Amid the continuing debate about our national identity and our constitutional arrangements, readers might be interested in this piece written this weekend for English newspaper The Mail on Sunday about our response to Prince William’s visit. It’s obviously written for an English audience, and it ended up being an embarrassingly positive piece where my republicanism almost abandoned me.

Bill Leak's take on our republican ambivalence in The Weekend Australian.

The last thing we need over here in Sydney is another cashed-up foreign interloper buying into the hyper-inflated property market to further jack up prices in the Harbour City.

But Prince Williams’ joking suggestion that he had so fallen in love with Sydney that he intends to buy a house here was not so much condemned as applauded.

A funny thing happened in Australia last week.

A country which is overwhelmingly republican in spirit, where most people presume that the republican question will be revisited on the sorrowful occasion of the Queen’s passing, seems to have put its republicanism on hold.

Credit for this goes solely to William.

Should he make good on his gag and shell out a lazy five million for a harbourside mansion, and show signs of assimilation by investing in a good pair of thongs and an eight-burner barbecue, Australians will be thrilled at the prospect of having the bloke as a neighbour.

But beyond that, Australians seem not only comfortable but almost excited by the idea of having him as our head of state.

This is in part an unfortunate reflection on his father. Charles is regarded here as the epitome of the upper-crust English oddball, a fellow so eccentric and wound-up that he is the antithesis of our laconic, knockabout style. The inevitability of his becoming our head of state leaves us cold.

But Wills has been afforded the highest honour a man can enjoy Down Under. He’s assumed top bloke status.

Amazingly he’s done so in the course of a whirlwind 72-hour visit. It featured none of the cliched nonsense which so often accompanies a royal tour. Mercifully, no koalas were hugged. And instead of the usual phalanx of dutiful flag-waving subjects, we saw a member of the Royal Family who walked not past but among crowds, mixing easily with everyday folk, making interesting and engaging conversation as if he were just another punter.

There were three events in Wills’ visit which were powerful button-pushing exercises. They spoke volumes about his style as a modern monarch. They also showed that William is very much his mother’s son - which more than anything may explain his popularity here.

The first was his decision to visit the Sydney suburb of Redfern, the squalid epicentre of Aboriginal urban deprivation, where black Australians lead a desperate semi-existence in a community ravaged by grog, heroin and speed. The arrival of our future King at the notorious Eveleigh Street meant so much to its residents - to say they were moved and amazed by his presence is an understatement. The rest of the nation noted William’s kindness and compassion in making the gesture.

The second was his visit to the Holsworthy Army Barracks on the outskirts of Sydney. The Prince spoke with soldiers who had returned from and are set to serve in Afghanistan, alongside their British comrades, in the war against the Taliban. It was a poignant reminder of our unbreakable relationship as two of the world’s most decent democracies. And Wills also got in a bit of shooting, earning the respect of the troops who commended him for being such a good shot.

The most powerful moment of his visit came on the third day in Victoria when William spent the morning and afternoon in the towns of Whittlesea and Flowerdale, having a barbecue with the survivors of the Black Saturday bushfire which claimed a staggering 173 lives last February. To this day, emotions are raw in these towns. And William was the absolute model of compassion as he wandered into the bush to talk with the victims of this terrible fire, shaking his head in disbelief as they told their tales, touching a man on the arm and saying quietly “I am so sorry”. When a woman broke down as she recounted the heroism of the volunteers, and then thanked William so much for making the visit, the Prince appeared to be channelling his mother’s heartfelt style as he said simply: “Not at all, it is a privilege to be here.”

Each of these events was poignant. But more interesting was the general vibe surrounding the visit, where in typical Australian style, we’d convinced ourselves ahead of Wills’ arrival that the whole thing was a bit of a non-event, only to end up almost obsessing over his presence here.

Even with some good-natured ribbing about his receding hairline, the women of Australia appear to be just as smitten as they have ever been with the dashing prince. Girls, young mums and grannies swooned in his presence. Even the NSW Premier Kristina Keneally had a giggly moment on welcoming His Highness to Sydney, gushing that he must have had so many fond memories from his last visit here, forgetting the fact that he was eight months old at the time.

The political debate surrounding his visit has been spirited. Republicans have declared that William’s niceness is a non-issue and that the only thing that matters is whether we have an Australian as our head of state. The monarchists have argued that the ease with which William has conducted himself - and the fact that he obviously understands and adores Australia, despite having spent no real time Down Under - shows that there is something innately special about the relationship between Australia and England, and that the Royal Family should forever be a part of that.

But it’s a debate which has really struggled to get beyond the more earnest blog sites and political shows. Most of us - including republicans such as myself - have simply been quite happy to see the top bloke prince having such a top time of it. 

We do a good line in complacency in Australia. As a modern and independent nation which has never stuck with tradition for tradition’s sake, and which abhors class, our constitutional arrangements might be absurd. But that doesn’t mean we are going to rise up and do anything about it, especially if the cricket is on or we have mates coming over for a barbie. There is simply no mainstream clamour to revisit an issue which we dealt with at a bungled referendum just over 10 years ago - and more importantly, even under a republican Labor Prime Minister, no political enthusiasm to place the issue back on the agenda.

And even though we’re not jumping for joy at the prospect of King Charles, we’ve seen enough of his son this past week to conclude that King Will might be a ripper of an idea.

17 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      06:28am | 27/01/10

      I’ve worked it out, I think. Republicans plan to wear us down by the sheer tedium of reading their repetitious whinges over and over and over and over ....

    • Cameron says:

      08:28am | 27/01/10

      Very few people would have a problem with William the bloke. It’s the system that he represents that is the problem!

    • Liz says:

      08:30am | 27/01/10

      A nice youn bloke visits. it doesn’t make ay difference to our becoming a Republic and soon.How is a monarchy relevant in any way to us?

    • Adam Dennis says:

      08:51am | 27/01/10

      Your suggestion that people seemed to “put their republicanism on hold” is clearly untrue. Try searching for articles discussing the republic for all of 2009. Now search for the same thing for 2010. It’s once again at the forefront of people’s minds, put there by the visit of this friendly prince. It’s apparent to me that for the most part this year’s republicanism is more measured, less foaming at the mouth. We’re more thoughtful about how our democratic model affects our country, less throwing stones at that quirky family living in the UK. We have the Prince to thank for that shift, but it doesn’t mean we’ve put our republicanism on hold.

    • D'oh says:

      12:32pm | 27/01/10

      @ Adam Dennis:

      “It’s apparent to me that for the most part this year’s republicanism is more measured, less foaming at the mouth.”

      Have you had the (dis)pleasure of reading Alan Howe’s recent rants published on The Punch??

    • Lenny J says:

      09:50am | 27/01/10

      The monarchy needs to be quietly put away in the history books where it belongs. I have to agree that Will’s visit was just a summer holiday for him as well as a publicity stunt to shore up support from one of the favoured minions again. I would expect that he had very little choice as to what his itinerary was. The royal hangers on are desperate to retain their particular perks of the royal business they derive their living from.

      To fawn all over a young eligible bachelor with loads of dough and nothing else to do is just the tip of the iceberg of celebrity adoraton which the more shallow amongst us seem to enjoy.

      Let’s focus on the real democratic future of Australia and how we become a major respected player in our region so as to do much good in this part of the world. The royal question is then just an irrelevant aside that needs to be ignored. Happily, many Australians are doing just that as we focus on our future and that of the many millions who look to our lead as an important democratic state in Asia.

    • hughie says:

      11:03am | 27/01/10

      I’m still not clear what the need of this republic is for.  No war or revolution = no artificial demarcation line defining our evolution as an independent country.  Substituting the lack of this for a republic seems a bit silly and unnecessary.

      You guys can slam the monarchy all you like, but what’s your alternative?

    • nic says:

      11:11am | 27/01/10

      Ha. Republicans must be gnashing their teeth, ‘why can’t he be bad tempered and ugly’, they say? The truth is the Royals are popular for a host of reasons Republicans can’t fathom. I’m glad that William provides some hope at what represents some stability in a changing world.

    • danj says:

      11:38am | 27/01/10

      I got tired last week of the media trying to suggest if you’re a republican you hate the royals. In my opinion being a republican has nothing to do with how you feel about the monarchy, more to do with what you want Australia to be.
      Personally I’m a republican, but if Prince William came within 50km of my place I would probably go and have a look, and if I met him I would be chuffed. I know a person that wet to school at Geelong Grammar with Prince Charles and said he was a great bloke, but he’s a republican. I think the media should stop trying to make a link that really isn’t there. What link would you draw if Prince Albert of Monaco visited? That we were going to get invaded? And anyway I don’t think they (the royals) would care that much if we ditched them anyway.

    • Undecided says:

      12:14pm | 27/01/10

      Great point danj. The poms all-in-all have been pretty supportive of our development. The Royal family would no doubt be sad to see us go, but would have absolute respect for the decision of the people.

      Personally I am not decided on the republic v monarchy debate, and quite like being attached to Britain in that sporting way, Cricket, Rugby, The Local Pub.

      But following his visit I can identify with this guy a lot more than I can all these dried up corrupt politicians attempting to force climate taxes on me and an who demonstare an unwillingness to stop banks and oil companies ripping the arse end out of my salary. I fear the day one of them has complete unopposed control in this country and unless they lift their game drastically then my vote might rest with the Royal.

    • Eat The Rich says:

      12:00pm | 27/01/10

      David, I’m happy for Wills to be our head of state. All he needs to do is adopt our “mainstream” values and take up citizenship (with corresponding Ozzieness test); and of course he has to live here. Not tooo much too ask. Is it? I would also consider his case exceptional and allow him to queue jump (ONLY AS A ONE OFF!)
      PS any chance of geeting a link to to the Sunday Mail Article? I’m always keen to see what the poms think of us?

    • Lenny J says:

      12:15pm | 27/01/10

      Dear Eric,
      Yes the tedium is wearing thin I have to admit and I agree whole heartedly. Oh, the tedium wasn’t the boring, mindless royal publicity machine (a la Hollywood) that thinks what a ‘royal’ had for breakfast is newsworthy?
      Oh excuse me. I must be on the Australian side of the debate where royalty in any form anywhere is an irrelevance in a modern world. Silly me…..

      By the way, if ‘Royalty’ i.e the British franchise has any respectability or integrity them why is the royal machine getting ready to bypass Charles (violating the Royal code of succession which is apparently God given)?

      He to his eternal credit was one of the few royals who dared to express his own opinions. What a scandal.

      He also has lived a provileged, unearned life but at least he expressed surprise that Australia was not yet a republic as it should have been generations ago.

      I always liked Charles as I think his time in Australia at school taught him the silliness and the odd pomposity of the whole royal thing. He has many qualities that I admire.

      Eric dear old thing, have you thought of emigrating to where the royal thing will last a bit longer? You may be much happier.

    • formersnag says:

      02:12pm | 27/01/10

      The only thing wrong with the monarchy is that we don’t have any here. i for one would enjoy having a real royal as our GG, doing all that stuff that the royals do back in England, out here in oz. it would create plenty of jobs for the paparazzi & sell plenty of women’s magazines.

    • H of SA says:

      03:12pm | 27/01/10

      Here’s my theory on why William has dampened republican sentiment:

      Australians are aware that our head of state is really just a figurehead, and that actual power rest with the PM. The day our head of state tries to exert power (and yes I know the history of Gough and all that but its 2010 now) - we will become a republic.

      So we see our head of state as being good for things like opening new stadiums, drawing attention to charitable causes - being a public voice for compassion ect.

      William is pretty good at that, in fact one of the best- so we are happy to give him the gig.

    • True Blue says:

      06:49pm | 27/01/10

      What hope does William represent?  Despite the opinion polls William will not become King until he is at least 60-assuming Charles shares the longevity of his mother and his grandmother.  Those wanting William to be the next King have no say in the matter and that is precisely the point.  Nothing said or done in Australia can change the fact that barring accidents or unforeseen circumstances Charles will be the next person to assume the English Throne.  We have no say in who our Head of State is until we become a republic.  Then individual popularity might account for something.

    • Lyn says:

      07:06pm | 27/01/10

      Danj-I agree with your comments. Williams visit was good because it brought the issue to the fore. There was plenty of debate and an increase in republican membership. Now if we could just get some politicians to grow a spine and start the debate in earnest with some public education to boot, then it wouldn’t matter how many fawning royal journos visit our shores.

    • Anjuli says:

      11:17am | 03/02/10

      Is it because he is royal or has become a celebrity like his mother before him , I am English who has been here for 37 years but even I think it is time that became a republic . The USA got rid of royalty and it hasn’t done them any harm , they still can’t get enough of them,the sticking block is how do we get the president we deserve .

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

TAbbott to fight PHI rebate cuts on behalf of 2.5 million to pay extra, but won't say what he'd do as PM. http://t.co/lXWpMXXF

Anthony Sharwood

Numerous workplace safety rules (no harness, fall arrest etc) broken in this pic of Roosters coach Brian Smith http://t.co/jx4PgtBs

Anthony Sharwood

Yo, mummy bloggers! Your expert input is required in this doozy of a child-rearing dilemma http://t.co/0JfOnCq1

Daniel Piotrowski

How we're getting ripped off at the ATM http://t.co/Vpu8DuHy

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Would you kill for a job?

Would you kill for a job?

Who would work in an abattoir? Most of us have done jobs we didn’t want to do because we needed…

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Parenting. It’s the new oneupmanship. Ah, how quaint the days now seem when parents could raise…

Hipsters with hip replacements

Hipsters with hip replacements

Someone once told me that when people reach a certain age they begin dressing in the manner they did…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter