The AFL and NRL are the sporting equivalent of socialism. Between them, the two leagues have the salary cap, the draft and all manner of measures designed to ensure that all teams are as equal as possible.

Buddy and Ben, the premiership X men

Even the finals are a way of giving half the teams in the competition a last gasp at glory. If the unstated object of the system is to knock off the top team, then the system usually works. Most years the team who finishes first at the end of the regular season does not go on to win the grand final.

Just four of the last 12 NRL minor premiers won the grand final, while five of the last 12 AFL minor premiers jogged a victory lap. Combined, that’s a ratio of three in eight, which is roughly the ratio of favourites which generally win at your average eight-race thoroughbred meeting. But this year promises to be different.

Season 2012 in both codes has all the hallmarks of a year when the minor premiers will kick on to hold up the big heavy trophy while the prime minister and assorted sporting officials are booed on stage on grand final day. Here’s why.

Hawthorn are peaking at the right time. The fact they score 154 points for every 100 they concede says more than their 17 wins from 22 games. This is a team with serious strike power in the forward 50.

If Buddy Franklin is having one of his Hollywood days when he’s all explosions and no plot, they still have targets galore in Roughead, Lewis, Gunston and Breust. Bookies had Hawthorn as favourites at the start of the year, just ahead of Carlton. It now seems laughable that the Blues were considered worthy of winning anything more than a chook raffle, but the Hawthorn assessment was spot on.

The Hawks have been disappointing since that epic, unbelievably intense ambush of Geelong in the 2008 grand final. The Cats recovered brilliantly from that shock defeat, winning two of the next four flags, while the best the Hawks have managed since is a preliminary final.

This year it’s hard to see who’ll stop them. The Swans tackle ferociously and play with real heart and, but they just don’t seem to have enough genuine goal kickers. Collingwood strung together 10 wins mid-season, but they’ve been hot and cold all year due to injuries. The constant speculation over Travis Cloke’s future probably hasn’t helped either.

Notwithstanding their recent hot streak, Geelong are probably too old, while Adelaide and the Eagles are probably still too raw. That said, the Crows were 50-1 outsiders at the start of the year, so they could be the team that keeps improving. But no one will improve enough to beat Hawthorn. With a resurgent Luke Hodge leading the midfield, the Hawks will beat whoever they play in the grand final by 50.

Over in the NRL, it has been well documented that the new finals system, modelled on the successful AFL system, has at last thrown up a mouth-watering batch of games in the first week of the playoffs rather than the usual drivel.

Todd Carney’s Cronulla faces his old club, the Raiders. Greg Inglis does likewise for the Bunnies against the Storm. There’s a ripper Queensland derby between the Broncos and Cowboys, while Bulldogs coach Des Hasler takes on the Manly team he led to premiership glory last year.

Even if you rub out the bottom three teams – Canberra, Cronulla and Brisbane – there are still five live chances. The Storm and Manly have been there, done that, while the Rabbitohs have strike power across the park. North Queensland have a show too. They’ve got a bloke called Thurston after all, and it’s worth remembering that the Cowboys beat the Bulldogs in Sydney in the 2004 finals series, in the last year the Bulldogs went on to be premiers.

Having given those four teams a rap, forget it. This year is all about the Bulldogs. They’ve lost just once since early May, and that was a loss you sense they had to have, which is kind of ironic because it happened in Canberra, the home of a famous comment about a recession we apparently had to have too.

Across the park, the Bulldogs look strong. They’ve got a no fuss-halves pairing who have clicked all year, they’ve got big barnstorming forwards led by Sam Kasiano, who has been one of the improvers of the year, they made the NRL’s most astute midyear acquisitions with Krisnan Inu and Sam Perrett, and they have a man with mercury for legs in fullback Ben Barba.

Their coach knows a thing or two about the sort of things or two you need to know about at this time of year too.

So that’s that. No wider narrative about which code is more popular or any of the usual fire starters. Just a straight assessment that this will be a favourite’s year, which is poetic justice really, because Tom Waterhouse might wake up in a month and find out that he knows what it takes to cop a few of those brutal hits after all.

Tell me I’m kidding on Twitter, everyone else does: @antsharwood

Comments on this post will close at 8pm AEST

Most commented

62 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • craig2 says:

      07:20am | 05/09/12

      No, Broncos all the way! Too much class for those Sydney and melbourne pratts.

    • TimB says:

      08:48am | 05/09/12

      Brisbane? Class?

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

    • craig2 says:

      11:09am | 05/09/12

      Stop laughing Tim, I note you haven’t put your team up, they didn’t make the finals?

    • Tom says:

      11:40am | 05/09/12

      Pure gold, Ants. “... having one of his Hollywood days when he’s all explosions and no plot”.

    • D says:

      11:47am | 05/09/12

      “Over in the NRL, it has been well documented that the new finals system, modelled on the successful AFL system”

      I don’t know how many times this needs to be said before people catch on, but the NRL/ARL used this system before the AFL - they’re going back to how they had it previously….

      As for the NRL- unfortunately I get the feeling that Manly will run riot through the finals series, starting with knocking off the Dogs this weekend. The Dogs are NO certainties, probably any of the top 8 are good enough on their day - but Manly are looking very good right now.

    • TimB says:

      12:01pm | 05/09/12

      “Stop laughing Tim, I note you haven’t put your team up, they didn’t make the finals? “

      LOL. Anyone paying the slightest bit of attention around here knows which team I follow.

      Heres a hint Craig- Minor Premiers wink

      *Continues laughing*

    • patsy says:

      12:43pm | 05/09/12

      @TimB-Congrats to Ben Barba but, ever heard of the Dally M curse?

    • sunny says:

      01:07pm | 05/09/12

      Cowboys vs Broncos should be a cracking game.

      Normally I would say Bulldogs vs Manly would be a corker too as they’re long time rivals, but now that they ditched the McIntyre system there’s no real incentive for Manly to dig deep if they’re under the pump in the latter part of the game, as they have a guaranteed ticket through to week 2. Yet to see this of course and will have to wait and see, but if there’s a cave-in then they need to bring back the McIntyre system next year.

    • craig2 says:

      01:20pm | 05/09/12

      That’s ok! It’ll be dagger to your heart Timmy boy should the teams meet and the broncos roll you. See what happens Monday.

    • Levi of Bris says:

      05:40pm | 05/09/12

      Of course manly will cruise through the finals. They have the backing of the refs in every game they play. After a season littered with atrocious refereeing and mind bogglingly idiotic calls, a Manly back to back seems all but assured. Especially if they face off against the Broncos at any point, where the penalty count could conceivably read 20 for manly vs 1 for Brisbane

    • ago says:

      07:40am | 05/09/12

      Yeah, I hope Waterhouse cops a hiding on his book, Smarmy c***.

    • TChong says:

      07:44am | 05/09/12

      Hawks v Collingwood - “Pies in a close one, 1 goal +.
      Doggies v Storm -  Doggies by 4 - golden point try from a scrum because .billy slater knocks on after fumbling a return kickoff, after they ((Storm ) equalise, in the 79th minute.

    • Tim says:

      07:45am | 05/09/12

      Ah the Sharwood kiss of death.

      Sorry Hawks and Dogs fans you’ve got no chance now.

    • TimB says:

      08:50am | 05/09/12

      C’mon, even Sharwood has to get one right eventually.

      Right?

    • Bill says:

      11:24am | 05/09/12

      Sharwood has no idea about our national code, just like your average rugby fan.

    • Tim says:

      12:10pm | 05/09/12

      Bill,
      I know, Sharwood really struggles with his Cricket articles.

      And why should Rugby fans necessarily be Cricket tragics as well?

    • Economist says:

      01:06pm | 05/09/12

      Yeah Ant you bastard wink as hawks fan you’ve screwed me. I wouldn’t say they’re a certainty, but the Swans games was a great one to watch. The Swans could easily do a round 5 on them.

    • Mahhrat says:

      08:04am | 05/09/12

      Swans and Hawks, Bulldogs and doesn’t matter.

      But even though I love my swannies, it’s certainly Hawthorn’s premiership to lose.

      Seriously though, can we discuss instead the need for a finals series?  Did anyone even witness the last round of the EPL, with Man City scoring a premiership-winning goal in the second minute of extra time?  Dearie me how good that was.

      The whole concept of “finals series” is a uniquely American concept that we seem to have run with, for whatever reason, yet I’ve never quite understood why.

    • Tim says:

      09:18am | 05/09/12

      Yes one exciting finish without finals vs hundreds of exciting moments with finals.
      No finals only works in Soccer because it’s so boring that everyone wants to get the season over as soon as possible. jks.

      But seriously it’s much easier for a crap team to upset a good team in soccer because one fluky goal can make all the difference, which is why no finals work better for them.

    • Gavin says:

      11:38am | 05/09/12

      How can you bag out the finals??
      I could think of nothing worse than a long drawn out season with a runaway winner.

    • Mahhrat says:

      11:45am | 05/09/12

      @Tim:  Um, no.  Every game in a non-finals league becomes critical.  Every game is exciting, because you can’t fugging TANK like all the currently shit clubs do to get better draft picks.  If you come bottom three, you go down a division.

      Imagine that?  Whoops, Melbourne you’re crap, you’re playing VFL next year.  Get over it.  Reckon there’d be more excitement then?

      As to “boring”, you’re in the minority there mate.  More people play Association Football, more people watch Association Football.  There is more money as well.

      I love my AFL and I think it’s great, by AF is the benchmark, not the exception.

    • Tim says:

      12:15pm | 05/09/12

      Mahhrat,
      more people eat McDonalds and drink coke as well. Doesn’t make a Big Mac meal the pinnacle of cuisine.

      And there’s a difference between having no finals and having relegation. I simply don’t think we have the depth to allow for relegation leagues in either AFL or Rugby League.

      Finals definitely make September a great time of year for football in Australia whereas your average Premier League winner is decided weeks before the end of the season. To me that takes a lot of the excitiement out of it.

    • Mahhrat says:

      01:00pm | 05/09/12

      @Tim:  That depends by what you measure the “height of cuisine”.  While they certainly aren’t healthy alternatives etc, the mere fact that I can walk into any McDonalds in the Western World, order a Big Mac and know what I’m going to get is actually pretty impressive.

      Sydney won one and nearly two premierships on a simple premise - you only need to win 16 games in a season.

      It is not right that you can lose 10 games and win a flag.  As much as Paul Roos deserves knighthood iMHO, that shit just ain’t sober.

    • Punters Pal says:

      04:35pm | 05/09/12

      If you will not play finals system, then only fair way is to play each other team home and away. It is not quite possible under current system, even if you get rid of the finals.

      Anything less and someone will whinge.

    • Little Joe says:

      08:14am | 05/09/12

      Can The Punch PLEEEASE employ someone who has some intelligence.

      Last week we had Anthony claiming that Sydney and Brisbane were Australia’s two largest cities.

      POINT OF NOTE :

      “The Hawks have been disappointing since that epic, unbelievably intense ambush of Geelong in the 2008 grand final. The Cats recovered brilliantly from that shock defeat, winning two of the next four flags, while the best the Hawks have managed since is a preliminary final.”

      1) There have only been 3 Grand Finals since 2008
      2) So the Hawks upset the Cats in 2008 ..... but this is now impossible!!! You obviously have NF idea about the game!!!!

      Some people will tell you that if you don’t turn up to a game you will lose ..... in AFL you can lose a game if you don’t turn up for a quarter of football I know ..... I am a St. Kilda Supporter!!!

      Casing Points

      1971 Grade Final Hawthorne vs St. Kilda
      Saints lead by 20pts at 3/4 Time only to lose by 7pts

      1997 Grand Final Adelaide vs St. Kilda
      Saints lead by 13pts at 1/2 Time only to lose by 31pts

      2009 Grand Final Geelong vs St. Kilda
      Saints lead by 7pts at 3/4 Time only to lose by 12pts with a toe poke / goal after the siren.

      Ps. Can’t wait for summer so Anthony can ‘write’ about cricket!!!

    • Pieman says:

      08:27am | 05/09/12

      Almost right, li’l Joe.  There have been only three AFL FLAGS since 2008, but FOUR Grand Finals

    • DT says:

      08:48am | 05/09/12

      What is a casing point?
      I think you tripped over your own spittle and completely misunderstood what a “Case in point” is.

    • Bill says:

      09:05am | 05/09/12

      Little Joe - don’t forget that Sharwood claimed that Australian football was only a “little more” popular than rugby league in a previous blog, despite the fact that more than 7 million people attend games of footy compared to 3 million who bother to turn up to the rugby. And lets not forget that the number of Australians who are members of AFL clubs is FOUR times that of the number who are rugby members.

      The guy has no clue, no idea and no relevance to the average footy fan.

    • Funcut says:

      10:15am | 05/09/12

      Little Joe,

      While Anthony made a mistake saying “winning two of the next four flags”, you have, I can only assume in a fit of pure pathos, destroyed your glass house with the throw of an awfully ugly stone by suggesting that “There have only been 3 Grand Finals since 2008”.

      There have, in fact, been four grand finals due to the drawn GF between St Kilda and Collingwood.

      Nit picking journalists is no fun. Nit picking nit pickers is awesome.

    • Little Joe says:

      10:37am | 05/09/12

      @ Pieman

      Yes us Saints supporters repress the notion that there were two Grand Finals in 2010 ..... especially when, with only 45seconds on the clock in the first GF a high ball floated to the top of the square and both Kossie and Milne were taken out.

      @ Bill

      Same goes for cricket!!!

    • Levi of Bris says:

      10:44am | 05/09/12

      Bill pops his little head up yet again to try to contend with the fact that more people watch NRL on an annual basis than AFL.

      I sense its really getting to you hey Bill. That and the provincial nature of your game which is restricted to one country. Even the french play league (and rugby). I hate to break it to you but excluding soccer, the brand of football played most around the world is on a rectangular field by big blokes called “rugby players”. Are you somehow more enlightened than the rest of the world? If so please do share your intellectual gigantism with the rest of us plebs….oh wait we made up out mind a long time ago that Aussie rules is about as entertaining as watching seagulls fight over a chip….and fumbling that chip constantly.

      “The guy has no clue, no idea and no relevance to the average footy fan.”

      The fact that you don’t even know the difference between league and rugby confirms that you sir have no relevance. Enjoy your provincial, 2nd in TV ratings game.

    • Tim says:

      10:50am | 05/09/12

      Bill,
      once again forgetting to mention TV audience.

      C’mon Bill, why so selective in your use of information?
      If Aerial Ping Pong is so dominant surely they would be getting at least double the TV audience of the NRL? Surely?

      It must be hard for you to walk around with that massive deluded superiority complex.

      ps. I’m pretty sure more than 7 million people attended games of “footy” last year but only 7 million of them attended the Aerial Ping Pong.

    • Bill says:

      11:45am | 05/09/12

      Hey Tim - Australian footy SMASHES the rugby in TV viewing numbers, just like it KILLS that stupid game in match day attendances, club membership numbers, player salaries, TV rights payments and any other category you care to.mention.

      How many games of rugby this year saw attendances over 20,000? Probably few, while our national code regularly gets crowds over 60,000 and sometimes even 80,000.

      Tell me again how the rugby game is more popular than Australian football?

    • Tom says:

      12:39pm | 05/09/12

      Little Joe, you forgot to mention the Geelong shot that hit the post and was called a goal. This piece of fortune kept the Cats within sniffing distance. Oooohhh, the pain.

    • Tim says:

      12:44pm | 05/09/12

      Bill,
      “Tell me again how the rugby game is more popular than Australian football?”

      Geez Bill, that dementia must be getting to you. Please show me where I said that? Other than in your head of course.

      “http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/numbers-add-up-for-nrl-clubs-in-pursuit-of-more-cash-from-rights-20111013-1ln6r.html”

      Total Rugby League TV audience 2011 128 million
      Total AFL TV audience 2011 113 million. oh it must burn.

      But hey, with the extra games the AFL had this year it might be close. But nothing like a “smashing” or “killing” that you talk about.

      NRL’s TV deal $1.025 Billion with the NZ TV rights, digital and mobile rights and radio still to be sold.

      The states with half the country’s population like AFL, the States with the other half like NRL. It’s a shame that people like you can’t understand it and need to prop your deluded thoughts up with silly talk of a “national code”.

    • Economist says:

      01:09pm | 05/09/12

      Little Joe,

      We’ve had our disagreements but I certainly feel for you with the Saints who I don’t mind. The draw two years ago was frinkin awesome.

      Good luck with your boys in the future.

    • TimB says:

      01:28pm | 05/09/12

      Shh Tim, don’t bring facts into this. You’ll scare Bill off.

      He always seems to go missing whenever someone posts some actual evidence against his silly claims…

    • Greg says:

      08:50am | 05/09/12

      The only way the hawks win is if someone else beats Geelong for them.

      The Kennett curse from the 2008 GF is still alive and kicking the only way they will get rid of it is to sacrifice him to the football gods before the game.

      Also well done for managing to write an article where you didn’t have a dig at Victoria or AFL

    • kaff says:

      02:22pm | 05/09/12

      I agree.

      The Hawks do look the goods, but they need to hope that either Freo, and very likely Sydney knock the Cats out first.

      Geelong should beat Freo which means they’ll probably play Sydney at the Olympic Stadium.  Even though Adelaide are a bit under-done this season, they should beat Sydney at home. 

      Sydney’s best results at Olympic Stadium have been against GWS.  At the SCG different story, but I’d back Geelong over Sydney. 

      That sets up a thrilling Geelong v Hawks final. 

      Mind you, if the Hawks knock over the Kennett curse, they deserve the flag.

    • Richard M says:

      10:08am | 05/09/12

      The mighty Swannies only lost to Hawthorn a couple of weeks ago in the last two minutes because they dropped their concentration at the Centre bounces.  Give them another go and with their finals experience and toughness, and knowledge of what to do against the Hawks, they might just do it.
      That’s if, of course, we can get over Adelaide at home on Saturday.  Grundy’s stupidity hasn’t helped.

    • Dash says:

      01:28pm | 05/09/12

      Yeah, they’ll be right this week. Better to have played the likes of Hawthorn, Collingwood and Geelong than the soft draw the crows have had in the lead up.

      Go BLOODS!

    • S.L says:

      10:52am | 05/09/12

      Who’s the guy on the left?

    • Dave Penberthy says:

      10:59am | 05/09/12

      The Crows will beat the Swans on Saturday, win again in two weeks and then win the flag. Anthony, you’re fired.

    • Richard M says:

      12:01pm | 05/09/12

      Well, maybe Dave, but then again, maybe not.  The Swans have had tough matches against top teams leading in to the finals, and are a hardened finals team, whereas Adelaide have had a whole lot of soft matches against bottom dwellers, and are very inexperienced - very good team though.  Walker and Tippett are a worry for us. We’ll see on Sat.
      Can we at least agree that it is good to see two non-Vic teams in the top four, especially when the Melbourne media clique (as usual) wrote both of them off at the beginning of the season.  What, by the way, happened to the Melbourne media’s great white hopes, Essendon and Carlton??!!  They had Essendon winning the flag after about rounds 6-8. Their blindness to teams outside Melbourne is extraordinary.

    • Dash says:

      01:34pm | 05/09/12

      No way! The Swans will crunch the Crows and send their ferral supporters home weeping from Footy Park!

      Taylor Walker is the typical Adelaide bogan. Look at the hair cut!! Pure S.A.!

      The boys from Sydney will give all your outside softies looking for the easy kick on the fringes a lesson in how to play hard accountable football.

      GO BLOODS!

      btw - I imagine there is a shit load of confusion in Adelaide on Fathers Day wink

    • Bear says:

      11:07am | 05/09/12

      With AFL, the fixture is so uneven now it doesn’t matter if they get knocked off. Who cares about Nrl other than one city that thinks it’s waaay bigger than it is and one backwater!?

    • Max Redlands says:

      11:17am | 05/09/12

      For purely parochial reasons I am looking forward to an Adelaide premiership.

      Fortunately, my hopes are not fantastical as there is every chance they could do it. But finals football is a wide open affair, I wouldn’t even write off Geelong and god forbid Collingwood find some form at this time of the year.

    • Catter says:

      11:18am | 05/09/12

      And it’s all copied from the way they run sport in the most capitalist place on earth, The US! In fact it’s reverse socialism in a way, as by trying to keep as many teams as possible it keeps all the fans interested. If it was one or two teams each year and nobody else had a chance fans of other teams would drop off. in England they have enough fans to stay interested, here we wouldn’t.

    • PW says:

      11:53am | 05/09/12

      Ah yes, another journo prepared to award not one but two premierships before a ball has been kicked in anger in the finals.

      Sticking to NRL, which I follow more closely, many journos were prepared to award the comp to the Storm at about Round 12, before they lost 5 in a row.

      Now we have one awarding it to the Bulldogs. The same Bulldogs beaten six tries to one by a team running 9th only a few days ago. Oh, but they did defeat the 13th place team at the weekend, that must make them unbeatable.

      The Hawks have been going along fine, but only scraped home against a fading Sydney team, I would not regard them as past the post either.

      I say lets not award titles just yet, lets play the finals series in both codes.

    • Baloo says:

      11:55am | 05/09/12

      CARN FREO

    • Brendan says:

      05:04pm | 05/09/12

      gO The mighty Dockers!! if we get over Geebung watch out.

    • Gav says:

      12:27pm | 05/09/12

      AFL finals football is all about man-on-man, lock-down football. The Hawks cannot handle this style of play, which is why they struggle against Geelong and the Swans. Look at their game last week against West Coast. In the first quarter, West Coast tried to match Hawthorns free running game and got smashed. They then changed to lock-down footy and clawed their way back into the match. Hawthorn would not have won the game without their first quarter.
      Expect teams to learn from this and shut down Hawthorn’s run. The question is; can Hawthorn play close, shutdown, stoppage football? I for one, doubt it.

    • Richard M says:

      01:01pm | 05/09/12

      Quite right, Gav.  The trouble is that bloody Buddy and Co only need to break out for a quarter, or even less, and they can just about win the game.  See v Swans 2 weeks ago.  It is hard to hold their goal scoring power for a whole game.
      But not impossible - I hope.

    • Janosz says:

      12:52pm | 05/09/12

      I’m not an AFL or NRL fan but, for me, the team that is top at the end of the home-and-away season should be considered premiers.  They’ve shown it over the long term.  Why have finals where half the clubs can participate?  Crazy!  If AFL and NRL want an additional competition, then why not have something like the FA Cup in Britain - a knockout competition.  Separate premiership from cup winners.  Given the expansion of both leagues, why not introduce two divisions with promotions and relegations?  But hey, what do I know about AFL or NRL?

    • kaff says:

      02:33pm | 05/09/12

      If it was a genuine “home and away” season, then the team that finishes top should be considered top.  However they aren’t genuine home and away seasons.

      If every team played each other twice, once at home and once at a ground of their opponent’s choosing (ie interstate where a home ground advantage is given up), then you can say it’s fair.

      However when you have the Sydney Swans playing GWS twice (for example) and some of the other clubs only playing them once, the Sydney Swans have an advantage.  Most clubs that played the Gold Coast twice last year had similar advantages.

      Similarly, some clubs might not have a “home” game against a particular club for three years as they may be drawn to play the team only once each season and the pattern goes home, away, away, home.

      I think there are too many teams in the Finals though, as some years you don’t need a winning percentage to make the eight.  Make it four or six and that’s enough.

      And I’m all for the equivalent of an FA Cup because I’d love to see some of the second tier state competition teams have a go against some of the other clubs, just to see how it goes.

    • bigmuzz says:

      12:56pm | 05/09/12

      I think whoever wins the upcoming friday night game between Dogs and Manly will go on to win the comp. It’s hard to split them, but i’m leaning towards Manly: they’ve got so much big game experience, with basically the same roster that won the comp last year. With other wins/losses I think it might even end up being a Dogs/Manly GF. But anything can happen on the day (and thru the series with injuries/suspensions) so I really have no confidence of who will win (should be a bloody good contest tho!) smile

      PS i have no allegience to either, as I am one of those poor Parra fans… yes, I know, I know… :(

      As for AFL, sorry for all you fans but to be brutally honest i don’t really know/care. (much as you all probably don’t know/care about the NRL GF!) lol raspberry

    • Parra spuds says:

      05:51pm | 05/09/12

      If I was a Parra fan I’d get on Afl or golf or badminton or any bandwagon going to dilute the pain! You might be waiting a long time to win anything otherwise.

    • TheRealDave says:

      01:16pm | 05/09/12

      FFS!!!

      Did Sharwood just ‘Kiss of death’ my beloved Bulldogs?!?!

    • TimB says:

      02:58pm | 05/09/12

      Apparently.

      It’s okay. We now have someone to sacrifice to the football gods should they fail.

    • TheRealDave says:

      03:25pm | 05/09/12

      I’m gonna go all Charlotte Dawson on Sharwood! You’ve been warned!!!

      wink

    • James says:

      03:45pm | 05/09/12

      Hope this will be as good as your prediction for NSW to win origin 2012.

    • Swamp Thing says:

      04:52pm | 05/09/12

      Hawks are footy gods full stop.
      Plenty of straight blokes on these pages would ‘go gay’ for buddy if they got the chance. (just sayin).

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@TheStalwart an analyst in Sydney said it was a "sad day" http://t.co/vh4Yu4OgDD. I think he was just exhausted and gave up analyzing

ToryShepherd

@CatherineDeveny @sydwritersfest A wobble

Paul Colgan

RT @NASA: Amazing views from the International Space Station of Pavlof Volcano erupting in Alaska. http://t.co/vqBkkiOful

Paul Colgan

US Google Doodle features a girl's touching depiction of her father's return from Iraq http://t.co/4LiRFOntTY

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter