It is impossible as an employee of Rupert Murdoch to offer any thoughts on the phone hacking scandal in the UK without being accused of being a company patsy and probably also a sycophant, even a liar.

End of the world…fuelled by a Guardian error. Photo: AP

On a personal and professional level I have found some of the revelations which have come out of the UK to be troubling at the very least, and appalling at their absolute worst. It is also the case however that two of the biggest and most damaging allegations against the company aren’t actually true at all.

From where I sit, working for the Australian arm of this media business, the whole affair is starting to look like a psychotic and reckless fight-to-the-death by British journalists who, in that hyper-competitive media culture, have often cut corners or chanced their arms to be first with the news.

Sometimes they have done so with little regard for whether that news has been completely correct, newsworthy or in the public interest.

The first point I would make about the British media and the Australian media is that there is a cavernous divide in the culture. That point is best underscored by the fact that, this year, two retired Supreme Court judges audited all of our mastheads over the past five years and found no evidence of phone-hacking, bribery of public officials, or anything which has been unearthed at News International. 

Six years ago I spent a very illuminating and entertaining fortnight on placement with The Sun in London. The page one story on my first day was the brilliant exclusive headed “Harry the Nazi” which depicted the third in line to the throne, whose great-grandmother had rallied Londoners during The Blitz, attending a fancy dress party with his rich mates dressed in a swastika armband. It was a cracking story, wholly in the public interest, a powerful (and funny) tabloid front page, and an example of the one thing I love more than anything about this company – its hostility towards the establishment, its mistrust of authority and institutions, its instinctive dislike for toffs who get ahead not on the basis of ability but birthright.

These instincts are part of the media culture which exists in Australia, but there are other aspects which are completely alien here. One night while drinking with journalists in London – not just from News International – we got talking about the Bali terrorist attack in which 88 Australians died. I told the British journos how we had an embarrassing moment after the bombing when we ran a front-page photograph of a young bloke tragically killed at the Sari Club, the last picture of him alive, where he was cuddling a young Aussie girl in his hotel pool that Saturday afternoon.

His best mate rang The Daily Telegraph on the day we published, and politely asked me as the newspaper’s chief of staff if we could take the photo off the website and not use it in print again. This was because the poor young bloke was actually in Bali on his buck’s week and his fiancee, already shattered with grief, had become even more distressed when she saw a photograph suggesting her would-be-husband was cuddling up with another woman.

The British journos exclaimed that it was such a terrific follow-up – suggesting headlines such as “Busted in Bali!” and so forth -  and laughingly dismissing me as a ponse when I explained we had immediately deleted the image from our website and photo library and did no follow-up at all.

The cut-throat competition of the UK was on display again this week with the battle between News International and the left-leaning Guardian newspaper over the coverage of the phone hacking scandal. The Guardian has been leading the charge against the Murdoch press but this week it was revealed that its most morally damning accusation, that the News of the World had hacked and deleted messages from young murder victim Milly Dowler’s mobile, creating false hope for her parents that she was alive, was actually false.

The Guardian had originally splashed this story all over its front page. The explosive nature of the allegation, which was sickening, was more than anything the driving force for the establishment of the Leveson Inquiry into the British press, and the closure of the News of the World newspaper by Rupert Murdoch. It now turns out that it never happened at all.

The Guardian does a good line in sanctimony and had a chance here to take the moral high ground by running a massive correction of its rolled-gold clanger. It chose not to, doing the very thing it so often accuses News International of doing, by burying its largely incomprehensible correction and going into full dissembling mode to say the essence of the story still stood.

Some of the story still does stand. No-one should have been listening to any messages on this poor girl’s phone, or indeed anyone’s phone. But the most damning aspect of the story was a total fiction. As was a second bombshell allegation, that The Sun newspaper illegally learned and recklessly revealed that former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s son had cystic fibrosis. The story had actually been written with Brown’s consent after the parent of another child with the illness had urged the paper to bring attention to the issue. Indeed after The Sun ran the story donations to the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation jumped from £600,000 in 2006 to £1,124,000 in the year of publication.

The dispute between the Guardian and The Sun might just prove that deep down all journalists are scumbags who will go to print with dodgy information to suit their agenda, and cover their behinds when it all goes pear-shaped.

Sitting here in Australia it is a culture that strikes me as alien, even though we have our own little media inquiry in this country too, which in itself was kicked along by a banner headline in a British newspaper which turned out to be nonsense. And hilariously enough, there is only one newspaper in this country which has been implicated in the illegal hacking of the private details of individuals. We don’t own it. It’s the Melbourne Age, raided by the police this week, and it ran more breathless and indignant copy on the UK phone hacking scandal than any other Australian newspaper.

Most commented

43 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Harry says:

      12:34pm | 18/12/11

      I hope Fairfax does the right thing and closes down ‘The Age’.

    • damien says:

      01:18pm | 18/12/11

      agree harry - for all the chest-beating by smh/age/abc journo’s, the closest thing we have in Australia to the hacking scandal is the Age using grifted logins to hack into labor party databases. Jonathan Holmes take note

    • the_pseudonym says:

      02:16pm | 18/12/11

      Shhhhhhh damien, the left never do anything wrong….....ask them, that’s why the proponents and the sheeple, know what’s best for all of us.

    • KH says:

      07:19am | 19/12/11

      Oh, whats the matter? Still can’t figure out how to unfold it?

    • acotrel says:

      07:36am | 19/12/11

      So Murdoch was ‘wrongfully accused’ - what a joke ?  Is that what’s called ‘trial by media’ ?  You’ve really gotta laugh ! ! Perhaps it was his turn in the barrel ?

    • Ethel says:

      12:43pm | 18/12/11

      Will the Guardian compensate those put out of work by its wild allegations?

    • acotrel says:

      07:43am | 19/12/11

      @Ethel
      A lot of the bastards probably should have been already sacked for their cynicism years ago !  Most times the ‘wild allegations’ could probably have been made randomly with confidence that they were correct.  A lot of these journos are just too bloody smart for their own good !

    • Karin says:

      02:14pm | 18/12/11

      “It is impossible as an employee of Rupert Murdoch to offer any thoughts on the phone hacking scandal in the UK ...”

      How very true.But still the apologists are just doing that.How about enlightening us why The Guardian should apologise?After all it is a well documented fact that the News of the World, among other UK papers,paid private detectives as well as policemen to dig up dirt on high-profile people.
      As for The Guardian “burying its largely incomprehensible correction “...ever noticed where the Murdoch papers bury their corrections?

      Headlines today,corrections buried in the middle of the papers.

      People in glass houses etc.

    • jf says:

      03:25pm | 18/12/11

      Wow. Even when the left Guardian is exposed for the very behaviour it accuses Murdoch papers of it is somehow not their fault or responsibility.

      “it is a well documented fact that the News of the World, among other UK papers,paid private detectives as well as policemen to dig up dirt on high-profile people.”

      Yes. And Murdoch acted swiftly and decisively when his employees were found to be acting badly.

      “it was revealed that its most morally damning accusation ... was actually false”

      Ah, but it’s different if the left do it.

    • Bruce says:

      04:53pm | 18/12/11

      A penny for your thoughts JF.

      In what sort of morally corrupt parallel universe do you equate The Guardians reporting of a story which was corroborated by the London Metropolitan Police at the time of publication with the News International’s systematically hacking of voice mail accounts including that of a missing schoolgirl who later found to have been murdered?

    • jf says:

      05:35pm | 18/12/11

      Bruce says: 05:53pm | 18/12/11

      “A penny for your thoughts JF.”

      Well, my thoughts weren’t to equate them.

      The NOTW’s conduct was reprehensible.

      That doesn’t mean that the Guardian should escape scrutiny because their conduct was less reprehensible.

    • Bruce says:

      03:08pm | 18/12/11

      “The cut-throat competition of the UK was on display again this week with the battle between the right-leaning News International and the left-leaning Guardian newspaper over the coverage of the phone hacking scandal.”

      I’ve made a small yet important addition to your statement above Penbo.

      In your haste to return serve you and your editors seem to have inadvertently overlooked it.

    • Bill says:

      03:08pm | 18/12/11

      Left wing losers.

    • Tom says:

      03:14pm | 18/12/11

      Did the audit of News Ltd in Australia look at syndicated copy from the UK papers, which was generated by illegal means, that appeared in The Australian, The Daily Tele & online? Local journalists might not have been involved in hacking but a company policy to syndicate content would surely leave local management with questions to answer. Let’s face it, this is all about profit & in the case of NoTW, profiting from crime. The question is, to what extent did News Ltd profit from crime?

    • marley says:

      03:39pm | 18/12/11

      @Tom - good question.  Another good question would be, how much does the Guardian profit by reducing its competition through its attack on NOTW?

    • hawker says:

      04:39pm | 18/12/11

      I hardly think the Guardian and NOTW were ever vying for the same readers, Marley. So the answer to your question would be not at all.

      And remember, closing NOTW was an unexpected and sudden move by Murdoch to stem the blood loss.  I can’t see how that could be seen as some sort of strategy from the Guardian.

    • Bruce says:

      04:43pm | 18/12/11

      Daft question quite frankly Marley.

      If you can identify me just one single soap dodger who on the closure of the NOTW decided to make the vast leap of from preferring right wing tabloid trash to left wing broadsheet elitism to accompany their full English on a Sunday morning then i’ll go hee.

      The single greatest beneficiary ofNews getting rumbled will be the equally odious Daily Mail.

    • marley says:

      06:00pm | 18/12/11

      Gentlemen, the Guardian appeals to progressives, the NOTW to the working class.  Admittedly the two are not the same.  Pity about that.  But sometimes they do overlap.

      Seriously,  if you think the Guardian, which has major financial issues, didn’t seek to put the boot into its competition, well, you’re dreaming.  Discredit the Murdoch press in general, and maybe you take a chunk not only out of NOTW, but out of the Times as well.

    • iansand says:

      06:04pm | 18/12/11

      marley - If you think that the NOTW and the Gruardian are in competition you should get out more.

    • marley says:

      01:15pm | 19/12/11

      @iansand - I think the Guardian and NewLtd are in competition.

    • the cheek says:

      03:49pm | 18/12/11

      People are so damn cynical aren’t they? Isn’t it a disgrace that just because you work for a media organisation with a long history of blatantly overt editorial bias, politically motivated propaganda, favoritism towards employees that follow the owners political line, that actually went to court to win the right to lie in broadcasts and was busted for massive shameless hacking, that people might doubt your motives? I bet if you stole something people would have the gall to call you a thief or something!

    • jf says:

      04:14pm | 18/12/11

      People may say the same thing about people who read such publications. They may be even more suspicious if those people contribute to the content of those publications by posting on blogs.

    • yourname says:

      03:59pm | 18/12/11

      “Ponse”—actually, I kind of like that spelling.

    • the labor landslide says:

      04:46pm | 18/12/11

      will Rupert Murdoch Or David Penberthy be the next Coalition PM?

    • Journo who never hacked anything says:

      08:33pm | 23/12/11

      Given our current political environment, I’d possibly be more confident with either of those options! lol.

    • The Labor Landslide says:

      04:51pm | 18/12/11

      Will Rupert Murdoch purchase the Australian federal parliament from the Australian people and make the Australian federal parliament a fully fledged subsidiary of News Limited ??
      Or will Rupert Murdoch just purchase The Liberal Party , The Labor Party , the National Party and the Greens ?

    • jf says:

      05:37pm | 18/12/11

      Hard to say. However, I’m pretty sure that if Murdoch made an offer to buy the Greens the response from Brown et al would be “how much”.

    • James In Footscray says:

      07:31pm | 18/12/11

      Yes, old Murdoch buys our elections by manipulating the minds of the hoi polloi.

      (Not our minds of course - we, as university educated progressives, see right through it.)

      We’d better keep a close eye on what those plumbers and factory workers are allowed to read.

    • Eda says:

      06:42pm | 18/12/11

      Mr Penberthy,

      Any one can follow the Levenson inquiry via the internet, which I am sure you are aware of.

      No one disputed the allegations (corroborated by the Met and Surrey police).

      Why is that? 

      I am amused that they didn’t, as the allegation could of been disputed, and was not, has now led to the unravelling of some very sordid, dirty and grubby practices, by some in the newpaper business.

      Anyhow, there is a long way to go in the Levenson inquiry and as there is going to be a ‘spin off’ inquiry re voice mail deletions, I’ll wait for their conclusion.

    • James In Footscray says:

      07:26pm | 18/12/11

      We’ve never heard Bob Brown et al ever concerned about privacy, until News hacks the phones of some celebs like Hugh Grant and Charlotte Church. In the UK.

      There wouldn’t be some other agenda would there?

    • Tom says:

      07:29pm | 18/12/11

      David, how illuminating was your fortnight’s placement with The Sun? Did you see or hear any evidence of phone hacking while you were there?

    • shane says:

      06:40am | 19/12/11

      Simple question did the NotW hack into peoples private voice mail accounts or not.

      I feel its a bit rich for News International to now start bleating about unfair reporting, and have noticed this is a trend across almost all New International papers.

      Your company invaded peoples privacy, broke the law and were caught.

    • Gratuitous Adviser says:

      07:46am | 19/12/11

      For me, the fact that Rupert Murdoch appears to have extraordinary influence on governemnt and who is in power in three countries, the USA, Great Britain and of course Australia.  His abilities to influence political parties to adopt his want and therefore advance his business interests and political leanings are legendary (how can any country allow one group to control 70% of a countries media – This is the way the communist and totalitarian States operate) and also despicable if you are a believer in democracy. 

      To quote from the Sustainable Business Forum:
      “Will anything change? James Murdoch today announced in the hearing that his organization is working on a new code of ethics. That much for solutions! – the sarcasm of this is certainly not lost on only the business ethics professor watching this. For us, the larger problem of Murdoch’s role in global politics is not that his organizations obviously resorted to shady practices in getting stories. It is still the fact that he personally wields enormous power over shaping public opinion. Blair, Cameron, or currently the ‘Tea Party’ movement in the US would be nowhere without his conglomerate backing them and providing a platform.”

      Because of the scandal his direct influence in the UK and Australia is on the way down but the “Tea Party”.  This is a worry!!

    • JR says:

      08:46am | 19/12/11

      “its hostility towards the establishment, its mistrust of authority and institutions, its instinctive dislike for toffs who get ahead not on the basis of ability but birthright.”

      Er… News International IS the establishment and James Murdoch is a classic example of someone getting ahead via birthright.

      See me after class.

    • Lezza says:

      09:42am | 19/12/11

      A beautiful response

    • john says:

      09:47am | 19/12/11

      The censorship of the comments on this article beggars belief.
      Penbo you are a disgrace.

    • Philip Crooks says:

      10:22am | 19/12/11

      Think of Jack Nicholson in a Few Good Men. News International cannot handle the truth.

    • Philip Crooks says:

      10:17am | 19/12/11

      Rupert Murdoch the media equivalent of Mother Theresa. David Penberthy his Malcolm Muggeridge, read the late Christopher Hitchins to see the real Mother Theresa.
      The person who wrote this rubbish must have no self respect, he even “wrote” for the Sun; headline Gottcha.
      Dr Gobbels is not dead meet his reincarnation.

    • haggis says:

      11:00am | 19/12/11

      Sorry, it was Gotcha! - wiv one t

    • Lezza says:

      11:06am | 19/12/11

      Just a teeney-weeney bit over the top

    • Lezza says:

      11:10am | 19/12/11

      Philip Crooks?
      If this is your real name, are you that eccentric Enzedder who worked for 2GB-Macquarie News back in the sixties?
      If so, get Penbo to pass on your E-Mail address to me.

    • Philip Crooks says:

      06:07pm | 19/12/11

      No Lezza I don’t know who or what Enzedder was enlighten me.

    • Ekit says:

      07:09am | 08/02/12

      You sure it’s not like the old Three Stooges films where seoomne would get poked with two fingers in the eyes?  Or it could be like in The Jerk when Steve Martin’s invention had made all that money and then people started getting cross-eyed and a class action destroyed everything he had. - Writer boy

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@Kittu64 That's true. Pretty sure I referred to "high salaried" women.

David Penberthy

@michelangeloruc not at all mate it is a great story and photo

tory_maguire

@nswpolice very polite and helpful officers manning the Pyrmont road closures this morning

David Penberthy

@KevCorduroy @SallyHitchiner it's a great idea I doubt he'd go for it though far too laid back

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter