to make between Liberal (who run the country like a business) and Labour (who run it like a charity).

      I chose business but to each their own.

    • Brad Coward says:

      05:14pm | 03/02/10

      Jack, no doubt you fail to notice the subtle biased outlooks of regular contributors to The Punch such as Anthony Albanese, David Penberthy, Tracey Spicer ect….all Labor !

      You would possible fail to notice mail building up in your letterbox but for the gentle humming of the mailman’s motor bike !

      Enjoy your chuckle, Jack.  He who laughs last, laughs longest.  May you live in interesting times.

    • Rod J'That says:

      04:38pm | 03/02/10

      It’s worth noting again that all of my comments are extremely observant, thoughtful, and intelligent, and generally far superior to every comment ever made by anyone else anywhere in the world about anything.

    • BobMc says:

      12:18am | 04/02/10

      Is that you, Kevin?

    • Dick J says:

      04:38pm | 03/02/10

      I have read above some comments about Howard’s core and non core problems.

      Can you remember when the “core promises” statement was made, or why?

      Back in 1996 the ALP was in power. Keating told everyone the budget
      was in balance and the hardship caused by the “recession we had to
      have” was over. Everything was rosy, just vote ALP.

      The Coalition asked for treasury figures to back the claims, but the
      ALP refused to make them available. “Trust us”, they said.

      Of coursethe ALP lost the 96 election and it turned out that Labor’s
      claims were a crock of crap. They were already $9billion into the red.

      This meant the financial underpinnings of the Coalition policies were
      meaningless. They had no way of keeping all the promises.

      Unfortunately Howard rationalised the promises into “core” and “non-core” promises.

      The core promises were delivered immediately. The non-core promises
      were delivered as soon as funds became available, with paying back
      Labor’s debt being a priority.

      All the promises, both core and non-core were delivered in Howard’s first 2
      terms.

      The Coalition also put in place a “Charter of Budget Honesty” which
      ensured treasury figures were available for scrutiny before elections. My recollectionn is that the ALP voted against the bill in parliament.

      Neither party can never again lie to Australia about the state of
      the books prior to an election.

      Thanks to Howard it has to be said all promises are now core promises. Over to you anal and banal . I wonder what the numbers will look like?

    • Cuppa says:

      04:37pm | 03/02/10

      I thought it was hilarious(& typical) when Rudd dissapeared after that failed bag of crap Copenhagen.My god he is P*ssweak.Rudd = FAIL.

    • Jane says:

      04:35pm | 03/02/10

      Flip flop…are you for real? a ‘war criminal’? ‘Thanks to Kev for getting us out of there’ you say? Newsflash….the ‘combat portion’ (not all ‘troops’)  removed were coming home after their rotation anyway..

      It may pain you to know that your hero Dudd didn’t think ‘we were lied to’ at all…indeed, he was quite adament that WMD existed at the time as well.!!

      Allow me to quote the Kruddster in 2002:

      “There is no debate or dispute as to whether Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction. He does.  There’s no dispute as whether he’s in violation of UN Security Council resolutions.  He is. “

      Nor was Rudd in any doubt a scant year later that Australia had a moral duty to remain in Iraq, as he forcefully told a Monash University audience on August 25, 2003 -

      “Iraq has WMD’s, it is a matter of impirical fact” - Kevin Rudd 2002

      Ooops.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      04:34pm | 03/02/10

      Yeah, what’s wrong with just publishing the biased crap supporting Labour?

    • stephen says:

      04:09pm | 03/02/10

      ‘This is a guest bog by journalist and former senior senior Howard Govt. Press…...’

    • mcdazz says:

      04:08pm | 03/02/10

      And how would you know?

      But the fact is that “Jack” said:

      “A bit rich for someone who worked for our laziest ever Treasurer to complain about a lack of government action.”

      And that is completely true.

      Costello did nothing - Howard was the one who called the shots in regards to the economy.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      04:05pm | 03/02/10

      @Flipflop: we wnet to Iraq for the same reason that the Labour-controlled UK went to Iraq - because we had no choice (IMO). This explains wht the ‘coalition’ was so diverse politically, including both the Right (USA & Australia) and the Left (UK). I suspect that Bush gave Blair and Howard a real arm-twist, perhaps threatening trade penalties and other sanctions if they hadn’t supported the USA. I can see no other reason for Australia and the UK going to war with Bush.

      As for Rudd ‘getting us out of there’, that’s just another example of Rudd taking the easy solution, nothing hard about it with Bush on his way out and saddled with no responsibility for the war in the first place. There was absolutley no downside for Rudd.

    • Mike says:

      03:50pm | 03/02/10

      The Liberals are so upset at losing power.

      This article sounds like it was written by trailer-trash.

      These ad hominim rants from Liberals make me fear for their return to power. Because they think they are so good, power in their hands is positively scary.

    • SM says:

      03:48pm | 03/02/10

      From a re-election point of view it doesn’t matter whether he’s there or not - he speaks well, Abbott and the Libs are hopeless, and accordingly he’ll win in a canter

    • watty says:

      03:47pm | 03/02/10

      DJG putting out household bins tonight?

      And here was me thinking he had disposed of all his garbage in today’s Punch.

      I had more than a “casual’ look at your most detailed insiders knowledge of a minders life in Canberra which you don’t just pick up in today’s Telegraph..

      Your description of a minder as a “cancer on our democracy” is either a clever smokescreen or evidence of a slight but sick derangement. Take your pick.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      03:42pm | 03/02/10

      You’re absolutely right; Costello didn’t work anywhere near as hard as Swan. Let’s face it, Swan’s typical day includes lots of hard work and very complicated activity:

      08:00 Spend some money.
      10: 00 Tea break.
      10:30 Spend some money.
      12:30 Lunch break.
      13:30 Spend some money
      15:00 Tea break.
      15:30 Ask the unions how much money they want.
      15:32 Give the unions some money.
      16:00 Spend some money.

    • Ben of Canberra says:

      09:34am | 04/02/10

      Steve, that’s ridiculous!
      We all know Swanny knocks off at 12:00.

    • mcdazz says:

      03:40pm | 03/02/10

      That’s “co-author” thank you very much.

    • Stavros says:

      05:02pm | 03/02/10

      Your welcome wink
      He “co-authored” the “book”, that still makes him a children’s author.

    • Chris says:

      03:39pm | 03/02/10

      Wierd article. The author seems to have less connection with reality than almost anyone I have ever read. Causality is inverted, good is bad… exactly the kind of thinking that prevails in politics these days.

      Which makes it amazing she got it right about Rudd.

    • RB says:

      03:28pm | 03/02/10

      Brilliant article.Spot on.Kevin Rudd is a liar & a show pony.He is the most useless prime minister i can remember.Has he actually achieved anything…?

    • Lex says:

      03:18pm | 03/02/10

      Like Clement Atlee Rudd may seem a modest man, but then"he has a lot to be modest about”.

    • Brian says:

      03:18pm | 03/02/10

      On advice of commission started by JWH 1981. Your Call

    • Stavros says:

      02:56pm | 03/02/10

      Kevin Rudd, prime minister, children’s author.
      Says it all really.

    • Bilbo says:

      02:50pm | 03/02/10

      I was thinking of buying and reading So Greek, but having read this I’ll save me money. Thanks Punch.

    • Kim says:

      02:47pm | 03/02/10

      Bravo Ms Savva, it is incredible that this guy has been able to fool so many common sense down to earth Australians - he is a complete pretender…and a downright embarrassment as a PM. However, he is wearing very thin with a lot of people and I suspect that before too much longer his tame media collaborators will start to turn on him and disclose his ample inadequacy.

    • persephone says:

      02:46pm | 03/02/10

      John A Neve

      I don’t think Jane’s being smart.

    • Rick says:

      02:44pm | 03/02/10

      Niki, you make some good points there about Rudd’s failings, but I would just like to make a few comments in his defence. For one thing Rudd is never gonna give you up, never gonna let you down, never gonna run around and desert you. Furthermore, he’s never gonna make you cry, never gonna say goodbye, never gonna tell a lie and hurt you. I think that you should go and think about these points for awhile.

    • Dick J says:

      05:05pm | 03/02/10

      Thank you Rick Astley -  another one hit wonder !  How apt !

    • Old Bert says:

      02:42pm | 03/02/10

      There’s a relevancy here Niki, to,  “the man wasn’t there”,    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Never_Was,  a true story of an unidentified, (except for his family),  man,  whose posthumous contribution is in a real sense as opposed to a political one,  might be a humble reminder to Mr Rudd, and all political aspirants,  of the transient nature and behaviour of mere mortals, and the need for leaders to aspire to less indulgent behaviour, as witnessed by Barack Obama, recognised today as the cognisant leader of the free world. It’s a pity Australia does not have a leader of such magnitude. So be it. What we have in Australia, is a subjective politic, highly sensitive to a realtime aggressive “journalistic”  interview, mostly led by the self promoting ABC interwiewers, and others in the commercial network, whose overarching goal is to publish their own opinion, however subtle or redneck their self aggandisement.. We have so much to learn in this country, and subsequently, the GST is being taken advantage by retailers to rip off pensioners and low income earners, by presenting a piece of roasting beef, mostly cow, dairy unproductive, to foist upon the cringing forelock tugging serfs, at an exorbitant price, prime beef being an export big earner.  For Chrisake, Mr Rudd, hammer these charlatans, mostly the big 3, but you don,t have the ticker. Unfortunatley, neither does the opposition.

    • H of SA says:

      02:37pm | 03/02/10

      Considering percieved conservative or liberal bias in the media (discussion of this has become its own industry) - I’m pretty sure some reputable studies have found the bias as actually usually toward the incumbent government more than about political ideology.

      But in general:

      Media companies = share holders = desire for cash

      and

      Liberal Govt = less company tax = more money for media companies

      therefore Media bias is more likely to be Liberal

    • Brad Coward says:

      05:21pm | 03/02/10

      Because David Penberthy, Tracey Spicer, Anthony Albanese etc were busy today and couldn’t write articles !

      I hope that you use nice soft paper in your printer because the regular A4 size might be a bit brutal on your tender membranes !

    • Ben says:

      02:36pm | 03/02/10

      You seem angry.

    • SpinningWheel says:

      02:07pm | 03/02/10

      Three cheers for Malcom Turnbull the only Liberal with integrity and the only one I would trust enough to vote for. Tony Abbott changes his mind way to much for me to ever take him seriously.

    • Henrietta says:

      02:02pm | 03/02/10

      I am voting for Kevin Rudd, I would rather his ETS than Abotts, I saw Abott on the 7.30 report last night. He stuttered and stammered and .It was a good interview and enough to make me realise ..better Rudd than the mad monk. I could not really care what you Liberals think of that!!!

    • Greg says:

      04:33pm | 03/02/10

      Actually, I was surprised that Kerry O’Brien was so concerned by what he calls a scare campaign about Rudds ETS. I don’t recall him admonishing Kim Beazley or Kevin Rudd about two very successful scare campaigns first against the GST and then against Workchoices. I think Kerry’s hippie, leftist views on climate change are humorous but not suitable in a journalist of his caliber. Hey Kerry, if your listening AGW is a sham, the “science” of AGW is crashing down daily. Oh, and Henrietta, if you think an ETS is the be all and end all why don’t you do some research on the IPCC and it’s recent gaffs?

    • Troy says:

      01:40pm | 03/02/10

      The biggest concern I have with Kevin Rudd is he is happy to accept credit for anything that goes right. But as soon as there is a problem he has one of his other ministers front the media. He has handled his ETS woefully, but worst still he hasnt got the message that Australians will not accept a new tax on Global Warming based on the incomplete and obviously inaccurate science. The fact that the unpopular Abbott is making ground in the polls is proof that Australians will not accept his ETS in its currant form. I also think Australians are starting to see through his Lies (Spin).

    • Sonia says:

      01:37pm | 03/02/10

      I don’t care if you see Rudd or not, for me it is important how is the economy , education,jobs,hospitals, social welfare,security and climate effecting us.
      So far I am satisfied with his work, also there are things to improve and things to change. One cannot fix the damage done by Howard and his government in one day. Also very important is to think abut the future and our children what kind of Australia we pass to them.
      It is opposition job to make sure the government is accountable for it.
      So far have you seen anywhere the Opposition Liberal and National Party.
      They cannot govern themselves yet they put the clown to be their Leader, what a joke. Did you hear Tony talking about his ETS, this man need help, very quick help if they want to be taken seriously.
      If he thinks that he can preach and take us for a ride then he is wrong.
      I am sure no sensible person would let him to govern over Australia,or tell me what to do with my virginity. If I save it , it wont be for Tony Abbott.
      Or the idea of planting 20 million trees,Bob Hawke planted over 500 million trees and it was not enough. His magic tricks are for kindergarden kids nor for me. The Liberals had a reasonable leader in Malcolm Turnbull or I could even vote for Joe , but this fanatic will never get vote form our family and most friends that I know share my view.

    • Greg S says:

      01:36pm | 03/02/10

      Frankly, I am stunned that they haven’t blamed the deficit on JWH, after all if he had only created a bigger surplus in the first place then Rudd and Swan would have had more to work with when the ‘rescued’ us.

      /sarcasm

    • John A Neve says:

      01:14pm | 03/02/10

      When one reads these blogs, it is obvious much of the debate revolves around which of the major parties is the better money manager. I would suggest both are as good or as bad as the other.

      I would suggest just prior to Labor taking office we were, overall, in a far worse position than we had ever been. Since Labor took over it has further declined.

      It all revolves around how we measure the countries worth, what we own, what we have sold, what we have to buy in and what we sell to balance the books. An in depth look at us over the last 20 years is not good and sadly I think it will get worse.

    • Rod J'That says:

      01:07pm | 03/02/10

      I’ll tell you how good my comments are. If my comments could wear dick togs, they’d be strutting along Bondi beach right now, doing a photo shoot with Annie Leibovitz.

    • mcdazz says:

      12:47pm | 03/02/10

      Here’s a summary of the article:

      Blah blah blah, Liberals good, blah blah blah, Labor bad, blah blah blah didn’t Abbott look good in his DT’s, blah blah blah I don’t like Rudd, blah blah blah, I still don’t like Rudd, blah blah blah.

      Thankfully, I found a use for the article - I’m going to print it out and use it as toilet paper because that’s all it’s good for.

      Seriously - why does The Punch continue publishing biased crap like this?

    • mcdazz says:

      06:11pm | 03/02/10

      It could be a bit ouchy - maybe I’ll soak the paper first.

    • Rose says:

      12:48pm | 03/02/10

      Howard was an absolute disgrace, he used the suffering of minority groups to further his own ideological agenda. He showed no regard for the people he was supposed to serve, encouraging racism and bigotry. There is no part of his time as PM I can look back on fondly, as for his economic record, pffft, imagine what could have been done with that level of revenue if someone who knew what they were doing had the reigns. He engaged this nation in a war based on bald-faced lies, and I am convinced that he knew all the evidence supporting Bush’s attack on Iraq was shonky. Sure he left some money in the bank, but he destroyed many of the social characteristics that made Australia great, and he sure as hell didn’t add any infrastructure of any value.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      04:03pm | 03/02/10

      @Flipflop: we wnet to Iraq for the same reason that the Labour-controlled UK went to Iraq - because we had no choice (IMO). This explains wht the ‘coalition’ was so diverse politically, including both the Right (USA & Australia) and the Left (UK). I suspect that Bush gave Blair and Howard a real arm-twist, perhaps threatening trade penalties and other sanctions if they hadn’t supported the USA. I can see no other reason for Australia and the UK going to war with Bush.

      As for Rudd ‘getting us out of there’, that’s just another example of Rudd taking the easy solution, nothing hard about it with Bush on his way out and saddled with no responsibility for the war in the first place. There was absolutley no downside for Rudd.

    • Flipflop says:

      02:21pm | 03/02/10

      Rose I really think John Howard is a war criminal and that pains me to say that. We had no buisness being in Iraq, we were lied to. Thank heaven Kevin Rudd got us out of there. He could have used that money to help the pensioners years before or even made our roads a bit safer or invested in our hospitals, there are many many areas that money could have been better spent

    • Rod J'That says:

      12:47pm | 03/02/10

      I’d like to see Kevin Rudd ‘declare war’ on my last comment, or any comment that I’ve ever made anywhere for that matter (orally or in writing). He won’t because he knows he’d lose the next election if he did. In fact there wouldn’t even be any more elections. The Governor General would just dissolve parliament, and appoint me sole ruler of Australia, assuming I hadn’t been swept to power by a popular revolution in the meantime. That’s how good my comments are.

    • persephone says:

      12:45pm | 03/02/10

      I think the Coalition are still waiting for Rudd to step up to the dispatch box, rip of the latex mask, and reveal that he is in fact a Chinese operative (he speaks Mandarin, you know).

    • Fiona says:

      12:44pm | 03/02/10

      Blimey! This has been entertaining. Great article Niki. In ten years time, he’ll need to unapologetically apologise (cos he likes to be not sorry for being sorry) to all of Australia for his spin over substance, his racking up of debt and squandering of our money, and for forcing us to put up with his hard hats, church stops and constant BS.

      ROFL

    • What says:

      12:42pm | 03/02/10

      And yet you say the stuttering moron Abbot “can’t help but be interesting?” It’s a wonder why the Liberal PR team hasn’t got that voice checked out yet - they did a good job on Howard in the 80’s.

    • persephone says:

      12:43pm | 03/02/10

      Rudd is cursed with the gift of making the right decisions.

      He’s made plenty which he clearly expected would be regarded as ‘courageous’. He was criticised, for example, for guaranteeing bank savings; if the policy hadn’t worked, this would now be seen as a ‘courageous’ decision.

      It worked, so it isn’t, despite the fact that it was one of the factors which helped us ride out the recession the rest of the world had.

      The stimulus package was also ‘courageous’ at the time, which is why the Coalition didn’t vote for the second round. But it worked and people showed they weren’t as adverse to governments wracking up debt as the experts all believed.

      So again, he loses the credit for being courageous.

      There’s a whole raft of issues like this, where the media, far from fawning all over him and calling him the messiah, identified a decision as a mistake.

      Until it worked. Until the public made it clear they liked it. Then it became obvious and easy.

      And make up your mind - either he’s a control freak who stage manages every utterance of every Labor member, or he gives his colleagues the respect they deserve as elected representatives and allows them to make policy decisions.

    • Craigo says:

      12:34pm | 03/02/10

      Niki. You forgot to mention that KRudd has “declared war” on almost every problem then announced he will “take swift and decisive action” before handing it over to some committee to muddle over for 18 months before allowing it to drift towards the next election cycle where no doubt he will announce “New Policies” to replace his lack of action.

    • mcdazz says:

      12:34pm | 03/02/10

      I’m not sure why The Punch continues publishing opinion pieces by politicians - they are hardly unbiased.

      Talk about one sided crap.

    • SM says:

      12:56pm | 03/02/10

      Indeed.  I’d rather read another one by that guy who bangs on about grocery prices.  Or that former Canberra woman who defends grocery prices

    • persephone says:

      12:33pm | 03/02/10

      Absolute essence of dagginess, pc.

      Ain’t it fun??

    • DJG says:

      12:31pm | 03/02/10

      Dont usually respond but must comment on Watty 11.51am. Of course i am/was a ‘minder’. Thats obvious. Why else would i describe the position as “a cancer on our democracy”. I am obviously full of self loathing. Perhaps you should become a ‘serious’ reader of Punch like myself. Your comments regarding my blog indicate you only gave it a ‘casual’ read. I am sure Ms Savva never drove to Canberra to save allowances. The article is nothing more than a nasty piece of writing against a man who put an end to the people who gave her some status in life, Messrs Howard and Costello. Mr Nobody, invisible man, fraud etc. etc. was too good for them. Move on Ms Savva your views on Mr Rudd hold less value in an objective sense, than the chap who will empty my household bins this afternoon.

    • mcdazz says:

      12:32pm | 03/02/10

      Don’t kid yourself.

      Howard and Costello brought us back into surplus by cutting back on infrastructure, health and other vital services that had been put in place.

      Add to that the completion of the sales of public assets and a resources boom, Australia was in a pretty good position.

      However, at a time when people WERE losing jobs and we WERE suffering from the GFC, the stimulus packages injected money where it was needed - into building infrastructure and retail.

      As for the financial sector legislation, you can thank Keating for that.

    • Rod J'That says:

      12:18pm | 03/02/10

      This comment - the one you’re reading right now - is pithy and knowing, and incorporates a little bit of arch humour.

      Thanks for reading.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      03:55pm | 03/02/10

      And my retort will leave you wondering, because I

    • Perry White says:

      12:14pm | 03/02/10

      Or… casting around for something to do in his first term Port Arthur fell into his lap and he circumvented our federal system, pressuring all state police ministers into simultaneously changing their gun laws, etc, etc, etc. Typical rightwing journo trickery: play the man, not the ball. We don’t live in America, we don’t vote for Presidents, we vote for political parties to form governments, the parliamentary leaders of which become Prime Ministers. One of our political parties has a core of actual values that mean something to ordinary Australians. The other one was invented by Bob Menzies to represent him in parliament; they’ve really been all-at-sea on the policy front since his demise. When he was casting about for ideas about his new party in the early to mid 1940s, where do you think got the idea for a party based on the ‘leadership principle’? I’ll give you a hint; leadership principle is the English for ‘Fuehrerprinzip’. Interesting that Menzies should create such a party when Fascism had already proved to be such a spiritually, morally and ethically vaccuous a disaster. Kind of reminds me of the Howard years. Only a staffer still spellbound by the ‘leader’ could write such tranparent, contemptable tripe. Bravo, Savva, bravo.

    • Greg says:

      03:41pm | 04/02/10

      interesting fictional piece you’ve written there. Only thing you have forgotten to add is that despite the downfall of communism we still have twits such as chairman Rudd who is showing a Soviet will to take control of freedom of speech. Perhaps you should go back to your collective farm and continue your research into the virtues of a Marxist political system. That should keep you occupied for the next century.

    • Perry White says:

      04:15pm | 03/02/10

      @Shelley,
      I didn’t say Labor ‘represented’ all ordinary Australians… I said their values meant something to them. Of course disgruntled ‘special interest cases’ have proven to be, historically, all grist for the fascist mill; like Menzies ‘forgotten Australians’. Why don’t you pursue your wage issues via tha appropriate channels and consider yourself fortunate you still have an IR system to complain about. Howard and his Liberal henchmen lost the last election because, given the hubris of control of the Senate, he finally felt secure enough to reveal his true attitude to the swing-voting ‘Howard battlers’ responsible for his reprehensible career.

    • Shelley says:

      12:56pm | 03/02/10

      One of our political parties has a core of actual values that mean something to ordinary Australians

      I must be no ordinary Australian. I like to think of myself as an average Australian and had assumed it is the same thing, sort of.

      Don’t assume Labor represent ALL ordinary Australians. It’s far from the truth.

      Ask any one of the aged care carers that are lighter in their pay packet through an IR reform that had promised to make no one worse off.

    • Super D says:

      12:13pm | 03/02/10

      Well I guess if you want to include private borrowings then the figures don’t look so good, but then again we Aussies like borrowing money to buy our houses and build our businesses and have to borrow overseas to do it.  This is not without risk as the government having to guarantee bank borrowings demonstrates though the alternative would be for the government of the day to regulate offshore borrowing by private companies and individuals.  Unless thats what you’re advocating then holding the increase in (private) national debt against the previous government is a little disengenous, if it is then bring on the great economic collapse of 2011!

    • yarraside says:

      12:13pm | 03/02/10

      “His voice acts like a verbal sedative.”  Really?  I’ve always found KRudd’s voice acts like a verbal laxative.

    • Bemused says:

      12:12pm | 03/02/10

      This is all so terribly unfair. Yes, Kevin Rudd has been seen with young kiddies and kittens. He also likes puppies, motherhood and rainbows, too. He is the MAN.
      Pity he isn’t a proper prime minister who can make a tough decision.
      C’mon Kevvie, do something that requires a little bit of ticker. Just once. Heavens above, you couldn’t even vote in cabinet when it came to deciding on the book pricing policy.
      What was that old saying that Kevin Rudd couldn’t go three rounds with Winnie the Poh?

    • GO THE AXOLOTL MEXICAN SERVANT says:

      02:46pm | 03/02/10

      Good one Wally,

      Your comment has given me a good giggle. I’ve almost peed my pants!! 

      Bring on the Giant Salamanders Come out were ever you are and show yourselves.  Standup and stand tall. Cheers to the salamanders.  You can count on my vote.  To the Sala’s hohoho.

      I just love it.

    • persephone says:

      02:26pm | 03/02/10

      OK, watty, we’ll settle for a control freak who shows respect for the opinions of his backbenchers.

    • watty says:

      12:59pm | 03/02/10

      Too easy persephone….he’s a control freak.

      Must be an election in the wind….Rudd mentioned “working families” at least 4 times in a 10 minute speech today.

      Putting Australia into more than $100 billion debt….now that’s courageous.

    • m0nty says:

      12:04pm | 03/02/10

      That’s good Ms Savva, you’re attacking Rudd for exactly the failing where Abbott is most vulnerable. Apparatchik 101.

      Abbott just released his first major policy, an ETS scheme which is so ridiculously soft on business that it wouldn’t reduce emissions at all, yet even the business lobby complained that the policy lacked detail. Plus it was entirely unfunded.

      Elections are usually fought on economic credentials. Rudd has that in spades given how he has avoided a recession where dozens of Western countries have not. Abbott has shown no sign of economic nous. Publishing policies that do nothing but add to the deficit won’t help to fight the perception that Abbott is an empty pair of Speedos.

    • John A Neve says:

      11:52am | 03/02/10

      Steve of Cornubia @ 0912hrs,
      What’s with this “healthy bank balance”.
      When the previous government came to power, Net Foreign Debt was
      $180 billion, when they left office it was $550 billion !!
      The National Debt in the same period went from $700 billion to $3.3 trillion.
      That’s a great legacy I don’t think.

    • John A Neve says:

      02:19pm | 03/02/10

      Jane @ 1340hrs,
      Do you doubt my figures Jane?
      Based on your post, you could easily search for yourself or are you just being smart?

    • Jane says:

      12:40pm | 03/02/10

      Someone please explainthe difference between ‘PRIVATE debt’ and ‘GOVERNMENT debt’  to John A Neve please..  LOL smile

      Just like the $ takings in tax increases ( ie the comrades liked to label the Coaltion the ‘highest taxing government’.....as each govt. successively is, d’oh) ...so do the ‘debt’ amount ‘figures’ . The trick is to compare apples with apples, the relevancy…and the relativity of it.
      It took the Coalition almost ten years to pay off previous Labor’s $96b GOVERNMENT debt…$176b with interest….to get into surplus. How’s the comparable GOVERNMENT debt looking now comrade?

      Maybe ‘Economic Conservative’ or is that ‘Christian Socialist’...(.or whatever he tags himself these days)  Kardboard Kevin can help you out?......wink

    • Wallace says:

      11:50am | 03/02/10

      Niki, have you every thought that the real Kevin Rudd isn’t there because the real Kevin Rudd isn’t really human? The way he has been acting in recent months points to one horrible and undeniable truth, Kevin Rudd is a giant salamander. He and his cohort of masquerdeing amphibions have taken over our government and plan to instigate their radical pro-axolotl agenda to the detriment of us all. You think the trade unions are the real power behind the Labour movement? But Rudd is only part of the wider conspiracy going on. A small cabal of Giant Mexican walking fish have been secretly running the world for centuries and are behind every major event in recent history. Like many people you probably thought that September 11 was carried out by a bunch of extremists from Al Qadea, but guess again, the 19 hi jackers were all salamanders straight out of mexico city. And the GFC, its got their slimy prints all over it! Its high time we as a society of proud non-amphibious Australians stood up to the axolotle menance, armed ourselves with giant fish nets and take back what’s ours! Fight the power!

    • eye4aneye says:

      06:51pm | 11/02/10

      Hilarious - yet it explains so much…...

    • Radical Chick says:

      11:47am | 03/02/10

      His voice acts like a verbal sedative.
      _________

      Best phrase of the article. I hope Abbott wins…cant withstand Krudd…he is a phony!!!
      And soon there will be Obama coming to town….It will be awful to watch Krudd displaying his male crush on Obama. yyyeeekkksss!!!

    • Robert Smissen says:

      11:45am | 03/02/10

      Matt, you must have been left on the front step too long, Niki’s old boss not only ran, he is still the BEST prime minister we were lucky enough to have since federation

    • Jenny says:

      11:31am | 03/02/10

      I do not think Rudd is rattled by Abbott.  I think he has been energised by having Abbott as an opponent.  I saw parliament yesterday and, yes while a little smug, Rudd was articulate and fired up (which made him more animated than he usually is) against Abbott.  Abbott looked worn out & kind of wormy looking.  I don’t believe anything Abbott says.  I think his climate action plan is all a smokescreen so that he can bullshit his way into power.  The Liberals know that eventually they will need to turn to an ETS to decrease carbon emissions drastically but they don’t want the electorate to know this. The Libs are like a fake fendi bag - it looks good on the outside but after a few uses it will fall apart & be useless.

    • Lukemac says:

      06:43pm | 03/02/10

      Even dead bodies can twich.

    • Jane says:

      11:43am | 03/02/10

      PMSL - riiiiiiiiiiight hahahhaa

    • Jenny says:

      11:21am | 03/02/10

      Wow what a great bit of fiction. If the rest of the book is like this then I won’t be buying it.  I could write a similar article like this on Howard in the same vein and no one would be the wiser.  It easy to make opinions about a person based on prejudices and biased perceptions using flowery language like Ms Savva has used.  But it takes a real person with guts & ethics to write an article that adds to the debate with facts & balanced opinion.  Ms Savva this is nothing but a piece of trash and I rue the time it has taken to read it.  Go to newmatilda.com if you want read intelligent debate about politics.  All this article does is pandy to the Rudd haters & adds nothing to the debate. For the record I have voted for both Labor & Liberal parties in the past. All this article does is make more likely NOT to vote Liberal if this is the best they can come up with.

    • watty says:

      02:14pm | 03/02/10

      Bitchy.bitchy Vivian.

      Savva was never a secretary for Howard or any other politician.However I think she could spell “what” without too much trouble.

    • Vivian says:

      11:33am | 03/02/10

      What do you expect from Howard’s ex secretary.
      There must be some dummy’s around if they take notice of waht she says

    • watty says:

      11:09am | 03/02/10

      Modest with it too persenphone “just a gifted amateur” Akin to our current P.M.?

      The system for answering questions on “Sunrise” malfunctioned. Failure to email the questions to be asked by Kochie proved disastrous and no doubt a head has rolled for this glaring mistake.

    • persephone says:

      12:17pm | 03/02/10

      Gee, when Abbott stuffs up (and he’s getting close to being a perpetual motion machine there) he gets hailed for his honesty.

      And I’m obviously going down in the world - a couple of weeks ago, apparently I was Julia Gillard.

    • Old Clive says:

      10:59am | 03/02/10

      Do you mean Here! Here! or may be you don’t know where you are!

    • John A Neve says:

      12:00pm | 03/02/10

      Old Clive,
      No I’m a little deaf, it comes with age

    • Willy K says:

      10:54am | 03/02/10

      Hey Niki… that was brilliant!  Would like to hear more from you.  Nail on the head stuff for me.  Rudd is 100% rolled-gold phoney!  How the hell people fell for it is beyond me.  I put it down to compulsory voting where those uneducated in politics vote for the sound-bite that offers the biggest handout for the least work.

      Please write some more and I hope you get picked up by MSM as a regular writer or hopefully a serious political interview TV program - something this country lacks.

    • J says:

      10:52am | 03/02/10

      @SLF - GOLD!

      True, Obama has turned out to be a bit of a disappointment.  I must admit I was suckered in by the flowery speeches.  Hopefully something will come of it.

    • nic says:

      10:31am | 03/02/10

      The next leader that perhaps needs a dose of honest media coverage is Obama. Probably a nice guy who’s not the magician he’s made out to be.

    • SLF says:

      10:37am | 03/02/10

      Winning a Nobel Piece Prize whilst fighting an illegal war on two fronts is pretty bloody magical.

    • DJG says:

      10:28am | 03/02/10

      Just another Parliamentary staff hack. They swan around the house, coffee at aussies, hang out in the Chairmans lounge at airports, dream up silly slogans “dirty big tax cuts” (clever as) delude themselves that they are important. They are the cancer of our democracy. They admire and worship the dark arts of spin, deceit and dishonest denial. They actually have an air of importance about them. When it all ends ‘et tu’ Ms Savva the relevance deprivation syndrome kicks in. Why not write a book full of private tit bits? Once of bad character always of bad character, making a buck out of kiss and tell. Clever. Howard and Costello should not be too upset, they must have known loyalty and integrity was not important to the likes of Ms Savva, unless of course there was something in it for her. Reading her book one comes away with the impression that she was the member for Higgins.

    • watty says:

      10:51am | 03/02/10

      DJG…the too well informed to be just a “casual ” reader of Punch.

      Sounds more like you too have been (or still are) a “minder” in Canberra (perhaps a Labor minder?)

      Everyone Ministers,Members,Senators minders the Press Gallery descended on aussies so why not Savva?

      Rules must have changed since I used to visit Canberra as on many occasions I had to invite “minders”  from both major Parties as guests into the Chairman’s Lounge.

      Petty!Petty!Petty!

    • Zeta says:

      10:41am | 03/02/10

      Staffers don’t ‘swan’ around. They scurry. Like rats being chased by cats. Staffers in Canberra are more likely to have a plunger on their desks than send anyone down to Aussies. Most staffers, except for the highest echelons, don’t get to enter the Chairman’s lounge unless in the company of their respective MPs. Even then, they’re more likely to drive to Canberra and pocket the travel allowance to supplement their mediocre incomes.

      And what are staffers supposed to do when they quit? They can’t go back to being journalists, they’re untouchable. Lobbyists won’t touch you after an election loss. Big PR firms have a different, corporate culture that doesn’t gel with the bang or bust attitudes of people who’ve worked in politics.

      Good on Nikki for co-opting her experience into a readable book. She had the decency to keep it off the shelves until both parties had retired. That’s the best anyone can ask.

    • pc says:

      10:22am | 03/02/10

      Hi Niki, Hi Persephone, Hi Punchmates

      Im really glad you are here Persephone. I dont know if you are a dag or not. I know I am and I get the feeling that unlike Niki and some of our other friends you havent caught up with the new black. I thought it was anti ruddism, but they’ve got a whole new new black. Rudd Rage. Perhaps its just because everyday in the coalition there is a new black. Like they get new leaders. Like they get new policies. I am a dag but still it seems like even the cool kids in the coalition cant keep up.

      Its so hard for Niki to keep up she has to regurgitate Peter Hartchers headline from last saturday. But thats ok Nikki, I know its hard to keep up and I like PH too.

      In 2009 the house of reps passed 205 pieces of legislation. 54 of these are still to be passed by the senate. As you mention Niki the cprs is the most famous of these. The coalition agreed to pass it, then they didnt, then they did, then because they were sick of thinking about it they rolled Malcolm. Its hard to keep up with fashion isnt it?

      So Niki is angry that something hasnt been done about climate change. She doesnt tell us what and thats because she doesnt know. You dont know if climate change is real. You dont know if you should do something about it. Now I think its fair enough for the average punter not to know, its a big complicated, sciencey subject. The average punter doesnt have the kind of resources available to a government or an opposition and thats (surprise surprise) why we have a government. (Im not entirely sure there is an oppoosition.) SO those resources. Scientists, economists and alike. When the coalition was in government it put those resources to work and in 2007 produced the Shergold Taskforce which reported that an ets was in Australia’s national interest.

      Now that Tony Abbotts out of government he suddenly doesnt know what he thinks. And thats because hes never bothered to find out. He hasnt spoken to any scientists, he hasnt even read a book on the subject. He even admits it.

      Tony Abbott: No, I dont claim to have immersed myself deeply in all of these documents. I’m a politician. I have to rely on briefings - I have to rely on what I pick up through secondary sources…..I havent yet finished Ian Plimers book. I have started Ian Plimers book. (Lateline 19/11/2009)

      So its no surprise Malcolm Turnbull said “Abbotts climate change policy is bullshit.” (7/12/2009)

    • sooz says:

      10:21am | 03/02/10

      Great article Niki. Absolutely spot on.

      It’s a pity though, that it will only be seen by Punch readers. It should be in the opinion pages of Fairfax and News.

      Good luck with the book

    • Terry Barnes says:

      10:20am | 03/02/10

      Thanks Niki, and by the way I agree with you that the Coalition’s election 07 hospitals policy that never saw the light of day was a ripper. Had it been released the whole political debate would have been transformed overnight.  Am off to find your book now!

    • Helen says:

      10:13am | 03/02/10

      Couldn’t agree with you more Phil.  K Rudd is the biggest con there is in politics….....He is an oxygen thief.

      He appears quite rattled now that he finally has an opposition leader there.  Malcolm Talkbull (from How Green was my Cactus) has become completely irrelevant.  I doubt he will run at the next election as he would lose his seat I should think.

      For those who believe Maxine Mckew romped it in over at Bennelong, well she did not.  John Howard won the primary votes and preferences got her across the line.  Many people have asked where she is as they have not seen her.  Oh well…....Be very Terrified as to what you wish for…....

    • Charles says:

      09:59am | 03/02/10

      It’s a pretty good article Niki, and you have quite an entertaining view of things.  I look forward to more contributions from you in the future

    • Moggy says:

      09:59am | 03/02/10

      I voted for Rudd. I would rather vote for a convicted conman than him again.  He is an empty shell that schmoozes the electorate with his soft reasonable presentation but doesn’t actually do anything. Gillard is the real PM. We all call Kevin 747 Kaiser Krudd The Kamera Klown!! And I’m dreading Obama’s visit….the Kamera Kaiser will follow him around the country like a preening fool.

    • The Drover says:

      09:56am | 03/02/10

      Ever heard of bloke called John Winston Howard, a PM who could make hard decisions.

    • persephone says:

      11:00am | 03/02/10

      The Drover

      Such as??

    • red robin says:

      09:57am | 03/02/10

      I thought Australians had excellent bullshit detectors?
      How a chameleon like Rudd continues to make favor I’ll never know.
      Rudd has enjoyed a dream run in the media now let’s hope the sheeple and the media wake up before we have more of this puppet.

    • persephone says:

      09:45am | 03/02/10

      No, Phil, I’m just a gifted amateur.

      And I like your rebuttal of my points. Gee, Costello did——um, what was that again??

      Oh, and I’d love to see Abbott on Sunrise, and count how many of the statements he makes there he has to retract by nightfall.

      It’s better to be cautious and not answer questions if you don’t know the answers than talk for the sake of talking and get it wrong.

    • Old Clive says:

      11:07am | 03/02/10

      You are never going to see Rudd in speedo’s or any other swimmies, if you see him in shorts it must have slipped past his watchers. I too am longing for an unbiased press,. At least they did get up before day break and get up on Black Mountain, to see a dinkie die[dinky dye] Horstralian in action.

    • Phil says:

      09:29am | 03/02/10

      Do you by any chance work for that nutter Nick Champion by any chance Persephone?

      Your attempts to say that Costello did nothing and Rudd everything would be comical except you actually believe it. Talk about a true deceiver.

      How many questions will Rudd be able to answer next time Sunrise viewers ask him? He would want to hope its better than 1 in 3.

      If not they should bring Abbott on for a few questions and see how many he answers. Would make refreshing telly, rather than everyone gushing over Rudd.

    • Jane says:

      09:24am | 03/02/10

      Spot on Dr Sam wink

      Hey, maybe it’s Kardboard Kev - I’m sure the Libs could lend it to them….maybe they already have!!

      You can see him here you can see him there…
      Kardboard Kev can be every bloody where.

    • watty says:

      09:22am | 03/02/10

      Sorry Matt but Savva worked in the Office of the Prime Minister in the days we had one.(Howard)

    • TIMFROMTHETOPEND says:

      09:22am | 03/02/10

      Oh all you right wingers you are bloody harsh on our messiah. Poor old Kevin 07 has made hard and tough decisions, he spent money. It doesn’t get much harder than that, cartoonists should depict him and swan sweating after getting the countries wallet out. Rudd is a fake of the worst kind, a poll driven populist chameleon. Tony Abbott is at least up front honest and a known quantity, he doesn’t leave you guessing, if he makes a blue he will admit to it.

      This great country of ours was built on action not reviews, leadership and decisive action is required just like any business. It is not surprising that Rudd and his cohorts do not understand this, they have never held real jobs, they have never made anything, or sold anything or had to rely on their wits to keep people employed. Union hacks and public servants is all you will ever get from the labor party.

      I love the article Niki, it is such a shame that the sheeple will never read it.

    • MONEY FOR NOTHING AND THAT IS THAT. says:

      01:51pm | 03/02/10

      HORSE MANURE with your “Union hacks and public servants is all you ever get from the labour party.
      As far as any party is concerned, it is all about which side their bread is going to be buttered and by whom!!! 
      It is all to do the so called TOP END OF TOWN so to speak.  The tit-for-tat..the owners verses owner…the power. the position..the secret power/money mongers, what ever describes them,  nd do say you do know this!
      Granted there is some truth about a certain type of person/s have never held REAL JOBS, they have never made anything, or sold anything. 

      As far as those type of people ‘that have never making anything’.  One thing they do is make themselves available, and that is all.

      They haven’t sold anything.  Yes they have sold.  They have sold themselves with their clever play with words.
      Sorry about them never had to run a business, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.  This type of person is very well turned into the running of a business.  It is a very large business that runs our country call THE BUSINESS OF POLITICS….  All participants income isn’t too bad, has a pretty good superfund and nice rewards e.g. free travel.  Etc too many to write at this minute.
      Remember little Johnny Howard not wanting to let his position go.  I don’t blame him.  It’s a tough world out there and he didn’t want to step outside of his comfort zone.  Hey there!! It may be tough at the top but it is too good to let go.  What is silly Billy (Oh and that’s another story), he was very, very nicely set up. 

      So you see why I am coming from about ‘the who’ may be or ‘the who’ may not be a morally good, justified, or acceptable person for the quote ‘ that hot seat..’  It hasn’t really got much to do the true and correct person as a matter of fact it has all to do with ‘what side is my bread going to be butter the most’  We see this is the crossing over of the political floor.  And if it is not the money (I beg to differ because there is always a couple of extra molar coming in,  called ‘money for nothing and that is tha. Last but not least it is the POWER!!!!  THEY LOVE THE POWER THIS POSITION GIVE THEM.  AND THAT IS A FACT!!!

    • Jack says:

      09:15am | 03/02/10

      More rubbish from another hack in denial about the 2007 result. A bit rich for someone who worked for our laziest ever Treasurer to complain about a lack of government action. Savva is clearly a confused woman, as the title of her book would indicate.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      03:41pm | 03/02/10

      You’re absolutely right; Costello didn’t work anywhere near as hard as Swan. Let’s face it, Swan’s typical day includes lots of hard work and very complicated activity:

      08:00 Spend some money.
      10: 00 Tea break.
      10:30 Spend some money.
      12:30 Lunch break.
      13:30 Spend some money
      15:00 Tea break.
      15:30 Ask the unions how much money they want.
      15:32 Give the unions some money.
      16:00 Spend some money.

    • D'oh says:

      09:10am | 03/02/10

      Head, meet nail.

      Pretty well spot on Savva, it confirms what I have suspected for the last 2 or so years and evidenced by the rather long list of Rudd Fails.

      Apart from the aforementioned Workchoices, Labor can only claim symbolic achievements with no real practical results.  The last 2 years truly have been spin over substance and your article comprehensively develops that truth.

    • J says:

      09:01am | 03/02/10

      Great article Niki - a brillaint morning read!

      I was never a big fan of Tony Abbott, but faced with another term of Kevin Rudd and his no-hoper leadership, I’ll be putting my vote in the Liberal camp this year.

      Hell, I could probably be persuaded to vote for a bag of sawdust… anything but another Labor term…

    • persephone says:

      09:00am | 03/02/10

      Yep, $12 billion surplus only a drop in the ocean of what was needed.

    • jack says:

      08:47am | 03/02/10

      I agree with T.Chong, and I wonder sometimes why this paper has to dig up people like niki who have nothing but a biased outlook, (LIBERAL).
      I have a chuckle when I read articles like this which brings back memories of what happened to there own prime minister. out of office and out of the electrate

    • James mehan says:

      05:14pm | 03/02/10

      You should check the history of Labor and Liberal
      Labor = Communism - Individuals controlled by the state
      Liberal = Individual freedom

    • watty says:

      10:04am | 03/02/10

      Mr Chong will no doubt appreciate the support Jack.

      Why do you think did the flagship of Labor the “Age”  “dug up” Savva as a political journalist and leading light of the Canberra Press Gallery?

      For her LIBERAL bias?

    • What's fair says:

      09:20am | 03/02/10

      Good Morning Punchers and particularly Jack

      Notwithstanding that Australia is a democracy that alows freedom of speech and therefore Savva (and commenters that do not hold your views) are free to express their opinions, articles like this are required to restore the balance between opposing views.

      This year the Punch has provided a better balance of articles compared to a significant portion of last year.

      So long as there is roughly a Counter Punch for every Punch, I think we can all be satisfied and engage various perspectives on important issues and engage in (hoepfully) civil, intelligent and meaningful debate.

    • persephone says:

      08:47am | 03/02/10

      Funnily enough, most people show different faces to different people.

      I talked to my dear old grandmother differently to the way I talked to my mother; I talked to my mother differently to the way I talked to my sisters; I talk to work colleagues differently to the way I talk to clients.

      I’ll bet most of the commentators here do the same. They don’t talk to their boss in the same way they talk to the guys as the pub.

      It’s called ‘addressing your audience’ and there’s a big emphasis on it in education (and always has been).

      Nikki Sava had the misfortune to work for a politician who couldn’t talk to anyone without appearing arrogant and out of touch, who achieved almost nothing in his period of office, despite being lauded as the Golden Boy and showered with opportunities.

      She can’t help being jealous.

      Rudd’s achieved more in two years than her boy ever did or would.

      That’s because he does have ticker.

    • persephone says:

      07:21pm | 03/02/10

      Brad Coward

      we have absolutely no evidence of any kind to suggest Rudd abused his staffers.

      He abused a couple of Labor senators, who were wanting to keep spending taxpayer’s money on electorate material.

      Far from being staffers, these guys have nothing to fear from Rudd.

      I think a PM who stands up to the heavyweights in his own party and stares them down for the benefit of the taxpayer has a lot of ticker.

      And yes, I listen keenly to what my colleagues say under their breath as I depart —I always value expressions of awe.

    • Brad Coward says:

      05:07pm | 03/02/10

      Get with the program, Persephone !  Rudd doesn’t have a ticker, he has a teleprompter !

      I love your reference to Mr Rudd “addressing his audience”.  Shows the level of respect he has for his staffers…bugger all in large lumps !

      Rudd must feel that Costello achieved a great deal as he gave the man a nice job looking after the futures fund or whatever fund it is.  Would you give an incompetent such a position ?  I forgot, you did !  You voted Labor.

      Out of interest…when you talk to your colleagues, do you ever hear what they say under their breath when you depart ?

    • watty says:

      09:29am | 03/02/10

      What’s with the “dude” moron?

      “Much like a photoshop of Palin in a bikini”  The “shark” in his red speedos”

      Change that to sicko moron.

      Waiting for right wing journos names if you can get the mind above the navel for a couple of minutes.

    • Alex says:

      08:45am | 03/02/10

      Danni…

      What do you mean Howard did something?  Infrastructure spending all but stalled during his rain as PM.  It was left up to the states to improve infrastructure in this country while he blindly road the wave of mining and reaped the benefits.  Bragging about how his policies were making our economy look great.  When really it was just the mines raking in the money for us.

      Not to mention the fact that every election he made promises that he then went and changed his mind about..

      And as for doing something, so did all the dictators throughout history, they did things to, and we knew what they stood for, does that make them a good thing?  No.  Just because you do something isn’t good, its what you do.

      Has Rudd been perfect, no, but he is no worse than Johnny.  And both of them are miles ahead of Abbot.  Abbot can’t even stick to his guns revolving around a question about sex before marriage, what is going to happen when someone questions him on a serious issue?

    • Louis McLennan says:

      08:38am | 03/02/10

      “In his first term, Howard took on his own base and reformed gun laws, an action which has had a hugely positive impact on Australian society;”. Don’t remind me of this. Howard could get away with this stuff because the people it effected had no choice if they vote nationals or not because the ALP is never a choice for them!

      Yeah this article explains Mr. Rudd pretty well.

    • julie says:

      08:36am | 03/02/10

      a song sprang to mind
      Johnny Hates Jazz
      Shattered Dreams Lyrics

    • Carl Palmer says:

      08:31am | 03/02/10

      “By the time people realise how much has been wasted, and how hard it will be to repay, he will be long gone…” This is so so true, hopefully he will be gone sooner rather than later.

      Great analysis and a great read.

      Niki, good luck with your book.

    • Danni says:

      08:21am | 03/02/10

      T., you miss the point. While you might not have liked Workchoices, at least Howard DID SOMETHING. We knew what he stood for and he formulated and implemented policy that directly reflected his and his party’s ideology. He took action to do what he thought was good for Australia, even if that action was unpopular or eneded up being proven wrong
      Rudd has done….?

    • persephone says:

      08:58am | 03/02/10

      If Howard had really had guts, he would have taken Workchoices to an election. He didn’t.

      So much for knowing what he stood for.

      And he frequently back pedalled on policy if he thought it might actually hurt him in the ballot box.

      Rudd has at least made an attempt to deliver on his election promises and faced the biggest financial crisis of our era without panic.

      If you don’t think our high level of employment, relatively low levels of debt, avoidance of recession and low interest rates are achievements, let’s face it, nothing would please you.

    • Matt says:

      08:20am | 03/02/10

      Niki - how would you know what a real PM looked like?

      Your old boss never had the ticker to run….

    • Vince says:

      09:25am | 03/02/10

      Ian -This is true, he also says “as I have said before and so did the previous Government/insert persons name” He is so obviously covering his ass all the time, and never putting his name on anything without having someone else lined up to blame before he comments. He is as weak as P#@@.

    • Sars says:

      09:14am | 03/02/10

      @Matt - she worked for John Howard for three years. Do you research.

    • JP says:

      08:14am | 03/02/10

      You’ve put into words what was my gut feeling ...

    • Shane says:

      08:13am | 03/02/10

      Briliantly said Nikki.  And people banging on about core and non-core promises probably don’t remember that the phrase was referring to the fact that Howard and Costello had to radically change their agenda when they took office because Labor lied about the dire state of the budget and they had less money than they anticipated.  Some things never change.

    • I don't like Little Johnny says:

      08:13am | 03/02/10

      Bill please don’t say it was the money in the bank from the previous government that saved us?  The package we got was acknowledged by economists worldwide as an excellent stimulus package that certainly helped shield us from the full effects of the GFC

    • Robert Smissen says:

      11:58am | 03/02/10

      Comment at 09:13am, please don’t give credence to world economists have to say, they didn’t see the road-train (GFC) coming even with it’s high beams on. Oh & for a definition of what an economist is, a quote by Sally-Anne Atkinson (past mayor of Brisbane) really sums it up, “an economist is like a bloke who knows 12 ways of making love, but doesn’t know any women”.

    • persephone says:

      10:59am | 03/02/10

      Or, of course, it could have been better thought out and delivered than those of other countries.

    • Toddzilla says:

      10:06am | 03/02/10

      Then why didn’t it work in any of the other 50 countries that implemented it and that Rudd copied. Must’ve been something different about the Australian economy. Rudd owes Costello his political livelihood.

    • watty says:

      09:50am | 03/02/10

      Yeah.Just like all other “I don’t like Little Johnnies” skip the thirty odd $billion in the bank…that doesn’t count.

      Many economists also challenged the wisdom of the Rudd stimulus package and the debt incurred but just skip that as well

    • Isaac says:

      08:14am | 03/02/10

      Biased but fair.

    • George says:

      08:13am | 03/02/10

      I don’t think she was talking about Howard, he’s long gone. However, you obviously still have issues with him. Savva was talking about Rudd, maybe you could, for once, stay on topic?

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      08:12am | 03/02/10

      Australia’s easy navigation of the GFC would have been impossible had Rudd been saddled with it after a few years in office. By then, Labour would have done what Labour does and put us deep in debt, leaving nothing in the piggy bank to stave off the crisis. Rudd and Swan desperately avoid ANY mention of the healthy bank balance they inherited when claiming credit for staving off recession, yet that alone, plus financial sector legislation put in place long before Rudd was elected, are the real reasons why we did so well.

    • trevor Parkinson says:

      05:10pm | 07/02/10

      well well and exactly how many of these projects have actually got off the ground or seen the light of day they will probably be like Rudd all puffery and no substance

    • Ronb says:

      07:30pm | 03/02/10

      Not forgetting that Rudd bought those pinks batts, all $5 billion dollars worth, from the US.  Obama thanked him for helping the US economy!!

    • persephone says:

      07:16pm | 03/02/10

      List of some of the major infrastructure (not school halls or pink batts) funded under stimulus package:

      Regional Rail Link (VIC) - $4.2 billion;
      Hunter Expressway (NSW) - $1.65 billion;
      Kempsey Bypass on the Pacific Highway (NSW) - $618 million;
      Duplication of the Pacific Highway between Sapphire to Woolgoolga (NSW) - $698 million;
      Gawler Line Modernisation and the Noarlunga to Seaford Rail Extension (SA) - $584 million;
      South Road Superway (SA) - $500 million;
      Realignment of Western Highway at Anthony’s Cutting (VIC) - $200 million;
      Northbridge Rail Link (WA) - $236 million;
      Duplication of the Douglas Arterial Road in Townsville (QLD) - $110 million;
      Kingston Bypass (Tasmania) - $41.5 million.

      Infrastructure Australia is currently developing the nation’s first ever national port strategy and national freight strategy - long term blueprints which together with the National Priority List will guide future investment in our vital transport infrastructure.

      The Rudd Labor Government has more than doubled the Federal roads budget and quadrupled investment in rail.


      source: http://www.ministers.infrastructure.gov.au/aa/releases/2010/January/AA016_2010.htm

    • james Hearn says:

      05:10pm | 03/02/10

      Actually you can thank Peter Costello for that - check the history Keating ran up the highest debt next to Rudd. Before that it was Hawke. All the liberal governments brought the debt to surplus or very low debt.

    • Cal says:

      04:54pm | 03/02/10

      Care to list the major infrastructure projects KRudd’s debt will provide? School halls do not count. So retail got a splash - whoopee… now what? It’s like a bad credit card debt after Xmas - gee we had fun, but now look at that interest bill!

      Oh, and you best go do some more research re financial sector legislation because you may find that your comments re Howard’s input are a tad on the ignorant side! I will credit Keating, etc with starting the ball rolling, however.

    • Jane says:

      04:21pm | 03/02/10

      Jack Thomas, absolutely spot on .....I’m tipping you’ll hit more than the odd leftie nerve there with those nasty facts. wink

    • persephone says:

      03:36pm | 03/02/10

      Jack Thomas

      no, school halls and pink batts aren’t counted in the 14% referred to; the number was for infrastructure which contributed to future economic growth, and alas! most economists don’t seem to think that spending on schools has anything to do with that.

      And you seem to confuse the stimulus handouts and ‘shovel ready’ projects - two different things.

      A bit strange, since in both stimulus packages clear distinction was made between spending on infrastructure and spending on handouts, but there you go.

      And yes, the Howard government’s failure to invest in needed infrastructure put the burden of providing it back on the private sector, but I don’t think that’s anything to boast about.

    • Adam says:

      02:34pm | 03/02/10

      New infrastructure?  You mean like the pink batts?  Internet Filter?  Broadband plan occuring in 8 years time?  The solar rebate?  Ooops that last one was Howard sorry.

    • Jack Thomas says:

      02:04pm | 03/02/10

      Good one medazz, roll out the false but all too common Labor spin, usually peddled by the bitter and twisted old Walter Mitty himself Paul Keating. Let’s bring him out again for a bitter one liner and a few laughs from the lizard.

      In contrast to Keating and Leftard spin, financial sector legislation was not dreamed up and implemented over the weekend by PK, but “the astute conduct of macroeconomic policies by successive governments” (direct quote from the head of ASIC last year).

      As you clearly have no idea, you should be aware that Keating’s success was in financial de-regulation.

      Most Leftards were too busy avoiding commerce and economics subjects at Uni, so they are unable to even question the same old lies from Keating, Swan, etc. De-regulation? That sounds nasty.

      I am not the only one who can’t find any actual infrastructure in the tens of billions Rudd frittered away to stay in government.

      According to the report for the Business Council, Groundwork for Growth, by Port Jackson Partners, only 14 per cent of the $76 billion it regards as stimulus spending was on infrastructure.

      That actually overstates the real amount since it includes all those “quick, just put in the order” replacement school assembly halls, pink batts, “clean” energy and other expensive low productivity expenditures that should not even be mentioned in the same sentence as economic efficiency or infrastructure.

      Remember the stupidity of Rudd harping on about “shovel ready” projects? The media rehashed his spin and failed to report that 86% of the Stimulus was going to plasma screens and new utes for 21 year old Tradies.

      Albanese is complicit in the scam too, calling himself Infrastructure Minister when he opposed any Howard privatisation, which subsequently went on to provide privately funded infrastructure.

      Albanese did manage to claim “success” with 32 infrastructure projects, 20 of which included new bike paths.

      According to the Port Jackson Partners report, overall economic infrastructure spending averaged about 4 per cent of GDP in the 15 years to 2004 and has since risen, hitting 5 per cent in 2008 under Howard.

      Stay with me Leftards. Take a sip of your Chai Latte if need be.

      Within that total spending, the private share of infrastructure increased to one half from under a fifth. In real dollars, engineering construction work over the past three years was threefold its level of the late-1980s/early-1990s.

      Maybe you consider Rudd’s upgrading of the Christmas Island detention centre for illegal immigrants as infrastructure?

    • George says:

      08:09am | 03/02/10

      Gee Mr Chong, one would suspect you are an ALP staffer the way you jump on every criticism of Rudd or the ALP. Frankly you are beginning to sound like a worn out record and people just laugh at your comments.

      maybe you can tell us what Rudd actually stands for because no-one else seems to know, including Rudd himself.

    • Super Hero V Melted Chocolate Bar says:

      08:06am | 03/02/10

      Come on you lefties, you are starting to sound a little rattled.  You know Mr Speedo Man is going to take on the puny little Milky Bar Kid and win!!

      Great column too Niki!
      Can’t wait to see Rudd spit the dummy on National TV. The real Rudd.

      Could you imagine Rudd in Speedo’s.
      Uuggh! Not before breakfast thanks!

    • Jim says:

      03:10pm | 03/02/10

      Kev should bot a few bucks off the wealthy lady and get a hair cut. His mullet looks so 60s

    • Ian says:

      08:05am | 03/02/10

      Rudd continuely keeps saying “on advice from” before he makes any comment. Or he will say “this was started by the previous Government”.or he always points out that “so and so supported the Government”. or similar to deflect ownershhip and resposibility of anything he does as Prime Minister. He never takes ownership and NEVER says “I”.

    • Paul says:

      07:59am | 03/02/10

      @pete right on! The race of mealy mouth words has begun. May the biggest mouth and bullshitter win. At least some of the satire/comedy is back on TV soon to keep these clowns real and palatable.

    • Soultrader says:

      07:59am | 03/02/10

      @T Chong.
      I always enjoy your commentary. Seems as though the fence you built to keep everybody out, has in fact prevented you from moving anywhere except further left.
      You will reach the end of the planet and fall off eventually.
      Oops - I must be a member of the flat earth society and Climate Change Denier Association.

    • pete says:

      07:38am | 03/02/10

      this country used to be a place where if you made a promise you kept it, no matter what.
      When did we become a nation of core and non core promise makers.  We used to call that fair dinkum and bullshit.

      Seems to me, that the latter is there in abundance no mattr what side of the political fence you populate

    • I don't like Little Johnny says:

      07:17am | 03/02/10

      ‘Granted he succeeded in staving off the recession threatened by the economic crisis which saved him from disappearing into vapor, but any fool could do that by spraying around billions of dollars’....no one else seemed to be able to Nikki…..get a grip, open the other eye and have a look back though the lying rodent’s record, you’ll find it littered with broken ‘non-core’ promises Nikki…you lost the election, get over it

    • Bill says:

      07:55am | 03/02/10

      Yet they all brought in an economic stimulus plan. Perhaps that wasn’t the factor most important to us keeping a recession at bay.

    • watty says:

      07:10am | 03/02/10

      Watch the old blood pressure TCHONG.

      Savva ,a self confessed Leftie worked for the Labor flagship,the Age , before she saw the light and joined Costello’s staff.

      Please assist and list the Coalition supporting journos in the Canberra Press Gallery.Bet it’s less than 10%

    • Tails says:

      08:27am | 03/02/10

      @T.Chong: Pretty sure there was a warning at the top of the article saying who it was from. You could have used that as a kind of classification rating. You know, like when you scour the TV guide for shows on SBS with MA(nas) after the show’s name.

    • T.Chong says:

      07:47am | 03/02/10

      Watty : The BPs fine dude, just getting a laugh from the “fair and balanced ” aspect. Ms Savva need to mentionn Abbott , “the sharK” in his red speedos is so funny, and shows a bit of a preoccupation that so many of the right seem to have. Much like a photo shop of Palin in a bikini.

    • Matt says:

      06:46am | 03/02/10

      Rudd said he’d apologise to Aborigines, and did. But I agree he’s done little else of what he said he would.

      But I don’t about comparing him with Howard and his “difficult task of introducing a goods and services tax” given he promised it was “never, ever” something he was going to do.

    • IMBMB says:

      12:32pm | 03/02/10

      Ah but an apology without any substance. All they got was a consultative committe without any power. Such a Ruddesce outcome!

    • Mick In The Hills says:

      12:25pm | 03/02/10

      and after he changed his position on a gst, he laid it all on the line for everyone to vote on, and we did.
      so the problem with that is ????

    • david says:

      06:44am | 03/02/10

      Brillian t observations. You have said it all !!!!
      Thank you ,

    • Paul says:

      06:29am | 03/02/10

      Who is Tony Abbott and will he repeat Howards schtick for non-core promises and a concerted do nothing approach to other key aspects of Australia that you didn’t mention? Frankly I don’t know what Tony’s policys are around my key concerns/issues of: Liberal support for widespread anti-competition practices in business, infrastructure planning, population size, homelessness and affordable housing, and political leadership that doesn’t indulge in kicking societies weakest ie single parents, mentally ill, boat people etc. Until Tony shows who he is- I will assume he and his frontbench are self-interested Howard reruns that will get the pointy end of my Blundstone. Political lies and a lack of confidence in these big mouths delivering promises are undermining both parties. As is this democracy where we only get two choices - dumb and dumber.

    • Richard Tuffin says:

      06:26am | 03/02/10

      Um, not a bad article actually, some great analysis of Rudd’s performance thus far and some real zingers there - “The man’s got a teleprompter where his ticker should be” is almost Crabb-esque!

      You have forgotten one major achievement of the Rudd Government since it came to power, and I think it would have been worth mentioning since it’s pretty much why Labor won the election in the first place.  It’s also a card that Rudd hasn’t played for a while but with environmental issues not giving Rudd anywhere near the love that he would have hoped for (in fact, almost the opposite is happening apparently) , I’m sure the abolition of Workchoices, even to the slightly limited extent that it’s occurred is something Rudd, Gillard and Swan will start talking about a lot more some time very soon!

      Apart from Workchoices, it’s probably fair to say that Rudd hasn’t had a lot of big wins. But, to his credit, there are actually lots of little wins that Labor will be able to boast about in the lead up to the election including, like it or not, hundreds of good news stories coming out of the stimulus spend.  Related to that, and whether it was an easy achievement or not, Labor has had a massive win by keeping Australia out of recession. This will cause a lot of angst amongst many swing voters who may have been considering heading back to Liberal for the next election, particularly if Abbott has a couple of real shockers over the next few months which, with all due respect is very, very likely, despite his early good form.

      The next election holds a lot more interest than people might have imagined after the #spill (had to get a twitter reference in there somewhere!), and despite probably doing a hellofalot better than anyone might have first have anticipated, I just don’t think Abbott will be able to get enough wins to get him across the line.

      It should be fun.  The first thing that’s got to happen is for everyone to agree on an appropriate #tag for the election on twitter.  Once we’ve got that sorted, then the fun can really begin!!!

      Thanks for a good early morning read though - well done!

      @richardtuffin

    • Paul says:

      05:37pm | 04/02/10

      Ronald, you forgot to mention: $50,000pa wage rise which was extorted by the MUA without ANY concession to productivity. Swan has just finished telling us that we’ll need to increase productivity if we want to be able to look after our seniors. Obviously, their ‘Fair Work’ isn’t the answer - it’s more like ‘Fair Game’ for the unions.

    • Ronald says:

      12:41pm | 03/02/10

      That’s the slightly limited reform of Workchoices that has delivered $50,000pa wage rises to MUA members. I’m sure lower-level wage slaves will be delighted with that outcome.

    • John A Neve says:

      06:07am | 03/02/10

      Hear,hear.

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      06:00am | 03/02/10

      Spot on analysis Niki! He is so fake that he has a different persona depending on who he is talking too. As soon as Abbott got the gig, Krudds tone changed. Some one must have said that he needed to be more down to earth to tackle Abbott so that’s what he is attempting. It wouldn’t take too much for Krudd to blow his cool on camera. He showed clearly yesterday little understanding on his own great big new tax. Keep pumping him on that and he will blow for sure. Like or hate Abbott he has invigorated this debate and will bring back some accountability from this so far up himself man that no one really knows who the hell he is.

    • T.Chong says:

      05:51am | 03/02/10

      Niki,I think you need to go have a ciggie,or a Bex and a good lie down.
      You left out Little Johnny lobbing WorkNoChoices onto the wage earning voter, and you also seem to have the uber Connedserfative hatred of the media,( notable exceptions of couse) who dont fawn after the LNP.
      Another party hack who cant accept the ‘07 result, and will claim media bias when Abbott stays in Opposition this year.
      This one sided piece of rubbish would even make Janet Albrechtsen blush.

    • Progressive Capitalist says:

      09:15am | 04/02/10

      Can’t handle the truth Chong? Live in the now and answer the question…has Rudd broken the majority of CORE promises? You’re justifying Labor’s failures - if anyone’s guilty of being a party hack it’s you. Objectivity rules, all parties deserve scrutiny for underperforming!

    • Steve says:

      02:51pm | 03/02/10

      So when people ACTUALLY earned more money and had better work place relations with their bosses on MOST occasions, your so called Work NoChoices was a bad thing?? Open your eyes.

      From your post i can see that you watch the ABC as you know about Albrechtsen and lap up their ALP biased drivel with the eagerness of an undergrad leftie journalist who hasn’t done a hard days work in his life.

      Otherwise you would know how much this nation prospered under the Libs and how much your parents prospered in the times of Howard, you KNOW your emporer has no clothes and the media is slowly finding out.

      Every word above is true, what about Hospital Reform?? Boat people?? 2 boats a week so far in 2010 and 50+ boats in 2009, good one kevvie, what about Education Revolution??

      Another broken promise, stop reading the left media and open your EYES!!

    • Adam says:

      02:31pm | 03/02/10

      Like T.Chong I’d be angry too, if I voted for Kevin Rudd.  Instead I’m just saddened.

    • Jack Thomas says:

      02:24pm | 03/02/10

      Conservative hatred of the media might be well placed TC when you consider how stacked it is with bitter and twisted biased old Leftards. You mention notable exceptions, because they are exactly that - exceptions.

      Our media is either lazy, asleep or too busy twittering Rudd’s Press Secretary, to even question the ultimate Spin Doctor. Warney must be in awe of Kevon 07. 

      I recall that under Howard you could not move without stepping over a ‘comedian’ trotting out a I hate Howard diatribe labelled as humour. Noticed those same muppets are back washing windscreens and not on the TV? Can’t come up with any decent material it seems. Haven’t been replaced with one comedian or show poking fun at Rudd. Why is that?

    • Donald says:

      12:27pm | 03/02/10

      T. Chong, I think you should revisit your comment in 2 years time, and see how they are looking then.

      Notice what’s happening now? - the long flight of chickens is winging home, the stupid wasting of “stimulus” money on unproductive rubbish is about to hit us, and try looking at how employers are not hiring staff under the dishonestly named Fair Work .

      The “greatest moral challenge of our time” has gone strangely quiet, just like hauling Japan and Ahmadinejad into court. Remember the hospitals’ promise, Chong? Do you? Good, because it’s the same answer as the promised tax cuts.

      But tax is about to increase, Chong, and then interest rates next month and next.. Enjoy!

      What a pity you accepted the ‘07 result, but then forgot there were some obligations and promises attached to it, Chong. Now you want to shoot the messengers who remind you of them.

    • Lyn says:

      12:21pm | 03/02/10

      T Chong, I can’t agree with you more one sided piece of rubbish.

    • Jack Thomas says:

      10:57am | 03/02/10

      You forgot to add “because I said so!” to your intelligent and well thought out response TC.

      I applaud you for typing this while you have fingers in wach ear saying “nah nah can’t hear you, not listening”.

      Try addressing the comments and arguing otherwise. The facts are pretty clear, lots of promises and p1ss and wind, but nothing done except taxpayers money spent and public servants employed to do jack.

      Oh, he’s kept web designers busy building a new website every five minutes to soundly tackle the issues of petrol prices (nope, still high and driven by the oil co’s), grocery prices (nope, still high and driven by the duopoly) and don’t even get me started on the My Schools website (that ranks schools based on number of water fountains and teachers called Jan).

      Even you would have to admit Ruddy is the froth on a cappucino.

    • Dr Sam says:

      08:30am | 03/02/10

      You can always gauge the accuracy of your piece by the venom spewed after the raw nerve has been touch. The ad hominem comments should be a compliment to you. You were spot on. Rudd is inauthentic.

      His facade drops with every tantrum, every grandiose posturing and every empty lecture. There is no integrity.

      Gillard on the other hand, is someone you can agree or disagree with, but she is principled. I have no idea who or what is Kevin Rudd.

    • watty says:

      07:05am | 03/02/10

      Savva, if nothing else, is savvy.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

@ToryShepherd there's always time for Din Tai Fung.

ToryShepherd

@drpiotrowski will be there just in time for Din Tai Fung

Daniel Piotrowski

@ToryShepherd I hope that's in your piece tomorrow. Also - are you coming over this week or laaaaaater?

ToryShepherd

@drpiotrowski yes, Snowtown Abbey should be given an entirely segregated feed...

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Deep down we’re all unionists, even the haters

Bill Kelty made a memorable speech last week. Addressing the ACTU Congress Dinner in Sydney, the legendary…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Craig Thomson speaks. Meanwhile, in Australia…

Speaking of yourself in the third person is usually a sign that you’re suffering from delusions…

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

South Australia. It’s the middle bottom bit.

If South Australia had just arrived in the world, red and wrinkled and mewling, what would we call it?…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

241 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter