You might have heard all the hoo-haa last week about the NDIS, or national Disability Insurance Scheme.

Make sure the water's deep enough… or you'll really be in deep.

In simple terms, it’s like a Medicare for disability. Not many of us use an ICU, but we all pay quite happily, through Medicare, and should the need arise, ICU care is just an ambulance ride away. Disability care and support isn’t that “neat”.

Currently, if you have a broken neck, are incontinent, need a wheelchair and an adapted vehicle, live in NSW and you acquired your disability in a car smash, your personal care support needs will be, for the most part, covered. As will your physio, speech and occupational therapy, your continence supplies (and the personal help you need for bowel and bladder care), someone to give you a shower each day, and even your wheelchair will be supplied, generally in a reasonable timeframe.

If, however, you jump into a riverbank and earn exactly the same set of injuries, you really are up shit creek, with no one to help you paddle, and, well, not even a paddle. You are likely, like Lillian Andren, to sit in a pool of your own piss four days a week, as “the system”
will only support you to have a shower twice a week.

So, for most people living life in the disabled lane, there is no “Medicare”, and an ICU crisis equivalent is the *only* care you’ll get (the “skip the antibiotics from the GP, let’s wait til we’re dying from the infection and go straight to ICU” model).

Supported accommodation will likely only be provided when your parents are buried or become disabled themselves. There is no preventative care, very little support so you can work, and therapy to keep what little movement you might have functional, is non-existent. The “system” is almost entirely crisis-driven.

You might think that your Total Permanent Disability (TPD) or Income Insurance has you covered. You’re wrong. It can cost up to $180K/year for accommodation support alone, let alone all the extras, like, say, a shower chair, or an accessible vehicle, let alone someone to drive it for you.

Australians seem to think that their $2M TPD policy has them covered. Don’t get me wrong, it will help, but who, at 22 (when you’re most likely to something stupid enough to land you a quadriplegic) has a TPD policy anyway? And of course, you can’t buy TPD to cover childhood brain cancer, or a traumatic birth resulting in the lifelong intelligence of a three year old, or whatever tragedy may befall your family.

Enter the knights in shining armour - the Productivity Commission - whose job it is to produce reports that suggest changes for Government to make our country an even luckier one. They’re a bunch of hard-nosed bastards, and simply do not recommend anything without the actuarial evidence to prove their ideas will make our fine country more prosperous.

The PC team, commissioned by Disability champion Bill Shorten, came out with these opening lines in their two volume, 1,049 page report:

“Most families and individuals cannot adequately prepare for the risk and financial impact of significant disability. The costs of lifetime care can be so substantial that the risks and costs need to be pooled.”

And then “The current disability support system is underfunded, unfair, fragmented, and inefficient…”

It recommends a system that gives some 410,000 Australians with severe disability the personal care, accommodation modifications, therapy, equipment and supports they need to live a dignified life. It won’t provide an adapted Mercedes Benz coupe, or a mansion on the harbour, but it would allow people with disabilities the ability to work where possible, and to hopefully prevent some of the tragedies we’ve seen in the sector.

The report goes on to say that a national no-fault system for all Australians with a severe disability (regardless of how or when they got it) would require a doubling of Australia’s current spend – taking a further $6.3B per annum out of the budget. It recommends that the extra funds are taken from general revenue - not an extra tax or Medicare style levy.

It also says that the benefits of the NDIS “would significantly outweigh the costs”, “the funding of the scheme is feasible and manageable” and that that within five years, the NDIS will pay for itself.

How the hell could it do that?

Well, if disabled adults could get the supported accommodation they need, their parent carers could maybe go to work, instead of living off welfare in public housing on the public dime. Carl Thompson, a Melburnian uni student who uses an electric wheelchair and needs help to go to the toilet, could get a job anywhere, instead of being confined to rolling distance from Flinders Street station, where a charity group help him go to the toilet at lunchtime (I guess other people with Carl’s needs just have to shit in their pants, or not work at all, relying on an ageing parent to do this work at home).

So – what was the big announcement last week? Julia Gillard, with Bill Shorten and Jan McLucas by her side announced $10M for an advisory committee to do some set up work. Oh, and she’s gonna talk with COAG about stuff.

Where’s the $6.3B per annum the PC recommended? Nowhere. But maybe in seven years, according to Julia Gillard.

“Seven years!!” the disabled and carers scream. “It only took twelve months to commit $42B for the NBN!”

“The $8B Carbon Tax only took 18 months.”

Does Julia’s announcement sound eerily like Hawke’s “No Australian child will be living in poverty”? David Holst, of Disability Speaks in South Australia certainly thinks so. His media release was scathing of the Gillard Government’s excruciating dragging, stating “Who knows what the political or financial climate will be in twelve months time far less in seven years time”.

When the Government states in their presser launching an NDIS (or rather, an advisory committee) “These reforms will be delivered in a way that is consistent with the Government’s fiscal strategy” one has to wonder exactly what that fiscal strategy is.

This week’s guest column was written by Sam Paior, the parent of two children with disabilities. Sam founded Parents Helping Parents Australia (parentshelpingparents.org.au) and is a board member of Dignity for Disability (d4d.org.au), a political party represented by the very honourable Kelly Vincent MLC who gets around in the South Australian Parliament in her wheelchair. The views here are her own.

Most commented

35 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Watcher says:

      07:14am | 17/08/11

      Many many disabled people can die in 7 years thus lessening the bill, hate to sound skeptical of the scheme ever getting off the ground but the Political climate does not generate much optimism

    • dovif says:

      11:50am | 18/08/11

      It is easy to see why the ALP wants to introduce it in 7 years

      Since there is no way the ALP will be in government in 7 years time. They can claim to have started a policy, without it ever affecting the bottom line of the ALP budget.

      It is another case of the left side of politics leaving its constituence in massive debt

    • Fnord says:

      07:14am | 17/08/11

      You really explained the reason this isn’t going to happen early in the piece.

      The Australian Government is not driven by benefit to the country or its people.  It’s driven by votes.  And “410,000 Australians” is a drop in the ocean for them.

      Wait until Abbott falls off his bike and breaks his back because he trips over his smug mug.  Then you’ll see some action.

    • Rev says:

      07:50am | 17/08/11

      @Fnord - wouldn’t the onus be on, like, you know, the Government?

    • Sam Paior says:

      08:41am | 17/08/11

      While the #NDIS is about 410,000 Australians directly, it indirectly affects many many more - all the carers, everyone who needs an acute hospital bed currenlty taken up by someone with a disability who should have been discharged months ago waiting for support hours so they can go home, employers who are sick of carers having to take time off etc etc. The benefits are much further reaching than they appear at first glance,

    • acotrel says:

      09:42am | 17/08/11

      @Fnord
      ‘Wait until Abbott falls off his bike and breaks his back because he trips over his smug mug.  Then you’ll see some action. ‘

      Is this a self-fulfilling prophesy ?

    • acotrel says:

      07:39am | 17/08/11

      Does this mean that people with injuries derived from poor workplace practices, will now get support without being hived off from Workcover onto Centrelink, and then persecuted by political opportunists like Howard ?

    • JohnB says:

      09:05am | 17/08/11

      No, I think what it means acotrel is the massive present welfare recipients that have never looked after their health, or that of their kids will receive more tax dollars.

    • Sam Paior says:

      09:26am | 17/08/11

      All of the kids I know with severe and multiple disabilities were born that way - genetic anomalies, birth injury or serious childhood illness. None of them were self inflicted or caused by poor parenting.
      Your comments are pretty insulting to families and people with severe disabilities who are doing it tough through no fault of their own. I hope that you never need to care for a 24 year old with multiple sclerosis, a 40 yo who has a stroke, a 50 year old with early onset dementia, or a child dealing with after effects of meningitis.
      This scheme will only be caring for those with serious disabilities.

    • acotrel says:

      09:39am | 17/08/11

      @Sam
      John is one of those people Charles Dickens wrote about when he mentioned someone rich saying ‘the poor should have managed their affairs better ’  ?
      Only little people get into downwards envy !!

    • JohnB says:

      10:16am | 17/08/11

      I’m sorry you misread what I said Sam Paior…Do you really think anyone be so heartless?

      “welfare recipients ......THAT….. have never looked after their health, or that of their kids”...

      I would NEVER put rubbish on the benefiting of genuine disability. Sorry for the confusion…..

      The other socialist rubbish, I’ll bang on about till I’m blue in the face.

    • acotrel says:

      10:46am | 17/08/11

      @JohnB
      ‘I would NEVER put rubbish on the benefiting of genuine disability. Sorry for the confusion…..’

      So you wouldn’t rubbish someone if you doubted their veracity over an injury ?  How would you know what is ‘genuine’, are you a doctor who owns a polygraph?

    • JohnB says:

      12:02pm | 17/08/11

      Are you suggesting acotrel, that a system that allows non genuine disability status is okay?

      I think your socialism’s gone a bit too far. Too far for Australia to afford in fact.

    • rod sexton says:

      07:51am | 17/08/11

      Gillard et al will all be long gone in seven years.

    • JohnB says:

      08:22am | 17/08/11

      Are we expecting a Labor government to give us value for money. Sure provide for the people that needed….. BUT….. I resent that this government is considering using my tax dollars to support some people with poor hygiene, eating habits, substance abusers including smoking, alcohol, over eating.

      Will we see some conditions on how our money will be spent. Or will it be more of the same Labor policy, give, give, give with no responsibility expected?

    • acotrel says:

      09:05am | 17/08/11

      @JohnB
      It never ceases to amaze me how you guys can spin things around to create the same statement - ‘Labor stinks’ !!!

    • JohnB says:

      09:32am | 17/08/11

      “spin things around”...No spin needed acotrel. They are not doing a good job with anything.

      “you guys” ...Do you mean those of us intelligent and practical enough to see ANOTHER scam when we see one?

      “‘Labor stinks’ !!! ” ....I’ve never seen you write a truer word acotrel.

      I think you’d be surprised at how close yours and my views are acotrel. For example yesterday you implied that I think we have a God given right to live better than those presently dieing of hunger. Nothing could be further from the truth….I’m a kind man, but I’m also a practical man. Practical is what’s missing from anything the Labor party has presented to date. My view is that the socialist way is not ever going to fix anything because they ALWAYS tackle the wrong problem.

    • Babe in the Woods says:

      08:56am | 17/08/11

      Advisory committee, vote for us for 7 years and you might get something, yada yada yada.  FFS just do something for a change instead of talking about it. Too much to hope for.

    • acotrel says:

      09:08am | 17/08/11

      @ Babe in the woods
      What do you expect from the LNP - empathy?  FAT CHANCE !!
      They’re more likely to bash you to help their political agenda, as Howard did with the Disability Pensioners !

    • Babe in the Woods says:

      09:27am | 17/08/11

      @Actorel, Why are you talking about the LNP?  I am making a general statement about all political parties.  Both sides.  This is all they do, set up committees and put mates in high paid jobs and promise to do something if re-elected.  Calm down, it is still early.

    • acotrel says:

      10:09am | 17/08/11

      @Babe in the Woods

      There is a radical difference in the way the LNP approaches caring for the disabled compared with that of the ALP.  Insurance against disability has never been mentione by the LNP.  In fact just before Howard got his backside soundly kicked in 2007, he began to persecute the disability pensioners.  It was all too hard for him to support implementation of audited OHS Management Systems by his precious business owners. So he took the old approach used to control rats - ‘block up their holes’!  He got Centrelink to make it more difficult to give disability support to the injured.  In fact Centrelink fudged the numbers by getting many disability pensioners to transfer to an age pension, where their age allowed. The whole thing expressed severe cynicism, and a total lack of empathy.  At least the Labor party is trying to do something for these disadvantaged victims.

    • Richard says:

      12:22pm | 17/08/11

      Folks can get Disability Support pension of $670 a fortnight, plus rent assistance if needed and a $58 f/n supplement to help with paying utilities, so you could be up around $850 a f/n….. and also other benefits. I’ve known folks on this pension who seem to be quite mobile, why one person I know even works in the Fire season up in a tower where he climbs a ladder 130 feet up, so why is he getting Disability pension ? The thing that needs to be done is to bugger off the parasites and bludgers, then the saved money can be used for a really great system for the real bona fide citizens.

    • Joy says:

      01:27pm | 17/08/11

      My daughter has Cerebral Palsy and Cronic Fatigue Syndrome and gets no assistance whatsoever , no disability pension NOTHING. She would be delighted just to get a concession card to help with her normal bills so that when she needs a wheelchair or walker or special shoes etc. it isn’t such a burden financially.

    • Cat says:

      03:42pm | 18/08/11

      you need to go back to centrelink and ask why she didn’t qualify, because she should have - you might find it was a case of the doctors reports not giving enough information - you really have to add a lot of supporting paperwork because often the forms they give you don’t cover all the issues that effect an individual.

    • Extremely Popular Policy free Liberals Nationals says:

      01:41pm | 17/08/11

      Liberal National Party are mentally disabled. They get the Age Pension.  The Liberal National Party is highly electorally popular but they have no policies!

    • Les Cope says:

      02:54pm | 17/08/11

      This is a great article that tells it like it is. The issues are not new and have been around for 50 plus plus years. When my son was diagnosed with a severe disability art the age of 3 months I niavely thought all would be okay. The Govt would support him and the family. How wrong I was. Now 39 years later the buck stops with us. His aging parents. We don’t need money spent helping us out. He is the one who has the major need and the NDIS if it does all come together, should provide that along with his individual plan.

    • Meredith says:

      04:48pm | 17/08/11

      This article does not give anyone an excuese to get ‘political’.  It was a facts driven piece that is trying to explain where the system is and where it has been for too long.  There is genuine suffering out there by too many of your fellow Australians so to start bitching about socialist views is insulting.

      The pressure that got the PC rolling needs to keep on to ensure that the State Govts, who are currently primarily responsible for the care needs of People living with a disability, increase their spending now.  It’s quite obvious that it’s their neglect that has the sector in the dire state it is now in and in that there should be great shame.
      Well done Sam!

    • Craig Wallace says:

      08:11pm | 17/08/11

      Hi Sam
      I’d like to see things moving faster too but we should also get the facts right here and deliver credit & fault where it’s due.

      The Federal Government can’t just click its fingers and introduce the NDIS. There is this thing in the way called the constitution which says that the States have powers in this area.

      If you don’t want to wait seven years then try ranting at the States to get a move on & commit. WA Premier Colin Barnett might be a good place to start given he has cast doubts on his State signing up to the scheme.

      The first attempt to move towards disability insurance was made by the Whitlam government shortly before they fell and neither the Fraser or Howard governments made this a priority. Out of interest, Gough Whitlam also introduced the first allowance for handicapped children prior to which there was, as far as I know, not a single Federal financial assistance program in place for families of children with disabilities.

      Bob Hawke may have said that no child will live in poverty but he and Dr Neal Blewett actually delivered Medicare - and did so at light speed between coming to power in March 1983 and February 1984.

      Your article also mentions continence supplies - a Continence Aids Assistance Scheme was introduced by the Keating Government in 1992.

      Many of these schemes were built on by govts of both persuasions (the Fraser Government also had a good record on disability in some areas) but let’s have some credit where its due and the good grace to congratulate the Gillard Government on taking this latest historic step towards decent care and support for people with a disability.

    • Sam Paior says:

      08:59am | 18/08/11

      Hi Craig,
      Thanks for your considered thoughts. I have spent a large chunk of my life over the past five years (since misguidedly moving back from the USA thinking that services here would be an improvement) holding my State government to task.
      Mentioning the light speed at which Medicare was introduced appears to demonstrate the point of my words above.
      As for continence supplies, the CAAS scheme really only touches the edges (so to speak) of the continence supplies of many people who need this help.
      I congratulate this Government for taking the steps to bring the issue to the Productivity Commission, but an announcement of $10M for an advisory committee is (almost) an insult. If they were serious and committed to this fundamental change and were doing more than giving lip service to the crises that so many face everyday, they would have offered up $2B or so to clear urgent crisis waiting lists, or at least some kind of committed timeline.
      For example, the lists of people who are stuck in hospital (hogging beds and dollars while other patients are ramped in the driveways) for want of a few support hours to go home, are a huge issue in every state. The states have proven themselves incapable of prioritising disability service, leaning on the feds to pick up the slack in undignified and fiscal irresponsible ways.
      This piece is not an anti-Gillard rant, though the punters here seem to turn any and all Punch writing one direction or the other (quite a skill). It simply expresses my (and many many other people living or caring with disability) disappointment at this, well, this pissy little announcement.

    • Caro says:

      12:17am | 25/08/11

      Hi Sam - The $10million you mention is not for “an advisory committee”. It is to pay for people to begin doing the detailed (and very complicated) work necessary to develop individualised assessment documentation, to work out exactly what will be funded and how, and to begin the vast amount of work necessary to develop new services and supports - including a major new labour force and infrastructure - to meet all the pent up demand. The advisory committee is only there to help oversee all this detailed technical work and to contribute ideas/suggestions/comments. 
      Sure, it’s frustrating, but you don’t and cannot create an entirely new, national, disability support system virtually from scratch, after decades of chronic underfunding and underinvestment and severe unmet need, replacing a currently state-based system, without a great detail of preparatory work. The introduction of Medibank/Medicare was a stroll in the park compared to creating an NDIS. Medicare wsas/is simply a different method of financing access to an already fully functional, existing acute health care system. The NDIS is an entirely different matter. Medicare would have taken years to introduce too if the government of the day had had to turn around and build scores of major new hospitals, source tens of thousands of nurses and train and accommodate thousands of extra GPs and specialists before Medicare could even begin operating.
      So - I’m afraid your criticisms are uninformed and therefore baseless.

    • Sam Paior says:

      08:45am | 25/08/11

      Caro,
      I am not bashing the Committee and understand their work is integral to the development of a functional NDIS. However, the PC also recommended immediate funding increases in accommodation and respite. There are already well established programs with waiting lists miles long that could do much to alleviate suffering without waiting seven years.
      The Gillard government’s commitment is, so far, as strong as their commitment to the NDS, which has not yet even established benchmarks, let alone met them since 2006 (? I think) when those reforms were “agreed”.
      It is not unhealthy to have some cynicism when it comes to disability funding in Australia. We need to keep the pressure up on Government to pull through with what what could (and hopefully will) be monumental reform for Australians with a disability.

    • graham says:

      12:03am | 18/08/11

      Howard changed this once-great nation’s thinking about the disabled and as a result we read here comments from people who resent their tax dollar being spent on this most deserving section of our population.
      Why didn’t Howard, during his “Cut the disabled from their pension” rant,(so reminiscent of Hitler’s ‘only the best are needed rant), sack his Minister responsible, sack the heirarchy that allowed “bludgers” to get on the DSP, and cause multiple other heads to roll? Because, as usual he was lying. And the selfish, ever out to justify that their tax dollars be not “wasted” followed on cue as always. They didn’t march in protest at their tax dollars supporting Howard’s failed businessman brother, or Howard’s (and all other pollies’), golden, golden handshake after doing nothing for the people over twelve plus years. Oh no. Pick out the least able to defend themselves group and fire away. What a sick, sad, cowardly bunch of sadistic syncophants. And now the Howardites have become the Abbottites.
      I hope you sleep well knowing that just down the road a child is not sleeping because he doesn’t have a bed that allows him to sleep at all. He’s not “getting” your tax dollar. Aren’t you all lucky.

    • Shin says:

      08:16am | 08/02/12

      @11 – That’s a view that’s auonrd the traps, Andrew, but to the degree that it’s plausible, it just highlights again what a bloody mess the government has made of this. … further strips them of credibility and believability if they were to represent this people swap as part of an integrated policy.Your right. Our political class is hopelessly compromised by this issue. I’d settle just for someone trying to get policy in the right direction.It’s worth remembering that there were effectively no asylum seeker boats in the 1980s. Mandatory detention and the pacific solution were short term policies cobbled together to try and fix a political problem. Like most new issues, government’s take many years to come up with any kind of framework, instead of just cobbling together something to get people to stop yelling at them about it. But, since 2002 the government (beginning with DFAT officials according to Michael Wesley’s book the Howard Paradox) has tried to convince the Asia-Pacific that this is a regional problem, and it’s slowly working. I’m convinced that such an agreement is the only way to end people smuggling once and for all (My PhD is on how successful Australia can be at such persuasion, hence my interest).Right now, i don’t care about the government’s consistency or credibility. I just want them to begin moving towards achieving a regional policy that prevents boats leaving for Australia, in return for Australia helping fund better regional treatment of asylum seekers & taking a much larger share of refugees.@ 17 “Just how many should we take here?”At it’s peak in 2009 we took 13k refugees, and 150k in migration (though that’s only 77k net migration, and overall numbers have fallen considerably in recent years). We could double those without a noticeable impact. Of course there are always going to be limits, no one has or would pretend otherwise. But we are no where near Australia’s capacity to take many more, and that’s assuming we only do so as long as it doesn’t have any major impact on our quality of life or economic development (indeed far from it, a larger population has significant economic and security benefits, but that’s an argument for another day).

    • Chris Chinniah says:

      12:04pm | 02/05/12

      By reading the article, I have learnt that people overvalue their insurance policies thinking that it would be enough to cover their living expenses even if they become disabled. I also disagree with the decision of the Australian government to take 7 years to implement the NDIS as it is way too long.

      Chris - http://americanvisitorinsurance.com

    • http://www.guccistore-jp.com/ says:

      01:36pm | 24/08/12

      m impressed! Extremely useful information specifically the last part I care for such info a lot. I was looking for this certain info for a long time. Thank you and good luck.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

RT @rdhinds: David Warner out for 2 in 5 balls. Now that's a real days work @malcolmconn and @crashcraddock1! #unrealopeners

Anthony Sharwood

Footy Show apologises for 20 years of irrelevant, boofheadish drivel... in our dreams. But the baby apol is a start http://t.co/oaDfGDMJBh

Malcolm Farr

@katedoak Love the 'gay click' reference. Sadly my comment wasn't good enough to be recorded.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @newscomauHQ: Blackberry. Levis. Sony. @sarahmichael24 reports why brands are cool one minute, and cold the next. | http://t.co/3KJHXkVG

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter