UNLESS Malcolm Turnbull is Harry Houdini, he is about to join the likes of John Hewson as another `almost was’ wealthy businessman who promised much but ultimately could not manage the politics.

This man is in a more comfortable position than Malcolm Turnbull

Things could hardly have gone worse for him this week. Just when he had the Government under real pressure over its faltering management of the Oceanic Viking crisis, problems on his own side overwhelmed him. Next week looks harder again.

He must be wondering why he left a perfectly successful career in business for this. He may not be wondering for much longer.

Mr Turnbull’s laser-like focus on the Oceanic Viking issue this week was effective but it also highlighted the depths of the challenge he faces reconciling his more moderate personal views with the conservative core of his party.

The dog whistle was out with a vengeance as Liberals suggested in Parliament that the refugees would compound their queue jumping by also jumping ahead on the public housing waiting list.

Mr Turnbull apparently endorsed this approach but one suspects he did so reluctantly. This kind of projection by leaders is always dangerous. Ultimately, it goes to credibility. As one observer noted this week, ``Turnbull’s problem is that he keeps selling off bits of his soul’‘.

It is not however, a problem he has on emissions trading which has suddenly and spectacularly morphed into a de facto leadership contest. Party sources say Tony Abbott, backed by the powerful leader of the right, Nick Minchin, is now actively re-positioning to take over.

He is aware that if Turnbull falls, the replacement cannot, by definition, be another emissions trading advocate. That rules out Joe Hockey, the only other realistic contender. Mr Abbott now thinks the Government’s scheme should be voted down - a complete reversal from his curiously pragmatic view only months ago when he said Turnbull was right to push it through.

One unaligned party-room source told The Punch it appeared that Nick Minchin had decided some time ago that Malcolm Turnbull must be replaced. Certainly his decision to aggressively advocate defeating the emissions trading scheme bills was a statement.

It was transparently calculated to do maximum harm to the cause of moderates arguing for a deal with the Government. Senator Minchin described the bills as ``an abomination’‘, called for their resounding rejection, and called Kevin Rudd’s pursuit of a scheme ahead of the rest of the world as as a ``vanity’’ that was ``really sickening’‘.

There was little room for misinterpretation from the hard-hitting speech. Nor was there from the fact he was joined by 17 enthusiastic senators as he delivered it.

The Liberal Party is now rent with division and faces its deepest crisis in well over a decade.

For Malcolm Turnbull there is a variety of ways this could go but all are bad in varying degrees. The best option would be for a deal to be reached through his negotiator, Ian Macfarlane with Penny Wong, and for the party-room to support that deal.

Macfarlane has had some success in this endeavour particularly with the removal of agriculture from the scheme. This is still the most likely scenario at present. In the event it goes this way, his supporters will say he has won a foundational battle to modernise the party and now has unrivaled authority.

The truth would probably be something different. As many as a dozen senators could still cross the floor to vote against the bills in direct defiance of the leadership. This would not be done lightly. The ongoing bitterness would likely reverberate until it shakes the leadership apart.

Then there are the abstentions - people too frightened to back their tough talk with a `no’ vote who are caught conveniently in the bathroom when the vote is taken.

The worst case scenario would be that the party-room rejects Mr Turnbull’s recommendation of a negotiated deal. This outcome, which could come as early as Monday or Tuesday, would end his leadership pretty much on the spot if only because of his own previously stated position on the issue.

The severity of this is possibility could lead him to a middle way in which he instructs Mr Macfarlane to strategically fail to reach a negotiated settlement thereby avoiding a party-room humiliation.

Either way, the terrain ahead of Mr Turnbull is treacherous. Optimists say he could yet emerge victorious. They are drawing parallels with the bitter but necessary fights to modernise their respective parties waged by leaders such as Tony Blair, Germany’s Angela Merkel, and even the British Conservative Party leader, David Cameron who looks set to win next year.

But perhaps a more apt comparison is probably with Simon Crean who fought entrenched interests to modernise the ALP and no doubt positioned it well to go forward, but did not survive to reap the benefits.

At this stage, it appears the numbers are probably with Mr Turnbull. Indeed, Mr Macfarlane, who has been keeping a little black book on the numbers, thinks his side has about two thirds of the party-room on-side.

But no-one has seen the deal yet and a party-room revolt and/or a complete breakdown of voting discipline in the Senate cannot be ruled out. Either would end Mr Turnbull’s leadership. It would just be a question of whether it happens quickly or down the track.

Unless of course, he really is Harry Houdini.

18 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • T.Chong says:

      05:02am | 21/11/09

      Yeah!  Bring on Tony"People person” Abbott, that way it will ensure the Coalition will stay in Opposition for atleast another two terms.

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      08:24am | 21/11/09

      My spirits lift at the thought that we have Senators that are prepared to block this abomination, even to the massive detriment of their own parties. Thank goodness the balance is starting to shift. If Turnbull’s the sacrifice then so be it. I urge Rudd to go for a double disillusion so we can bring this back into the public arena for some much needed debate.  He know’s public opinion on this is changing as the costs of his floored emissions trading scheme become apparent. If he can’t rush it through next week he knows it is doomed. Since 1988 several thousand scientists have spent more than US$50 billion looking for evidence of human-caused global warming without coming up with a definitive answer. I read that 41% of Americans now don’t believe in man made climate change and the numbers are gaining momentum daily. This blind faith has been going on for far too long. Many scientist’s are starting to come out of the closet and spill their guts on what is the biggest con ever attempted on the people of this planet. I implore those same Senators to demand the detail on this UN treaty Krudd and Wong are about to sign. 7billion as punishment a year that returns us nothing when we have people who can’t even get to see a dentist or a bed in a hospital. 
      Roll on next week, it will make for some very interesting viewing.

    • Luke says:

      08:31am | 21/11/09

      Abbott, Hockey, Bishop, Bronwyn, Minchin should all be thrown out and replaced with young blood, who want to get behind Turnbull and show respect for their Leader. People who want to change direction for the Libs. Turnbull is more than capable of being a good PM he just needs the right people around him.

    • Daniel says:

      10:38am | 21/11/09

      I feela tiny bit sorry for Turnbull. He only has himself to blame though in relation to all this. He has joined a party that doesn care in the slightest about the environment & has never been interested in protecting Australias ecosystems.On top of that he has the SYdney heat tody to reinforce why we need a proper ETS with proper targets.

    • harry says:

      11:38am | 21/11/09

      Malcolm Turnbull is too focused on the Labor Party and scoring political points. If listened more and talked less he might learn a few things.

    • Don Clark says:

      12:13pm | 21/11/09

      It isn’t a floored scheme - its a cap and trade scheme. *Wink*.

      And only those who’ve not done their homework are sucked in by the wildly over-blown costs/taxes hype.  Support for action now is still well in the majority, despite the frankly incredible, indeed ludicrous, claims of con.

      With their nonsensical statements Senators Minchin and Joyce have between them probably consigned their respective parties to oblivion for the best part of two decades in the first case, perhaps forever in the second. A poor result: either more delay on climate against the clear will of the people, or a neutered, feeble and febrile opposition for years to come. For shame, Senators.

    • Chris says:

      01:09pm | 21/11/09

      If the Liberals had the brains to oppose the ETS without opposing the science of climate change they probably would be having a lot of success now, or at least they wouldn’t constantly be the story.

      As they are now they look like a bunch of fruit cakes. Climate change is not a left wing conspiracy to de-industrialize the world and Nick Minchin should be ashamed of him self for destroying the Liberal party as part of his own personal and out dated cultural war.

    • RT says:

      04:16pm | 21/11/09

      I think Turnbull will get an agreement on the ETS over the line - just. He will then lead the party to the next election defeat in a year, only because to change leaders now would probably cause an even bigger defeat. If the ETS opponents in the Liberal Party succeed in voting the legislation down again, they will have set up a landslide win to Rudd in an election early in 2010.

    • Andrew Goff says:

      07:53pm | 21/11/09

      “I read that 41% of Americans now don’t believe in man made climate change “

      Well then that settles that debate. *rolls eyes*

    • Anne Ragan says:

      07:03am | 22/11/09

      For Australia’s sake Libs. GET BEHIND TURNBULL!  He’s the best thing to happen to this country,and nobody is helping him. Stop the in fighting and get on with it. Kevin is on a crusade to turn us over to the Indonesions. He won’t care. The way he looks now he’ll be lucky to see retirement.Let’s get on with it please!!!!!!!!!!

    • BPobjie says:

      10:06am | 22/11/09

      “Kevin is on a crusade to turn us over to the Indonesions.”

      Your material’s strong, Anne - try working on your delivery if you want the really big belly laughs that the above deserves.

    • Gisselle says:

      02:28pm | 22/11/09

      After another term of Rudd I’m sure Turnbull is going to be looking alot more of a contender for Prime Minister. He just needs to get rid of a few of the idiots around him and reoganise his front bench, bring in some new fresh faces and ideas. Turnbulls got the goods, just 1 more term as Opposition Leader will give him the experience he needs, and I think he would be terrific PM.

    • harry g says:

      03:21pm | 22/11/09

      Andrew Goff. 50% of Americans don’t know where Australia is.

    • John of Perth says:

      03:52pm | 22/11/09

      Poor Malcolm, he is finished long ago and only he is the only one that doesnt know it.
      Even Jesus would not be able to unite this bunch of lunatics.
      Malcolm leave those buffoons before you have a stroke or end up in mental hospital.
      We need new leader , new party members, new ideas.
      The times of Howard long gone,and it is time to clean the room and house from mould and decay.
      I don’t think your are the cleaner Malcolm.

    • Bruce says:

      04:40pm | 22/11/09

      Biggest problem for Malcolm Turnbull is the media. They just have not got tied of the Labor Party yet. Rudd to win the next election, no matter who the leader of the opposition is. The media will make sure of it. Mark Latham can tell you what that is like.

    • Andrew Goff says:

      06:23pm | 22/11/09

      @Harry G

      Well I’d say that makes Australia 9% more likely than climate change.

    • Cameron says:

      12:13am | 23/11/09

      Kevin Rudd must sleep soundly at night, irrespective of which country he’s in.
      If a credible opposition could provide a real alternative to policy, if a credible opposition could offer a viable alternative to the Government full stop, then we might find Rudd at home more, we might find robust debate in the parliament not point scoring crap that every voter pays for both ideologically and in dollars, and we might find a political system capable of pumping out real policy on a raft of issues, not just debating climate change. Alas, we’re not experiencing this situation. It’s hard to vote for the only alternative at the moment when their own house is completely out of order. We know there are guys in the Liberal Party who are working harder and longer on internal party issues than they are on working at providing alternative policy for the people of Australia. How can you vote for them ? End result of course is that Rudd’s ego grows ever larger, Labor becomes increasingly arrogant and the administration and future prospects of this country aren’t maximised to its full potential. Both sides of politics need to LIFT. The next Liberal PM probably isn’t even sitting in Parliament right now…and let’s hope so.

    • ROFL says:

      07:56am | 24/11/09

      Jeeze Louise!  All the media’s fault, eh Bruce. Sure it is, son. Sure it is.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

RT @antsharwood: Meanwhile, a case from the glass half full files. Andrew Bolt has attacked me in a much nicer way than usual today http://t.co/mQqX6rOc

Anthony Sharwood

Meanwhile, a case from the glass half full files. Andrew Bolt has attacked me in a much nicer way than usual today http://t.co/mQqX6rOc

Anthony Sharwood

Trust you've all read Greens senator @larissawaters excellent yarn about the threats to the Reef on The Punch today http://t.co/i6aatFIO

Daniel Piotrowski

.@GQMagazine profile of Justin Bieber. Really well written. WARNING: It's about Justin Bieber. http://t.co/NELebjMB

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Reports of Ron Paul’s death are greatly exaggerated

Reports of Ron Paul’s death are greatly exaggerated

Reports of Ron Paul’s political demise have been greatly exaggerated and his tactical genius is…

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not…

Our Budget blade didn’t cut aid, it’s being paid in spades

Our Budget blade didn’t cut aid, it’s being paid in spades

Ten million children vaccinated. 2.5 million people with access to safe drinking water. And 30 million…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Real women like men who drink beer

Real women like men who drink beer

British comedian John Cleese calls them “beer fairies”.  It’s a euphemism for… Read more

198 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter