It was never going to be a bread-and-circuses affair but Wayne Swan’s third budget offers a little showbag of policy trinkets everyone gets to keep.

Tax time will now be a liberating experience for put-upon families. Apparently.

Just like the rise in cigarette tax, they are the kind of concrete changes that can make a government a real talking point in offices and over dinner tables. While not multi-billion-dollar headline initiatives, they offer voters little improvements that are, it has to be said, broadly agreeable.

First is the eHealth initiative. If you sign up it will put an end to the usual round of 20 questions about your medical history any time you see a new doctor. It’s totally optional and you can manage it yourself, so there’s little ground for the typical privacy objections raised against this kind of initiative.

It is decidedly not designed to be part of a system-wide information sharing to create efficiencies across GP practices and hospitals. Rather it’s a bit like an iPhone: a useful little gadget some people will enjoy having, if they’re confident they can handle it correctly.

There’s also what Swan calls the “tick and flick” tax returns system. From 2012 you’ll be able to claim a standard $500 deduction in your tax return, and it will increase to $1000 the following year. It’s a simple – and again, broadly unobjectionable – means by which the government can offer a little hard cash to voters over the coming years.

A side point, but Swan made a bizarre argument that the measure would somehow improve people’s work-life balance. “This means less time with the Tax Pack and more times with loved ones,” Swan said. It was a “key step towards a ‘tick and flick’ system of pre-filled tax returns that will make life easier for working families at tax time,” he added.

Now, how much time do tax returns actually take? Return Strain is hardly one of the key quality-of-life issues facing the country. Perhaps courtesy of the Treasurer every dad in Australia gets time to, say, go out the back yard and saw a plank in half.

It’s no election bribe but still, it’s a promise of extra cash in your pocket in a couple of years’ time.

There are other less agreeable changes likely to start making themselves felt over the coming months. One is a barrage of advertisements and marketing material aimed at selling the government’s health reform plan paid for by a $30m Budget provision. It’s likely to be seized on by the Opposition as blatant electioneering, though it’s not dissimilar to the Howard Government’s campaign to promote Work Choices.

The government’s plan to return the budget to surplus couldn’t be done without savings, and that means dropping some government programs. As you’d expect, he skated over the spending cuts by talking about how the government had “offset all new spending over the forward estimates” and “delivered net savings”.

Many of the spending cuts are about killing off or cutting back projects that weren’t working – like the $1 billion Green Car Innovation Fund, which has now become an $790m program.

Other spending cuts will be noticed in some families’ budgets. After abandoning the construction of 220 childcare centres the government has also decided to cap the child care rebate at $7500 and pause the indexation of the childcare rebate for four years. Translation: not as much money back on child care as some might have been expecting.

The government has also decided to scrap a program that offered payments of between $1500 and $5000 to people starting up a Family Day Care service. The saving will be $14.8 million.

$180 million has also been cut from the program that offers a $500 rebate on installing rainwater tanks in your house. As with the cuts to the green car program and the Family Day Care service the government says a lack of demand prompted the decision, but if you were planning to get that rainwater tank any time soon it might be worth checking to see if the cash will still be available.

The cuts are carefully identified, though, and won’t affect as many as stand to gain from Swan’s showbag of eHealth and tax return treats. The cap on government spending, combined with the global uncertainty surrounding Greece and the latest round of market instability, will also reduce the likelihood that the recent run of punishing interest rate rises will continue unabated.

Combine all this with the previously scheduled tax cut that kicks in from July this year and it all adds up to a low-profile package of sweeteners in the months running into an election. The Budget is not quite as small on politics as Swan would have us believe.

Most commented

27 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Ben Colby says:

      10:38pm | 11/05/10

      In 2008 the world’s economy fell off the cliffs something many forget.
      Some parts of the world are still bankrupt and the outlook v is ery bleak so spare a thought for those people affected.
      It really astounds me about the negativity about Rudd and the budget when he has kept this country in such good shape. 
      Howard pulled the wool over 22 million sets of eyes for nearly 12 years and at the end of it we did not have one single thing to show except the GST and attacks on two countries so I think many should think back .

    • Paul H says:

      04:36am | 12/05/10

      Ben Colby, you conveniantly forgot about the 20 billion surplus left by the Howard Government, which Krudd threw to the wind. It’s not Krudd that has kept this country in good shape, it’s the mining sector and demand from China that kept us afloat. Now Krudd is going to have his super tax on the mining industry and watch that fall apart as the mining companies shelve their forward research projects and take their business off shore. When this happens, watch Swan’s budget disappear into a black hole. If Krudd is not pulling the wool over your eyes, have a little look at all the reports and projects that are due AFTER the election. He knows that if brought on now, more people wouls see him for what he really is and vote against Labor. Did you miss the increase in the fuel levy for ethanol fuel in the budget or the amount of interest rate rises we have had recently? He derided the Howard government for all the interest rate rises during his election campaign but is suddenly silent when it happens on his watch. Talk about dodgy!!!

    • iansand says:

      12:13pm | 12/05/10

      Would that be the same mining sector that gave the country the prosperity that enabled the accumulation of The Surplus?

    • Minh says:

      02:00pm | 12/05/10

      Haha. it took Peter Costello 12 years to repay $96 billion debts from your beloved labor bid spending. It took 2 years for your PM and co to build up $115 billion last year and this year $40 billion plus and years ahead debts to this nation. That’s what your labor shows.

    • Amanda says:

      11:02pm | 11/05/10

      As a musician, a carer of a disabled child and a woman who will be less able to work because of higher costs in childcare I am about the bottom of the rung in this society, according to Rudd and Swan. How hard is it to ride the wave of successful financial management of the Howard/Costello era? This pair are not for the working people of Australia. They’ve made an absolute mess of every decision they’ve made and and should get out of office. They’re idiots!

    • Alex says:

      11:14pm | 11/05/10

      We had nothing to show for it…except a considerable surplus, and no foreign debt. While I am neither pro Liberal or Labour, it is best to know your history before you blame the countries problems all on Howards shoulders…those 12 years of so called wool pulling, was used to pay back the massive debt Australia owed to overseas loans…debts racked up by the previous Labour government.

      The Negativity about Rudd right now has nothing to do with the budget, and everything to do with the fact that everything he promised those of us who voted for him, he has essentially backflipped on. -That- is why we are angry.

    • Mavis says:

      08:03am | 12/05/10

      Yes, slogans and symbols and don’t cut it for me either. “Delivery? .... ha, ha, ha ... You must be kidding.” Pity the voter is too stupid to notice.

    • Jess says:

      12:29pm | 12/05/10

      We are a resource heavy economy and there was a resource boom. A monkey could have written Australia’s fiscal policy for the 15 years and we would have come out ahead. Furthermore, the surplus was partially a result of the economic policies put in place by the Keating government. The Liberal Party doesn’t deserve credit for the surplus any more than Labor deserves credit for preventing recession.

    • Stan o' 16% o' Hume Weir says:

      12:29am | 12/05/10

      to Ben Colby, are you for real? the only thing about 22 was 22 billion not million. 22 billion dollars banked away after fixing up Keetings over spending debit that was well into the billions. And here’s the punch line Krudd and cohorts just left us in 40-100 billion dollars in debit. and they won’t get it into surplus by 2012 - he’s dreamin’

    • NeilM says:

      08:50am | 12/05/10

      To Stano’ 16% o’ Hume Weir
      22 billion banked away and handing out that much in welfare payments to the middle class each year, is not good government.
      Nor is subsidising Private Hospitals through a shonky subsidy to Private Health Funds. Nor is involving us in two wars each of which costs us in excess of 1 billion per year, neither of which has an end date (when talking about cost think how we justify spending 8 billion in Iraq so far for no gain to us at all).
      You might also remember that Howards Recession of the early 80s was handed to Labour to fix up, the 90s recession sure we can blaim on Keating, the 2008 recession is an external impact that Liberals did nothing to guard against (22 billion is less than a fifth of even the oppositions supposed plan for getting through the recession so cant be regarded as effective planning) and it was left to Labour to get us through that.

      As to dreaming about going into surplus by 2012, the opposition are saying they wil get there even earlier, how can they do that without dreaming even more sleepily.

    • JodieS says:

      11:52am | 12/05/10

      HEAR HEAR Neil H - Completely agree with you.

    • Tina says:

      12:41am | 12/05/10

      what does this budget mean for people that are struggling with 2 disabled teenage adults and only gets a carer allowance with a husband that earns 75000 a year and has another child at school….....absolutely nothing!!!!

    • Christian Real says:

      07:20am | 12/05/10

      Tina,
      You appear to be on a better wicket than most people who are struggling.
      My wife gets the carer’s allowance for looking after her father that lives with us, and since I was injured at work in December, and had an operation to repair a snapped tendon,workcover only pays 80% of what I normally earn.
      My wife has had to take care of me also,as well as her father, while I have been recovering from the operation and even though i am only receiving workcover, which is 80% of normal pay,my wife’s carer’s pension still gets means tested,adjusted and cut back on what workcover is paying me.
      We are managing, but we have had to cut back on some things, and if your husband earns $75,000 a year, that is around 2 1/2 years pay for me, when I am working, it appears that you are doing a lot better than us and others, that really knows what it means to ‘struggle’

    • Amanda says:

      11:23am | 12/05/10

      Tina, it appears that Christian is not very intelligent and has formed some sort of “I’m worse-off than you” competition. Perhaps he should keep his comments to the article and not pass judgments on things he knows nothing about! Snapped tendon, Christian, really! The woman has 2 disabled teenagers - for life! Carer allowance is not carer pension, either, mate. $50 a week! You have offended me with your self-righteous whinging. Lye on the lounge and watch TV while you recouperate from your operation and your wife makes you dinner. $75K is nothing when you have 3 kids to raise! You are out of touch and offensive. Go back to watching TV.

    • John A Neve says:

      03:39pm | 12/05/10

      Amanda,
      The average wage in this region is $35K, thats right, I said $35K, maybe that is because we aren’t as “intelligent as you”?

      If a family on $75K plus carers allowance can’t cope!!! What hope is there for those on less?

      I think your trouble Amanda, is you spend too much time in front of the TV.

    • Christian Real says:

      04:11pm | 12/05/10

      Amanda,
              What can I say except that I am possibly more intelligent then you will ever hope to be, please don’t take it personally, but if you are prepared to hurl insults at someone, be prepared to be able to take being insulted back.
              I have certificates and qualifications in Aged care,Disability, and Home and community services, what qualifications do you have?

    • Amanda says:

      12:29am | 13/05/10

      It seems that picking on Tina, and now me, is more appropriate than commenting on the budget or at least the article at hand. FYI, I hold a double degree with an incomplete Masters from UNSW, thank for asking. The correct amount of the average wage in NSW for a person with between 10-19 years of experience, ie, the average parent, is actually $85K, with new workers earning, on average $45K! Most working families with children have two incomes per household, with 1 worker working part-time. The costs of raising a child in NSW is approximately $1M over their time living with their parents which leaves tax payers with children considerably worse off than those without. Now before you start saying that those who have children should be prepared to pay for them, it is the nation of Australia who requires that we go on to reproduce and create fine, upstanding and intelligent, well-educated individuals, preferably graduates, to advance Australia and to pay for all of the pensions when the low income earners, who will not have sufficient superannuation to support themselves, retire! Families on a wage of approx $82K get NO family tax benefit!  A family on that wage also is ineligible for the disabled pension. The costs of caring for a child with a disability is extremely expensive for the average family! And with 2 disabled boys, I can only imagine the strain put on poor Tina. Just to give you a small picture of the reality of raising a disabled child, add to the $1M of the costs of raising children these costs, most of which are ongoing throughout the child’s life as they often never leave their parent’s home: a paediatric wheelchair costs $10K + (non-motorised) to be replaced every 6-8 years; a commode, $2,500; a lifting hoist $3,500; a van that is convertible (that is worthy of conversion), upwards of $40K; conversion of said van, between $10-$15K; ongoing medical supplies, such as nappies, enemas, bed pads, epilepsy medications, they can run into the hundreds per month. When the government closed down the homes for the disabled and shifted care into the home they pocketed the money they saved and shared little with the families who are now caring for them, leaving them with little financial, physical and emotional assistance. We are just about to put an elevator into our house at a personal cost of $45K just so that our child, who is house-bound for much of the year due to the inability of his body to regulate his temperature, can have access to the rest of the house, as he should be entitled to. We were told there was no government assistance to be had. Before you say, “Well they’re your kids”, bear in mind that 1 in 3 people will be disabled at some stage in their life, whether by birth, accident or old age. So instead at pointing your bent fingers at the victims of a negligent government, don’t shoot the messenger but endeavour to understand the issues and be proactive in fighting for a solution for those who have it far worse off than you could possibly imagine. Tina deserves more assistance! PS, I’d love to watch TV. Maybe you can come over and look after my son for a couple of hours while I have a rest. I’ve been ill for about 2 1/2 years now through sheer exhaustion and will probably never get back to the job I’m so highly trained for and which cost me thousands in Uni fees!

    • John A Neve says:

      10:05am | 13/05/10

      Amanda,

      Having read both your and Tina’s posts again, I see little relating to the budget, rather, Tina is whinging.

      As to your latest post, this is not about NSW’s it’s about Australia added to which you are the one who chose to claim a higher intellect!!

      Remember Amanda, “he who throws the first stone”.

    • Concerned says:

      08:56am | 12/05/10

      The Australian media covered the recent Greek debacle where the other European countries (mainly Germany) agreed to a loan of $135 Billion, how exactly are we that different now thanks to Rudd and his party, we too are now 40-100 billion dollars in debt. The mining tax will most likely see an increase in unemployment, companies taking their business off shore to other deposits, this will further affect infrastructure, what are they doing…?
      We are one of the highest cost of living countries in the world and we are certainly well on our way to maintain this for future years thanks to increases in both the Federal and State parliaments. Can someone please break down the state and federal budgets, combined for each state and show the real hurt for all families pertinet for each stae.How they are aligned.
      Please explain!

    • John A Neve says:

      10:10am | 12/05/10

      Concerned,

      Says “how exactly are we that different” to Greece? 
      Truly Concerned if you don’t know or cannot se the difference, rather than post here, do a little study.

      We are “now 40-100 billion dollars in debt”, can’t you be more precise than that? The fact is Australia has one of, if not the lowest debt to GDP ratios in the world.

      Our cost of living will for the forseeable future be high, we want what the big countries have. But we don’t have the population to support it, simple really.

    • persephone says:

      11:55am | 12/05/10

      The Liberal’s alternative stimulus package was $180 billion, so if Labor’s only ‘40-100’ billion in debt, we’re obviously better off than we would have been if the Libs had been in.

    • Ryan says:

      10:17am | 12/05/10

      Lets see if that slaughtered goose lays those golden eggs that Labor is relying on to get them out of this mess they spent us into.

    • Kate says:

      01:55pm | 12/05/10

      OMG! It amazes me how many people want something for nothing! YOU chose to have your children, YOU chose to take out the mortgage that you took out - suck it up and deal with the choices that you have made!! My husband and i have average wages, rent a home and have 2 kids. While we would LOVE to have more kids, the reality is we can’t afford it. I’m happy that we will both get a little extra in our pays after 1 July - its certainly better then paying more out. As for the cost of childcare going up, i dont mind paying the extra if it keeps quality workers in the profession. My youngest child attends a centre that already pays above award wages and also has higher kids to staff ratio - yes its one of the most expensive in the area but it is worth every cent!

    • dsecrets says:

      04:10pm | 12/05/10

      Sure, forget about work choices, or the fact that the current liberal government could possibly bring it all back in, but just under a different name. Lets see, no job stability = possible job loss, there goes your mortgage, there goes your costs of living, and then your standing at the door of centrelink wanting a dole check.

      No-one cared much when Rudd was stimulating us! How many people enjoyed the Christmas bonus???

      I agree with Kate! Suck it up!! I have three kids, rent, and looking to get back into the workforce to make ends meet. So what? Isn’t that what we do?

      And as for the miners…so they should give back. Think of all that land they are digging up, that may never get used again. You can’t put homes in a big, unstable hole in the ground, or stabilise houses that are on top of current mines, or put houses on filled in mines. All that land wasted, a housing crises, and companies that earn billions of dollars every year…..Hmmmmmm

    • Ronk says:

      04:35pm | 12/05/10

      OMG a political leader said that the opposing party had made the country/state a better place than it was the last time his own party was in power! What gentlemen these Poms are. If an Australian politician has ever said anything like that, it must have been even longer ago than the last time an Aussie minister resigned because of mistakes made in his portfolio (instead of the modern Aussie tactic of toughing it out, saying he’s not to blame because he knew nothing, and blaming his subordinates).

    • wondering says:

      12:30am | 13/05/10

      do single mothers recieve any sort of extra bonus this year ?

    • patrina says:

      01:46pm | 21/05/10

      could anyone tell me if the $900 tax bonus for low income earners which was handed out last year available this year or was it a one off thingy

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter