Winemakers will tell you that the key to getting a really good harvest of prime grapes is to trick the vines into thinking they’re dying. Give them just enough water, but only just enough, and the vines will divert every last precious drop of moisture into the fruit and produce a bumper crop.

This young man has an extremely bright future… especially under a certain MJ Clarke

Overnight, the Test careers of several leading Australian players were in danger of withering, as runs and wickets had dried up. But like the vines, the likes of Mitchell Johnson, Brad Haddin, Mike Hussey and Ricky Ponting extracted just enough to help their team deliver the sweetest of victories.

Last night’s thrilling two wicket win over South Africa was rightly hailed as a victory for the future of Australian cricket, as 18 year old tyro Patrick Cummins backed up his six wicket second innings haul with a nerveless knock which included his hitting the winning runs.

But above all, this was a victory for Michael Clarke, the much-maligned skipper whose only real crime down the years has been to be a Gen Y who acts like a Gen Y in a team which, any day now, will be entirely comprised of Gen Ys.

There is a certain crustiness we expect from our cricket captains. Even decidedly uncrusty 20-something and 30-something sideline onlookers demand it. Captains must be grizzled and impossible to please like Border, or statesmanlike like Waugh, or have a paunchy old school body like Mark Taylor. Then they’re real men. Real captaincy material.

Tats, apparently, are un-captainlike. So are hot girlfriends. So are fast cars. What a ridiculously sepia-tinged way of looking at things. The way some people think, you might as well telecast the cricket in black and white.

Michael Clarke has been anything but ignorant of the public mood, so he has changed. He moved from trendy Bondi to the family-orientated Sutherland Shire in Sydney’s south. Admittedly, his lifestyle changes were PR-managed to the max. He even went on telly to say he’d been keeping a lower profile over winter in the downtime before the October Sri Lanka tour.

But so much of modern life is stage managed. Clarke has more minders than Barack Obama, but that’s how it is. What matters is not whether he drives a Ferrari or a Toyota Corolla, and whether he has a diamond stud or not. What matters is how he captains the national cricket team. And on that score, he is proving himself more than worthy.

Clarke’s first Test as captain was in the final Test of last summer’s Ashes, when Ricky Ponting was injured. With the urn gone and little to play for, Australia’s demoralised, outclassed squad was walloped by an innings and then some. Scratch that one from the record.

His next assignment was in Sri Lanka. In 2004, Ponting played his first full series as captain there, and achieved the remarkable feat of winning 3-0 after being behind on the first innings of each Test. Ah, but he had a team full of champions. Just as there are 11 Tim Tams in a pack, Ponting wouldn’t have swapped one of his 11 for anything.

Clarke had it way harder. He trekked over with an untried spinner in a spinner’s paradise, an untried paceman, an out of form opener, an ageing champion and enough assorted burdens to bog down one of the local elephants. But somehow, his team not only won but dominated the series.

Two moments stood out. One was his decision to give that noted trundler Mike Hussey the ball in the second Test. Hussey duly removed Sri Lankan dangerman Kumar Sangakkara. Then in the decisive third Test, leading 1-0, his priceless 112 on the back of opener Phil Hughes’ 126 sealed the series. It was the consummate captain’s knock.

Clarke at his best has the steel of Waugh, the grit of Border and the tactical nous of Taylor. But above all, he relates to his players and they to him.

Two years ago in South Africa, on Phil Hughes’ breakthrough tour, it appeared that Ricky Ponting was benefiting from at last being in charge of young players, and not having guys like Warne around to destroy the power balance. That theory fizzled, as Ponting’s own form struggles took precedence over everything else.

Clarke is back in form, so he doesn’t have that to worry about. And he, too, is thriving as the leader of a young bunch – especially as he knows the oldies won’t be around much longer. At 30, Clarke is both old enough and senior enough to lead, but young enough to be one of the gang.

Of course, all of this would have been a much harder sell if Dale Steyn had held a regulation caught-and-bowled overnight and Australia had narrowly fallen short of victory. But we won. We squared a series 1-1 against the world’s best team (no matter what the rankings say) on their own patch. That’s a huge thing.

Forget about that historically woeful innings of 47 in the first Test. That was an aberration. And remember, we dismissed South Africa for 96 the same day. The pitch was clearly wonky. The thing to take out of that first Test loss was Clarke’s incredible first innings century.

Sizing up the pitch like a true captain, he scored quickly and dashingly, as he knew that every minute at the wicket was a minute closer to dismissal. In the end he made 151 off 176 balls, more than half his team’s total. It was brilliant, and it proved beyond doubt that Clarke the batsman is a man for all occasions.

He’s a man for all occasions as skipper too. As the oldies inevitably fade away, just watch as more youngsters like Patrick Cummins bust their guts to be part of the Michael Clarke regime. We’re lucky to have a skipper like him.

Twitter: @antsharwood

68 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Cy says:

      02:24pm | 22/11/11

      Michael Clarke should not be the Captain - her does not fit the mould nor is he doing a good job. The person for the job of Captain is Shane Watson. If
      Shane were Captain you would see an immediate uplift in the team

    • Ben C says:

      03:07pm | 22/11/11

      @ Cy

      I wouldn’t have Watson captaining at all - we don’t need a captain who is going to be out injured every two or three years.

    • pC says:

      05:01pm | 22/11/11

      as much as i like him as a player, watson is even more of a pretty boy than clarke is. scented candles anyone? i think clarke is going to make a great captain. i’m a crusty 20-something but a fan of clarke…as long as we start winning again!!

    • stephen says:

      08:20pm | 22/11/11

      They won Cy.
      He’s doing a good job, and will be a great Captain.

    • Ben says:

      09:14pm | 23/11/11

      Rather than being dropped Simon Katich should have been captain. Australian cricket needs a hard bastard like him. None of this group hug and team pact bullshit that Clarke is up to. Best to have a man who would furiously stalk into the change rooms and hurl his bat through the wall if he gets out for less than a 50. The other players would respond to his uncompromising attitude. He’d give Alan Border a run for his money in terms of general crankiness.

    • GB says:

      11:48am | 22/11/11

      Clarke hasn’t deserved anywhere near the amount of flak he has copped but he sure as hell doesn’t deserve gushing pieces like this written about him either Ant. You’re dismissing all the bad stuff like the 47 all out as irrelevant, but are happy to focus only only the positives to support his bona fides as Australia’s Test Captain? Using his century in Cape Town as supporting evidence and totally dismissing the other 3 times he failed to pass 11 is pretty flawed methodology I’d have thought. The jury is still well and truly out IMO.

    • MDMConnell says:

      03:02pm | 22/11/11

      My thoughts exactly.

      Clarke seems to inspire either blind hatred or fingers-down-the-throat gushing praise. Why can’t we just say he’s doing an okay job so far and leave it at that.

      Plus Pat Cummins was selected by the “Old” selectors who were apparently so hopeless they had to be sacked. Nothing to do with the Clarke-led New Guard at all.

    • Tim says:

      11:51am | 22/11/11

      Why on reading this do I think that Ant Sharwood has a poster of Michael Clarke on his wall?

      Clark’s been OK in his start as captain but still has a looooonnggg way to go.

      Last night’s win was fantastic but I don’t think Clarke had a lot to do with it. Our bowlers were fairly good and our batsmen finally got a few runs. Note, that’s a few runs.
      We’ll see what happens over the summer.

    • Mahhrat says:

      12:07pm | 22/11/11

      A messy poster at that.

    • gobsmack says:

      12:34pm | 22/11/11

      I agree.
      Australia at 3/141 chasing 300 plus when Clarke came in.  If ever there was a time for a captain’s knock, this was it.
      Clarke gets 2 runs.
      The fact is that Clarke makes most of his big scores when it doesn’t matter.  Either in losing matches or when everyone else in the team is making big scores.
      I really can’t recall any occasion where he’s put on a match winning (or match saving) innings.

    • Matthew says:

      01:21pm | 22/11/11

      Top score in the 2nd of 65 and in the 1st it was only 88.  How is this even close to good?

      Ponting got 62 for both innings and Clarke got 13, how is this remotely close to good?

      It wasn’t a good performance, it was an average performance….10 years ago 300 would’ve been below average for Australia but suddenly we’re happy with it.

    • Dave says:

      02:06pm | 22/11/11

      Ant’s poster would be on the ceiling I’ll bet

    • stephen says:

      08:27pm | 22/11/11

      The SA bowlers, especially the spinners, were first class, and we still beat them.
      Lately, our cricketers have been behaving like businessmen, ie don’t so much attack, but let the opposition make mistakes, and the balance will tip in our favour.
      Thus, our bowlers have recently been woeful, and have been, by default, pressuring selectors to upmarket the batting lineup to compensate.
      If you doubt this, go to the stats.

    • mick says:

      12:08pm | 22/11/11

      Sports people are like cars.  You have to replace them at some time. 

      There needs to be a time when loyalty is replaced by the new crop who have so much to offer.  It is about time that Ricky Ponting and a few of the ‘old farts’ called it a day as this will be good for the sport and ensure that Australia retains its position in the cricketing world.

    • Andrew says:

      12:08pm | 22/11/11

      Mark Taylor was blocky, not paunchy.

    • Mahhrat says:

      12:09pm | 22/11/11

      The best bit of this article is that you didn’t fall into singing the praises of the poor young Pat Cummins who is going to come home at 18 to one of the stupidest media circuses ever.

      We need to be protecting and nurturing this apparently rare talent, but such has been the dearth of worthy news coming from the cricket world lately that we’re going to go apeshit stupid over the kid.  I just hope his mind and body hold up under the expectations of us all.

      I don’t know if it’s because I don’t have pay TV, but a lot of my mates and I don’t have the passion we had as kids for the sport, when we would go watch our heroes and we would see them on TV as well.

      Cricket is far better watched on television, and I can’t help but think that 20/20’s move to Foxtel is not a good thing for the future of the sport.

    • Matthew says:

      02:15pm | 22/11/11

      I’m in my mid-20s and I don’t have the passion of my child/teenage years anymore.

      Remember the days when hayden would come out and get 200 runs and bat for 2 days without batting an eyelid or bevan would hit 4 on the last ball to win the game for us.  Or taylor would take a catch with his foot.

    • Cath says:

      03:48pm | 22/11/11

      Mahhrat, Michael Clarke seems to be aware of that, judging by his words at the end of the test.  Sensible comments from a captain who is doing a pretty good job.

    • TS says:

      12:10pm | 22/11/11

      Nice article, made for a nice change from the tears an article over there -> about climate change has unsurprisingly brought about.

      Truly though, this domestic summers’ series will be the litmus test by which Clarke will measured to be rid of the monkeys and detractors. I hope he and the test team (gogogogo Warner!) do well (I couldn’t care less about the T20 results, and only care a smidgen more about the fossil-like 50 over format (when are the changes being brought in?)).

    • Macca says:

      12:12pm | 22/11/11

      I think Clarke has been an excellent Captain. He’s had a bowling attack full of underperforming koala’s and a batting line-up comprised of the ancient and ailing. Despite this, he has lead from the front as a batsmen and got results as a captain for his team and country. His fielding positions and bowling rotations are creative and well thought out, and far more intricate than anything Ponting ever demonstrated.

      As Ant has said, the level of criticsm levelled at him has been overt. But I suspect Australian Cricket on the international stage will be much better after Clarke has finished his rein as Captain than what he inherited. It’s unfortunate that we can’t say the same for the greatest Australian Batsman I’ve ever seen. The series against New Zealand should be Ricky’s last.

    • badrinath says:

      02:18pm | 22/11/11

      lead from the front as a batsman…. when was this, other than occasionaly?

    • gobsmack says:

      03:11pm | 22/11/11

      “Leading from the front”!?
      When the game was there to be won, he made 2.
      Fortunately, Hussey, Haddin and Johnson did the job for him.
      You would have to be from NSW.

    • Ben C says:

      03:46pm | 22/11/11

      @ Macca

      “The series against New Zealand should be Ricky’s last.”

      Even if it’s only because the second and final Test is on his home pitch.

    • stephen says:

      08:36pm | 22/11/11

      ...‘batmen you’ve ever seen ?’
      Are you too young to remember Kim Hughes, or are you mistaking captain for mere batman, (as, undoubtedly, the selectors did in, I think, 81 ?’)

    • mere says:

      07:41pm | 23/11/11

      steve waugh, Ab and punter make kim hughes look like a tail ender

    • Wicket Waz says:

      12:17pm | 22/11/11

      He (Clarke) has always had a persona of “what the game can do for him” right from his first innings when he made 150 odd in Bangalore. Local media were forbidden from interviewing him without going through his manager first… That said he grows on you in a very slow fashion.

    • S.L says:

      12:18pm | 22/11/11

      Firstly Pup can’t be THAT good because he’s from NSW or that’s what many cricket fans who post on here think. Same with Patrick Cummins. Much better prospects in the other states!
      Has my opinion of Michael Clarke changed? No I still think he’s an over publicised wanker.
      On a positive note it’s heartwarming to see a changing of the guard. If only the Windies could find some players of note it would almost be like the good old days…............

    • Babe In The Woods says:

      12:32pm | 22/11/11

      I took a bit of exception to an off-handed remarked there.  I actually liked the statesman ship and grit of Steve Waugh.  And I admired crusty old “Captain Grumpy” Border.  I don’t play cricket but certainly did watch a lot of it.  To me those men seemed to sum up all that was good in Test Cricket (so this has nothing to do with the other forms of the game)  and somehow just added to it.  I never feel that with Pup.  Whether he will go on to be a great captain or not, I don’t know, but I do wish him (and all Australians) well.  But somehow watching him playing Test, well, it’s just not cricket.

    • n_dude says:

      12:55pm | 22/11/11

      Look, I agree it was a great victory, but I still think it is too early to judge Clarke. His innings at the Wanderers was great considering it made up the bulk of their first innings score. I also think some of his moves as a captain worked. Nevertheless,I think the middle order is still brittle against class bowling and Clarke has not shown enough consistency in his batting. The home series against India later this year will be an important test for Clarke and the team.

    • James says:

      01:04pm | 22/11/11

      Clarke is a massive tosser, which would be fine if he played for Manchester United. You’re somewhat correct that we expect our captain to be a hard and gritty character but more importantly we expect them to be humble. Cricket is still a traditonal game. Nobody knew or cared to ask what kind of car Waugh etc drove because they were too busy doing their job.

    • Chris says:

      01:14pm | 22/11/11

      People don’t like Clarke because he comes off as a W***ker. It’s nothing to do with age.

      I’m 20 and I hate him. So does every single person I’ve ever talked to about Cricket. Michael Clarke epitomises everything that is wrong with Australian cricket.

    • Babe In The Woods says:

      01:58pm | 22/11/11

      @Chris, not the way I would have put it, but it is sort of what I was getting at.  A cricket captain is more than just a player to be judged on stats etc.  It has to do with demeanour, character etc.  The sort of stuff people want to see in a captain.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      02:09pm | 22/11/11

      I agree its not his age, nor was it his batting which was better than a lot of others in the Australian team. It was the whole “Clark the brand” thing. Still one thing that made me respect the guy was when he chose not to put himself up for the 20/20 bidding, citing wanting to concentrate on his test career.

      Someone focussing on playing real cricket as opposed to bogan giggles gets thumbs up in my mind.

    • Mick ii says:

      02:35pm | 22/11/11

      Come off it,

      Would you rather a captain that makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside? or one that wins matches?

      Maybe we could have Hamish and Andy as captains, or Rove, or Kylie Minogue.  They probably can’t play cricket but at least people like them. 
      Bah

    • gobsmack says:

      03:13pm | 22/11/11

      @HTPM
      He didn’t put himself up for the 20/20 bidding to save himself the embarassment of being passed in.

    • Butu, bring my gun. says:

      10:56pm | 22/11/11

      Babe In the Woods is correct. Character. Demeanour. Moustache. All of these things are important. But these don’t cover what makes a great captain. Only one thing does.

      A hyphenated name.

      If the young pup had a name like Michael Ffofington-Clarke then he would indeed be a natural captain. His photo would replace that of ‘Chuck’ Fleetwood-Smith on my bedside table. Truely a travesty that he was never the captain of his national team. The selectors should have hung their heads in shame, selecting an absolute nobody like Bradman as captain ahead of our Chuck. Bradman. Say it out loud. I don’t hear any hyphenations.

      A national disgrace.

    • Mike says:

      02:05pm | 22/11/11

      Funny how supposedly blokey males will nag and gossip like females during a Miss Universe comp… Maybe the Australian male is far more feminine then he wants to admit. Talking about clothes, fashion sense and girlfriends, that was in a Cleo magazine, and apparently Australian cricket forums as well.

    • red says:

      02:23pm | 22/11/11

      “World’s best team”
      Am I missing something? Ah, I think the poms might have something to say about that little statement…

    • stephen says:

      08:40pm | 22/11/11

      Yeah, ‘well, not on my watch’.
      Watch the advs, son. You might learn something.

    • Mick ii says:

      02:29pm | 22/11/11

      “if Dale Steyn had held a regulation caught-and-bowled” 

      Ha Bollocks,  it would have snapped his arms off if he got anywhere near it.

      Clarke captained well…Ponting played well.

      The world is in harmony again.

    • CynicalGoatWA says:

      03:05pm | 22/11/11

      Gee whiz that is one of the most fawning Punch articles I’ve read since the last Mal Farr/Mark Kenny love-in in support of Gillard. Lots of “scratch that one from the record” and “aberrations” too to somehow back up the hero worship of Clarke.
      He needs to do a lot more to earn respect. Powder-puff pieces like this wont help his cause one iota.

    • Knemon says:

      03:25pm | 22/11/11

      Ricky Ponting should use the upcoming summer tests as his swan song. He should announce now that he plans to step down from test cticket after this coming Australian summer. He deserves (has earnt) a decent send-off from his home crowds.

      Sorry Ant, nice article!

    • wolf says:

      03:28pm | 22/11/11

      Ponting, Hussey, Haddin, Johnson all have to go.  It’s time boys.

      I know that will leave a big hole in the batting which will need a big man to fill it.

      Select Cossie. He’s come in at or near the top of the shield run scorers over the last 2 years batting on ‘result wickets’. That and he has the body and nickname of a champion - look at Inzie, Boonie, and fat Warnie as proof.

    • Mick ii says:

      04:06pm | 22/11/11

      Are you Sri-Lankan?

    • Red Cap says:

      03:41pm | 22/11/11

      Could Anthony Sharwood back up his love letter with some anlysis to support it. I judge Clarke only on his record of not delivering when it matters. The hallmark of Australian captains is precisely that capacity to deliver whne the team needs it - a Captain’s knock coupled with the grudging respect of your players, they may not like you but they respect you and cannot fault your commitment or performance. Clarke is not suited to the hard scrabble that is required to bring Australian cricket back.

    • Bill says:

      08:16pm | 22/11/11

      Couldn’t agree more. Sharwood’s obviously ignorant of what makes a good captain and leader.
      But if they were launching a range of undies, Clarke would be the best man to lead the team out.

    • Ben C says:

      03:48pm | 22/11/11

      Straying slightly off topic, is Mickey Arthur the right man to be coaching the Australian cricket team? Is he deserving of the job based on his credentials? Would the fact he is not from the Australian system help in reinvigorating the national team?

    • wolf says:

      04:18pm | 22/11/11

      I’m sure that was the line of thinking behind employing Robbie Deans to coach the Wallabies.
      With this appointment we’ll be a few more years in the wilderness yet.

    • stephen says:

      08:31pm | 22/11/11

      M.A. is the outcome of the revamp of the Board of Selectors.
      Get used to it, and support him.

    • Grant H says:

      04:21pm | 22/11/11

      Bar a few innings, Clarkes returns with the bat over the last few seasons is not far off that of pontings.  With everyone calling for Pontings retirement, on averages alone from these last few seasons, Clarke should not even be in the team, let alone captain.
      I agree that he makes some good changes on the field, however his annointment as captain elect a few years ago was partly responsible for our slide with issues with Katich and Symonds, two very good players.  ACB has treated him as the heir apparent, but until he can stand up and knock out scores when games aren’t lost or dead rubbers, but when it really matters (like last night), he is not deserving of either a spot in the team let alone being captain on form alone.  One or two good scores a year is not enough, let alone hiding yourself down the order.

    • Digger says:

      05:24pm | 22/11/11

      Micheal Clarkes only real crime, are you serious. just ask Katich, Symonds. Cmon be realistic, open your eyes. Your a journo yeah?

    • tinygrasshopper says:

      05:35pm | 22/11/11

      “Clarke at his best has the steel of Waugh, the grit of Border and the tactical nous of Taylor.”
      Can I please have some of whatever you are smoking?
      151, 2, 11, 2 definately back in form -_-’

    • Jason says:

      07:01pm | 22/11/11

      ...and that concludes this paid advertisement ... wink

    • Chris says:

      07:26pm | 22/11/11

      47 all out. Big innings in a losing match. Out for nothing when it mattered. “Too tired to play another match” according to cricinfo.

      No grit. Just filling in until we find a proper captain.

    • Bill says:

      07:40pm | 22/11/11

      People should stop wondering why Clarke will never be respected as captain: his problem is simple…all style and little substance. ACB’s eyes lit up when they thought of the marketing potential, but thats all he is…a marketing tool.
      If Warnie was able to stop tarnishing the ACB’s rep, the golden age could have continued a little longer. Now we’re stuck with a product that looks pretty but lacks functionality. Time for a refund!

    • pete says:

      07:52pm | 22/11/11

      Dad, what’s trolling?

      Well son….

      “Clarke at his best has the steel of Waugh, the grit of Border and the tactical nous of Taylor. But above all, he relates to his players and they to him.”

    • stephen says:

      08:38pm | 22/11/11

      That’s not a troll.
      The descriptions are too accurate, (or is R. Benaud still awake ?)

    • mars says:

      10:33pm | 22/11/11

      sorry, but mr clarke IS a wanker!! he is about as statesmanly as a packet of dodgy brandless chips…& my opinion of him stems from his own behaviour over the short period he has been in the cricketing landscape. & hypocrite is the first word that comes to mind if ever his name is mentioned. i wouldve preferred hussey as interim capatano until a suitable long termer could be groomed. huss is actually a man & a gent & unwaivering respect of his peers & the cricketing public.

    • Rick says:

      05:42am | 23/11/11

      hehe. Anyone considered that a lot of Aussies don’t like cricket and can’t really give a toss who the captain might be? Nothing more boring than wasting a lovely Aussie summer’s day, inside looking at the idiot box. Cricket on, I turn off. Who is the Clarke person, what does he look like?

    • Tim says:

      06:01am | 23/11/11

      Clarke’s crime has nothing to do with him being Gen Y and everything to do with him being a giant tool. This article is insulting in that it doesn’t give credit to the Australian public who can spot a tool a mile off.

    • Castro says:

      06:49am | 23/11/11

      Anthony, Anthony, Anthony… (sigh).

      You made us wait for this:

      “Clarke at his best has the steel of Waugh, the grit of Border and the tactical nous of Taylor. But above all, he relates to his players and they to him.”

      Absolute bullshit.  He shouldn’t even be in the team let alone captain.  He is a pea-hearted little wretch who always folds when we need him: to wit 2 in the second innings chasing a big total.

    • Terence of Sydney says:

      07:39am | 23/11/11

      If I were in a team with Micahel CLarke as captain I’d have to belt him.  He never shuts up on the field, he’s constantly telling his collegues (who are professionals by the way) what and how they should be doing what they do best and on top of all that he’s a big girl. He’ll never be able to motivate a team like an Ian Chappell or a Steve Waugh for the simple reason that he wants to be their best mate more than he wants to lead.

    • NightStalker says:

      11:16am | 23/11/11

      Michael Clarke has never been and never will be a good Australian Captain, too much ‘prettyness’ all round

    • John from Vaucluse says:

      12:42pm | 23/11/11

      How good was Pat Cummins. He had a smile on his face the whole game and there was no other place on this earth that he wanted to be other than out in the middle of the pitch with the chance to hit the winning runs.
      Bring on more keen youth.

    • M.G says:

      01:34pm | 23/11/11

      Agree with you John from Vaucluse - Cummins was a shining late for Australian Cricket this past week…....The problem with Clarke is that he isnt in the Waugh/Border mould and he is not captaining a dominant Australian squad…..he was brought into the squad as a young ‘star’ and was told by everyone he was awesome and was destined to lead from the start…..He was never going to develop into a true leader like Waugh, who tried and failed countless times, was always the underdog and shone when it was least expected of him…..Australian cricket fans need to realise our golden age is over, and prepare for a rebuilding period with our young talent….Clarke might mature with age…..and maybe he can make a name for himself by slowly developing a young team into another dominant squad…but that will take years.

    • Michael says:

      01:40pm | 23/11/11

      Wow so many haters in these comments. People wonder why our team struggles when all they get is constant criticism… Tall poppy syndrome is alive and well. Clarke has waited for his chance and now he has it, let’s see what he can do before writing him off. Personally I think he’ll be a great captain. He is clearly intelligent and a good leader, and the younger players in the dressing room love him.

      Too many fans suffer from unattainable expectations due to the freakish talent we had during the late 90s/early 00s. That was a one-off team. We won’t see that type of talent across all 11 players in a very long time.

    • Arnold Layne says:

      05:53pm | 23/11/11

      West Indies are currently 3/455 in India with a top 5 aged 21, 18, 27, 22, 21.  Let’s hope they’ve finally unearthed a generation of players who can deliver consistently.  Darren Bravo in particular looks to be a class act.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

RT @toplitigator: @farrm51 I think I have found the winner: 'Bladder and Bowel Website'

Malcolm Farr

RT @toplitigator: @farrm51 Very difficult to believe the excitment of 'Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Scheme' website doesn't have ppl all over it.

Malcolm Farr

RT @toplitigator: @farrm51 As for the 'Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping' website, just how do you contain your excitement?

Malcolm Farr

RT @lynlinking: @farrm51 Well the links should be posted on Twitter more, by people that care about the Government. Perhaps the MSM could help cheers lyn

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not…

Our Budget blade didn’t cut aid, it’s being paid in spades

Our Budget blade didn’t cut aid, it’s being paid in spades

Ten million children vaccinated. 2.5 million people with access to safe drinking water. And 30 million…

An insecure workforce makes for an insecure society

An insecure workforce makes for an insecure society

It’s usually best to avoid putting too many statistics in a post but reading the ACTU’s report…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: The greatest ending to a football season ever?

Dave B says:

Congratulations & well deserved win! I've been a Utd supporter from 7 years of age, even stuck with them when they went down to the 2nd Div. However, despite the X-town rivalry & even as a devout MU fan, I can say that I truly admired the determination, courage & skill shown by the Blues - What a spectacle,… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Real women like men who drink beer

Real women like men who drink beer

British comedian John Cleese calls them “beer fairies”.  It’s a euphemism for… Read more

198 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter