Like anyone else, Australians are keen to pick up a bargain.

Thanks to the Feds, this is only happening in the most literal sense. Pic: Brianne Makin.

Our grocery aisles are filled with premium brand products alongside their cheaper cousins. We like to get the best deal when we’re buying an appliance, building our homes or fuelling our cars.

And let’s face it, while we all like to buy Australian made, we mostly consider the origin of products after we’ve checked the price tag. Who can blame us? We’ve all got families to feed and bills to pay. And a dollar only goes so far.

Our families are what I’ve been thinking about when considering the recent changes we’ve made to strengthen Australia’s anti-dumping system.

Dumping. Funny name, but a serious concept.

Dumping happens when a company exports its product to Australia and sells it below the price it charges in its home market or below cost. Where that causes economic loss to an Australian business producing similar goods, additional import duties can be applied to help level the playing field.

Dumping can happen with any imported product, but the common victims of dumping are in the manufacturing and farming sectors. At the moment there are 24 anti-dumping measures in place in Australia covering products such as chemicals, plastics, food and base metals.

Under our system, local companies that believe dumping is causing damage to their business must present their case to Customs for ultimate determination by the Home Affairs Minister. If I find that dumping is happening and it’s damaging the local business, I can put remedies in place.

In recent years, Australian companies have complained that the system just isn’t working and that has meant extra stress, on top of the pressures the manufacturing and farming sectors are already facing.

They’ve complained that the process to apply for an anti-dumping order takes too long, is incredibly complicated, requires huge effort and at the end of the day it’s too expensive to attempt – especially for smaller businesses with limited resources. There are also concerns that the system doesn’t reach the best outcomes.

These complaints are not new – they were being made under the Howard Government. What is new is that this Labor Government has listened and done something to improve the situation.

As part of a detailed review, we’ve announced we’ll be making 29 improvements to the anti-dumping system.

Among them are:

- A 45 per cent increase in the number of Customs staff working on anti-dumping issues to ensure cases are dealt with more efficiently
- Greater use of trade and industry experts in investigating complaints
- A new support officer to support small and medium businesses and downstream manufacturers and producers to actively participate in anti-dumping investigations
- Improving access to imports and subsidies data, and clarifying the data requirements for making an application
- And my favourite - a 30 day time limit for Ministerial decisions on anti-dumping cases.

These changes are designed to improve timeliness, increase compliance, make accessing the system easier for smaller players and lead to better decisions being made.

Our improvements will give greater certainty to manufacturers and primary producers – and their workers, families and communities.

The changes have gone down well amongst industry. Companies that employ thousands of Australians have welcomed our suite of improvements, as have the respective unions.

And I think this package will strike the balance that we all want – a competitive marketplace and a strong local economy. And that means a good deal for everyone.

Most commented

25 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      07:40am | 06/07/11

      Better late than never, with the anti-dumping stuff !  I’m pleased to see this vestige of action to try to rectify our industry situation. Globalisation has been ripping the heart out of Australia for the past 20 years, and the ideologues still love the freemarket economy!  What did they believe would happen when all the tariff protection of our industries was removed?  We now have an industry sector almost devoid of hi-tech, and farmers who have continually reducing quotas imposed on them by the secondary producers.

    • Tubesteak says:

      10:09am | 06/07/11

      So what. If you can’t compete then don’t play the game.

      I don’t want to fund the existence of people that can’t look after themselves.

    • acotrel says:

      02:05pm | 06/07/11

      @Tubesteak How could Australian manufacturing industry ever compete with appalling third world workplaces in countries where wages and prices are a fraction of those in Australia.  Where there isn’t even the intention to improve OHS, or environmental management? - areas in which we are rightly legislated?  You can take the approach that unionism is the problem through dedication to maintaining our wages at a level compatible with prices.  Or you can be critical of the way prices are maintained while huge profits are being made by exploiting third world workers. The result is the same - the playing field is not level, and no amount of neoliberal ideology will ever correct that! Thye only way forward that I can see, would be to establish a nexus between prices and wages, and systematically reduce both simultaneously, to near third world levels.  It’s never going to happen because the ideologues would scream about government intervention. They want it all their own way - happy to be bailed out when the free market fails!

    • acotrel says:

      02:23pm | 06/07/11

      @Tubesteak Why should your lifestyle be subsidised by the rest of us? - birthright?

    • Sony B Goode says:

      09:33pm | 06/07/11

      OMG I’m going to agree with acotrel. Free markets fundamentalism is as bad as nanny statism. You can’t have policies based on ideology that do not look into the systemic consequences of that policy.

      Free markets and liberties in general have certain implicit assumptions, when those assumptions no longer hold then liberties granted must be carefully considered.

      The fact is we are rapidly reaching peak government. Government is running out of new areas of our lives to govern and is over reaching its mandate globally.

      Freedoms are being challenged in every aspect of our lives. The role of government and its unfettered right to interfere in our lives needs to be reconsidered.  For example, Government health care has a strong incentive to control your lifestyle. Any system where demand is unlimited but funding is finite is going to have issues and unintended consequences.

      Just imagine when everything goes through NBN there will be no right to privacy or anywhere to hide from government on the Internet in Australia.

    • atthepub says:

      07:49am | 06/07/11

      As part of a detailed review, we’ve announced we’ll be making 29 improvements to the anti-dumping system.
      All I hear is, we’ve spent more of your tax dollars on review and research and implementation of legislation .. how about letting people keep some of their tax dollars so that they don’t need your department interfering and re-arranging stuff.

      It’s not the governments place to play big daddy with other people’s money to ensure a competitive market place.

      A competitive market place naturally occurs when you leave the power where it belongs with the people instead of stealing it away from them and then create some artificial environment where everyone has to thank big daddy for sorting their affairs.

      Governments make me sick with their inflated sense of ego and self righteousness.

    • jay-ded says:

      08:13am | 06/07/11

      mmmm.  Somehow I don’t think any of these things will make a difference.  If you actually placed laws around what we import then maybe it might be different.  Where are the standards on our imports?  We place standards on our Australian companies but then we go and import sub standard goods?  What are you going to do about that?  Oh that’s right absolute sweet FA.  Maybe, you’ll get a committee to look into it.  You’ll give them a nice office and they’ll write a lovely 500 page report and then you’ll just ignore it.
      Oh and the goods that we import?  Are they going to have the same carbon tax that our larger Australian companies will pay?

    • Jack says:

      09:11am | 06/07/11

      Won’t need to worry about the report thanks to Labor selling the farm to foriegners and doing its best with taxes like the CO2 tax to place enough practices to bankrupt any remaining buisnesses. You then have the new industrial relations rules all aimed at preventing bludgers and thiefs from being sacked and winding back the clock to inpower unions. You can see the mass union actions occurring already and the only thing left to occur is the BLF style thuggery on the streets.

    • jay-ded says:

      09:26am | 06/07/11

      @ Jack.  Too true.

    • acotrel says:

      02:12pm | 06/07/11

      @jay-ded The theory was that by calling up ISO9000 Quality Management System standards in the FTA, that commonality would exist in product quality across the various countries - great theory, but all bullshit!

    • acotrel says:

      02:18pm | 06/07/11

      @Jack You seem to have been well indoctrinated!  I thought that the people selling the farm to foreigners were union members - members of the Farmers Federation?

    • BMJ says:

      09:15am | 06/07/11

      How about creating conditions where these small businesses are more competitive?

    • acotrel says:

      02:27pm | 06/07/11

      @ BMJ
      ‘How about creating conditions where these small businesses are more competitive? ‘

      GIve it a rest!  What are you - a commie?

    • DY says:

      09:26am | 06/07/11

      Pity neither the Liberals nor Labor protect our land from foreign investors. I read this morning that Chinese owned companies are buying   up prime farming land and buying residential property at alarming rates. They are also doing the same thing in Africa and South America as well as The South Pacific. Next thing we will be paying tax to the Chinese.

    • jay-ded says:

      12:19pm | 06/07/11

      You can thank Labor for that DY.  They were the ones that opened the door to overseas land buyers, not Liberal.

    • Martin Hopes says:

      01:07pm | 06/07/11

      @ DY & Jay-ded…Many Australian companies have invested heavily overseas - are you saying they should not be allowed to? You both appear to suffer from xenophobia. Perhaps you both voted for Pauline Hanson.

    • acotrel says:

      02:46pm | 06/07/11

      @DY most of the land around the west of Melbourne was owned by Yanks and Poms who tied it up for years!  It’s only been in the last 40 years that Melbourne has been able to expand westward.  And there is still action by councils to rezone and acquire the land for housing. Who owns most of the NT these days - is it Vesteys?  What nationality are they? Does it really matter, they cant take it away with them?

    • DY says:

      04:05pm | 06/07/11

      jay-ded when did Labor start to open the doors?

      Martin Hopes who I vote for is my business and not yours. Martin can you go and buy land in China? or Fiji for that matter. Xenophobia - hatred or fear of foreigners or strangers or of their politics or culture. I think not but you have already judged me. By your comment on Pauline Hanson would that make you Xenophobic?

      acotrel you are correct they can’t take the land away with them but they can do whatever they want with the land. China has bought some of the most prized farming land in Australia that it has spooked both Liberal and Labor. Liberal senator Bill HeffernanI believe is chairing a committee into foreign ownership.

    • Harquebus says:

      09:51am | 06/07/11

      All that energy being covered up by an energy guzzling bulldozer. What a waste.
      Dumping is a temporary phenomenon. You guessed it. Peak oil mate, peak oil.

    • stevem says:

      10:12am | 06/07/11

      The Commodore was turned left-hand-drive and sold in the US. The Pontiac version sold 30-35% cheaper than the Commodore. Was that dumping?

    • Fiddler says:

      10:31am | 06/07/11

      Get rid of parallel importing laws while you are at it. It’s one thing to protect our industry, but it’s another thing to protect the ridiculous level of ripping off that importers do to us. Imported cars cost two-three times what they do overseas, same with many consumer items. What Mr O’Connor is the government doing about that?

    • MarK says:

      01:52pm | 06/07/11

      Brendan how much will your carbon tax cool the globe?

      Will that bulldozer have to pay a carbon tax on the fuel it is using in the picture?

      What if it was a sole trader vs being owned by say BHP? Does one pay fuel tax and not the other?

      I must email you and see if you have any info yet you big Labor person you

    • lesley laurel says:

      06:20pm | 06/07/11

      onl;y foreigners buy australian products.
      australians are too up themselves to buy australian as foreign goods are swank

    • lesley laurel says:

      06:24pm | 06/07/11

      true blue australians and green voters buy stuff from ALDI.
      Only foreigners and Liberal National Voters can afford to shop at IGA.
      Usually Australian goods are unknown except in the better half of Coles And Wollworths.

    • lesley laurel says:

      06:45pm | 06/07/11

      should we buy new south wales or queensland products?
      Phil Gould Says
      “Never trust a Queenslander”
      Tom Raudonikis says
      the trouble is that New South Wales don’t hate queenslanders enough. We should really hate them”

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Amen, Senator... John McCain To Tim Cook: ‘Why The Hell Do I Have To Keep Updating Apps On My iPhone?’http://t.co/V9XIbzw752

Malcolm Farr

@nigelmcbain I don't see the nexus between gay marriage and gay sex education in schools. ACL does. Health issues should be taught whatever

Daniel Piotrowski

@jennijenni a few companies are known to do that - ask for story ideas from job applicants so they can steal them later

Malcolm Farr

: Bruce Springsteen: "I get roughed up crowdsurfing… people try to pull chunks out of me" http://t.co/jiHqt8agt9” it was him, @patricklion

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter