Tonight, a young man from New South Wales will step on to a cricket field in old South Wales. Phillip Hughes, age twenty, son of a banana farmer, will open the batting for his country in international sport’s most enduring contest, Ashes cricket.

Almost a dozen cricket fans gather in England.

He’s dreamt of this moment for much of his young life. One can write with some confidence that he hasn’t dreamt of playing his first Ashes Test at Sophia Gardens, rather at Lords or Headingley or Old Trafford.

The opening match of the 2009 series will be the first Ashes Test played on neutral soil. That is, it will take place neither in England nor Australia, but in a foreign country, Wales.

The first Welshman to captain England at Test cricket, Tony Lewis, wrote of Sophia Gardens, ‘a day watching there when the prevailing wind blows is like a week at sea’.

The Australians say they don’t know how the pitch will play. The English may know less. The English cricket team have never completed a full international at Cardiff. Their two one day internationals there were washed out.

At least Australia has experience at the venue. The team lost to Bangladesh there in 2005, the day after Andrew Symonds’ first famous bender.

English sportsmen, particularly their rugby players, usually come to Wales as the enemy. Wales is a rugby nation. Rugby for many Welsh people is identity.

Cricket in Wales has its own identity too, an identity distinct from the English game.

The one Welsh side in the county championship, Glamorgan County Cricket Club, was formed in 1888. J.H. Morgan wrote in the 1970 Wisden of ‘a club which was started to serve a county and grew to represent a nation’. For Glamorgan, one of the thirteen historic counties of Wales, came to represent all of Wales at cricket.

David Lloyd George introduced the daffodil as the Welsh national emblem during the First World War. Glamorgan CCC adopted the emblem.

Glamorgan defeated the touring Australians in 1964 and 1968. On both occasions the crowd sang the Welsh national anthem ‘Mae Hen Wlad Fy Nhadau’ in victory.

Australian-Welsh cricket relations pre date even the Ashes. The Australian Aborigines played The Gentlemen of Swansea in 1868. After the tourists won the match, they engaged in the throwing of spears and boomerangs.

Glamorgan played the 1902 Australians at Cardiff, while still a minor county. Over 10 000 attended the first days play. The Australians played at Cardiff again in 1905 and in 1909, against South Wales.

One hundred years later Cardiff provides cricket its one hundredth Test venue.

Yet for all of the uniqueness of Glamorgan / Welsh cricket, the decision to award its flagship ground Test status is symptomatic of so much that is wrong with the English game.

England cricket does not have a single ground large enough to accommodate crowds of more than 30 000. Lords is the largest venue, with a capacity of 29 300.

The 2005 Ashes brought us scenes of thousands of fans locked outside Old Trafford and The Oval in a futile clamber for tickets.

The response of the governors of the game, the England & Wales Cricket Board, has been to move a Test to an even smaller ground. Sophia Gardens has a capacity of 15 600.

The Barmy Army are an overseas phenomenon because they can’t get in the grounds at home.

Durham became a Test venue in 2003, now Cardiff. Southampton’s Rose Bowl has also been conferred “international status” by the ECB. Add the six historic Test grounds – Lords, The Oval, Edgbaston, Trent Bridge, Headingley and Old Trafford – and nine small grounds share around 47 days of England cricket each summer. Each one gets too few England games. The result for cricket fans is higher ticket prices and low capacities.

Eight professional football clubs in London all provide more seats than England cricket does in a metropolitan area of fourteen million.

In Britain new football and rugby grounds have been built from scratch as those games have expanded. Cricket has reacted to the growth of its audience by restricting access.

Kevin Mitchell of The Observer describes English cricket audiences as ‘crammed into tiny grounds designed for Victorian gentlemen of leisure’.

Worse, much worse, there is no free to air TV coverage of the England cricket team.

Since the ECB sold the rights to BSkyB in 2006 the average viewing audience has gone from 1.3 million to 250 000.

The problem with English cricket is that the game is run by and for the eighteen county clubs. That is, private members clubs made up of a tiny proportion of the cricket following population.

The structure of the ECB ensures that eighteen county chairmen own and run the game for their own ends.

Their number one priority is sustaining county cricket. That priority trumps all else – a successful national team, funding the grassroots, providing access for fans.

A majority of England cricket’s profits are spent on supporting county cricket. Eighteen county clubs are handed well over twenty million pounds between them every year, which they then spend on importing Australians, West Indians, South Africans and Indians.

Yet English county cricket does not fulfil the role of strong breeding ground for the national team.

Former Australian wicket keeper and coach of Surrey, Steve Rixon, has called county cricket ‘a cesspit of mediocrity’.

Australia may or may not win the 2009 Ashes series. Ridiculous selections - involving spinners and all-rounders - help our opponent.

But over time we will win far more often than not, thanks to the structure of the game both here and there. Over the last twenty years Australia has won nine Ashes series, England one. The margin in Tests is thirty four to nine.

English cricket lover William Buckland authored a book last year, Pommies, an attack on the members only affair, the white upper middle class monoculture, that controls the game there.

He despaired that, ‘with small stadiums, limited TV coverage and the Lord’s Effect all working in tandem, this game could end up as an expensive indulgence for the upper middle classes in London and the shires, like opera’.

The Australian Government stepped in, in the public interest, to lead a restructure of soccer in this country when reform from within was no longer possible.

In the absence of a British Kerry Packer prepared to embark on a take over raid in order to force the administrators of the game to reform, the UK Government should nationalise the game, in the public interest.

A new governing body is needed to reorganise English cricket to serve the millions of cricket lovers denied access to the game now.

Most commented

10 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Haydos says:

      08:37am | 08/07/09

      I’m more interested in whether this Hughes bloke can will take over where I left off . .  ..

    • RT says:

      09:12am | 08/07/09

      ‘Where I left off’, Haydos at 8:37am? What, you mean as in consistently failing to score runs? Unlike the real Matthew Hayden near the end of his test career, Hughes won’t have the luxury of being selected on long-ago form if he fails to post good scores. He will have to continue his run of success or his test career could be over by the time the ashes are decided.

    • Peter Warrington says:

      12:02pm | 08/07/09

      Hughes must look at the footage of 2005 and count his lucky stars.

      No offence to Anderson, Onions, Broad and the damaged Flintoff, but they seem about B compared to the 2005 Fab Four, who were A++.

      and Johnners, Siddle, Hilfy and Hauritz (plus Clark) is probably better than our attacks of 72 (Massie, Colley, Hammond, Gleeson), 77 (Walker, out of whack Thommo, Pascoe, Malone, O’Keefe), 85 (the raw McDermott, sick Henry, shiffling Gilbert and O’Donnell, the uncertain Holland and Bennett, and peroxide version Thommo), 89 (Hughes, an older Lawson, Campbell, HOhns), 93 (Julian, Reiffell, Holdwsorth) and 005 (tired Dizzy, damaged McGrath, expensive Lee and confused Kasper with his fast offies.)

      we’ve got more part-time options, too, a la 72, 75 and 93.

      Hussey and Ponting as form issues but when/if they fire, look out. but Haddin, Johnson, Hauritz possibly the best 7,8,9 since Kill Bill #1.

      sad to say it but Australia 2,3 or 4, depending on pitches and weather; England 0, or maybe a consolation at the Oval with Harmison taking 10-0, too late.

      as for Luke’s piece, are you suggesting that the numerous soccer stadia be used for cricket? are their league or union grounds big enough? I guess Wembley would be big enough, but what about the rest? maybe they need to take up AFL, solve multiple problems all at once.

    • Walsh says:

      02:02pm | 08/07/09

      “English cricket lover William Buckland authored a book last year, Pommies, an attack on the members only affair, the white upper middle class monoculture, that controls the game there.”

      For all Australia’s egalitarianism there is no whiter team or infrastructure than Australia. It’s a national disgrace. If you are brown, regardless of talent you have almost zero hope of playing for Australia. The number of super talented Indian and Pakistani-Australian players who quit the sport because of grass-roots and administrative racism is incredible.

      England cricket is weighed down by history. Australia doesn’t have the same attachments but still does a very good job of promoting our own monoculture.

    • Neill Jones says:

      11:34am | 09/07/09

      Walsh says: “If you are brown, regardless of talent you have almost zero hope of playing for Australia.”

      Notwithstanding the fact that Usman Khawaja has captained Australia at U-19 level?

    • Luke Foley says:

      12:58pm | 09/07/09

      Peter, I’m for playing cricket on ovals, not rectangular football & rugby grounds. Sharing home games across nine small grounds, in a land mass the size of England & Wales, is a nonsense. Old Trafford & Headingley are 47 miles apart, Edgbaston & Trent Bridge 33 miles from each other,Lords & The Oval are separated by 4 miles.

      Move England games to 3 main grounds. One in London - Lords; one in the midlands - either Edgbaston or Trent Bridge; one in the north west - either Headingley or Old Trafford.

      More days cricket at each = more revenues = expenditure on ground upgrades & more seats = more access and lower ticket prices for the cricket following masses. All three grounds would be guaranteed the revenues to expand to 40 000+ seats.

      So, 3 big gounds to host 90% of England matches. Add an occasional visit to the outliers of Durham & Cardiff (as Australia does to Hobart’s Bellerive) so fans in the north east and Wales can see the national side.

      Australia, with 5 main grounds plus an outlier at Hobart, provides 2 million seats per summer for the fans. England & Wales, with nearly three times the population, can’t provide a million seats per summer.

      A prediction: cricket’s new imperialists, the Board of Control for Cricket in India, will come to the UK in 2013. They will play IPL at the new oval shaped London Olympic Stadium, capacity 80 000. They’ll fill it again and again and again, with the great mass of cricket fans now denied access by the rulers of the English game.

    • Peter Warrington says:

      02:18pm | 09/07/09

      seems logical. when you can get the red and white roses to agree whether it should be Old Trafford or Headingley, we can tell Gareth Evans he can retire, his successor has been identified.

      BTW, loved the shots of the freeloaders watching from the embankment along the River. reminiscent of all great grounds - Redfern, Hurstville oval, Kemblawarra

      ps if Australia’s best spinner is female, is there any regulatory impediment to them being selected for the “men’s” team? (some of those tweakers the Poms had out here for the recent World Cup were seriously good, more flight and drop than anyone since Phil Edmonds.

    • Jenny says:

      09:14pm | 09/07/09

      Thought provoking.

    • Jenny says:

      09:21pm | 09/07/09

      PS For contemporary reflections on ‘Victorian gentleman of leisure’ and cricket - can I refer you to the first of Seigfried Sasson’s 3 volume memoir - “Memoirs of a Fox-Hunting Man”. I think its the sort of thing your readers may enjoy.

    • Luke Whitington says:

      02:35pm | 17/07/09

      As you rightly point out, the major problem is restricted TV access. I believe that is also the case in much of the the West Indies. While watching live cricket is unbeatable, the success of the sport relies on it being broadcast. I watch 5 days of Test cricket every year live at the SCG, but the vast majority of international cricket I have seen over my lifetime has been on free-to-air television. My understanding of the game has been shaped by the commentators, the slow-mos, the hot-spots and the interviews. I can only imagine the damage being done to cricket by that being denied to eager, cricket loving kids in England and the Windies because they can’t see any cricket on their home TV. I don’t know the solution, except for the ICC intervening in national Boards to ensure mass access to the sport.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@KateEllisMP I believe you! Kid does naplan tests at home for fun. Geez.

Paul Colgan

Wow... Vines embedded here show the incredible scale of the destruction in Oklahoma City http://t.co/EWoXgE03A2

Anthony Sharwood

An Oklahoma radio station called "The Twister", complete with tornado logo, urges residents to pray http://t.co/U2Cj8vIgdz

ToryShepherd

@KateEllisMP asks kids at prospect what their fave thing is. NAPLAN, says one. Surely a plant!!!

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter