Three weeks ago, in a bitter and premature rant, The Punch ran a story entitled The Suns’ Humiliation is Demetriou’s Humiliation.

Hooray, we're better than Port Adelaide. Now to beat a real team…

The basic premise of the piece was that this hapless bunch of newbies, whose jumpers look like hot dog franks dipped in mustard, would not win a game until Christmas. As in, Christmas 2017. Not only were they an embarrassment to themselves, we argued, but a dagger in the heart of AFL supremo Andrew Demetriou’s expansionist dreams.

How very short-sighted of us. In light of the Suns’ remarkable win over Port Adelaide on the weekend, it is time to man up and admit we were wrong. To be even more accurate, I was wrong. About the Gold Coast. But not about expansion

Let’s relive the Suns’ incredible comeback. Down by more than 40 points late in the third term, the Suns rallied, with star recruit Gary Ablett leading the way, to overhaul the Power on their home turf in Adelaide.

Ablett was not alone. He was ably assisted by a bunch of kids who had only learned AFL over the summer, including improving league recruit Karmichael Hunt, and the latest product of the blueblood Matera footballing clan, 18 year old Brandon Matera, whose name appears to be a product of his parents’ Beverley Hills 90210 obsession.

The Suns were also assisted by Port key forward Justin Westhoff, who sprayed a shot after the siren that would have stolen the game for his team the game. Oh, the agony.

This match has given Demetriou some much-needed breathing room. As stated in the piece three weeks ago, the AFL boss is very good at accepting the backslaps for his initiatives, many of which have been worthy of praise.

But he is equally good at vanishing when things take a nasty turn. He was nowhere to be seen when all the St Kilda and Ricky Nixon stuff blew up over summer, and was equally invisible after the Suns’ first three woeful losses, by a combined 280 points.

Expect to see him strutting around Melbourne this week, now his mission to conquer the outlying universe with AFL is back on track. The thing is, it’s not. If events of the weekend have proven anything, it’s that the AFL’s expansion is on dodgier footing than ever.

How dodgy? Well now, the most recent club to join the competition before the Gold Coast Suns was a mob called the Port Adelaide Power in 1997. That’d be the same team the Suns beat on Saturday.

Since inception, Port has been a rabble. Never mind the fluky 2004 premiership over a rapidly fading Brisbane Lions, in a season when the Swans and Eagles hadn’t yet fully matured as premiership powerhouses. Talk about good timing. You and I and a couple of mates would have won that game if we’d bothered to strap on a pair of football boots.

Port has the worst fans in the league, and the fewest. This year, as almost every year, they have generated crowd figures that might even shame the NRL. Yes, they really are that bad. Of the teams in the traditional “AFL states”, their crowds are easily the lowest.

This is a team whose official colours are black, white, silver and teal. Silver and teal? Silver and frikken teal??? No self respecting man I know has the faintest idea what teal even is. And if he does, I don’t know him anymore.

The Power also have chicken salt signage at their home games. Chicken salt. That’s just low.

More often than not, Port seem to beat local rivals the Adelaide Crows in a matched billed as “the showdown”, presumably because most Port fans are the sort of people who have a deep affinity with firearms.

The Crows aside, every other team dreams of playing Port, even on their bad days. Just ask Geelong, who dished out a 119 point hiding in the lopsided 2007 grand final. Did I say lopsided? The MCG almost tipped into the Yarra.

That 119 point margin rings a bell. Ah yes, that’s right. It’s the same margin by which the Suns lost their first ever game, to Carlton. Ask yourself: would you rather lose a grand final by that much or your first ever game? I know what my answer is.

So while the suits on AFL mahogany row think they can breathe easy now the Suns have arrived as a legitimate AFL entity, the expansionist dream remains in tatters. They won’t have achieved anything until they’ve brought the game of Australian Rules Football to a lonely outpost called Alberton.

57 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      05:37am | 26/04/11

      Football must serve some purpose?

    • sir ronald bradnam says:

      05:51am | 26/04/11

      So let me get this right if they lose they are a failed experiment, a rabble, an impossible dream of a delusioned Demetriou and if they win then they are in even bigger failure.
      Definitely an article by a one eyed Melburnian, were you overlooked for selection or bullied by Demetiou as a kid because you sound like a bitter ranter.

    • S.L says:

      06:37am | 26/04/11

      The AFL heirachy have the same limited views as the NRL. Now I’m sure most AFL followers here would prefer to see another team in Tassie or Bendigo, Ballarat or even Sale then to venture into territory foreign to the code.
      Western Sydney will be a big hole the AFL will be pouring $100 notes into with little return and remember the current Gold Coast league franchise, the Titans is the third bite of the cherry to establish a league team in their “heartland”.
      The Suns are a novelty. They will never be anymore than that…......

    • Gareth says:

      06:43am | 26/04/11

      Tatters? What a load of BS this piece is. Typical attitude of a NSW/NRL based ‘expert’. Sure the Gold Coast are going to cop some losses, they are mostly young kids, but it’s all part of the developmental process. I expect the GC to do alright eventually, they should have plenty of support, god knows there are enough Victorians up there.

      As for Port yes there probably are some issues there but other than that I would say the expansion has worked out pretty well. It certainly not in tatters. The game has never been richer or more popular. Look at the TV rights deal due to be signed any day rumored to be worth $1billion. Look at 90K at the G yesterday for a home and away game. The crows and the Eagles sell out all there home games in Adelaide and Perth every time. Tatters? Don’t even get me started on NRL. Oh and how is the economy going inNSW?

    • stevie p says:

      07:36am | 26/04/11

      I agree with everything you say about Port Adelaide. They also have the ugliest looking supporters in the country. When the match camera picks them up following a “poor decision” they resemble something like inner earth creatures or extras from the ‘village of the damned’.

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      08:19am | 26/04/11

      Stevie P, you have saved the morning by taking this story in the spirit it was intended, which was basically to bag Port Adelaide, which is good fun. Come and collect your massive easter hamper from The Punch office

    • Faybian says:

      09:32am | 26/04/11

      So we’re picking on Port’s supporters now, rather than Collingwoods? What a load of crap.

    • Bilby says:

      10:56am | 26/04/11

      Bloody oath Faybian. Who made that decision?  We all know about ‘pies supporters. I heard if you play their club song backwards it contains satanic messages!

    • Ras Putin says:

      02:32pm | 26/04/11

      Stevie—you obviously have not seen any collingwood supporters—they are the most disgusting in any sport!!

    • Gareth says:

      04:05pm | 26/04/11

      Oooh that’s why this story was factually incorrect….... because it was comedy.

    • Charles says:

      12:15pm | 27/04/11

      I’d go one further and put all SA footy fans in the same box, the crows ones are just luckier their composite team managed to win a few.  Crows supporters are either young thugs urinating off the stands or elderly women armed with knitting needles and a spin tingling chant of “GO CROWS - “claps hands” GO CROWS”.. and so on.  It must eb the water.

    • Davo from St Kilda says:

      08:27am | 26/04/11

      What is it with Anthony Sharwood and his constant obsession with putting our national code down? Jealousy of our success? Embarrassment by the fact that the NRL will NEVER be able to compete with the AFL?

      To say that Andrew Demetriou was ‘invisible after the Suns’ first three woeful losses, by a combined 280 points’ is mind-blowingly ignorant drivel. Demetriou runs the AFL, not the Suns. It’s not his job to comment on the success or otherwise of individual clubs on a week-by-week basis. Never has been and never will be.

      When he says that Port Adelaide have been a ‘rabble’ since their inception in 1997 also makes me roll all over the floor laughing my a—- off. Port won the flag in only their eighth season (and made the GF again only three years later), and last year had 30,000 paid up members, more than double that of the most supported NRL club. Hardly a rabble, Anthony…

      Sharwood then goes on to ridicule the Power’s guernsey colours. I’d provide a counter-example using an NRL club, but, like the majority of Australia’s football fans, I don’t know what any of their jumpers look like (except the Storm, which has Victoria’s famous Navy Blue and Big V!).

      Still, let Sharwood bag the AFL as much as he likes. The facts are that the Brisbane Lions (Bears) averaged 11,000 per game in their first season in 1987, yet now attract 29,000 every home and away game they play nationwide, compared to the Brisbane Broncos who average 26,000. Looks like that expansion into foreign, hostile rugby league territory has been successful. Look out western Sydney - you’re next.

    • richo says:

      11:54am | 26/04/11

      Our national code, that for most of it’s life was known as the VFL (here’s a clue the V doesn’t stand for Australia). Australia doesn’t have a national football code. In the 2 most populist states Rugby League rules the roost, in the others it’s Aussie Rules, either way no one can claim to be the national code. Most Swans and Lions fans are just ex-Victorians. Cricket is the closest thing we have to a truly national sport.

      I don’t buy the argument that Aussie Rules was invented in Australia either. The AFL’s own historian said it has no links to Mangrook and that the inventor of the game spent a few years at the Rugby school in England, where he no doubt would have witnessed Gaelic football, rugby League and Union as well as Association football. Aussie rules is just an amalgamation of all those sports already invented, hardly anything new. The only difference is it’s played on a cricket oval, rather than rectangular field, and has four posts.

      Aussie Rule’s roots lie very much in England. It’s a little bit like saying VB or XXXX is an Aussie invention, no beer had already been invented, this is just a different take on it.

    • Dave-o says:

      12:11pm | 26/04/11

      @Richo, The NSWRL begot the ARL and the ARL begot the NRL. Just 10 years later than the VFL.

      Wills only codified, the game it had history dating before that. Some people put emphasis on this fact because it pre-dates every other “football” code in the world.

    • Levi says:

      12:47pm | 26/04/11

      Here we go again. Nah Davo, you’re right. The fact that we can play an ANZAC day test where the “A” plays the “NZ” (you know, something international) clearly makes us inferior. Now enjoy your little victorian game and leave the rest of us to enjoy a real sport.

      Cheers

    • Dave-o says:

      12:55pm | 26/04/11

      @Levi

      And Rugby League is just as popular in NZ as AFL is in Newcastle.

    • richo says:

      01:40pm | 26/04/11

      That’s exactly my point Dave-o. Rugby League was and is a NSW and QLD game so it can’t lay claim to being a national game. The AFL has the same problem in that it was the Victorian Football League for the majority of its history, so I would argue that it can’t lay claim to being our national game.

      Which begs the question, What is our national game? I would say cricket as you can get together with people from all around OZ and they all pretty much know the rules of cricket. If you were to suggest a game of Rugby League to a Victorian they wouldn’t know where to begin, much the same as if you were to ask a New South Welshman for a game of Aussie rules, chances are he wouldn’t know the rules.

      Soccer is a game where most know the basic rules, but with Aussie’s not wanting to adopt it, it can’t lay claim to being our national game. People only know what Rugby Union is if they went to private school. Basketball is a Yank game. So once again I would suggest our only national game is cricket, even though I’m not a huge cricket fan.

      Another interesting thing is that in ancient China they used to kick skulls around and play a game very similar to modern day soccer, and from the information I can find it seems to out date Marngrook. So can the Chinese lay claim to having invented the first football code?

      Also the Aboriginal Australian’s played a game called Woggabaliri which is very much like soccer as well. So maybe the Aboriginals could lay claim to having invented soccer, if they can prove they did it before the Chinese.

      I think we need to invent an all new game, that is played in every state all around Australia. That way we will have our own game that is truly national.

    • G says:

      03:51pm | 26/04/11

      Two most populist states? Mmm, you might just want to check that

    • Levi says:

      06:32pm | 26/04/11

      Like it or not Davo, and whichever way you look at it, more people would rather play with a Steeden than a Sherrin. Get over it. Victoria loses.

    • Dave-o says:

      09:48am | 27/04/11

      @Levi

      A true believer rears his head.

      “More people would rather play with a Steeden than a Sherrin”

      Let me guess, you based this unquestionable fact on your own observations. You and all your mates like League so it must be the most popular right? Your local newspaper dedicates 40% of its content to Todd Carney’s drinking habits so it must be more popular. I’d bet my bottom dollar more Sherrin’s are sold each year than Steeden’s

      Wake up champ, AFL and Australian footy has marginally more followers. Why do League fans get so upset that they play second fiddle.

      I’m actually rather upset a SANFL or at least a WAFL troll hasn’t rolled into here to regal you with stories of the glory days. Just like most of NSW you stauncly believe League is your game and Aussie Rules is their (Victorians) game. Truth is your both just as ugly as each other when it comes to the sad ongoing parochial battle that has been waged.

    • TT says:

      08:41am | 26/04/11

      Anthony, it sounds like those grapes taste sour -  really, really sour.  Back-peddle as much as you want and try to put another spin on it but you were sadly wrong in your first article and even more off the mark on this one.  You lack a foresight and a vision for the future of the game but you did make me laugh with this silly piece of writing in particular when you wrote:

      “You and I and a couple of mates would have won that game if we’d bothered to strap on a pair of football boots.” 

      Perhaps Andrew D should come and ask for your advice before making decisions since you are such an expert football strategist and imaginary grand final winning player!

    • N.S. Welshman says:

      08:52am | 26/04/11

      You wish Andy! Its way too early to make any judgement about the Suns. Look how the local dive ball competition is struggling.

    • MarK says:

      08:58am | 26/04/11

      I actually watched the game from half time and had a ball. Great game for the drama and Hunt was actually OK.

    • stephen says:

      09:01am | 26/04/11

      Teal is like bone….the colour, that is, (remember the 70 s ?)
      (All valiants had embossed teal insignias on the glovebox.)

      But Port aren’t all that bad. Didn’t they play the Crows 2 weeks ago ?
      They were very good in reflexive actions under pressure, especially at the posts. And everyone’s ugly in Adelaide.
      I think their expansion west is a mistake. Why not in Tassie ? They could have brought a bit of focus to the southern teams west of the Murray.
      TV rights would have been enormous.
      And the Crows jerseys look like tim-tams.

    • GC Dude says:

      09:31am | 26/04/11

      Anthony…...your attempt to illicit a strong response from your readers works yet again. Still, I bet you lie awake at night dreaming of writing something of substance that doesn’t rely on the tactic of baiting. Perhaps you should take up fishing, you seem a natural…...

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      10:05am | 26/04/11

      Hey GC dude, I’ve been working most of the holiday weekend. This is as close to fishing as I’ll get. By the way, I am seriously thinking of becoming a Suns fans. Contrary to what people like Davo from St Kilda might assume, I watch heaps of AFL and enjoy it. But I’ve never had a team. Reckon the Suns might be the ones

    • Stuart says:

      11:33am | 26/04/11

      Anthony, while I don’t doubt you actually enjoy the game it’s probably only begrudginly. The fact is on several occassions now you’ve written baseless anti AFL baiting articles with absurd conclusions and you expect us to believe that you’re actually a fan of the AFL? Sure you are, and I’ve got a bridge for sale.

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      12:06pm | 26/04/11

      I’m interested Stuart. Arch or suspension? Hey, and it wouldn’t be red by any chance would it?

    • Stuart says:

      12:38pm | 26/04/11

      I see now, you’re actually an AFL fan pretending to hate the AFL, positing all sorts of fatuous argument in an attempt to make all those league tools look even more stupid and anemic than they already are. Good work.

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      12:52pm | 26/04/11

      Yeah yeah yeah, I’m a faker, whatever. But this bridge. How much is it? And can I come around and pick it up?

    • Stuart says:

      08:41pm | 26/04/11

      Was it a slow day for you Anthony? Sorry, I couldn’t possibly trust such a valuable piece of engineering to an avowed fraud.

    • DOOOOOooOooOoooooomed says:

      09:42am | 26/04/11

      Poor Anthony. I see him now, pouring over the statistics, desperately seeking a chink in the AFL armour. Ignoring context, halving or doubling numbers because it rained, or it didn’t rain or some such thing. Having found one little irrelevant item of information he runs screaming into the street, “Eureka! Proof the AFL is doomed!”

    • Gus says:

      07:18pm | 26/04/11

      Also, if you can’t find a chink in the armor you can always fabricate one:

      “This year, as almost every year, they have generated crowd figures that might even shame the NRL. Yes, they really are that bad.”

      Ummm…for each of the past four seasons (possibly longer, I stopped checking after four seasons) Port Adelaide has had crowd averages which were higher than fifteen of the sixteen NRL teams.  Fifteen of the sixteen.

      2010 Port Adelaide average: 23,044
      2010 NRL average: 18,533
      (Only a single NRL team – Brisbane – had a higher crowd average than Port Adelaide)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Australian_football_code_crowds

      2009 Port Adelaide average: 24,443
      2009 NRL average: 17,831
      (Only a single NRL team – Brisbane – had a higher crowd average than Port Adelaide)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Australian_football_code_crowds

      2008 Port Adelaide average: 22,126
      2008 NRL average: 18,440
      (Only a single NRL team – Brisbane – had a higher crowd average than Port Adelaide)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Australian_football_code_crowds

      2007 Port Adelaide average: 27,870
      2007 NRL average: 17,313
      (Only a single NRL team – Brisbane – had a higher crowd average than Port Adelaide)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Australian_football_code_crowds


      I see now why the author wrote that Port’s crowd numbers “might” even shame the NRL.  You know, in an alternate universe where it’s bad to have a crowd average which is better than 93 percent of your competition

      God, no wonder NRL fans think AFL is a Victorian-only sport – so would I if I relied on articles like this.

    • 4leaf says:

      11:33am | 26/04/11

      Anthony, I love bagging Port (Swans fan living in Adelaide) and don’t particularly like Demetriou, but this column is just plain dumb.  Bringing aussie rules to Alberton?  Have you not been to an SANFL game (Alberton being the home of the most successful aussie rules side in the SA State League’s history)?  And pretending that Port fluked a premiership in 2004, when Mark Williams’ side was minor premiers in 2002 and 2003, won the flag in 2004 and before the 2007 GF disaster, they had to win all those finals games to make the big one!  Your premature column on the Suns a few weeks ago was a symptom of a wider media problem - trying to draw conclusions about everything from the tiniest thing.  So one Gold Coast loss ended in a prediction that the AFL expansion was a disaster and one bad newspoll leads to your profession predicting the downfall of the political parties as we know them.  But then I guess we, the consumers, are to blame.  You guys have to find something to entertain us with 24/7!

    • Mitch says:

      02:28pm | 26/04/11

      Agreed, Anthony’s article so to speak attacks the man and not the ball.  Port dominated much of the early 00’s despite constant falling apart come finals time, and thoroughly deserved their 2004 flag.  2007 was a weak year, with Port and Collingwood the only teams to challenge Geelong at all once they started dominating.  In hindsight their PF against North that year was basically a competition to see which team loses by 100+ points to the Cats in the GF, which Port managed to *win*.

      The Suns are a completely different creature to Port.  They’ll be swimming in AFL funded for decades to come, while Port were granted a license and given no assistance.  GC and GWS are projects that’ll take decades to succeed, much better to compare them to the Swans and Lions, both of whom are only now starting to resemble something remotely related to profitability and a stable fan base (with the added bonus of almost 10,000 old South Melbourne and Fitzroy members respectively no less).

    • Roja says:

      03:59pm | 27/04/11

      As a Collingwood supporter in Adelaide, I love the Power.  I used to cop it from everyone, but now with the Crows V Power divide people are too busy too give me crap - with the exception of Eddie.  Of course not one of those people can name me 5 other AFL presidents and usually shut up after that point is made.

      As for the 2007 GF, the real GF happened a week earlier when the Cats beat the Pies by 5 points in a cracker of a game.  I happened across a Power fan immediately after that game that drunkenly assured me with all 3 of his teeth that “the pies are shit” and “the power will smash the cats by 100 points”.  I cheered each and every one of the Cats 119 points the following week. 

      So to me what the Suns did on Saturday was like a gift from god, power fans are currently all in hiding and Adelaide is far more beautiful for it.  2011 looks to be a beautiful year.

    • Cats fan says:

      11:58am | 26/04/11

      I love to bagout Port and new teams as much as the next man, but your link to attendances showed that Port doesn’t have the lowest attendance in 2011 - Brisbane and Gold Coast do. I’m assuming you’re referring to the 2010 season…

      Anyway, here’s a few Port jokes for you and the readers:

      Q: Why shouldn’t you let a Port Power player walk your dog?
      A: They can’t hold onto a lead

      Q: Who kicked 6 goals in the 2007 Grand Final?
      A: Port Power

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      12:10pm | 26/04/11

      You’ll note I wrotethat Port’s attendances are the lowest of the teams in the traditional AFL states, ie WA, SA and VIC. Pretty sure that linked table verifies that.

      Geez I’m commenting a lot today. back to work on there’ll be no Wednesday Punch…

    • Dave-o says:

      12:23pm | 26/04/11

      Port wear poofy teal because their traditional colour stripe is black and white. Gee wonder who that clashed with. Probably explains the caliber of their supporters as well.

      Its great to see all the doubters enjoying a big slice of humble pie. And of all the teams to spray a kick after the siren and deliver the scums their first win. Couldn’t have happened to a nicer pack of .....

    • fairsfair says:

      12:31pm | 26/04/11

      I can’t cop AFL, but I kind of enjoyed that. You better be careful though, doesn’t Kochie follow Port? OOooh you’re in trouble now Sharwood!

      Oh and thanks to your “frikken teal” comment I now have Chisel’s “Shipping Steel” stuck in my head…. going to be a long day.

    • Lauren says:

      01:37pm | 26/04/11

      Honestly, I couldn’t give a shit if the AFL expands or not. Being at the MCG yesterday with nearly 90,000 attendance, that’s all I need.

    • Levi says:

      06:30pm | 26/04/11

      Yeh I suppose there’s not much else to do in Melbourne than watch seagulls fight over a dropped chip.

    • Bikinis on Top says:

      02:43pm | 26/04/11

      Australian Rules knows how to expand successfully and courageously. Rugby League does not know such things.
      The AFL leads NRL by the nose or by the balls when it comes to expansion of new teams and new fans.

    • Levi says:

      06:29pm | 26/04/11

      Yeh, just like Coles. Pfff

    • stephen says:

      06:36pm | 26/04/11

      OK.
      But I still believe R.L play is constrained by a too small field.
      The ball does not move enough, and this is not good for TV money.

      AFL likes to market its technique via small seasonal impressions : a small change, say an alteration to the ‘holding the man’ rule, which will be good for TV.
      Remember this : TV.
      Rugby League is actually a better game.
      It has not been developed properly.
      (And it’s future is not comparative at all with Union.)

    • Marto says:

      08:26pm | 26/04/11

      GWS will be the AFL’s Vietnam, nothing more certain.  Demetriou’s problem was that he has tried to essentially demand that New South Welshmen like his game, through provocative advertising suggesting the AFL was ‘the game that made Australia’ and the like.  Problem is that the sport has never been fancied up here, never in 150 years of the game being played.  Then you try and insult us through advertising and lob an unwanted team into a city that still hasn’t embraced the Swans after 30 years, well good luck with trying to polish that turd.  Once the novelty of the first few games wear off, they will be the white elephant in the Sydney sporting market.

    • Dave-o says:

      02:00pm | 27/04/11

      @ Marto

      If Sydney is AFL’s Vietnam than I guess that makes Sheedy Giap.

    • Flutz says:

      08:06pm | 26/04/11

      Nice one Ant - but I think it has become all to easy to “get” these AFL supporters, entertaining as it is to the rest of us to see them not get the joke.

    • jp says:

      09:52pm | 26/04/11

      This article proves is that league fans are so insane they’re impossible to satirize.

    • Dan says:

      07:50am | 27/04/11

      “Since inception, Port has been a rabble. Never mind the fluky 2004 premiership over a rapidly fading Brisbane Lions, in a season when the Swans and Eagles hadn’t yet fully matured as premiership powerhouses. Talk about good timing. You and I and a couple of mates would have won that game if we’d bothered to strap on a pair of football boots.”

      Nonsense. Port made three straight preliminary finals, and featured some of the best players (Tredea, Cornes, Wanganeen) of the past decade. They won because they deserved to. If you think that you and a couple of mates could have won, you are delusional.

      Oh, and as for 2007, at least they made the GF. 14 other clubs failed to do so.

    • Dash says:

      11:37am | 27/04/11

      Rugby Union and Rugby league are both minnows in this country compared to the AFL. The only reason the NRL survives is the money and media coverage pumped into it by News Limited! Oh hang on, that would be the same News Limited that pays Sydney Uni boy Anthony Sharwood to write these pieces! Hmmm interesting.

    • Muttley says:

      12:18pm | 27/04/11

      lol, oh thats funny. Union is a worldwide game with limited domestic following and league is getting stonger you loon. Always cracks me up when some sorry AFL supporter needs to try to drag down other sports to make theirs look better. Your joke of a game is never going to make real inroads North of the border you goose.

    • Dash says:

      01:16pm | 27/04/11

      Now now, please don’t call me a goose just because I stated the obvious that Australian Rules is a bigger game in this country than both Rugby Union and League. By any measure, tv rights, crowd attendence, financial turnover, playing numbers, that’s a fact! No need to get all hot under the collar about it. The beaten man resorts to abuse to try to win an argument.

      It is also a fact that News Limited pumps millions into the NRL and relentlessly promotes it in NSW. And it’s also a fact that without that media coverage, that money and the money from the leagues club pokies, the game wouldn’t exist! The gate receipts and TV rights for Australian football make the NRL and ARU look like minnows!

      As an example, the NRL ANZAC clash had 35,000 and the AFL ANZAC clash pulled 90,000. And if you want another example watch the TV rights deal soon to be signed with the AFL.

      A good mate of mine held a high finance position at the Rugby Union and they look in awe at the AFL. At their junior promotion, at their playing numbers, at their crowd attendences, at their sponsorship dollars, at their paid up club memberships, at the stadium rights, at the tv rights and even at the number of women that attend and support the game.

      People said the same thing as you when the Swans moved to Sydney in 1982. “It’ll never make inroads north of the boarder”. And now the Swans average crowds are larger than the average crowds for any of the NRL teams!

      Btw, the British Commonwealth is not the world! And how is league getting stronger? No racial abuse, drunk and disorderly or physical assault charges over the last week??? No little kids smashed up by islander kids at junior level? The showcase event for league is State of Origin and even that concept was stolen from Aussie Rules! Heritage round, indigenous round all stolen from the AFL. Talk about regressive!

    • Daryl says:

      11:45am | 27/04/11

      “They won’t have achieved anything until they’ve brought the game of Australian Rules Football to a lonely outpost called Alberton”. WTF!!!! Port Adelaide are one of the oldest sporting clubs in Australia. Formed in 1870, 36 SANFL premierships and playing out of Alberton oval for over a century. Your article shows how little you know about Port Adelaide and about Australian football. You are an ignorant fool!

      Crawl back into your silvertail rugby union hovel! How have the crowds been at the Tahs this year?

    • Hamish says:

      03:54pm | 27/04/11

      Seriously what’s with all these un-Oztrayan tools who bag out our glorious indigenous game and instead follow a hybrid-rugby game invented by inbred Yorkshiremen and played by criminals on day release and/or bail? I joined 80,000 of my patriotic bretheren at Australia’s sporting temple yesterday to watch a game invented by an Australian, for Australians. The AFL, where 80,000 is a crowd figure and not a TV audience number.

    • Dan says:

      09:12am | 28/04/11

      Ironically Alberton, as well as being the home of Port Adelaide is also a suburb of the Gold Coast.

    • Elmo says:

      09:43pm | 19/04/12

      I don’t see how Optus have a leg to stand on. They claim it’s no different than rrnoedicg to a DVR in your home, but in reality it is completely different. When you record to your DVR at home you aren’t re-distributing your content to thousands of other people. That’s exactly what Optus are doing here.Sure, Telstra and the AFL are greedy bastards. You’ll get no argument from me on that count. But if TV Now is stopped in its tracks, it will be because it’s illegal under copyright law.I’m also failing to see what’s so brilliant about the concept of TV Now   it’s not a new or novel concept at all. Just a prohibited one. People have been rrnoedicg TV and distributing it via the intertubes for years.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

.@GQMagazine profile of Justin Bieber. Really well written. WARNING: It's about Justin Bieber. http://t.co/NELebjMB

Daniel Piotrowski

Government to consider a Greens call for a national anti-corruption body #auspolhttp://t.co/mrkCu9HQ

Daniel Piotrowski

@speedmouse I ask myself that everyday as I bask in my tasks.

Daniel Piotrowski

I was responsible for this headline. It was quite difficult to think up. http://t.co/q5rnWpLM

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Reports of Ron Paul’s death are greatly exaggerated

Reports of Ron Paul’s death are greatly exaggerated

Reports of Ron Paul’s political demise have been greatly exaggerated and his tactical genius is…

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not…

Our Budget blade didn’t cut aid, it’s being paid in spades

Our Budget blade didn’t cut aid, it’s being paid in spades

Ten million children vaccinated. 2.5 million people with access to safe drinking water. And 30 million…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Real women like men who drink beer

Real women like men who drink beer

British comedian John Cleese calls them “beer fairies”.  It’s a euphemism for… Read more

198 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter