I recently visited the Primary School I attended in rural Victoria. The old school, first built in 1870, has been replaced by a new structure on the outskirts of the town. The modern buildings, with their light, open work spaces and landscaped surrounds, offer an attractive learning environment. The old brick school that I attended now serves as a community centre.

Betcha Nicole's kids Sunday and Faith don't get around on one of these

There was one surprise at the new facility: a large covered area to house the many bicycles that the students ride to school. In my time, most pupils either walked or rode to school. Only the kids from the surrounding farms were driven, and even some of them rode their bikes into town.

These days, very few children ride to school, with over 60 per cent being driven, and another 20 per cent using public transport. Many schools don’t have a bike shed. According to a survey released by the Health Foundation and the Cycling Promotion Fund this week, 46 per cent of children travel less than ten minutes to get to school.

As today is National Ride to School Day, it is timely to consider the survey results, and what can be done to encourage more youngsters to walk or ride to school.

Up to a quarter of adolescents are overweight or obese, a condition which will impact upon their later health and add to national costs. Inactivity costs the nation more than $10 billion each year. And chronic illness, arising from a sedentary and unhealthy lifestyle, is becoming more prevalent.

Only a quarter of children currently not riding to school had ever ridden to class in the past. Yet 40 per cent of these children had asked their parents if they could ride.

As most children can ride, and most households have at least one bike, the availability of a machine is not the problem.

When asked why they would not allow their children to ride to school, the main concerns expressed by parents centred on safety and the dangers posed by traffic and other road users. Half of the respondents cited personal safety and the amount of traffic as major issues for them. Safety at intersections and crossings, and the speed of traffic along the route were also significant factors in the parental decision.

This is understandable, although the fact that so many parents drive their children to school actually adds to the volume of traffic, particularly in the vicinity of schools!

There is no single, simple answer to this problem. More people are riding more often, and the national cycling strategy aims to double the number over the next five years. But most of the new riders are adults.

What we need is a co-ordinated approach, involving schools, local authorities and parents.

For years, some municipalities have displayed ‘nuclear free zone’ symbols in their streets. Instead of these largely meaningless symbols, how about displaying signs of a ‘bike safe town’ to indicate that a series of measures had been put in place to encourage cycling?

These measures would include the welcome use of footpaths by young riders, designated crossings for cyclists, enforced lower speed limits around schools, and an education program in rider etiquette.

National Ride to School day reminds us of the challenge we face to encourage more children and adolescents to ride. But a concerted program to ensure safety is required if this aspiration is to be fulfilled.

Some municipalities and cycling organisations are tackling the challenge with innovative programs. A ‘bike safe town’ strategy would add to their efforts with a uniform, easily recognisable, and educative program.

Most commented

75 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Kerryn says:

      05:50am | 23/03/12

      I ride my bike to work most mornings.  Luckily I’m in a small country town, but I plan to continue the practise when I move to Brisbane (still working on it!).  The health benefits are phenominal (doo doo, doodoodoo) and you’re actually awake when you get to work - minus the coffee.  Not to mention everyone at work is complimenting me on my rather attractive figure :-D

      It’s a case of being careful and paying attention to your surroundings.  Unless I’m turning right, I stay as far left as possible to allow cars to drive past without worry.  I always indicate and I refuse to wear lycra!

    • PW says:

      06:27am | 23/03/12

      Kerryn if you are riding a short distance in a small country town, you wouldn’t need lycra. However, when you start getting up over 25km per trip, in your street attire you will start to experience some discomfort to the nether regions due to the location of seams in most clothes and the propensity for clothes and underwear to move independently of your skin. It is for this reason that riders wear lycra, at least lycra knicks. Some like to wear brightly coloured gear which makes them more visible and some do it to look good.

      I’ve never understood the utiltarian value of colour co-ordinated lycra vests, I find a cotton t-shirt perfectly adequate.

      You really cannot be worried about what those who oppose cycling due to their own jealousy might think about your choice of attire.

      The trouble with kids riding to school is that unless you’ve got enclosed bike lockers, some jerk is going to fiddle with the bikes. And traffic in some areas is not bik-friendly for an experienced adult cyclist, let alone a kid.

    • ScottB says:

      08:39am | 23/03/12

      @ PW - “...and some do it to look good”

      No one, I repeat, No one looks good in cyclists lycra outfits

    • pw says:

      09:23am | 23/03/12

      “No one, I repeat, No one looks good in cyclists lycra outfits”

      Liz Hatch, Rochelle Gilmore, Victoria Pendleton, to name just three who wear lycra extremely well.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      10:00am | 23/03/12

      @PW

      Liz Hatch in Maxim?

    • Arnold Layne says:

      10:33am | 23/03/12

      Kerryn, if you supplied photographic evidence I’d be happy to compliment you on your rather attractive figure too.  smile

    • Thtephan says:

      11:01am | 23/03/12

      While I too always indicate, I find lycra is a wonderful cycling attire. I have many different outfits which come in handy for leisurely rides in Centennial Park, and also for podium dancing at the clubs. Very comfortable and I feel so alive while wearing them. The Fluoro pink pair is my favourite.

    • SteveKAG says:

      05:56am | 23/03/12

      I could not agree more, one of my fondest memories of both primrary and secondary school is riding with my sister on our bikes to and back from school each day.

      I think two problems exist, when i was kid the population was half of what it is now so there was simply less traffic and drivers i think were more courtious and in less of a rush.

      Also there was a higher instance of single income families, the mum was always at home.  These days mroe families than not have both parents working and the parents are trying ensure safety of their kids.

      I think for these reasons we may only get a 5 or 10% increase in participation of any cycling to school program in the long term.

    • Tedd says:

      06:06am | 23/03/12

      It’s time we spoke up about governments and their politicians failing to provide suitable infrastructure to facilitate kids riding to school over recent decades, such as more bike paths and bike sheds.  If all that wealth created by your Federal govt had been more widely directed, Kevin, you could’ve written a review of the effects of that, instead.

    • Emma says:

      06:36am | 23/03/12

      And still parents would drive their kids to school. I actually think that some parents cant be bothered teaching their kids enough about traffic. They should accompany the child on the bike on the first days. But wen the parents are already overweight and taking the car the 200 m to the local convenience store than you cant expect that they would go on a bike in the early morning with their kid. I mean, its not like Australia is the absolute traffic nightmare if you see it in a global comparison.

    • marley says:

      09:17am | 23/03/12

      I was under the impression that roads and the like are a state and local, not federal, responsibility.  So who is to blame, again, for the lack of cycle paths?

    • VickiPS says:

      12:33am | 24/03/12

      The federal government does, in fact, provide funding to local authorities to construct cycle paths, although I can’t recall details of the funding program.  The nutty result is that in some places (such as the suburb I live in) bicycle paths will be constructed even while there are no paved footpaths.  My six year old grandson is only a few hundred metres from his state school, as the crow flies, but the only way for him to get there safely is if he is driven.  (There is no school bus service).

    • Little Joe says:

      06:23am | 23/03/12

      Let’s talk reality here.

      Around most schools in Australia you will see 40km/h speed signs during starting and closing times. We have been told these are needed because children are easily distracted and walk out into traffic.

      What Mr Andrews is advocating is that we get children to ride on the road with bikes to and from school. Hmmm??

      I rode to school back in the early 80’s but I would never do the same again now. The streets that I used are still the same width, but with more pot holes and carry three to four times more traffic.

    • Steve says:

      08:39am | 23/03/12

      Children are allowed to ride on the footpath, so is an accompanying adult so unless the car hops the curb they should be just fine.

    • RED says:

      09:07am | 23/03/12

      @Steve
      Anybody is allowed to ride on the footpath

    • Lie Lover? says:

      09:40am | 23/03/12

      @RED
      “Anybody can ride on the footpath” in Queensland. That is not true for the other states.

    • Little Joe says:

      04:26pm | 23/03/12

      Reality check!!!

      1) On my way home a continual warning came from the radio “It’s ‘Ride to School Day’ so all you motorists please watch out because a lot of children will be leaving school on bikes”

      2) At the intersection of Pickering St. and Shand St. Brisbane I almost watched a young child on a bike get hit by a car following their elder sibling across the road. The child didn’t look and Mum was there holding the pram.

      Ride to school day almost ended in tragedy for one family.

    • PW says:

      06:44am | 23/03/12

      Oh and isn’t Nicole cute in the pic. Lucky she was sitting on a bike, she probably would have towered over the boys. Nicole was always a tall gal.

      For more of the teenage Kidman, check out the video of Bop Girl (by Pat Wilson), circa 1982, on You Tube.

    • KH says:

      06:56am | 23/03/12

      I heard yesterday about a ‘bike bus’ where a group of parent / teacher volunteers pick up kids on their bikes along a pre-defined route to school, timed so people knew when to show up - so you end up with a hundred kids riding their bikes - I thought that was a great idea - the kids get to ride, in a large group with supervision, and get the benefits - and less cars around the schools…............ Maybe this is something that could be encouraged?

    • Emma says:

      07:24am | 23/03/12

      That is a terrific idea. Unless you live really remote there is often someone you can ride together with. Already a small group is better than riding on your own.

      I think as well allowing and helping the child to commute to school independently will have amazing effects on the child’s development and understand of their surroundings. If you have taken your bike to school for years and you want to make your drivers licence, then you are already so much more familiar with traffic and more responsible.

    • Tim the Toolman says:

      08:38am | 23/03/12

      I don’t drive and I shudder at the thought of large groups of kids ambling around on roads while riding bikes…  if you think traffic jams are bad now, wait until there’s 30 kids weaving and wobbling down the middle of Punt Road at an average pace of 5 Kmph.

    • Potato says:

      09:04am | 23/03/12

      Thats right Tim the Toolman, the solution to road congestion and slow travel times is MORE cars.

      MORE people leaving bikes at home and driving makes traffic go SO MUCH FASTER…..

    • Peter Dellaplane says:

      09:53am | 23/03/12

      I know you are being sarcastic, Potato, but you are actually correct.  It is amazing how a single bicycle on the road increases not only traffic congestion but also all those dreaded carbon emissions.  Every single car that has to pass that bike has to change down from top gear (most efficiency) to second or first gear (lowest efficiency) to slowly squeeze by the cyclist.
      Imagine how much worse it will be when the cyclists are children and you have no idea if they are about to veer in front of your car.
      Unless they are on dedicated cycle paths, bicycles cause far more trouble than they are worth.  There are better ways to cycle for fitness than to clog up arterial roads during rush hour.

    • James1 says:

      09:56am | 23/03/12

      Our daughter’s school has a “walking bus”, which snakes its way through our neighbourhood picking up kids at designated spots along the way.  Our daughter didn’t like walking on her own (because it is boring) and preferred the bus because she liked socialising.  This way she gets the best of both worlds.

    • KH says:

      10:16am | 23/03/12

      Tim - I think kids under 14 can ride on the footpath, not the road…............from what I saw, they weren’t on the road, and the supervisors kept them sort of single/double file so that people could still get past them.  They are little kids, not road warriors!!

    • Potato says:

      04:47pm | 23/03/12

      Peter Delophane, you are a muppet.

      Do you honestly believe that if the 20,000 people who cycle to work across Sydney were to leave their bikes at home and drive, adding 20,000 cars to the road, that it would be better for congestion and carbon emissions?!? really??? no…REALLY???

      I guess in your view all those cars sitting stationary on the M4, M5, F3, Southern Cross Drive etc etc etc queued up behind OTHER cars are really resulting in an efficient use of transport??? 

      You slow down to over take a bike?? big deal, these days you spend 50% of your time in the car standing completely still, queued up behind dozens of other people in cars…so where is the benefit in adding more cars to the road system?

      And I wont even go into the DOZENS of written reports from every continent on earth detailing the transport, health, economic and environmental benefits of getting more people onto bicycles - cause muppets like you think slowing down for 10 seconds is the most important thing to consider….despite the fact that you’ll happily sit in a queue with traffic for hours every week it doesn’t dawn on you that perhaps all these cars are causing the delay!????  It was obviously those three cyclists that maybe added a total of 20 seconds to your journey!?

      Once again…REALLY?

    • Glenn says:

      07:18am | 23/03/12

      Somebody needs to talk to the schools as well. A number of my friends have kids that go to school, and the school FORBIDS them to ride a bike to school!!

    • Lauren says:

      09:16am | 23/03/12

      What school is that? Seems a bit far fetched to me. You can’t forbid someone getting somewhere a certain way. You sure it isn’t more a case of not providing bike sheds, thus kids having nowhere to put the bikes and therefore not riding?

    • Dood says:

      07:21am | 23/03/12

      I personally rode my bike to right though all of my years in schoop. Even though I was overweight thoughout, it did keep it in check. I then started Uni and my weight went up since I had a motorbike to get around. I have a physical job now and that is getting my weight down again.

      Kids today really need the chance to ride to school and let the exsperence form good habits for life

    • M says:

      07:45am | 23/03/12

      Ha. As if modern parents with all their fears about stranger danger and speeders would let their kids have some responsibility.

    • Emma says:

      09:41am | 23/03/12

      This time I agree with you. Remember when we were out all day around the neighbourhood as kids, and we didnt have a mobile phone at hand or parents ready to drive us everywhere. Look after the safety of your child, by all means educate it around traffic and risks, but give it a little more independence and trust. You may say traffic has increased but this is the world our children grow up in and they have to learn how to responsibly handle it.

    • KH says:

      10:20am | 23/03/12

      Emma - yes indeed - we would leave after breakfast and not show up home till after dusk….........unless we needed food!!  I remember exploring my whole neighbourhood, and I grew up inner city Melbourne, not some country town…..................I feel a bit sorry for kids these days…....

    • Anne71 says:

      12:59pm | 23/03/12

      Too right, Emma. My friends and I used to be out all day during the school holidays, with the only restriction being “be home by the time the streetlights come on”.  Our parents never worried too much because we knew not to talk to nor accept anything from strangers, and there was also safety in numbers.
      I, too, feel a bit sorry for kids these days.

    • Peter says:

      07:46am | 23/03/12

      I love riding my bike to work each morning and thank clover Moore for all her work in making Sydney more cycle friendly - pity that Barry O’Farrell and his mob are determined to stop any more bike lanes in Sydney

    • Jane2 says:

      08:53am | 23/03/12

      What can we do to get more kids riding? Make parents take chill pills.

      Parents are paranoid. “The roads are too dangerous and some big bad person may do something to my kid. ”

      Well teach your kid road safety and stranger danger.

      I knew how to cross a road saefly by myself before I entered primary school. I walked myself to school over 3 very busy major roads from Prep. Mum knew I would cross only at the crossings and would look in both directions before crossing. She made sure I was educated. She also made sure that I knew never to hop in the car with a stranger no matter what they said an dif someone tried to grab me to kick, bite and scream the place down.

      The roads are busier now but all of those intersections I used to cross now have lights on them so they are safer to cross than ever before. Teach your kids a route that is the safest.

      If you want your kids to be safe educate them! And that is you, the parent, not the education system!!!!!!

    • M says:

      09:11am | 23/03/12

      Yes, this.

      I rode my bike to school from the age of 8. But in the early 90’s, everyone in my suburb was riding push bikes anyway, so it was sorta natural to ride it all by myself to school.

    • Michellemac says:

      11:50am | 23/03/12

      You know, I always thought this until I had kids. I work full time, from home quite often so I do get to walk my kids to school a few mornings a week (I did this just this morning), I also walk to pick them up from after school care.

      BUT being a parent doesn’t suddenly excuse one from peer group pressure. Parents/mothers practice this too. It’s just not the ‘done thing’ for children at our school who are in lower primary school to walk/ride to school alone. So for all the theory in the world, I am still not prepared to be the one parent who lets her kids go off to school alone, nor am I willing to risk the safety of my children to prove a point about what they ‘should do’.

      from age 6, when I started primary school, I used to walk/ride to school a couple of kilometres each day, on a road through bushland and often short cutting through the bush itself. I also came across some weirdos as a young kid and was smart enough to know what to do. Speaking to other parents and friends the same age as me, we all had similar experiences -but we were always with a group of friends and there was safety in numbers because all the other kids were there too. No such safety in numbers these days and it would take a fairly seismic shift in thinking for parents to start sending their kids off to school en masse alone so for me it is a no.

      Not so worried about the paedos as the traffic which is far, far worse than it was when I was a kid. I also used to play cricket on the road and we’d shout ‘car’ when one came - every 10 mins or so - and have time to pick up the wickets, often ball one more ball, and walk to the side of the road because our roads were long and stright.  These days even on my quiet street, cars are far more frequent and drivers not attuned to watching out for kids playing in the streets like we used to in the ‘good old days’. Plus most new suburbs, where lots of families live, have windy crescents and curving streets which stops the visibility for drivers and pedestrians. Again, fairly sure they will be safe, but not a risk I am willing to take with my two.

    • M says:

      12:04pm | 23/03/12

      So you bow to peer pressure in adult hood? Are you incapable of making your own descisions?

      Are you afriad of what other people think of you?

    • Potato says:

      09:02am | 23/03/12

      Cycling (and walking, along with public transport) MUST form a key component of the future NSW transport direction.

      People cannot honestly believe that by adding more and more cars to the road, then trying to build more and more motorways/tunnels/bridges/tolls that transport will get any better.

      The only solution is to have LESS cars on the road, and the only way to do this is to encourage people to cycle, walk, or use public transport.

      If we could coax 50,000 Sydney-siders (or Melbournites)  into cycling to work everyday instead of driving, that would be 50,000 less people in cars.  All this starts at school and by encouraging safe cycleways, bike parking, education of cyclists/drivers etc.

      As long as we have muppets like Alan Jones, the Daily Telegraph and Farry O’Barrel trying to ‘help Sydney people’ by putting more and more cars on the road, the worse the problem will get.

      And yes, I know, some people can’t ride for a variety of reasons (distance, health, needing a work car) BUT if 50,000 people who COULD ride to work did so, then those that needed the car would have less traffic to deal with, and more chance of parking the thing at the other end

    • PW says:

      09:27am | 23/03/12

      A Penrith to Parramatta cycleway following the rail corridor would be lovely. It’s in the Bike Plan of the previous Government, as Potato points out it would make a considerable difference to traffic in this area, but under the current regime it is a pipedream.

    • PW says:

      09:32am | 23/03/12

      A Penrith to Parramatta cycleway, following the rail corridor would be lovely. It would make a significant difference to both rail and road congestion in this area. It is in the 10 year bike plan of the previous Government put out some time ago now. Unfortunately the current regime have scrapped the “greenway” that was to follow the old railway goods line from Dulwich Hill to Lilyfield, and it seems like the Penrith-Parramatta route will remain a pipedream. Such backward thinking.

    • Peter Dellaplane says:

      10:03am | 23/03/12

      I’m one of the people who wishes they could cycle to work but can’t due to health problems (hip damage).
      I would love to have really effective public transport, but they never make it large enough (I’m too tall) and it always seems to cost more than owning and running my own vehicle anyway.
      I think it is inevitable that everyone (other than the wealthy) will eventually be condemned to a future of depending on public transport.  I am not looking forward to it.

    • Al says:

      11:20am | 23/03/12

      Peter Dellaplane - Some of us are already condemed to relying on public transport through no fault of our own.
      I am not able to get a licence due to medical conditions and live too far away to ride (and realy don’t want to deal with the idiots on the roads). So public transport or walking are my only options.

    • Potato says:

      04:56pm | 23/03/12

      Mr Dellophane,

      You are right, public transport i crap - mainly because there is too much of a focus on cars.

      Increasing car use will make the problem 1000 times worse in coming years, not to mention more epxensive.

      but it doesn’t have to be that way.

      Many other countries/cities (who have focused on public transport/walking/cycling rather than cars) are excellent places to live and work (i’ve done it it a dozen places).  Public transport needs to be clean, inexpensive, punctual and regular.

      Unfortunately getting public transport to this standard takes commitment and cost…... and unfortunately all we seem to do is spend billions on another bridge, another motorway, another set of traffic lights.

      Any fool can see that more cars = more congestion = crappy travel times

      So the solution is get more people OUT of cars

      Simple!

    • MD says:

      09:23am | 23/03/12

      We’re constantly told that if you let your kids walk/ride to school, they will be abducted or hit by a car, guarenteed because society is evil and you should shelter your kids from it as well as not teaching them about run on sentences.

      It seems there’s two sides to every ‘please think of the children’ lobby.

    • M says:

      09:58am | 23/03/12

      Thinking of the Children is what has lead us down this path in the first place.

    • BMX says:

      09:35am | 23/03/12

      I rode my bike to school from year 8 onwards. Walking was just too slow and boring, and the combination of BMX gearing and a long steep hill made me one fit kid.
      We’ve got a few steep hills in my area between us and the surrounding schools and I’ll be happy to sign my kids permission slips if they ever want to ride to school, as this will stop them from being fatties.
      You shouldn’t bubble wrap awesomeness.

    • M says:

      09:37am | 23/03/12

      Clover moore wasting millions on cycleways in the city that are hardly used. Cycling is not the answer. De-centralisation in combination with better funded public transport is.

      Sydney’s CBD cannot continue to be the main place of commerce in the city.

    • Andre says:

      10:15am | 23/03/12

      My kids aren’t school age, but i wouldn’t let them ride to school if they were, too many nutters and perverts around. For me it is about safety.

    • BMX says:

      10:39am | 23/03/12

      But if they’re on a bike they can get away quicker! Give them a chain & padlock and they can brandish that as a weapon against the nutters.

    • M says:

      10:50am | 23/03/12

      Even if you are a troll, this is exactly the sort of mindset that has led to the problem in the first place.

    • Andre says:

      11:04am | 23/03/12

      Which problem are you referring to M? The nutters or other?

    • M says:

      11:31am | 23/03/12

      Fat arsed children who are too coddled by fat arsed and paranoid parents to get themselves to school.

    • Andre says:

      12:07pm | 23/03/12

      @M I think you are one of the nutters hoping kids ride to school so you can prey on them.

    • Kelly says:

      12:08pm | 23/03/12

      Yes because nutters and perverts are just a recent invention. In fact you can find one lurking behind every bush ...

      Kids these days are more at risk from other kids! They have a greater chance of being physically assaulted by bullies they go to school with. They are also more likely to be approached by perverts on the internet because lazy parents give their kids unfettered access and their own bloody IPhones!

      Hell when I was a kid there were a few dodgy men around town. We called them old pervs. How the hell did we manage to remain unmolested with no such thing as mobile phones and Mummy picking us up in the SUV? Oh that’s right we didn’t even have a home phone til I was 16 and our family never had a car! I walked or rode to school by myself many times or with a brother. Often in the rain. Imagine that! Gee what a bad mother I must have had…

    • M says:

      12:44pm | 23/03/12

      @Andre, It must be fabulous to be so paranoid. Do you watch ACA a lot? What about Today Tonight?

    • BMX says:

      01:17pm | 23/03/12

      Like Kelly, once we could walk our neglectful parents made us walk to school. Hold our hands? Forget that! Daytime TV was too good back in the 70’s. We learnt to use our feet, and fend for ourselves on the way home, avoiding the odd stray dog. And when you saw a panelvan driving slowly past the school, you knew the best option was to get a dink from the kid down the street (sitting on the bike luggage rack) as to get home quicker.
      Then you had the added danger of cub & scout nights, in which we shared tactics of how to avoid the lecherous hands of Akela & Baloo. We learnt our stranger danger lessons well in those days.
      And kids these days are sheltered from all this fun…
      Remember, you shouldn’t bubble wrap awesomeness.

    • Andre says:

      02:19pm | 23/03/12

      My mum and sister didn’t remain unmolested and I’m not going to take that chance with my children.

    • Lie Lover? says:

      10:21am | 23/03/12

      @M “Cycling is not the answer.” I seriously doubt anyone said that by itself cycling was meant to be. Like most problems in society today the easy solutions don’t exist. It is about a range of solutions and options that when integrated will solve the problems. Cycling is merely a part of the solution. De-centralising is another part.

    • M says:

      11:04am | 23/03/12

      De-centralising is the only solution. The main place of employment atm in Sydney is in the City itself.

      Tax incentives should be offered to some of the larger companies to move their offices to outlying locations that have underutilized public transport hubs.

      If you have millions of people all trying to get to the same spot, it will inevitably lead to the mess we are in now.

      The other thing which needs to be looked at is increasing the density of urban development. Australians are stuck in the mindset of low level, wide suburban spread. That is causing a lot of tranport issues as well. We NEED high rise apartment developments to concentrate the population around transport hubs, incetivising their use.

      If people worked, lived and played within a 20km radius, a lot of our transport issues would be solved.

    • Nicko says:

      11:41am | 23/03/12

      I was in Sydney this weekend M and I saw heaps of cyclists even though it was raining. I reckon you are just restating another throw away line from the anti bike lobby aka Allan Jones and the Telegraph. Decentralisation would probably just result in more car use- Check out the Nor-west busineess park during peak hour and you will see what I mean.

    • M says:

      12:02pm | 23/03/12

      Decentralisation needs to be combined with high density development around existing transport hubs for it to be a viable solution. This means highrise apartment/office blocks.

      NIMBY shoots them down everytime.

      Another thing which would go a hell of a long way to reducing current transport woes would be tax and toll incentive for people to take up motorcycles and scooters. At the end of the day, people who could take public transport drive because they don’t like using public transport.

      I am one of them.

      Reduce tolls for bikes and scooters to a quater of what cars are charged (being that they take up a quater of the space and weigh 5 times less than a mid sized car), reduce insurance and rego costs, and provide motorcycle parking facilities.

      It’s way cheaper than spending billions on public transport.

    • Kassandra says:

      11:52am | 23/03/12

      I went to school in the 50s and 60s mostly in Sydney. Nobody was driven to school then except maybe the mums working in the canteen (women didn’t drive). Nobody rode a bike to school either. You walked or got the bus. Bikes were things you rode after school or on weekends. The only place I ever saw anybody ride a bike to school was in Broken Hill, and that would have been maybe 6 kids at most in the whole school. I can’t think of a worse idea than encouraging kids to ride bikes to school. Too dangerous and they are always going to be a status symbol competition. And before the fat police start up - there were hardly any overweight kids at school in my day. You don’t have to ride a bike to be skinny (and only cyclists think anyone looks good in lycra).

    • Fiona says:

      12:00pm | 23/03/12

      About 10 years ago my stepson used to ride to school (he was quite obese). It was good for him and he was losing weight. Mind you he got knocked off said bike one day when a car clipped the back wheel. Lucky he wasn’t killed.

      Then one day two bully thugs from his school accosted him and stole his bike. They said, ‘hey that’s a nice bike, we’ll take it thanks’. Mind you, we only found this out years later, he’d told us it was stolen from the bike racks. He was embarrassed by being bullied. The school did nothing and didn’t care. They just said it happens all the time. Nice.

    • M says:

      12:50pm | 23/03/12

      You need to teach him two things.

      1) Cars are dangerous, and can kill you. Be carefull around them.

      2) You need to teach him how to fight to defend himself against bullies.

    • Fiona says:

      01:26pm | 23/03/12

      That’s ok he’s grown up now and quite self assured. Thing was we weren’t aware of what was going on. It’s quite usual for kids to keep bullying to themselves and many parents are completely unaware of the trauma their children are going through. As many parents are unaware their little angels are bullies!

    • SKA says:

      12:10pm | 23/03/12

      Is it really the end of the world if kids don’t ride bikes or walk to school? In primary school, my folks dropped me and my brother off. We didn’t have weight problems because we spent recess and lunch tearing around, played in the backyard when we got home and played team sports on the weekend. Admittedly though, I think my folks would have let us walk if we lived close enough (lived a 1.5 hour walk away) - if we had lived close by at ages 10 and above, definitely would have been expected to walk. By high school, we both caught public transport and then walked from the station home (about 20 minute walk) - I think in high school, kids should definitely be getting themselves to school but I do understand in kids aged under 10/11.

    • mr g says:

      01:55pm | 23/03/12

      All of the money that Andrews’s mates, (Howard, Costello, & Abbott), put in the bank and called “surplus to needs” had been used as it was meant to be, this problem wouldn’t exist. They could have made money available to the States to put dedicated biketracks in every Capital city and major rural centre in the Nation. Taxes are collected to pay the cost of needs. Not to be put away for election purposes.
      Andrews, who has never supported such a program, State or Federal whilst in Government, now seeks to convince us that bowing to the fuel companies was not the reason that programs such as this weren’t looked at then.
      My opinion? All kids should be bussed to school and physical education/sports programs integrated into the curriculum and as compulsory, absenting inability, as Maths, English, and the other compulsory programs.

    • Mr Pod says:

      02:08pm | 23/03/12

      I have been badgering my local council and state government to gravel a 1.5 km section of a long redundant train track.  It runs directly past 4 schools in a large and fast growing area and would enable kids to ride safely to school, avoiding the massive bottle neck that all the cars dropping off kids cause.. Say nothing of the health benefits for kids and and community.  But it is now 4 years of being passed around with everyone agreeing what a cheap use of a disused resource, their answer to the bottleneck is to build more road lanes.  Classic.

    • mr g says:

      02:38pm | 23/03/12

      Mr Pod. Build a small carriage with rail wheels and work out how to make it move and bingo. Put an adult on a roster system and Bob’s your Mum’s bro. Tow it with an old ute equipped with rail wheels maybe.
      Toot, Toot!

    • SalC says:

      03:40pm | 23/03/12

      I saw two mums herding their 5 kids on bikes (all under 5) across a major arterial crossing, in an effort, I suppose to celebrate Ride to School day.
      They waited for the little green man, but the kids were all over the place, not for lack of mum’s trying.
      God I thought that looked dangerous.

    • AJ says:

      03:57pm | 23/03/12

      As a kid i would have loved it if i had been allowed to ride to school but my parents preferred for me and my brother and sister walked to school more for the safety of our bikes than then anything i think. I can see why some parents wouldn’t want their early primary age kids to make their own way to school but i think more parents need to encourage their older children to start doing this. And it may be that it is not adults that are the concern for their kids but other kids.

    • stephen says:

      08:28pm | 23/03/12

      I rode to school most days in Melbourne.
      Good fun, and I was wet most days showing up to put books in my locker, but the traffic was better then, (we lived in Brighton where everyone of importance was over 55, and anyone younger was from South Melbourne ... well they seemed younger : runts on stunts, (nah, only joking ... I never grew up either) but nowadays, kids shouldn’t ride to school, not on your life.
      There are too many busy roads in the suburbs now, (and where the hell is everyone going to in such a hurry ? They can’t all be late for a UN meeting at noon ?)
      If children are to be encouraged to ride to school, then there should be marked paths for them on the left shoulder of the road.
      Not on footpaths, where accidents are prevalent, but to the left of traffic, well away from moving cars.
      (Actually, only last wednesday I was meant to attend a ‘Planning for Cyclists and Pedestrians’ 2 day course held in Spring Hill -  I was offered a scholarship, could not attend, and could not reserve a place for another person in lieu, but suffice to say, a previous course was cancelled in November for lack of interest.)
      No interest ?
      Kick up the price of petrol Julia, and lets get many more saddle sores and better general health.

      It is not the cyclist - child or otherwise - who needs instructions on road use, but the motorist who wants the road to be a test of will, strength, and V8 performance.

      It may well be that proper tracks or speedways be built in outlying suburbs for drivers who wish to race or drive at speed.
      Only then, by force of the thrush of death-defying adrenalin and the distinction in feeling of a careful suburban drive, will recklessness behind the wheel be forgotten.

    • Robert Smissen of country SA says:

      11:06pm | 23/03/12

      When I was a kid in Katanning WA my siblings & i road 3.2km across the paddocks to catch the school bus from the side of the road. HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM, I guess times have change a bit

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter