There’s a fine line between the “next big thing” and a national legend. There’s an even finer line between the “next big thing” and a nobody.

James Pattinson is not only awesome at bowling, he's a super Riverdancer too. Pic: AP.

This nation has an obsession with manufacturing superstars, with believing that ordinary Australians are capable of the extraordinary. The physiological limits of the individual - how fast they can run, how high they can sing - are irrelevant.

Of far greater importance is “the story”, the tried-and-true narrative of how the perennial underdog has become the nation’s top dog, albeit for a fleeting moment. The media has a ball in delivering these inspirational tales. And why wouldn’t they; the public never fails to swallows the hype.

There are “next big things” in every industry. Last time I checked, Reece Mastin was the hottest young talent in music, and the cast of “The Slap” were in line for an Emmy.

Sport, however, is the industry with the greatest strike rate. Even in a slow news week, sports journos can crank out a dozen “next big things”. The Aussie male heart might be a tough nut to crack, but just watch it crumble during a daily sports bulletin. With zero-to-hero stories rolling like an avalanche, seemingly emotionless men are reduced to wide-eyed schoolkids, harbouring crushes for their respective team’s latest sensation.

Australian cricket is a serial offender, churning out “next big things” by the dozen. In 2008, a relatively unknown off-spinner named Jason Krejza hit the scene with a stunning eight-wicket haul on debut. For at least a week all the newspapers went into overload, revelling in their “Krazy Krejza” puns. Six weeks later, the Tasmanian was dropped from the team, never to play again.

Since then, the Aussie selectors have unleashed another 22 rookies into the national line-up, most of whom have opened their account with a media storm like that of Krejza. That few have managed to keep their spot in the Australian team is irrelevant; at one stage or another they each had their 15 minutes of fame. Fickle Aussie fans, too excited about the next sensation on the list, have barely noticed the turnover.

A fortnight ago, on the same night that many Australian teenage boys and girls were getting wasted on the Gold Coast, 18 year-old Patrick Cummins became a national legend. As Cummins celebrated his sixth wicket for the innings, Aussies parents couldn’t have cared less about their wayward children’s antics; in Cummins, they had regained their faith in the younger generation.

As expected, the media responded in a frenzy. More so than any of the debutants before him, the press turned Cummins into the second coming. Amid the chaos, Australian captain Michael Clarke - a former child prodigy himself - chucked in the summer’s first quotable quote; “The focus is now on managing Cummins and making sure he becomes one of the all-time greats”.

All. Time. Greats. Like Bradman or something.

This week the focus has turned to fellow speedster James Pattinson. In Cummins-esque fashion, the Victorian debutant ripped through the New Zealand batting line-up in one devastating spell. He finished the match with a six wicket haul, a man-of-the-match novelty cheque, and a nation’s worth of expectations. Pattinson became Australia’s latest lovechild as the injured Cummins slipped into the shadows.

Pattinson, and Cummins for that matter, could become superstars. Indeed, there is no reason to believe Pattinson is not capable of repeating his Sunday heroics. He may be young, but he seems to possess all the hallmarks of a good fast bowler. He’s fast, he’s accurate, and from certain angles he looks a bit like Glenn McGrath. To the average punter, Patto is almost the complete package; all he needs now is a Sanitarium contract and a supermodel girlfriend.

Chances are, though, he won’t make it. Having seen my fair share of cricket I knows exactly what happens next. After a few weeks of press conferences Pattinson will struggle in his next tour, get dropped from the national side, and break down with a career-threatening back injury. By this time next year his story will be a cricketing myth: “Remember that young Victorian lad; that boy had the most potential of any cricketer I’d ever seen. God only knows what he could have become”.

Aside from the rare mention at a family trivia night, the cricketing world would have largely forgotten about Pattinson and fallen in love with another no-name. When this happens I will reserve my sympathy only for the man himself and the unfortunate infants named “James” by their cricket-mad yet narrow-focused parents.

Even if he does become a star, the signs aren’t good. As much as Aussies love the rise of a nobody, they have little patience for an underachiever. After his phenomenal debut, Pattinson will face unreasonable expectations for the remainder of his playing career. From here on in, every game he plays where he fails take five wickets will be considered a failure.

Perhaps it can be said that Australians are an impatient lot. The nation craves fresh blood and has little tolerance for yesterday’s news. Most of all, Australians love to get excited - not about people - but about excitement itself.

The chase for a “next big thing” has little to do with unearthing the next Bradman; it’s all about finding the next Krejza, and the Krejza after that. It doesn’t matter if Pattinson or Cummins become superstars or not. In the minds of Aussie fans, they’ve already gone from nobody to somebody. And frankly that’s enough.

24 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Macca says:

      05:36am | 06/12/11

      I hate that we do this. We are turning into England.

      Someone said that Janes O’Connor is the next Dan Carter after his debut at 10 against the Barbarians. Ignoring the fact he bombed 3 tries and the opposition was a collection of foreign individuals who have trained together for all of 6 minutes and are in desperate need of a break after a long 10 month season, JOC was adequately competent.

      Cummins and Pattinson started well. They are big young strapping lads who have bowled about 50 overs in their cricketing lives. They have much to learn, and whilst the start was positive, the number 1 pick in the Australian Test Sise is Peter Siddle. And for all his determination and work ethic, I think that speaks volumes for the quality of our pace attack. Currently.

      I think they could both have excellent careers, but they have a long way to go before they start meeting the expectations of the previous generation. So, instead of making these wild comparisons, I’m just going to sit back and enjoy watching these young fellas develop. And celebrate them when they do perform.

      Congrats on a great start Patto and Cummo (hmmm.. I should day something about Lyon too. And get that guy a better nickname), keep it up.

    • Mad Doug says:

      11:26am | 06/12/11

      I suggest Kimba…because he’s a white Lyon.

    • Mahhrat says:

      05:57am | 06/12/11

      Great article, but it says more about the selection priorities of those that make the decisions than anything else.

      Punch has covered adnauseum the simple ways we the public are manipulated by confected media storms like the OP describes;  they’re designed to be exciting, they tap into every “instant gratification” node in our brains, and so we keep watching.

      What needs to be remembered is that these kids are human beings - mostly young, highly naive and with no real clue about the world.

      That Cricket Australia is allowing them to be treated in such a manner, to me, is worse than the media vultures who feed off them.  If we are going to focus on their physical welfare, we should be equally as concerned with their psychological.

    • Tom says:

      08:17am | 06/12/11

      Mahrat, great posting “we the public are manipulated by confected media storms” or nearly as good, “the media vultures who feed off them”. Thanks.

    • gobsmack says:

      06:46am | 06/12/11

      Batsmen, in particular, often have a great first year and then the opposing sides start working out their weaknesses and flaws in their technique (eg Hughes).

    • Nathan says:

      07:08am | 06/12/11

      Also they come into the team generally on top form. I can’t make my mind up about Hughes though, he shows glimpses but i am not convinced he is a top order batsman at Test Level.

    • VVS says:

      07:47am | 06/12/11

      In my opinion, Hughes is not a test player. Probably never will be.

      He has massive flaws in his technique, most notably against the short ball, and has no ticker to grind out an innings when the going is tough. Take his initial Sth Africa tour off his stats and the remainder is appalling.

      Contrast with Justin Langer, one of our best openers, who also had a pretty poor technique, but had a mountain of ticker.

    • Budz says:

      07:50am | 06/12/11

      @Nathan, I would finish your last sentence with “yet”.

    • Macca says:

      08:56am | 06/12/11

      VVS, completely disagree with both arguments.
      1. At 23, Hughes has a decade to learn his trade. His stats are not far off a competent test opener and he dominates first class cricket. He needs time against the best in the world to change his technique. Facing the NSW 2nd XI quicks in the nets for 3 months every summer won’t challenge his technique.
      2. Langer had a pretty solid technique. Footwork had a tendency to be timid, but he kept his elbow up, played back through the line and kept bat and pad together. He rarely fell over, was a very balanced batsmen. He had a reasonable technique

    • Nilbog says:

      01:42pm | 06/12/11

      @ VVS - pretty much nailed it.

      @ Macca - your comments sum up what is wrong with a lot of people’s thinking. Hughes shouldn’t be given time to “learn his trade” in test cricket. He should earn his spot in the team through consistent performance at both test and/or shield level, year after year. If he doesn’t consistently perform he should be dropped.

      Hughes averages 48 over 60 shield games, Katich averages 53 over 236 games…

      Hughes averages 36 over 16 games, Katich averages 45 over 56 games…

      And Langer’s technique was solid, if not awkward looking. He made it work.

    • Frank says:

      08:42am | 06/12/11

      the problem is Cricket and Footy are boring, they need to do as much as they can to make it even remotely interesting….

    • Seth Brundle says:

      07:38pm | 07/12/11

      I’m just replying to this because I picture you sitting all alone, hitting “refresh”, about to cry because no one responded to your trolling.

    • Samuel says:

      08:48am | 06/12/11

      Good stuff, Hawkins. I would sort of say that this is a process gone through by most sports teams (club and international) that go from a period of glory into a period of transition. As Macca says, remember England in the 90s! And then look at them now, settled, balanced, on top of the world. Or *shudder* the West Indies. For the last 20 years. Let’s just hope Australia finds a few genuine superstars soon - or better yet, finds a few very good players who act as a balanced XI.

      It’s the same same in other sports, even if it’s a bit harder in a club team to have quite as rapid a turnover. I guess you often see it in sports like Ice Hockey with the rookie superstar - the guy who gets drafted high, plays a few spectacular games, becomes ‘The Next Gretzky,’ burns out, gets injured and winds up playing for some crazy Finnish club. I’m sure the same exists in AFL, but I really wouldn’t know…

    • Adam Diver says:

      08:49am | 06/12/11

      Well there is a real fairy-tale story being glossed over. That of Nathan Lyon (early days still), but worked at manuka and then adelaide to get a crack at cricket, 2 years later the incumbent test spinner, and IMHO will be for years to come. Accurate, aggressive, good variation and unlike beer and hauritz has an ability to spin the ball.

      One last thing, this confected superstar in australian cricket is only in overdrive ATM because we lost possibly the greatest generation of cricketers ever.

    • M.G says:

      10:17am | 06/12/11

      Agree Adam Diver - the true great story to come out of the last few weeks of Australian Test Cricket is Lyon. Finally, we may have a slow bowler who can actually turn the ball, vary his flight and pace and keep pressure on some batsmen…...He just seemed to do all the little things right, bowled with confidence and to his strengths…and showed some patience!!! Although it was only the Kiwis….he bowled well on a pretty flat track…..Hopefully Australia sporting media dont jibber on too much if he goes for a few runs every now and then…..Cummins and Pattinson both look good…..line and length with pace (take note Mitchell Johnson) - but are young and will take time to perfect their craft…..the beauty of legends like Mcgrath and Warne was that they were allowed to develop with time….I recall Warnes first test match…1 for 150 odd???

    • Michael R says:

      10:18am | 06/12/11

      “this nation” ... “In the minds of Aussie fans” ... This author has a disturbingly detatched identity. A cool, derisive tone. From whence comes this desire to see our future generation fail, we can only imagine. If this is the new breed of journalist then we have more than cricket to worry about.

    • Mahhrat says:

      10:58am | 06/12/11

      Is it just me or does that picture look like Pattinson’s given Mike Hussey a big ol’ squish, and his noots have exploded, much to Warner’s delight?

    • GB says:

      12:14pm | 06/12/11

      LOL. Nice pickup.

      There should be some sort of caption contest on the punch attached to that image.

      LMAO!

    • Liam says:

      12:37pm | 06/12/11

      Yes but Pattinson and Cummins actually ARE the next big things. They are both young blokes, injury free and bowl great shapes at 150km/h. Starc, being such a natural looking left-arm quick, is also an exciting prospect. I don’t disagree with your argument, but you chose the wrong time to make it. And although the media might hype up each newcomer, real cricket enthusiasts don’t swallow the spin if it’s not realistic. Some Australians absolutely love cricket (and play cricket for as long as their body allows them) and it’s awesome to see two young pacemen coming through with so much potential. Can’t wait to get right behind these young blokes in the new year and see Viru et al suffer in their jocks (fingers crossed).

    • DaisyDuke says:

      03:12pm | 06/12/11

      Less talk about the new players, more focus on Clarke’s new squeeze.

      Puts Lara to shame.

    • Arup Saikia says:

      04:44pm | 06/12/11

      At least the Australian system is still throwing up young players with reasonable potential.

      One of the big problems that succeeding / younger generations face in the wake of a highly successful one is being relentlessly compared to its predecessors (and suffering). The West Indian system just cant produce cricketers to fill the shoes of their bigger/better/bolder brothers of the 80s and 90s. Australia needs to get over its Waugh-Warne-Gilchrist-McGrath era. They will eventually get together a band of young quicks and modern so-called technique-less batsmen.

      Just get the feeling that the kernel of that side has already emerged and under yuppie-cricketer-TV star Pup Clarke could well beat everyone on their turf this summer.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

RT @toplitigator: @farrm51 Very difficult to believe the excitment of 'Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Scheme' website doesn't have ppl all over it.

Malcolm Farr

RT @toplitigator: @farrm51 As for the 'Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping' website, just how do you contain your excitement?

Malcolm Farr

RT @lynlinking: @farrm51 Well the links should be posted on Twitter more, by people that care about the Government. Perhaps the MSM could help cheers lyn

Malcolm Farr

941 web sites and nothing to read. The rarely visited http://t.co/vPfJmesu sites. http://t.co/MhXMyvZv

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not…

Our Budget blade didn’t cut aid, it’s being paid in spades

Our Budget blade didn’t cut aid, it’s being paid in spades

Ten million children vaccinated. 2.5 million people with access to safe drinking water. And 30 million…

An insecure workforce makes for an insecure society

An insecure workforce makes for an insecure society

It’s usually best to avoid putting too many statistics in a post but reading the ACTU’s report…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: The greatest ending to a football season ever?

Dave B says:

Congratulations & well deserved win! I've been a Utd supporter from 7 years of age, even stuck with them when they went down to the 2nd Div. However, despite the X-town rivalry & even as a devout MU fan, I can say that I truly admired the determination, courage & skill shown by the Blues - What a spectacle,… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Real women like men who drink beer

Real women like men who drink beer

British comedian John Cleese calls them “beer fairies”.  It’s a euphemism for… Read more

198 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter