The Defence Department posted this image from Afghanistan on its website on Tuesday. As you can see, the faces of the Australian soldiers were obscured.

The ADF's farcical airbrushing of Diggers, and ours of Afghans.

For security reasons, we have decided to also obscure the faces of the Afghans in the photo.

The Defence Department released this photo along with a media release, which explained the men pictured were village elders and religious leaders of Chenartu, north-east of Tarin Kowt. The photo shows the Afghans laughing and getting on well with members of Australia’s Special Operations Task Group as they engage with Afghan communities across Oruzgan province.

What would happen if the Taliban saw this photo? How would they regard these villagers? As traitors? Would they execute them? Have they already done so?

This media release once again highlights the wholly farcical nature of the Defence Department acting on the media’s behalf as supposed reporters in Afghanistan.

In detailing the great success of the combined Afghan-Australian hearts-and-minds operation, they quote the commanding officer of the SOTG. But his name “cannot be disclosed for security reasons”.

The commanding officer’s comments are utterly worthless. No half-respectable media organisation could, or would, re-report what he has said. If an independent reporter had actually been present when the CO spoke, it may have been acceptable to protect the commander’s identity and still relate his comments.

But for all we know, what he said might have been written in Canberra.

A Defence media release from January 22 talked of a “bright future” for the Oruzgan province after Australian and Afghan soldiers had worked together on uncovering weapons caches.

The release stated: “More than 30 weapons caches have been found since the operation began on 1 January 2010.”

That’s a lot of caches. And good work, too, in uncovering them. But rather than pointing to a bright future, it only confirms the place is riddled with weapons with and people who want to kill members of the foreign and national armies.

The release named and quoted an Afghan National Army 4th Brigade private who spoke of how good he felt when uncovering stores of weapons.

Defence never puts names to Australian privates. That’s off-limits.

Once again, Defence is exposing others while protecting its own. Moreover, it is wasting its time and energy with such media releases. No one uses them.

Australian media representatives need to be permanently stationed in Afghanistan. Call it “embedded”, if you will, but the Defence Department’s cynical arm’s-length media management in Afghanistan is a proven failure.

What would a news crew, whether television or print, have done if it was invited along to that riverside meeting of Australians and village elders? There’s no question – we would have run photos of both the locals and the Australians.

Publication might have put the Afghans at some risk, but it would be seen for what it was – a meeting between troops and locals.

That gives the Afghans in the images more room to move than branding them, under the official Defence Department logo, as cooperative stooges. 

Have a look at this awful staged shot, below, reportedly taken by Defence on December 19, and also posted on their website this week. The caption reads: “Over there! A SOTG soldier invites a local villager to a medical clinic.”

Yep that's it mate, just down there on your left.

I don’t think this Afghan man is any danger. It looks more like a lost soldier asking for directions back to camp.

Most commented

18 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • T.Chong says:

      05:13am | 12/02/10

      This is what happens when jornalists are proudly embedded.
      GW and his “with us , or against us” attitude was proudly taken up by Fox News etc, and the rest of the worlds media ( via multi national media moguls) has set the tone, and now others follow.
      Embedding is not to protect the journalists, it is to protect the militaries image.
      Some people just cant accept that we are an invasion, now an occupying force. We are no more loved than any occupiers have ever been. It is pure BS that “our” troops are some how seen as saviors.
      It is a myth.

    • JJJ says:

      06:16am | 12/02/10

      Oh Paul, you might want to do some research before shooting off at the mouth (or keyboard). Australian troops are required to get permission from locals to take their photos (because we are culturally aware and considerate, considering we are at war), so Afghani people in the pictures have given their consent for them to be released.

      Even if, perchance, this permission was NOT given, I find it unlikely that a.) local Afghani people would be able to access photos released in Australia (they don’t have the internet in every home, let alone electricity most of the time!) and b.) if locals met with foreign troops, the taliban probably already know. ... so who are you suggesting they need ‘protection’ from?

      Taking an elitist view on human rights to try to come across as ‘the good guy’ is nice and in theory, I agree that all humans should be given the same consideration… but if you have not been to Afghanistan, you don’t really have much of a clue about the situation. I would be very surprised if you have, since it’s fairly obvious you don’t understand the workings of our military.

      Given also that a Sheikh Haron (living in Australia) has been sending hurtful hate-mail to the families of Australian troops who have been killed at war (therefore, having had their names released), protecting OUR OWN troops is clearly a necessity and priority.

    • John A Neve says:

      06:19am | 12/02/10

      Any in depth comment of Afganistan would be as facical as the conflict it’s
      self. No one in their right mind believes we should be there. Like Iraq we will harm more people than we will help.

      This is a politician’s war, not a people’s war and it’s the people who will suffer.

    • Eric says:

      06:44am | 12/02/10

      How interesting. Your view of the value of military press releases exactly parallels my view of the value of journalism.

      Let the ADF do their job. They don’t need to be hobbled by the inclusion of military-hating scandal mongers to hamper everything they do.

    • Nigel says:

      07:00am | 12/02/10

      So what you’re saying is that the Australian Defence Force, using taxpayers money, should pay for you to go to Afghanistan, live there and provide security for you so you can embarrass them by sensationalising stories.  That sounds fair.
      When media outlets pay their own way they can report however they choose and until then they can put up with the information that the Defence Department is gathering on their behalf.  It’s not the prime reason the ADF is there and filing newsworthy reports will only ever be an inconvenient sideline for the ADF which rightfully seeks to highlight the great work its people are doing.
      Methinks you protest too much.

    • Bill says:

      07:58am | 12/02/10

      Nigel,

      If Rupert can’t have a paid site, then he must tighten the belt elsewhere.  More and more journalists will ‘beg’ for money to keep their careers alive and you can bet that those who toe the government line in their articles, will be funded by the government to go.

      So journalism is becoming more and more like prostitution, if you want the service, you have to pay for it.

    • Barry says:

      08:17am | 12/02/10

      Anyone who believes anything that comes out of police or defence media units has rocks in their heads. I know- i used to work in one!

    • persephone says:

      09:15am | 12/02/10

      What? It would be OK if you were over there to take photos of the locals and use them, but it’s not OK for the ADF to do the same?

      Sounds like sour grapes to me.

    • Jamers Hunter says:

      09:15am | 12/02/10

      dont you love the photograph?
      whos that in the photograph
      Hmmm not sure if thats an aussie digger but the person in the blanket is Osama Bin Liner

    • Jason says:

      09:20am | 12/02/10

      When Australia is eventually invaded (it will be), I hope we can look upon the invading forces with their guns and bombs as friends.  Somehow I doubt it.

    • James says:

      02:20pm | 12/02/10

      You seem pretty certain there Jason.  Care to elaborate on who is going to invade, and when.  Oh, and a why wouldn’t go astray.  While your at it, perhaps a how would be in order.  But in order to work out the how, we must also know where this invasion will begin.  So, in support of your assertion that we will be invaded, all you need to provide is the who, when, why, where, and how.  Apart from that, great post!

    • Dingo_aus says:

      09:33am | 12/02/10

      Surely journalists can go to Afgahanistan and compete with the output of the ADF media reports?  The dodging of bullets and kidnappers is part of the story of reporting from that location. It isn’t the ADF stopping you.

      If journalists can’t even report Climategate when it lands in their laps (inboxes) why should we suspect something other than poor journalism is to blame for stopping “logical” reports from Afgahnistan?

    • Zeta says:

      09:47am | 12/02/10

      “By the etiquette of war, it is permitted to none below the rank of newspaper correspondent to dictate to the general in the field” Oh man what a great start to the day. I never get to quote Mark Twain.

      (“The incompetent leading the unwilling to do the unnecessary” - Evan Wright, Rolling Stone war scribe and author of Generation Kill. Applies to both armies and newspapers in equal measure.)

    • SteveB says:

      11:40am | 12/02/10

      “That’s a lot of caches. And good work, too, in uncovering them. But rather than pointing to a bright future, it only confirms the place is riddled with weapons with and people who want to kill members of the foreign and national armies.”

      The same principle is used by Law Enforcement and Government in their war on drugs, if seizures go up, it means they must be winning the war, if seizures go down, it means they must be winning the war.

      The saddest part is that in the main, media organisations will unquestioningly regurgitate the press releases they are handed, because when it really comes down to it, news is just another product to be sold, news corporations are there to make money and the less you have to pay to get it (IE someone else produces it for them) the more likely it will be sold as is.

    • Sad part of it all says:

      04:42pm | 12/02/10

      Exactly.  The power of the media.  The owners the controllers, the humble seagull scavenging and fighting for his meal ticket to gain about of notoriety and a couple of dollars,  pity isn’t it.

    • AdamC says:

      12:01pm | 12/02/10

      I agree with JJJ and Dingo_aus on this.

      The fact is, Paul Toohey, if you ‘embedded’ yourself with Aussie troops in Oruzgan (sp), took some happy snaps and sent copy back to Australia about said soldiers hearts and minds campaign, there would be some other hack on the Punch writing about what a disgrace you are.

      Journos don’t like military spin. Which is odd, because they don’t seem to mind being tawdry ‘churnalists’ re-writing press releases and quoting talking-heads when it comes to just about everything else.

    • stephen says:

      01:58pm | 12/02/10

      Reality and truth are distinct.
      Mums and Dads aren’t ready for the former ; the latter will do.
      (And are they not getting it Paul ?)

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JoshuaWithers: Have you seen the Australian version of Breaking bad? He get's cancer and Medicare covers his costs and the series ends.

Paul Colgan

How the totally awesome weather in Australia recently is hurting retailers http://t.co/4dvDwDlNZG

Paul Colgan

Hell, your name is Excel and Powerpoint.

Anthony Sharwood

Great fun yarn by @the_mattyoung and @DebKillalea. What the hell annoys you about the evening commute? http://t.co/Eyi82lHiBQ

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter